Skip to content

Effects of Rosuvastatin on Aortic Stenosis Progression

Effect of Cholesterol Lowering on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Mild to Moderate Aortic Stenosis (ASTRONOMER)Aortic Stenosis Progression Observation Measuring Effects of Rosuvastatin and The Sub-Study Protocol.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00800800
Acronym
ASTRONOMER
Enrollment
378
Registered
2008-12-02
Start date
2002-11-30
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2010-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Stenosis

Keywords

progression of aortic stenosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of rosuvastatin compared to usual care in patients diagnosed with aortic valvular stenosis. Patients must have a diagnosis of mild to moderate aortic stenosis (AS) and no clinical indication for the use of cholesterol lowering agents. A multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, with a two year recruitment period, and a treatment duration of a minimum of 3 years from the time of the last patient randomized to a maximum of 5 years.

Interventions

DRUGRosuvastatin

40 mg, oral, single dose

DRUGPlacebo

oral, single dose

Sponsors

Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
CollaboratorOTHER
AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 82 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Mild to moderate AS defined by peak Doppler aortic valve velocity 2.5 to 4 m/sec * Baseline LDL-C value must be within targeted level for all risk categories according to the Canadian Guidelines * Baseline triglyceride levels must be within target level for the risk categories

Exclusion criteria

* Very mild AS defined by peak Doppler AS velocity \<2.5m/sec, because the rate of progression is not well defined; Females of child bearing potential who do not practice adequate contraception. * Severe AS defined by peak Doppler AS velocity \> 4m/sec. These patients are excluded because they will have a high probability of aortic valve replacement even without further AS progression. * Greater than moderate aortic regurgitation, defined as aortic jet width to aortic outflow tract ratio \>0.45; Patients with diabetes or with a fasting blood sugar level \> 7.0 mmol/L (must be confirmed with one repeat assay within 14 days). * Significant concomitant mitral valve disease, defined by \> moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) or mitral valve area (MVA)\< 1.5 cm2; A very high risk of CAD (10 year risk \> 30%), according to the Canadian Guidelines.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The changes in transvalvular aortic velocities and the changes in aortic valve area.Between baseline and close-out measurments.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The incidence and severity of adverse events, the clinically relevant changes in echocardiograms, and laboratory analysis will be compared between the two treatment groups.Baseline and minimum of 3 year follow-up.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026