Skip to content

Long Term Safety and Efficacy Study of Teriflunomide 7 mg or 14 mg in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Long-term Extension of the Multinational, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study EFC6049 (HMR1726D/3001) to Document the Safety of Two Doses of Teriflunomide (7 and 14 mg) in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis With Relapses

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00803049
Enrollment
742
Registered
2008-12-05
Start date
2006-10-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2017-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Multiple Sclerosis, Oral treatment

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study was to document the long-term safety and tolerability of teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) participants with relapse. The secondary objective was to document the long-term efficacy on disability progression, relapse rate and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) parameters.

Detailed description

Participants completing the EFC6049 (HMR1726D/3001) study were given the opportunity to continue in the extension study; * participants receiving teriflunomide 7 mg or 14 mg were blindly maintained on the same dose of teriflunomide. * participants receiving placebo were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to teriflunomide 7 mg or 14 mg. The study period per participant was broken down as follows: * Double-blind treatment: up to a maximum of 288 weeks or until teriflunomide was commercially available in the country where participant lived, * Post-washout follow-up: 4 weeks after last treatment intake. No post-washout follow up if participant continued on teriflunomide treatment by obtaining its commercial form after end of the study. The total duration of the extension was 292 weeks (about 6 years) from the first participant enrolled or until teriflunomide is commercially available in the country where participant lived.

Interventions

Tablet, oral administration QD.

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant who completed the previous double-blind placebo-controlled study EFC6049 and who did not meet criteria for treatment withdrawal. * Willingness to participate in a long-term safety/efficacy trial.

Exclusion criteria

* Any known condition or circumstance that would prevent in the investigator's opinion, compliance or completion of the study. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline (LTS6050) up to 28 days after last dose of study drug up to 450 weeksAdverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study drug (in LTS6050) up to 4 weeks (28 days) after last dose of study drug. Serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included both serious and non-serious AEs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to 12 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DPUp to 10.8 years (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks)Sustained DP defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 12 weeks. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability in participants with MS. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to Multiple Sclerosis \[MS\]). Probability of DP at 12 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on time to DP defined as date of first DP minus (-) date of randomization in EFC6049 study +1 day. Participants free of DP (no DP observed on treatment) were censored at the date of last on-treatment EDSS evaluation in LTS6050. Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non-occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t.
Time to 24 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DPUp to 10.8 years (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks)Sustained DP was defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) EDSS score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 24 weeks. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability in participants with MS. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). Probability of DP at 24 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on time to DP defined as date of first DP minus (-) date of randomization in EFC6049 study +1 day. Participants free of DP (no DP observed on treatment) were censored at the date of last on-treatment EDSS evaluation in LTS6050. Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non-occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t.
Percentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP)Up to 10.8 years since EFC6049 randomization (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks)Sustained DP was defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) EDSS score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 12 weeks and 24 weeks. EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with MS. It consists of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing seven functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicates worse neurological function. Percentage of participants who were considered as free of disability progression confirmed after 12 week sustained progression and 24 week sustained progression were reported. Analysis for this outcome measure was performed on combined data of EFC6049 and LTS6050 study, as pre-specified in protocol.
Annualized MS Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression EstimatesUp to 8 years since LTS6050 randomizationARR was obtained from total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during treatment period divided by sum of treatment durations in LTS6050 study only. Each episode of relapse - appearance, or worsening of a clinical symptom that was stable for at least 30 days, that persisted for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever was to be confirmed by an increase in EDSS score or Functional System (FS) scores. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). FSS: to assess the neurological function. Total score range: 0 (normal) - 6(worse), higher scores = worse neurological function. To account for the different treatment duration among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable; log transformed treatment duration as offset variable; treatment group, region of enrolment and baseline EDSS stratum as covariates).
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Volume of Abnormal Lesions (Burden of Disease [BOD]) at Week 192 Since LTS6050 RandomizationBaseline, Week 192BOD was assessed by cerebral MRI and defined as the total volume of all abnormal brain tissue (calculated as the sum of the total volume of T2-lesion component and T1-hypointense lesion component).

Countries

Austria, Canada, Chile, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 117 centres in 21 countries between 16 October 2006 and 23 December 2015. A total of 742 participants who completed study EFC6049 (NCT00134563), entered in this extension study (LTS6050 \[NCT00803049\]).

