Skip to content

Dopamine and Insulin Resistance

Dopamine Receptor Availability and Insulin Resistance

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00802204
Enrollment
28
Registered
2008-12-04
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2017-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Keywords

Obesity, Insulin Resistance, Neuroendocrine regulation, Eating behaviors, Dopamine signaling

Brief summary

Obese individuals have fewer striatal dopamine type 2 receptors (DRD2) than normal weight individuals. Lower DRD2 levels are associated with addiction and a decreased sense of pleasure.Obesity is also associated with insulin resistance (poor insulin action).We propose that insulin resistance and low DRD2 are associated. Using PET imaging,we aim to determine DRD2 binding potential (BP) in the brain is associated with insulin resistance and neuroendocrine hormone levels. Obese participants will be compared to lean, gender and age similar participants. We also aim to determine the effect of caloric restriction on DRD2 BP in obese subjects

Detailed description

In has been reported obese individuals have fewer striatal dopamine type 2 receptors (DRD2) compared to normal weight individuals congruent with diet induced obese rodent models and similar to models of addiction. Lower DRD2 levels are associated with addiction and a decreased sense of pleasure. Excessive weight gain also contributes to the onset of impaired insulin signaling (insulin resistance). In the brain insulin regulates monoamines and has trophic effects. We propose that the previous reports of low DRD2 in individuals with obesity will be associated with the degree of insulin resistance. Using PET imaging, we aim to determine DRD2 binding potential (BP) in the striatum and hypothesize these measurements will be associated with insulin resistance and potentially other neuroendocrine hormone levels. Obese participants will be compared to lean, sex and age similar participants. We also aim to determine the effect of caloric restriction on DRD2 BP in obese subjects. We hypothesize the caloric restriction will improve insulin resistance and that changes in DRD2 binding will be associated with changes in insulin signaling.

Interventions

RADIATIONPET scan

Both lean and obese undergo a PET scan of the brain using the radioligand,fallypride \[18F\] at baseline. Obese subjects who complete caloric restriction will have repeat scan after diet. Completed at baseline and post-VLCD

PROCEDUREOral glucose tolerance test

Subjects will be required to drink a glucose solution; blood samples will be taken over a 5-hour time period Completed at baseline by both lean and obese and in obese post-VLCD

PROCEDUREMRI

An MRI of the brain and abdomen will be performed prior to PET scan One time at baseline in both lean and obese

BEHAVIORALPsychological scales to assess attitudes and behaviors related to eating and quality of life

A series of short psychological scales will be administered during the study. Completed at baseline

OTHERCaloric Restriction

Obese participants only complete a short-term (\ 10days) very low calorie diet

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Lean who are age and sex similar to obese will complete baseline outcome measurements only. Obese will complete baseline outcome measurements then the VLCD intervention with post outcome measurements .

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Ages 18-60 yrs * obese BMI \> 30kg/m2 and Weight less than 350 lbs * lean control BMI 18-25kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* Structured exercise \> equivalent to 30mins 5x week of walking times a week * History of Substance Abuse, including but exclusive to alcohol, cocaine, marijuana, heroin, nicotine * Current psychiatric disorder or significant h/o disorder * Use or any antidepressants or antipsychotics for last 3-6months or depot antipsychotics in the last 12 months * Any condition felt by PI or co-investigators to interfere with ability to complete the study * Inability to abstain from alcohol, physical exercise or \> 1 cup of coffee or equivalent daily for 3 days prior to imaging studies * Significant co-morbidities including atherosclerotic disease, metabolic disease, liver or renal insufficiency or abnormality found on MRI * Any condition which would interfere with MRI or PET studies, e.g. claustrophobia, cochlear implant, metal fragments in eyes, cardiac pacemaker, neural stimulator, tattoos with iron pigment and metallic body inclusions or other metal implanted in the body which may interfere with MRI scanning * Subjects on medications determined by PI, ex. sibutramine, frequent benzodiazepines or related drugs, which could affect quality of study for last 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
GlucoseBaseline to post 8-10days after VLCD
Striatal DRD2 Receptor BindingBaseline and after 8-10days VLCDRegion of interest compared to reference region to calculate binding potential
InsulinBaseline to post 8-10days after VLCDmicroU/ml
Insulin Sensitivity From Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT_SI)Baseline to post 8-10days after VLCDInsulin Sensitivity from Oral Glucose Tolerance Test was estimated using the minimal model method
LeptinBaseline to post 8-10days after VLCD
Acyl GhrelinBaseline to post 8-10days after VLCD

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Binge Eating Score QuestionnaireBaselineIncreased scores indicate increased binge eating behaviors. Score 0-46

