Skip to content

Study of Ataluren (PTC124™) in Cystic Fibrosis

A Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study of PTC124 as an Oral Treatment for Nonsense-Mutation-Mediated Cystic Fibrosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00803205
Enrollment
238
Registered
2008-12-05
Start date
2009-09-08
Completion date
2011-11-12
Last updated
2020-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystic Fibrosis

Keywords

Cystic fibrosis, Nonsense mutation, Premature stop codon, PTC124, Ataluren, PTC Therapeutics

Brief summary

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder caused by a mutation in the gene that makes the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. A specific type of mutation called a nonsense (premature stop codon) mutation is the cause of CF in approximately 10% of patients with the disease. Ataluren is an orally delivered investigational drug that has the potential to overcome the effects of the nonsense mutation. This study is a Phase 3 trial that will evaluate the clinical benefit of ataluren in adult and pediatric participants with CF due to a nonsense mutation. The main goals of the study are to understand whether ataluren can improve pulmonary function and whether the drug can safely be given for a long period of time. The study will also assess the effects of ataluren on CF pulmonary exacerbation frequency, cough frequency, health-related quality of life, antibiotic use for CF-related infections, CF-related disruptions to daily living, body weight, and CF pathophysiology.

Detailed description

This study is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety study, designed to document the clinical benefit of ataluren when administered as therapy of participants with CF due to a nonsense mutation (premature stop codon) in the CFTR gene. It is planned that \ 208 participants who are ≥6 years of age and have a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≥40% and ≤90% of predicted will be enrolled. Study participants will be enrolled at sites in North America, Europe, and Israel. They will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either ataluren or placebo. Participants will receive study drug 3 times per day (at morning, midday, and evening) for 48 weeks. Participants will be evaluated at clinic visits every 8 weeks. Additional safety laboratory testing, which may be performed at the investigational site or at an accredited local laboratory or clinic, is required every 4 weeks for the first 6 months of study participation. At the completion of blinded treatment, all compliant participants will be eligible to receive open-label ataluren in a separate extension study.

Interventions

DRUGAtaluren

Ataluren will be provided as a vanilla-flavored powder to be mixed with water.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo matching to ataluren will be provided.

