Skip to content

Shockless Implant Evaluation

Shockless Implant Evaluation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00800384
Acronym
SIMPLE
Enrollment
2500
Registered
2008-12-02
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2018-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventricular Fibrillation, Ventricular Tachycardia

Brief summary

This trial will assess the safety of defibrillator testing and the influence of defibrillation testing on the efficacy of clinical shocks. The trial will test the hypothesis that implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation without defibrillation testing (DT) is non-inferior to implantation with testing against the composite endpoint of ineffective first appropriate clinical shock or arrhythmic death. It will also test the hypothesis, that defibrillation testing increases the peri-operative (30 days) complication rate of ICD implantation.

Interventions

Implantable defibrillator to detect and terminate ventricular arrhythmias

Sponsors

Guidant Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Patients undergoing initial implant of an ICD or CRT-D device (can be upgrade from a pacemaker)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients, who in the opinion of their treating physicians are ineligible for either strategy (DT or no DT) * Patients on active transplant list * Patients unwilling to provide informed consent * Patients not available for follow-up * Pregnancy or women of child bearing potential not following an effective method of contraception * Anticipated right sided implantation of the ICD generator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First Occurrence of the Composite of Failed First Appropriate Clinical Shock From the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Arrhythmic DeathMean follow-up of 3.1 yearsThe number of patients having experienced either an appropriate inefficient shock and/or arrhythmic death during the follow-up time frame of 3.1 years is compared between both groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perioperative Complication Rate30 daysA predefined set of expected complications attributed to defibrillation testing during implant procedure was analyzed in both groups.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Canada, Czechia, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First patient was recruited 13 January 2014, last patient was recruited 4 April 2011. All patients were part of the general ICD population at participating sites.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing
Patients in this arm were implanted with their ICD without having the defibrillation test performed at implant. No VF induction was performed.
1,247
ICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing
Patients in this arm were implanted with their ICD and VF induction was performed followed by shock delivery to test shock efficacy at implant.
1,253
Total2,500

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1726
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2417

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicICD Implant Without Defibrillation TestingICD Implant With Defibrillation TestingTotal
Age, Continuous62.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.51
62.98 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.69
62.78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
232 Participants244 Participants476 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1015 Participants1009 Participants2024 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
625 / 1,247632 / 1,253
serious
Total, serious adverse events
776 / 1,247790 / 1,253

Outcome results

Primary

First Occurrence of the Composite of Failed First Appropriate Clinical Shock From the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Arrhythmic Death

The number of patients having experienced either an appropriate inefficient shock and/or arrhythmic death during the follow-up time frame of 3.1 years is compared between both groups.

Time frame: Mean follow-up of 3.1 years

Population: All patients were analyzed as per intention to treat. An on treatment analysis was performed in 1190 patients in the group without defibrillation testing and in 1165 patients in the group with defibrillation testing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ICD Implant Without Defibrillation TestingFirst Occurrence of the Composite of Failed First Appropriate Clinical Shock From the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Arrhythmic Death90 participants
ICD Implant With Defibrillation TestingFirst Occurrence of the Composite of Failed First Appropriate Clinical Shock From the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Arrhythmic Death104 participants
Secondary

Perioperative Complication Rate

A predefined set of expected complications attributed to defibrillation testing during implant procedure was analyzed in both groups.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Perioperative complication rate was assessed in patients undergoing ICD implant. Number of patients having experienced at least one of the predefined complications was assessed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ICD Implant Without Defibrillation TestingPerioperative Complication Rate69 participants
ICD Implant With Defibrillation TestingPerioperative Complication Rate81 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026