Skip to content

Solifenacin Succinate Versus Tolterodine 4mg Once Daily

Solifenacin in a Flexible Dose Regimen With Tolterodine as an Active Comparator in a Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomised Overactive Bladder Symptom Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00802373
Acronym
STAR
Enrollment
1355
Registered
2008-12-04
Start date
2003-07-31
Completion date
2004-10-31
Last updated
2014-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

Keywords

Overactive Bladder

Brief summary

Prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, 2-arm, parallel-group, design. Flexible dose regimen for solifenacin succinate, fixed dose treatment regimen for tolterodine. Assessment of OAB symptoms by patient diaries.

Interventions

DRUGSolifenacin succinate

oral

DRUGTolterodine

Oral

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

At study entry: * Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary correctly * Symptoms of overactive bladder (including urinary frequency, urgency or urge incontinence) for \>= 3 months At randomization: * Patient must experience frequency of micturition on average \>= 8 times per 24 hour period during the 3 day micturition diary period * Patient must experience at least one of the following symptoms during the 3 day micturition diary period: * At least 3 episodes of urinary incontinence or, * Patients must exhibit urgency at least 3 times

Exclusion criteria

At study entry: * Pregnant women or women who intend to become pregnant during the study or women of childbearing potential who are sexually active and practising an unreliable method of birth control or will be lactating during the study. Reliable contraceptive methods are intra-uterine devices, contraceptive pills of combination type, hormonal implants and injectable contraceptives * Clinically significant outflow obstruction (at the discretion of the investigator) * Significant post void residual volume (PVR\>200ml) * Significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor as determined by the investigator * Patient with a neurological cause for abnormal detrusor activity * Evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs * Uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma, urinary or gastric retention or any other medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator makes the use of anticholinergics contra-indicated * Non drug treatment including electrostimulation therapy or start of a bladder training program during the 2 weeks prior to entry into, or during the study * Use of drugs intended to treat urinary incontinence * Diabetic neuropathy * Known or suspected hypersensitivity to solifenacin, tolterodine, other anticholinergics or lactose * Any clinically significant condition, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the patient unsuitable for the trial * Participation in any clinical trial within 30 (90 in the UK) days prior to randomisation * Employees of the Yamanouchi Group, third parties associated with the study, or the study site At randomization: * Patient who did not complete the micturition diary according to the instructions * Total daily urine volume \> 3000 ml as verified in the micturition diary

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline in mean number of micturitions per 24 hoursWeeks 4, 8 and 12

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline in mean number of incontinence and urge incontinence episodes per 24 hoursWeeks 4, 8 and 12
Change from baseline in mean volume voided per micturitionWeeks 4, 8 and 12
Change from baseline in number of pads usedWeeks 4, 8 and 12
Change from baseline in mean nocturia episodes per 24 hoursWeeks 4, 8 and 12
Change from baseline in mean urgency frequency per 24 hoursWeeks 4, 8 and 12
Change from baseline in patient perception of bladder conditionWeeks 4, 8 and 12
Patient assessment of treatment benefitWeeks 4, 8 and 12
Physician assessment of treatment benefitWeeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of patients requiring an increase in the dose of the study medicationWeeks 4, 8 and 12

Countries

Belarus, Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026