Sponsors

Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
PTC Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ability to provide written informed consent (parental/guardian consent and participant assent if \<18 years of age) * Age ≥6 years * Body weight ≥16 kg * Abnormal nasal transepithelial potential difference (TEPD) total chloride conductance (a less electrically negative value than -5 millivolts (mV) for total chloride conductance \[Δchloride-free+isoproterenol\]) * Sweat chloride \>40 milliequivalents/liter (mEq/L) * Documentation of the simultaneous presence of a nonsense mutation in at least 1 allele of the CFTR gene and a CF-causing mutation in the other CFTR allele, as determined by gene sequencing from a laboratory certified by the College of American Pathologists (CAP), under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act/Amendment (CLIA), or by an equivalent organization * Verification that a blood sample has been drawn for confirmation of the presence of a nonsense mutation in the CFTR gene * Ability to perform a valid, reproducible spirometry test using the study-specific spirometer with demonstration of an FEV1 ≥40% and ≤90% of predicted for age, gender, and height * Resting oxygen saturation (as measured by pulse oximetry) ≥92% on room air * Documentation by VivoMetrics that the participant has satisfactorily completed a 24-hour LifeShirt® cough frequency assessment * Confirmed screening laboratory values within the central laboratory ranges (hepatic, adrenal, renal, serum electrolytes, and reproduction \[women only\] parameters) * In participants who are sexually active, willingness to abstain from sexual intercourse or employ a barrier or medical method of contraception during the study drug administration and 4-week follow-up period * Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, drug administration plan, study restrictions, and study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients or excipients of the study drug * Any change (initiation, change in type of drug, dose modification, schedule modification, interruption, discontinuation, or reinitiation) in a chronic treatment/prophylaxis regimen for CF or for CF-related conditions within 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment * Exposure to another investigational drug within 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment * Treatment with systemic aminoglycoside antibiotics at the time of the Baseline TEPD assessment * Treatment with intravenous antibiotics within 3 weeks prior to start of study treatment * History of solid organ or hematological transplantation * Ongoing immunosuppressive therapy (other than corticosteroids) * Ongoing warfarin, phenytoin, or tolbutamide therapy * Ongoing participation in any other therapeutic clinical trial * Major complications of lung disease (including massive hemoptysis, pneumothorax, or pleural effusion) within 8 weeks prior to start of study treatment * Evidence of pulmonary exacerbation or acute upper or lower respiratory tract infection (including viral illnesses) within 3 weeks prior to randomization * Known portal hypertension * Positive hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody test, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test * Pregnancy or breast-feeding * Current smoker or a smoking history of ≥10 pack-years (number of cigarette packs/day \* number of years smoked) * Prior or ongoing medical condition (for example, concomitant illness, alcoholism, drug abuse, psychiatric condition), medical history, physical findings, electrocardiography findings, or laboratory abnormality that, in the Investigator's opinion, could adversely affect the safety of the participant, makes it unlikely that the course of treatment or follow-up would be completed, or could impair the assessment of study results.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Predicted Function (Percent-Predicted) of Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at BaselineBaseline (Week 1)Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percentage of predicted function, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FEV1 (the amount of air that can be exhaled in 1 second). Spirometry was assessed by using current guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS). Baseline was the average of percent-predicted FEV1 at screening and randomization.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FEV1 at Week 48End of Treatment (EOT) (Week 48)Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percentage of predicted function, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FEV1 (the amount of air that can be exhaled in 1 second). Spirometry was assessed by using current guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS). The percentage of change in percent-predicted of FEV1 was calculated as follows: (\[percent-predicted FEV1-Baseline percent-predicted FEV1\]/Baseline percent-predicted FEV1)\*100. Baseline was the average of percent-predicted FEV1 at screening and randomization. A negative change from Baseline indicates that percent-predicted of FEV1 decreased.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FVC at Week 48EOT (Week 48)Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percentage of predicted function, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FVC (the amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath). Spirometry was assessed by using current guidelines of the ATS and ERS. The percentage of change in percent-predicted of FVC was calculated as follows: ((percent-predicted FVC-Baseline percent-predicted FVC)/Baseline percent-predicted FVC)\*100. Baseline was the average of percent-predicted FVC at screening and randomization. A negative change from Baseline indicates that percent-predicted of FVC decreased.
Rate of Pulmonary Exacerbations as Defined by Modified Fuch's Criteria Over 48 WeeksBaseline to EOT (Week 48)A Respiratory Event Form, which collected data on various signs, symptoms, and effects for each event, was completed by the Investigator when informed by the participant of a respiratory event. Pulmonary exacerbations were assessed by using the modified Fuchs' criteria, which defines an exacerbation as a respiratory event requiring treatment with parenteral antibiotics for any 4 of the following 12 symptoms, with or without intravenous antibiotics: change in sputum; new or increased hemoptysis; increased cough; increased dyspnea; fatigue; temperature \>38°C; anorexia; sinus pain; change in sinus discharge; change in physical examination of the chest; decrease in pulmonary function by 10% or more from a previously recorded value; or radiographic changes indicative of pulmonary function. The 48-week exacerbation rate was determined by adding the weekly rates for each arm and dividing the sum by 48.
Change From Baseline in Awake Cough Hourly Rate at Week 48Baseline, EOT (Week 48)The frequency of awake cough was measured using the LifeShirt, which incorporates motion-sensing transducers, electrodes, a microphone, and a 3-axis accelerometer into a lightweight vest. The rate was determined by dividing the total number of coughs by 24 (the number of hours of the observation period). Baseline was the latest, valid assessment prior to the treatment. A negative change from Baseline indicates that coughing decreased.
Change From Baseline in the Respiratory Domain Score of the Revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) at Week 48Baseline, EOT (Week 48)The CFQ-R consists of 44 items, including generic scales of physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, health perceptions, emotional functioning, and social functioning, and CF-specific scales of respiratory and digestive symptoms, body image, eating disturbances, and treatment burden. Each domain score ranges from 1 to 4. Scores were linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health. Domain scores were calculated by using the following formula: 100 \* (sum of responses - minimum possible sum)/ (maximum possible sum - minimum possible sum). The minimum possible sum = number of questions \* 1; the maximum possible = the number of questions \* 4. Baseline was the latest, valid assessment prior to the treatment. A negative change from Baseline indicates that health has worsened. Participants may have switched age groups during the study.
