Multiple Sclerosis
Conditions
Keywords
Multiple Sclerosis, Oral treatment
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study was to document the long-term safety and tolerability of teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) participants with relapse. The secondary objective was to document the long-term efficacy on disability progression, relapse rate and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) parameters.
Detailed description
Participants completing the EFC6049 (HMR1726D/3001) study were given the opportunity to continue in the extension study; * participants receiving teriflunomide 7 mg or 14 mg were blindly maintained on the same dose of teriflunomide. * participants receiving placebo were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to teriflunomide 7 mg or 14 mg. The study period per participant was broken down as follows: * Double-blind treatment: up to a maximum of 288 weeks or until teriflunomide was commercially available in the country where participant lived, * Post-washout follow-up: 4 weeks after last treatment intake. No post-washout follow up if participant continued on teriflunomide treatment by obtaining its commercial form after end of the study. The total duration of the extension was 292 weeks (about 6 years) from the first participant enrolled or until teriflunomide is commercially available in the country where participant lived.
Interventions
Tablet, oral administration QD.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Participant who completed the previous double-blind placebo-controlled study EFC6049 and who did not meet criteria for treatment withdrawal. * Willingness to participate in a long-term safety/efficacy trial.
Exclusion criteria
* Any known condition or circumstance that would prevent in the investigator's opinion, compliance or completion of the study. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Baseline (LTS6050) up to 28 days after last dose of study drug up to 450 weeks | Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study drug (in LTS6050) up to 4 weeks (28 days) after last dose of study drug. Serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included both serious and non-serious AEs. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to 12 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP | Up to 10.8 years (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks) | Sustained DP defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 12 weeks. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability in participants with MS. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to Multiple Sclerosis \[MS\]). Probability of DP at 12 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on time to DP defined as date of first DP minus (-) date of randomization in EFC6049 study +1 day. Participants free of DP (no DP observed on treatment) were censored at the date of last on-treatment EDSS evaluation in LTS6050. Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non-occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t. |
| Time to 24 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP | Up to 10.8 years (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks) | Sustained DP was defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) EDSS score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 24 weeks. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability in participants with MS. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). Probability of DP at 24 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on time to DP defined as date of first DP minus (-) date of randomization in EFC6049 study +1 day. Participants free of DP (no DP observed on treatment) were censored at the date of last on-treatment EDSS evaluation in LTS6050. Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non-occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t. |
| Percentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP) | Up to 10.8 years since EFC6049 randomization (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks) | Sustained DP was defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) EDSS score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 12 weeks and 24 weeks. EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with MS. It consists of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing seven functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicates worse neurological function. Percentage of participants who were considered as free of disability progression confirmed after 12 week sustained progression and 24 week sustained progression were reported. Analysis for this outcome measure was performed on combined data of EFC6049 and LTS6050 study, as pre-specified in protocol. |
| Annualized MS Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression Estimates | Up to 8 years since LTS6050 randomization | ARR was obtained from total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during treatment period divided by sum of treatment durations in LTS6050 study only. Each episode of relapse - appearance, or worsening of a clinical symptom that was stable for at least 30 days, that persisted for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever was to be confirmed by an increase in EDSS score or Functional System (FS) scores. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). FSS: to assess the neurological function. Total score range: 0 (normal) - 6(worse), higher scores = worse neurological function. To account for the different treatment duration among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable; log transformed treatment duration as offset variable; treatment group, region of enrolment and baseline EDSS stratum as covariates). |
| Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Volume of Abnormal Lesions (Burden of Disease [BOD]) at Week 192 Since LTS6050 Randomization | Baseline, Week 192 | BOD was assessed by cerebral MRI and defined as the total volume of all abnormal brain tissue (calculated as the sum of the total volume of T2-lesion component and T1-hypointense lesion component). |
Countries
Austria, Canada, Chile, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was conducted at 117 centres in 21 countries between 16 October 2006 and 23 December 2015. A total of 742 participants who completed study EFC6049 (NCT00134563), entered in this extension study (LTS6050 \[NCT00803049\]).
