Skip to content

Trial Assessing Cooled Radiofrequency Denervation as a Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain Using the Sinergy System

A Double Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial Assessing Cooled Radiofrequency Denervation as a Treatment fr Sacroiliac Joint Pain Using the Sinergy System

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00802997
Enrollment
51
Registered
2008-12-05
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2014-01-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Other Acute Pain

Brief summary

to evaluate the effectiveness of cooled radiotherapy denervation of the sacroiliac region using the sinergy system by comparing a treatment group to a placebo group

Interventions

DEVICESinergy

radiofrequency denervation

sham procedure

Sponsors

Baylis Medical Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Predominantly axial pain below L5 vertebrae * greater than 75%pain relief from 2 seperate lateral branch blocks done on different days * chronic axial pain lasting longer than 6 months, 3 day average VAS between 4 and 8 * age greater than 18 * failed to acheive adequate improvemnet with comprehensive non-operative treatments, includingbut not limited to: activity alteration, non0steriodal anti-iflammatory, physical and/or manual therap, and flurpscopically guided steriod injections in and around the area of pathology * all other possible sources oflow back pain have been ruled out, including but not limited to the intervertebral discs, bone fracture.

Exclusion criteria

* Beck Depression greater than 20% * irreversible psychological barriers to recovery * spinal pathology that may impede recovery such as spins bifida occulta, * moderate to severe foraminal or central canal stenosis * systemic infection or localized infection at inducer site * concomitant cervical or thoracic pain greater than 2/10 on VAS * uncontrolled or acute disease * chronic severe condition such as rheumatoid arthritis * preganancy * active radicular pain * immunosuppression * workers compensation * allergy to injectants or medications used in procedure * high narcotis use greater than 30 mg hydrocodone or equivalent * smokers * body mass index greater than 29.9

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Status Change for Sacroiliac Joint Pain IntensityBaseline and 3 monthsScale ranges from 0 to 10. A score of 0 represents no pain and a score of 10 represents the highest level of pain.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Status Change for Sacroiliac Joint Pain IntensityBaseline and 6 MonthsScale ranges from 0 to 10. A score of 0 represents no pain and a score of 10 represents the highest level of pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lateral Branch Neurotomy34
Sham Procedure17
Total51

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham ProcedureTotalLateral Branch Neurotomy
Age Continuous64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 participants51 participants34 participants
Sacroiliac Joint Pain Intensity5.8 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
6.0 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
6.1 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants37 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants14 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 340 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 340 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Status Change for Sacroiliac Joint Pain Intensity

Scale ranges from 0 to 10. A score of 0 represents no pain and a score of 10 represents the highest level of pain.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lateral Branch NeurotomyPain Status Change for Sacroiliac Joint Pain Intensity-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Sham ProcedurePain Status Change for Sacroiliac Joint Pain Intensity-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
p-value: 0.035t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Pain Status Change for Sacroiliac Joint Pain Intensity

Scale ranges from 0 to 10. A score of 0 represents no pain and a score of 10 represents the highest level of pain.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 Months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lateral Branch NeurotomyPain Status Change for Sacroiliac Joint Pain Intensity-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Other Pre-specified

Pain Status Change for Sacroiliac Joint Pain Intensity

Scale ranges from 0 to 10. A score of 0 represents no pain and a score of 10 represents the highest level of pain.

Time frame: Baseline and 9 Months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lateral Branch NeurotomyPain Status Change for Sacroiliac Joint Pain Intensity-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026