Percent-Predicted of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at BaselineBaseline (Week 1)Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percentage of predicted function, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FVC (the amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath). Spirometry was assessed by using current guidelines of the ATS and ERS. Baseline was the average of percent-predicted FVC at screening and randomization.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Disruptions in Activities of Daily Living Because of Pulmonary SymptomsBaseline up to EOT (Week 48)During treatment, any disruption in the activities of daily living, such as missed school or work, was documented if it was due to an exacerbation-like episode. Participants and caregivers recorded all disruptions in an electronic diary. The rate of disruptions was defined as the total days with disruptions to daily living divided by the total study duration.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 48Baseline, EOT (Week 48)Participants were weighed, and the weight was recorded at Baseline and then every 8 weeks during the treatment period. Baseline was the latest valid assessment prior to the treatment. A positive change from Baseline indicates that weight increased.
Change From Baseline in the Concentration of Interleukin-8 (IL-8) in Serum and Sputum at Week 48Baseline, EOT (Week 48)Expression of IL-8 was measured in serum and in sputum. Sputum was spontaneously produced and tested by using standardized procedures developed by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics, Inc. Therapeutics Development Network (CFFT-TDN). Baseline was the latest valid assessment prior to the treatment. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the concentration of IL-8 decreased.
Change From Baseline in the Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase in Sputum at Week 48Baseline, EOT (Week 48)Expression of neutrophil elastase was measured in sputum. Sputum was spontaneously produced and tested by using standardized procedures developed by the CFFT-TDN. Baseline was the latest valid assessment prior to the treatment. A positive change from Baseline indicates that the concentration of neutrophil elastase increased.
Change From Baseline in the Concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in Serum at Week 48Baseline, EOT (Week 48)Expression of CRP was measured in serum. Baseline was the latest valid assessment prior to the treatment. A positive change from Baseline indicates that CRP concentration increased.
Change From Baseline in the Total Lung Score as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 48Baseline, EOT (Week 48)Lungs were imaged by using non-contrast, spiral CT. The total lung score for each CT scan was established by the sum of 5 characteristics from the Brody scoring system, with scores ranging from 0 to 40.5, with lower scores indicating better lung function. The characteristics scored were bronchiectasis (score range 0 - 12), mucus plugging (score range 0- 6), peribronchial thickening (score range 0 - 9), parenchyma (score range 0 - 9), and hyperinflation (score range 0 - 4.5). Baseline was the latest valid assessment prior to the treatment. A positive change from Baseline indicates that lung function worsened.
Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Chloride Transport as Assessed by Transepithelial Potential Difference (TEPD) at Week 48Baseline, EOT (Week 48)TEPD was assessed in each nostril using standardized equipment, techniques, and solutions. Assessments were made on the nasal epithelium cells lining the inferior turbinate. Warmed solutions of Ringer's solution, amiloride, chloride-free gluconate, isoproterenol, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) were perfused for ≥3-minute sequentially through a nasal catheter while a voltage tracing was recorded. Total chloride transport was computed for each nostril. The total chloride transport values were calculated by subtracting the voltages at the end of a perfusion from the voltage at the end of an earlier perfusion (isoproterenol - amiloride). The average of the values for each nostril was computed. If the assessment was available in only 1 nostril, this value was used as if it were the average of both nostrils. Baseline was the latest, valid assessment prior to the treatment. A positive change from Baseline indicates that nasal chloride transport increased.
Change From Baseline in Sweat Chloride Concentration at Week 48Baseline, EOT (Week 48)Sweat was collected, from each arm, by using pilocarpine iontophoresis. The chloride concentration in the sweat was quantified for each arm by using standard laboratory methods. Tests were also considered valid if the sweat collection time was ≤35 minutes; tests with longer collection times were also considered valid if extra time was needed to obtain sufficient volume (≥15uL) for analysis. For analysis purposes, the average of the values from each arm were computed. If the assessment was valid and/or available in only 1 arm, this value was used as if it were the average of both arms. The method used was consistent with the CFFT-TDN guidelines. Baseline was the latest, valid assessment prior to the treatment. A negative change from Baseline indicates that sweat chloride concentration decreased.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Baseline up to 4 Weeks Post-Treatment (Week 52) or Premature Discontinuation (PD)A TEAE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship that occurred or worsened in the period extending from first dose of study drug to 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. AE severity was graded as follows: Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening; Grade 5: fatal. A TEAE was considered related if in the opinion of the Investigator it was possibly or probably caused by the study drug. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the Adverse Events module.
Rate of Study Drug Compliance by Drug AccountabilityBaseline up to EOT (Week 48)Study drug compliance was assessed by using a Pharmacy Subject Study Drug Accountability Log (completed by the investigational site personnel). The rate of compliance was defined as 100 \* (number of sachets taken/number of planned sachets) during the study. All calculations were based on the records of the first dose date to the last dose date. To differentiate dose strengths while maintaining the blind, each kit had a unique kit number and had prominent lettering A and B. Each kit contained 65 packets of 1 of the dose strengths (125, 250, or 1000 mg or matching placebo). Labeling for active drug and placebo was identical.
Rate of Study Drug Compliance by Patient-Reported DataBaseline up to EOT (Week 48)Patient-reported data were obtained from the participant's electronic daily diary, which was completed by the participant or the caregiver. During study treatment, the electronic daily diary was to be completed by the participant or caregiver each day for each dose. For each participant, compliance is described in terms of the percentage of study drug actually taken. All calculations were based on the records of the first dose date to the last dose date. To differentiate dose strengths while maintaining the blind, each kit had a unique kit number and had prominent lettering A and B. Each kit contained 65 packets of 1 of the dose strengths (125, 250, or 1000 mg or matching placebo). Labeling for active drug and placebo was identical.
Concentration of AtalurenPredose and 2 Hours Postdose at Week 1, Week 16, Week 32, EOT (Week 48)Blood samples were drawn immediately before administration of the first daily dose (dose taken with breakfast) of study drug and 2 hours after the first daily dose. Whenever possible, the pre-dose sample was to be obtained within 15 minutes of drug administration. Participants in the Placebo arm did not receive Ataluren and are not included in this Outcome Measure.
Rate of Interventions for Respiratory SymptomsBaseline up to EOT (Week 48)During treatment, any intervention including hospitalization or use of oral, inhaled, or intravenous antibiotics was documented if it was due to an exacerbation-like episode. Participants and caregivers recorded interventions in an electronic diary. The rate of interventions was defined as the total days with interventions divided by the total study duration.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 299 male and female participants with nonsense-mutation-mediated cystic fibrosis (nmCF) aged ≥6 years signed the informed consent form and were screened for eligibility, of which 61 did not meet entry criteria to participate in the study.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 238 participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either ataluren or placebo. Six participants (4 in the ataluren arm; 2 in the placebo arm) were excluded from the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population because they did not have at least 1 post-Baseline forced expiratory volume (FEV1) assessment by Week 8.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ataluren
Participants received ataluren TID: 10 mg/kg of body weight with breakfast, 10 mg/kg with lunch, and 20 mg/kg with dinner (total daily dose 40 mg/kg). Treatment continued for 48 weeks, after which participants were followed for 4 weeks.
120
Placebo
Participants received placebo TID: 10 mg/kg of body weight with breakfast, 10 mg/kg with lunch, and 20 mg/kg with dinner (total daily dose 40 mg/kg). Treatment continued for 48 weeks, after which participants were followed for 4 weeks.
118
Total238