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

9 lean enroll but only 8 complete. The lean complete study after baseline outcome measurements. 19 obese enroll but only 18 complete baseline outcome measurements and of these 15 completed the VLCD and post-outcome measurements

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lean8
Obese18
Total26

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalObeseLean
Acyl Ghrelin132 pg/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 106
78 pg/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 55
235 pg/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 104
Age, Continuous39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Beck Depression Inventory II(BDI-II)6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
3 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
BMI33 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
39 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
23 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Glucose86 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
87 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
82 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Insulin14 (µU/ml)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
18 (µU/ml)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
6 (µU/ml)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Leptin34 ng/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
43 ng/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
13 ng/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
OGTT_SI (Insulin Sensitivity from OGTT)6 (10-4min-1/µU*mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
3.98 (10-4min-1/µU*mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
11.2 (10-4min-1/µU*mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American Participants
8 participants7 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian Participants
18 participants11 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants18 participants8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants18 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Weight91 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26
104 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
60 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 90 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 90 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Acyl Ghrelin

Time frame: Baseline to post 8-10days after VLCD

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lean BaselineAcyl Ghrelin235 pg/mlStandard Deviation 104
Obese BaselineAcyl Ghrelin78 pg/mlStandard Deviation 55
Obese Post-dietAcyl Ghrelin59 pg/mlStandard Deviation 36
Primary

Glucose

Time frame: Baseline to post 8-10days after VLCD

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lean BaselineGlucose82 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6
Obese BaselineGlucose87 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9
Obese Post-dietGlucose81 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7
Primary

Insulin

microU/ml

Time frame: Baseline to post 8-10days after VLCD

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lean BaselineInsulin6 microU/mlStandard Deviation 2
Obese BaselineInsulin19 microU/mlStandard Deviation 10
Obese Post-dietInsulin11 microU/mlStandard Deviation 5
Primary

Insulin Sensitivity From Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT_SI)

Insulin Sensitivity from Oral Glucose Tolerance Test was estimated using the minimal model method

Time frame: Baseline to post 8-10days after VLCD

Population: 9 lean enroll but only 8 complete. A ll lean complete study after baseline outcome measurements.~19 obese enroll but only 18 complete baseline studies and of these 15 completed the VLCD

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lean BaselineInsulin Sensitivity From Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT_SI)11 10-4*min-1*microU-1*mLStandard Deviation 4
Obese BaselineInsulin Sensitivity From Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT_SI)4 10-4*min-1*microU-1*mLStandard Deviation 3
Obese Post-dietInsulin Sensitivity From Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT_SI)4 10-4*min-1*microU-1*mLStandard Deviation 3
Primary

Leptin

Time frame: Baseline to post 8-10days after VLCD

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lean BaselineLeptin13 ng/mlStandard Deviation 5
Obese BaselineLeptin43 ng/mlStandard Deviation 12
Obese Post-dietLeptin34 ng/mlStandard Deviation 15
Primary

Striatal DRD2 Receptor Binding

Region of interest compared to reference region to calculate binding potential

Time frame: Baseline and after 8-10days VLCD

Population: Baseline outcome measurements are compared between lean and obese. Baseline and post outcome measurements are compared for the obese who completed VLCD

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lean BaselineStriatal DRD2 Receptor Bindingputamen33 ratioStandard Deviation 3
Lean BaselineStriatal DRD2 Receptor Bindingcaudate28 ratioStandard Deviation 3
Lean BaselineStriatal DRD2 Receptor Bindingventral striatum19 ratioStandard Deviation 4
Obese BaselineStriatal DRD2 Receptor Bindingputamen38 ratioStandard Deviation 3
Obese BaselineStriatal DRD2 Receptor Bindingcaudate33 ratioStandard Deviation 3
Obese BaselineStriatal DRD2 Receptor Bindingventral striatum22 ratioStandard Deviation 3
Obese Post-dietStriatal DRD2 Receptor Bindingcaudate32 ratioStandard Deviation 3
Obese Post-dietStriatal DRD2 Receptor Bindingventral striatum22 ratioStandard Deviation 3
Obese Post-dietStriatal DRD2 Receptor Bindingputamen36 ratioStandard Deviation 4
Comparison: Baseline outcome measurements are compared between lean and obese. Baseline and post outcome measurements are compared for the obese who completed VLCDp-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Paired t-test to compare baseline and post-diet outcome measuresp-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Binge Eating Score Questionnaire

Increased scores indicate increased binge eating behaviors. Score 0-46

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lean BaselineBinge Eating Score Questionnaire6 score from questionnaireStandard Deviation 6
Obese BaselineBinge Eating Score Questionnaire12 score from questionnaireStandard Deviation 7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026