Pre-assignment details

Participants who received placebo in EFC6049 study were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either teriflunomide 7 mg/day or 14 mg/day and, those who received teriflunomide 7 mg/day or 14 mg/day in EFC6049 (NCT00134563) received same double-blind treatment in this extension study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg
Participants who completed treatment of placebo (for teriflunomide) tablet once daily (QD) for 108 weeks in EFC6049 study, received teriflunomide tablet 7 mg QD for 288 weeks in this extension study.
129
Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg
Participants who completed treatment of teriflunomide 7 mg tablet QD for 108 weeks in EFC6049 study, continued their treatment with teriflunomide 7 mg tablet QD for 288 weeks in this extension study.
252
Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg
Participants who completed treatment of placebo (for teriflunomide) tablet QD for 108 weeks in EFC6049, study received teriflunomide 14 mg tablet QD for 288 weeks in this extension study.
108
Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg
Participants who completed treatment of teriflunomide 14 mg tablet QD for 108 weeks in EFC6049 study, continued their treatment with teriflunomide 14 mg tablet QD for 288 weeks in this extension study.
253
Total742

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event21331327
Overall StudyDeath2102
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1019613
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0203
Overall StudyOther than Specified Above3925
Overall StudyProgressive Disease61066
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0110
Overall StudyRandomized and Not Treated0002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject19431644

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgPlacebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg/14 mgTotal
Age, Continuous39.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
38.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
37.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
38.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
38.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
Gender
Female
94 Participants175 Participants85 Participants182 Participants536 Participants
Gender
Male
35 Participants77 Participants23 Participants71 Participants206 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
107 / 129195 / 25495 / 107197 / 250
serious
Total, serious adverse events
32 / 12971 / 25423 / 10762 / 250

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study drug (in LTS6050) up to 4 weeks (28 days) after last dose of study drug. Serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included both serious and non-serious AEs.

Time frame: Baseline (LTS6050) up to 28 days after last dose of study drug up to 450 weeks

Population: Safety population: all participants randomized in the LTS6050 study and exposed to IMP during the LTS6050 study treatment period, regardless of the amount of treatment administered. The safety analysis was conducted as the treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Treatment Emergent SAE24.8 percentage of participants
Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Leading to Death2.3 percentage of participants
Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE93.8 percentage of participants
Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Leading to Permanent Discontinuation17.1 percentage of participants
Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Treatment Emergent SAE28.0 percentage of participants
Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Leading to Death0.8 percentage of participants
Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE91.3 percentage of participants
Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Leading to Permanent Discontinuation12.2 percentage of participants
Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE94.4 percentage of participants
Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Treatment Emergent SAE21.5 percentage of participants
Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Leading to Death0 percentage of participants
Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Leading to Permanent Discontinuation12.1 percentage of participants
Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Leading to Death0.8 percentage of participants
Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE91.2 percentage of participants
Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Treatment Emergent SAE24.8 percentage of participants
Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Leading to Permanent Discontinuation10.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Annualized MS Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression Estimates

ARR was obtained from total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during treatment period divided by sum of treatment durations in LTS6050 study only. Each episode of relapse - appearance, or worsening of a clinical symptom that was stable for at least 30 days, that persisted for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever was to be confirmed by an increase in EDSS score or Functional System (FS) scores. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). FSS: to assess the neurological function. Total score range: 0 (normal) - 6(worse), higher scores = worse neurological function. To account for the different treatment duration among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable; log transformed treatment duration as offset variable; treatment group, region of enrolment and baseline EDSS stratum as covariates).

Time frame: Up to 8 years since LTS6050 randomization

Population: ITT(LTS6050) population: all participants who were randomized in the LTS6050 study and had at least 1-day IMP exposure during the LTS6050 study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgAnnualized MS Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression Estimates0.216 relapses per participant-year
Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgAnnualized MS Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression Estimates0.183 relapses per participant-year
Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgAnnualized MS Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression Estimates0.176 relapses per participant-year
Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mgAnnualized MS Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression Estimates0.160 relapses per participant-year
Secondary

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Volume of Abnormal Lesions (Burden of Disease [BOD]) at Week 192 Since LTS6050 Randomization

BOD was assessed by cerebral MRI and defined as the total volume of all abnormal brain tissue (calculated as the sum of the total volume of T2-lesion component and T1-hypointense lesion component).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 192

Population: ITT (LTS6050 population). Number of participants analyzed=participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Volume of Abnormal Lesions (Burden of Disease [BOD]) at Week 192 Since LTS6050 Randomization5.307 millilitres (ml)Standard Deviation 9.088
Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Volume of Abnormal Lesions (Burden of Disease [BOD]) at Week 192 Since LTS6050 Randomization3.969 millilitres (ml)Standard Deviation 11.135
Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Volume of Abnormal Lesions (Burden of Disease [BOD]) at Week 192 Since LTS6050 Randomization3.720 millilitres (ml)Standard Deviation 6.696
Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mgMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Volume of Abnormal Lesions (Burden of Disease [BOD]) at Week 192 Since LTS6050 Randomization3.943 millilitres (ml)Standard Deviation 9.685
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP)

Sustained DP was defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) EDSS score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 12 weeks and 24 weeks. EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with MS. It consists of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing seven functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicates worse neurological function. Percentage of participants who were considered as free of disability progression confirmed after 12 week sustained progression and 24 week sustained progression were reported. Analysis for this outcome measure was performed on combined data of EFC6049 and LTS6050 study, as pre-specified in protocol.