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAcquired a Lung Infection01
Overall StudyAdverse Event72
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyMedical Monitor Decision10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11
Overall StudySponsor Decision01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject99

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtalurenPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous23.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.06
23.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.24
23.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.64
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants59 Participants117 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
62 Participants59 Participants121 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
118 / 120115 / 118
serious
Total, serious adverse events
46 / 12050 / 118

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FEV1 at Week 48

Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percentage of predicted function, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FEV1 (the amount of air that can be exhaled in 1 second). Spirometry was assessed by using current guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS). The percentage of change in percent-predicted of FEV1 was calculated as follows: (\[percent-predicted FEV1-Baseline percent-predicted FEV1\]/Baseline percent-predicted FEV1)\*100. Baseline was the average of percent-predicted FEV1 at screening and randomization. A negative change from Baseline indicates that percent-predicted of FEV1 decreased.

Time frame: End of Treatment (EOT) (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenPercentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FEV1 at Week 48-2.534 percent changeStandard Deviation 13.2452
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FEV1 at Week 48-5.500 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.5595
Comparison: Least squares (LS) mean estimates based on mixed model for repeated measures (Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48) of relative change in percent-predicted FEV1 as the dependent variable; independent variables including Baseline percent-predicted FEV1, treatment, visit, interactions between treatment and visit and between Baseline percent-predicted FEV1 and visit; and stratification factors of Baseline age, Baseline inhaled antibiotics, and Baseline percent-predicted FEV1.p-value: 0.123595% CI: [-0.756, 6.264]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Percentage of Predicted Function (Percent-Predicted) of Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Baseline

Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percentage of predicted function, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FEV1 (the amount of air that can be exhaled in 1 second). Spirometry was assessed by using current guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS). Baseline was the average of percent-predicted FEV1 at screening and randomization.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 1)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenPercentage of Predicted Function (Percent-Predicted) of Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Baseline62.092 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.6159
PlaceboPercentage of Predicted Function (Percent-Predicted) of Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Baseline60.232 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 15.1437
p-value: 0.3264ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Awake Cough Hourly Rate at Week 48