Pre-assignment details
Participants who received placebo in EFC6049 study were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either teriflunomide 7 mg/day or 14 mg/day and, those who received teriflunomide 7 mg/day or 14 mg/day in EFC6049 (NCT00134563) received same double-blind treatment in this extension study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg Participants who completed treatment of placebo (for teriflunomide) tablet once daily (QD) for 108 weeks in EFC6049 study, received teriflunomide tablet 7 mg QD for 288 weeks in this extension study. | 129 |
| Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg Participants who completed treatment of teriflunomide 7 mg tablet QD for 108 weeks in EFC6049 study, continued their treatment with teriflunomide 7 mg tablet QD for 288 weeks in this extension study. | 252 |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg Participants who completed treatment of placebo (for teriflunomide) tablet QD for 108 weeks in EFC6049, study received teriflunomide 14 mg tablet QD for 288 weeks in this extension study. | 108 |
| Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg Participants who completed treatment of teriflunomide 14 mg tablet QD for 108 weeks in EFC6049 study, continued their treatment with teriflunomide 14 mg tablet QD for 288 weeks in this extension study. | 253 |
| Total | 742 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 21 | 33 | 13 | 27 |
| Overall Study | Death | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 10 | 19 | 6 | 13 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Other than Specified Above | 3 | 9 | 2 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Progressive Disease | 6 | 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Randomized and Not Treated | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 19 | 43 | 16 | 44 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg | Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg | Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg | Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 39.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 | 38.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 | 37.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 | 38.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 | 38.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 |
| Gender Female | 94 Participants | 175 Participants | 85 Participants | 182 Participants | 536 Participants |
| Gender Male | 35 Participants | 77 Participants | 23 Participants | 71 Participants | 206 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 107 / 129 | 195 / 254 | 95 / 107 | 197 / 250 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 32 / 129 | 71 / 254 | 23 / 107 | 62 / 250 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study drug (in LTS6050) up to 4 weeks (28 days) after last dose of study drug. Serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Time frame: Baseline (LTS6050) up to 28 days after last dose of study drug up to 450 weeks
Population: Safety population: all participants randomized in the LTS6050 study and exposed to IMP during the LTS6050 study treatment period, regardless of the amount of treatment administered. The safety analysis was conducted as the treatment received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Treatment Emergent SAE | 24.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE Leading to Death | 2.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 93.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE Leading to Permanent Discontinuation | 17.1 percentage of participants |
| Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Treatment Emergent SAE | 28.0 percentage of participants |
| Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE Leading to Death | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 91.3 percentage of participants |
| Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE Leading to Permanent Discontinuation | 12.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Treatment Emergent SAE | 21.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE Leading to Death | 0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE Leading to Permanent Discontinuation | 12.1 percentage of participants |
| Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE Leading to Death | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 91.2 percentage of participants |
| Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Treatment Emergent SAE | 24.8 percentage of participants |
| Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE Leading to Permanent Discontinuation | 10.8 percentage of participants |
Annualized MS Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression Estimates
ARR was obtained from total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during treatment period divided by sum of treatment durations in LTS6050 study only. Each episode of relapse - appearance, or worsening of a clinical symptom that was stable for at least 30 days, that persisted for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever was to be confirmed by an increase in EDSS score or Functional System (FS) scores. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). FSS: to assess the neurological function. Total score range: 0 (normal) - 6(worse), higher scores = worse neurological function. To account for the different treatment duration among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable; log transformed treatment duration as offset variable; treatment group, region of enrolment and baseline EDSS stratum as covariates).