Time frame: Up to 10.8 years since EFC6049 randomization (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) (EFC6049 \[NCT00134563\] + LTS6050) population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgPercentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP)Free of DP Sustained for 24 Weeks55.6 percentage of participants
Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgPercentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP)Free of DP Sustained for 12 Weeks45.6 percentage of participants
Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgPercentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP)Free of DP Sustained for 24 Weeks56.6 percentage of participants
Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgPercentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP)Free of DP Sustained for 12 Weeks50.6 percentage of participants
Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgPercentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP)Free of DP Sustained for 24 Weeks48.2 percentage of participants
Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgPercentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP)Free of DP Sustained for 12 Weeks37.3 percentage of participants
Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mgPercentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP)Free of DP Sustained for 12 Weeks52.7 percentage of participants
Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mgPercentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP)Free of DP Sustained for 24 Weeks56.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to 12 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP

Sustained DP defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 12 weeks. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability in participants with MS. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to Multiple Sclerosis \[MS\]). Probability of DP at 12 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on time to DP defined as date of first DP minus (-) date of randomization in EFC6049 study +1 day. Participants free of DP (no DP observed on treatment) were censored at the date of last on-treatment EDSS evaluation in LTS6050. Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non-occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t.

Time frame: Up to 10.8 years (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) (EFC6049+ LTS6050) population: all participants randomized in both EFC6049 and LTS6050 studies that had at least 1-day IMP exposure during both EFC6049 and LTS6050 studies. Analysis for this outcome measure was performed on the combined data of EFC6049 andLTS6050 study, as pre-specified in the protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgTime to 12 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP0.544 Probability
Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgTime to 12 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP0.494 Probability
Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgTime to 12 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP0.627 Probability
Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mgTime to 12 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP0.473 Probability
Comparison: Analysis was performed using Log-rank test with treatment, EDSS strata at baseline and region as covariates. Estimation was performed using Cox proportional hazard model with treatment, EDSS strata at baseline and region as covariates.p-value: 0.207995% CI: [0.602, 1.128]Log Rank
Comparison: Analysis was performed using Log-rank test with treatment, EDSS strata at baseline and region as covariates. Estimation was performed using Cox proportional hazard model with treatment, EDSS strata at baseline and region as covariates.p-value: 0.303995% CI: [0.591, 1.152]Log Rank
Comparison: Analysis was performed using Log-rank test with treatment, EDSS strata at baseline and region as covariates. Estimation was performed using Cox proportional hazard model with treatment, EDSS strata at baseline and region as covariates.p-value: 0.827195% CI: [0.736, 1.26]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to 24 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP

Sustained DP was defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) EDSS score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 24 weeks. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability in participants with MS. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). Probability of DP at 24 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on time to DP defined as date of first DP minus (-) date of randomization in EFC6049 study +1 day. Participants free of DP (no DP observed on treatment) were censored at the date of last on-treatment EDSS evaluation in LTS6050. Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non-occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t.

Time frame: Up to 10.8 years (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) (EFC6049+ LTS6050) population: all participants randomized in both EFC6049 and LTS6050 studies that had at least 1-day IMP exposure during both EFC6049 and LTS6050 studies. Analysis for this outcome measure was performed on the combined data of EFC6049 andLTS6050 study, as pre-specified in the protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgTime to 24 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP0.444 Probability
Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgTime to 24 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP0.434 Probability
Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgTime to 24 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP0.518 Probability
Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mgTime to 24 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP0.438 Probability
Comparison: Analysis was performed using Log-rank test with treatment, EDSS strata at baseline and region as covariates. Estimation was performed using Cox proportional hazard model with treatment, EDSS strata at baseline and region as covariates.p-value: 0.801795% CI: [0.678, 1.362]Log Rank
Comparison: Analysis was performed using Log-rank test with treatment, EDSS strata at baseline and region as covariates. Estimation was performed using Cox proportional hazard model with treatment, EDSS strata at baseline and region as covariates.p-value: 0.186695% CI: [0.559, 1.117]Log Rank
Comparison: Analysis was performed using Log-rank test with treatment, EDSS strata at baseline and region as covariates. Estimation was performed using Cox proportional hazard model with treatment, EDSS strata at baseline and region as covariates.p-value: 0.876395% CI: [0.767, 1.357]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026