The frequency of awake cough was measured using the LifeShirt, which incorporates motion-sensing transducers, electrodes, a microphone, and a 3-axis accelerometer into a lightweight vest. The rate was determined by dividing the total number of coughs by 24 (the number of hours of the observation period). Baseline was the latest, valid assessment prior to the treatment. A negative change from Baseline indicates that coughing decreased.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Hourly Rate at Week 48Baseline28.218 coughs/hourStandard Deviation 20.2726
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Hourly Rate at Week 48Change From Baseline-0.595 coughs/hourStandard Deviation 18.3221
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Hourly Rate at Week 48Baseline24.472 coughs/hourStandard Deviation 16.7828
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Hourly Rate at Week 48Change From Baseline0.882 coughs/hourStandard Deviation 14.3936
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Respiratory Domain Score of the Revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) at Week 48

The CFQ-R consists of 44 items, including generic scales of physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, health perceptions, emotional functioning, and social functioning, and CF-specific scales of respiratory and digestive symptoms, body image, eating disturbances, and treatment burden. Each domain score ranges from 1 to 4. Scores were linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health. Domain scores were calculated by using the following formula: 100 \* (sum of responses - minimum possible sum)/ (maximum possible sum - minimum possible sum). The minimum possible sum = number of questions \* 1; the maximum possible = the number of questions \* 4. Baseline was the latest, valid assessment prior to the treatment. A negative change from Baseline indicates that health has worsened. Participants may have switched age groups during the study.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Respiratory Domain Score of the Revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) at Week 48Aged 6-13 years, Baseline77.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.07
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Respiratory Domain Score of the Revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) at Week 48Age ≥14 years , Baseline70.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.678
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Respiratory Domain Score of the Revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) at Week 48Aged 6-13 years, Change From Baseline-0.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.028
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Respiratory Domain Score of the Revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) at Week 48Age ≥14 years, Change From Baseline-2.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.365
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Respiratory Domain Score of the Revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) at Week 48Aged 6-13 years, Change From Baseline-3.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.973
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Respiratory Domain Score of the Revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) at Week 48Aged 6-13 years, Baseline79.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.879
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Respiratory Domain Score of the Revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) at Week 48Age ≥14 years, Change From Baseline-3.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.245
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Respiratory Domain Score of the Revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) at Week 48Age ≥14 years , Baseline65.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.771
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FVC at Week 48

Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percentage of predicted function, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FVC (the amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath). Spirometry was assessed by using current guidelines of the ATS and ERS. The percentage of change in percent-predicted of FVC was calculated as follows: ((percent-predicted FVC-Baseline percent-predicted FVC)/Baseline percent-predicted FVC)\*100. Baseline was the average of percent-predicted FVC at screening and randomization. A negative change from Baseline indicates that percent-predicted of FVC decreased.

Time frame: EOT (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed 'signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenPercentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FVC at Week 48-2.139 percent changeStandard Deviation 10.0463
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FVC at Week 48-3.484 percent changeStandard Deviation 9.9304
Secondary

Percent-Predicted of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Baseline

Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percentage of predicted function, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FVC (the amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath). Spirometry was assessed by using current guidelines of the ATS and ERS. Baseline was the average of percent-predicted FVC at screening and randomization.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 1)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed 'signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenPercent-Predicted of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Baseline78.332 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 13.1825
PlaceboPercent-Predicted of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Baseline76.609 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 13.3711
Secondary

Rate of Pulmonary Exacerbations as Defined by Modified Fuch's Criteria Over 48 Weeks

A Respiratory Event Form, which collected data on various signs, symptoms, and effects for each event, was completed by the Investigator when informed by the participant of a respiratory event. Pulmonary exacerbations were assessed by using the modified Fuchs' criteria, which defines an exacerbation as a respiratory event requiring treatment with parenteral antibiotics for any 4 of the following 12 symptoms, with or without intravenous antibiotics: change in sputum; new or increased hemoptysis; increased cough; increased dyspnea; fatigue; temperature \>38°C; anorexia; sinus pain; change in sinus discharge; change in physical examination of the chest; decrease in pulmonary function by 10% or more from a previously recorded value; or radiographic changes indicative of pulmonary function. The 48-week exacerbation rate was determined by adding the weekly rates for each arm and dividing the sum by 48.