Time frame: Up to 8 years since LTS6050 randomization
Population: ITT(LTS6050) population: all participants who were randomized in the LTS6050 study and had at least 1-day IMP exposure during the LTS6050 study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg | Annualized MS Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression Estimates | 0.216 relapses per participant-year |
| Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg | Annualized MS Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression Estimates | 0.183 relapses per participant-year |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg | Annualized MS Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression Estimates | 0.176 relapses per participant-year |
| Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg | Annualized MS Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression Estimates | 0.160 relapses per participant-year |
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Volume of Abnormal Lesions (Burden of Disease [BOD]) at Week 192 Since LTS6050 Randomization
BOD was assessed by cerebral MRI and defined as the total volume of all abnormal brain tissue (calculated as the sum of the total volume of T2-lesion component and T1-hypointense lesion component).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 192
Population: ITT (LTS6050 population). Number of participants analyzed=participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Volume of Abnormal Lesions (Burden of Disease [BOD]) at Week 192 Since LTS6050 Randomization | 5.307 millilitres (ml) | Standard Deviation 9.088 |
| Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Volume of Abnormal Lesions (Burden of Disease [BOD]) at Week 192 Since LTS6050 Randomization | 3.969 millilitres (ml) | Standard Deviation 11.135 |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Volume of Abnormal Lesions (Burden of Disease [BOD]) at Week 192 Since LTS6050 Randomization | 3.720 millilitres (ml) | Standard Deviation 6.696 |
| Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Volume of Abnormal Lesions (Burden of Disease [BOD]) at Week 192 Since LTS6050 Randomization | 3.943 millilitres (ml) | Standard Deviation 9.685 |
Percentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP)
Sustained DP was defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) EDSS score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 12 weeks and 24 weeks. EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with MS. It consists of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing seven functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicates worse neurological function. Percentage of participants who were considered as free of disability progression confirmed after 12 week sustained progression and 24 week sustained progression were reported. Analysis for this outcome measure was performed on combined data of EFC6049 and LTS6050 study, as pre-specified in protocol.
Time frame: Up to 10.8 years since EFC6049 randomization (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks)
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) (EFC6049 \[NCT00134563\] + LTS6050) population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg | Percentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP) | Free of DP Sustained for 24 Weeks | 55.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg | Percentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP) | Free of DP Sustained for 12 Weeks | 45.6 percentage of participants |
| Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg | Percentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP) | Free of DP Sustained for 24 Weeks | 56.6 percentage of participants |
| Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg | Percentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP) | Free of DP Sustained for 12 Weeks | 50.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg | Percentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP) | Free of DP Sustained for 24 Weeks | 48.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg | Percentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP) | Free of DP Sustained for 12 Weeks | 37.3 percentage of participants |
| Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg | Percentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP) | Free of DP Sustained for 12 Weeks | 52.7 percentage of participants |
| Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg | Percentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP) | Free of DP Sustained for 24 Weeks | 56.2 percentage of participants |
Time to 12 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP
Sustained DP defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 12 weeks. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability in participants with MS. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to Multiple Sclerosis \[MS\]). Probability of DP at 12 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on time to DP defined as date of first DP minus (-) date of randomization in EFC6049 study +1 day. Participants free of DP (no DP observed on treatment) were censored at the date of last on-treatment EDSS evaluation in LTS6050. Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non-occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t.
Time frame: Up to 10.8 years (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks)
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) (EFC6049+ LTS6050) population: all participants randomized in both EFC6049 and LTS6050 studies that had at least 1-day IMP exposure during both EFC6049 and LTS6050 studies. Analysis for this outcome measure was performed on the combined data of EFC6049 andLTS6050 study, as pre-specified in the protocol.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg | Time to 12 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP | 0.544 Probability |
| Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg | Time to 12 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP | 0.494 Probability |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg | Time to 12 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP | 0.627 Probability |
| Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg | Time to 12 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP | 0.473 Probability |
Time to 24 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP
Sustained DP was defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) EDSS score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 24 weeks. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability in participants with MS. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). Probability of DP at 24 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on time to DP defined as date of first DP minus (-) date of randomization in EFC6049 study +1 day. Participants free of DP (no DP observed on treatment) were censored at the date of last on-treatment EDSS evaluation in LTS6050. Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non-occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t.
Time frame: Up to 10.8 years (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks)
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) (EFC6049+ LTS6050) population: all participants randomized in both EFC6049 and LTS6050 studies that had at least 1-day IMP exposure during both EFC6049 and LTS6050 studies. Analysis for this outcome measure was performed on the combined data of EFC6049 andLTS6050 study, as pre-specified in the protocol.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg | Time to 24 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP | 0.444 Probability |
| Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg | Time to 24 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP | 0.434 Probability |
| Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg | Time to 24 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP | 0.518 Probability |
| Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg | Time to 24 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP | 0.438 Probability |