Time frame: Baseline to EOT (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
AtalurenRate of Pulmonary Exacerbations as Defined by Modified Fuch's Criteria Over 48 Weeks1.42 exacerbations
PlaceboRate of Pulmonary Exacerbations as Defined by Modified Fuch's Criteria Over 48 Weeks1.78 exacerbations
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 48

Participants were weighed, and the weight was recorded at Baseline and then every 8 weeks during the treatment period. Baseline was the latest valid assessment prior to the treatment. A positive change from Baseline indicates that weight increased.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 48Baseline53.46 kgStandard Deviation 13.941
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 48Change From Baseline0.87 kgStandard Deviation 3.342
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 48Baseline56.01 kgStandard Deviation 13.149
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 48Change From Baseline0.83 kgStandard Deviation 3.101
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Sweat Chloride Concentration at Week 48

Sweat was collected, from each arm, by using pilocarpine iontophoresis. The chloride concentration in the sweat was quantified for each arm by using standard laboratory methods. Tests were also considered valid if the sweat collection time was ≤35 minutes; tests with longer collection times were also considered valid if extra time was needed to obtain sufficient volume (≥15uL) for analysis. For analysis purposes, the average of the values from each arm were computed. If the assessment was valid and/or available in only 1 arm, this value was used as if it were the average of both arms. The method used was consistent with the CFFT-TDN guidelines. Baseline was the latest, valid assessment prior to the treatment. A negative change from Baseline indicates that sweat chloride concentration decreased.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Two and 5 participants in the ataluren and placebo groups, respectively, were not evaluable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Sweat Chloride Concentration at Week 48Baseline100.140 millimoles/LStandard Deviation 14.217
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Sweat Chloride Concentration at Week 48Change From Baseline-1.325 millimoles/LStandard Deviation 8.9431
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sweat Chloride Concentration at Week 48Change From Baseline-0.619 millimoles/LStandard Deviation 10.2657
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sweat Chloride Concentration at Week 48Baseline96.586 millimoles/LStandard Deviation 15.9279
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in the Concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in Serum at Week 48

Expression of CRP was measured in serum. Baseline was the latest valid assessment prior to the treatment. A positive change from Baseline indicates that CRP concentration increased.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in Serum at Week 48Baseline6.899 mg/liter (L)Standard Deviation 11.5869
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in Serum at Week 48Change From Baseline2.420 mg/liter (L)Standard Deviation 10.5162
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in Serum at Week 48Baseline7.037 mg/liter (L)Standard Deviation 8.4411
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in Serum at Week 48Change From Baseline2.031 mg/liter (L)Standard Deviation 10.1202
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in the Concentration of Interleukin-8 (IL-8) in Serum and Sputum at Week 48

Expression of IL-8 was measured in serum and in sputum. Sputum was spontaneously produced and tested by using standardized procedures developed by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics, Inc. Therapeutics Development Network (CFFT-TDN). Baseline was the latest valid assessment prior to the treatment. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the concentration of IL-8 decreased.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Concentration of Interleukin-8 (IL-8) in Serum and Sputum at Week 48Serum, Baseline39.537 picograms/mLStandard Deviation 14.1697
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Concentration of Interleukin-8 (IL-8) in Serum and Sputum at Week 48Serum, Change From Baseline-2.334 picograms/mLStandard Deviation 13.2141
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Concentration of Interleukin-8 (IL-8) in Serum and Sputum at Week 48Sputum, Baseline267629.93 picograms/mLStandard Deviation 259089.569
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Concentration of Interleukin-8 (IL-8) in Serum and Sputum at Week 48Sputum, Change From Baseline28882.79 picograms/mLStandard Deviation 199160.845
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Concentration of Interleukin-8 (IL-8) in Serum and Sputum at Week 48Sputum, Change From Baseline9957.24 picograms/mLStandard Deviation 166348.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Concentration of Interleukin-8 (IL-8) in Serum and Sputum at Week 48Serum, Baseline55.845 picograms/mLStandard Deviation 131.8505
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Concentration of Interleukin-8 (IL-8) in Serum and Sputum at Week 48Sputum, Baseline250170.95 picograms/mLStandard Deviation 180581.976
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Concentration of Interleukin-8 (IL-8) in Serum and Sputum at Week 48Serum, Change From Baseline-16.197 picograms/mLStandard Deviation 138.3108
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in the Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase in Sputum at Week 48

Expression of neutrophil elastase was measured in sputum. Sputum was spontaneously produced and tested by using standardized procedures developed by the CFFT-TDN. Baseline was the latest valid assessment prior to the treatment. A positive change from Baseline indicates that the concentration of neutrophil elastase increased.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Twenty-two participants each in the ataluren and placebo groups were not evaluable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase in Sputum at Week 48Baseline183.64 ug/mLStandard Deviation 221.901
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase in Sputum at Week 48Change From Baseline5.45 ug/mLStandard Deviation 232.824
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase in Sputum at Week 48Baseline227.35 ug/mLStandard Deviation 227.881
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase in Sputum at Week 48Change From Baseline-8.67 ug/mLStandard Deviation 296.105
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in the Total Lung Score as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 48

Lungs were imaged by using non-contrast, spiral CT. The total lung score for each CT scan was established by the sum of 5 characteristics from the Brody scoring system, with scores ranging from 0 to 40.5, with lower scores indicating better lung function. The characteristics scored were bronchiectasis (score range 0 - 12), mucus plugging (score range 0- 6), peribronchial thickening (score range 0 - 9), parenchyma (score range 0 - 9), and hyperinflation (score range 0 - 4.5). Baseline was the latest valid assessment prior to the treatment. A positive change from Baseline indicates that lung function worsened.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Eleven and 10 participants in the ataluren and placebo groups, respectively, were not evaluable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Total Lung Score as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 48Baseline9.531 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7526
AtalurenChange From Baseline in the Total Lung Score as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 48Change From Baseline0.282 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3441
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Total Lung Score as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 48Baseline9.619 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4244
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Total Lung Score as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 48Change From Baseline0.560 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5602
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Chloride Transport as Assessed by Transepithelial Potential Difference (TEPD) at Week 48

TEPD was assessed in each nostril using standardized equipment, techniques, and solutions. Assessments were made on the nasal epithelium cells lining the inferior turbinate. Warmed solutions of Ringer's solution, amiloride, chloride-free gluconate, isoproterenol, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) were perfused for ≥3-minute sequentially through a nasal catheter while a voltage tracing was recorded. Total chloride transport was computed for each nostril. The total chloride transport values were calculated by subtracting the voltages at the end of a perfusion from the voltage at the end of an earlier perfusion (isoproterenol - amiloride). The average of the values for each nostril was computed. If the assessment was available in only 1 nostril, this value was used as if it were the average of both nostrils. Baseline was the latest, valid assessment prior to the treatment. A positive change from Baseline indicates that nasal chloride transport increased.

Time frame: Baseline, EOT (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Total Nasal Chloride Transport as Assessed by Transepithelial Potential Difference (TEPD) at Week 48Baseline1.578 millivoltsStandard Deviation 3.8786
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Total Nasal Chloride Transport as Assessed by Transepithelial Potential Difference (TEPD) at Week 48Change From Baseline0.312 millivoltsStandard Deviation 5.0574
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Nasal Chloride Transport as Assessed by Transepithelial Potential Difference (TEPD) at Week 48Baseline1.950 millivoltsStandard Deviation 3.5462
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Nasal Chloride Transport as Assessed by Transepithelial Potential Difference (TEPD) at Week 48Change From Baseline0.139 millivoltsStandard Deviation 5.8139
Other Pre-specified

Concentration of Ataluren

Blood samples were drawn immediately before administration of the first daily dose (dose taken with breakfast) of study drug and 2 hours after the first daily dose. Whenever possible, the pre-dose sample was to be obtained within 15 minutes of drug administration. Participants in the Placebo arm did not receive Ataluren and are not included in this Outcome Measure.

Time frame: Predose and 2 Hours Postdose at Week 1, Week 16, Week 32, EOT (Week 48)

Population: The As-Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
AtalurenConcentration of AtalurenWeek 1 Predose0 micrograms/milliliter (ug/mL)
AtalurenConcentration of AtalurenWeek 1 Postdose14.100 micrograms/milliliter (ug/mL)
AtalurenConcentration of AtalurenWeek 16 Predose4.350 micrograms/milliliter (ug/mL)
AtalurenConcentration of AtalurenWeek 16 Postdose11.900 micrograms/milliliter (ug/mL)
AtalurenConcentration of AtalurenWeek 32 Predose4.630 micrograms/milliliter (ug/mL)
AtalurenConcentration of AtalurenWeek 32 Postdose13.400 micrograms/milliliter (ug/mL)
AtalurenConcentration of AtalurenWeek 48 Predose3.970 micrograms/milliliter (ug/mL)
AtalurenConcentration of AtalurenWeek 48 Postdose10.500 micrograms/milliliter (ug/mL)
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

A TEAE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship that occurred or worsened in the period extending from first dose of study drug to 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. AE severity was graded as follows: Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening; Grade 5: fatal. A TEAE was considered related if in the opinion of the Investigator it was possibly or probably caused by the study drug. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the Adverse Events module.

Time frame: Baseline up to 4 Weeks Post-Treatment (Week 52) or Premature Discontinuation (PD)

Population: The As-Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)At least 1 TEAE98.3 percent of participants
AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 1 TEAE15.0 percent of participants
AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 2 TEAE67.5 percent of participants
AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 3 TEAE15.8 percent of participants
AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 4 TEAE0 percent of participants
AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 5 TEAE0 percent of participants
AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Unrelated TEAE25.0 percent of participants
AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Unlikely related TEAE32.5 percent of participants
AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Possibly related TEAE28.3 percent of participants
AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Probably related TEAE12.5 percent of participants
AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Discontinuation due to TEAE6.7 percent of participants
AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Serious TEAE37.5 percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Discontinuation due to TEAE2.5 percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)At least 1 TEAE97.5 percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Unrelated TEAE35.6 percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 1 TEAE16.9 percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Probably related TEAE5.9 percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 2 TEAE55.1 percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Unlikely related TEAE26.3 percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 3 TEAE25.4 percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Serious TEAE40.7 percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 4 TEAE0 percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Possibly related TEAE29.7 percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 5 TEAE0 percent of participants
Other Pre-specified

Rate of Disruptions in Activities of Daily Living Because of Pulmonary Symptoms

During treatment, any disruption in the activities of daily living, such as missed school or work, was documented if it was due to an exacerbation-like episode. Participants and caregivers recorded all disruptions in an electronic diary. The rate of disruptions was defined as the total days with disruptions to daily living divided by the total study duration.

Time frame: Baseline up to EOT (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified categories.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenRate of Disruptions in Activities of Daily Living Because of Pulmonary Symptoms0.037 days with disruptions per studyStandard Deviation 0.055
PlaceboRate of Disruptions in Activities of Daily Living Because of Pulmonary Symptoms0.047 days with disruptions per studyStandard Deviation 0.0755
Other Pre-specified

Rate of Interventions for Respiratory Symptoms

During treatment, any intervention including hospitalization or use of oral, inhaled, or intravenous antibiotics was documented if it was due to an exacerbation-like episode. Participants and caregivers recorded interventions in an electronic diary. The rate of interventions was defined as the total days with interventions divided by the total study duration.

Time frame: Baseline up to EOT (Week 48)

Population: The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenRate of Interventions for Respiratory SymptomsHospitalization0.010 days with interventions per studyStandard Deviation 0.0222
AtalurenRate of Interventions for Respiratory SymptomsUse of Antibiotics0.220 days with interventions per studyStandard Deviation 0.2284
PlaceboRate of Interventions for Respiratory SymptomsHospitalization0.021 days with interventions per studyStandard Deviation 0.0469
PlaceboRate of Interventions for Respiratory SymptomsUse of Antibiotics0.245 days with interventions per studyStandard Deviation 0.238
Other Pre-specified

Rate of Study Drug Compliance by Drug Accountability

Study drug compliance was assessed by using a Pharmacy Subject Study Drug Accountability Log (completed by the investigational site personnel). The rate of compliance was defined as 100 \* (number of sachets taken/number of planned sachets) during the study. All calculations were based on the records of the first dose date to the last dose date. To differentiate dose strengths while maintaining the blind, each kit had a unique kit number and had prominent lettering A and B. Each kit contained 65 packets of 1 of the dose strengths (125, 250, or 1000 mg or matching placebo). Labeling for active drug and placebo was identical.

Time frame: Baseline up to EOT (Week 48)

Population: The As-Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
AtalurenRate of Study Drug Compliance by Drug AccountabilityDrug Kit A90.149 percent of doses taken
AtalurenRate of Study Drug Compliance by Drug AccountabilityDrug Kit B90.830 percent of doses taken
PlaceboRate of Study Drug Compliance by Drug AccountabilityDrug Kit A85.119 percent of doses taken
PlaceboRate of Study Drug Compliance by Drug AccountabilityDrug Kit B86.614 percent of doses taken
Other Pre-specified

Rate of Study Drug Compliance by Patient-Reported Data

Patient-reported data were obtained from the participant's electronic daily diary, which was completed by the participant or the caregiver. During study treatment, the electronic daily diary was to be completed by the participant or caregiver each day for each dose. For each participant, compliance is described in terms of the percentage of study drug actually taken. All calculations were based on the records of the first dose date to the last dose date. To differentiate dose strengths while maintaining the blind, each kit had a unique kit number and had prominent lettering A and B. Each kit contained 65 packets of 1 of the dose strengths (125, 250, or 1000 mg or matching placebo). Labeling for active drug and placebo was identical.

Time frame: Baseline up to EOT (Week 48)

Population: The As-Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AtalurenRate of Study Drug Compliance by Patient-Reported Data71.48 percent of doses taken
PlaceboRate of Study Drug Compliance by Patient-Reported Data69.27 percent of doses taken

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026