Skip to content

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Repaglinide Combined With Insulin NPH Versus Biphasic Human Insulin 30 Alone in Inadequately Controlled Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Multi-centre, Open, Randomised, Parallel, Controlled Trial in Type 2 Diabetic Subjects Inadequately Controlled With SU +/ Biguanide Therapy, to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Repaglinide Combined With Bedtime Insulin vs. Insulin Alone

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00799448
Enrollment
40
Registered
2008-11-27
Start date
2003-09-16
Completion date
2004-09-20
Last updated
2017-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

This trial is conducted in Europe. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of repaglinide combined with insulin NPH versus biphasic human insulin 30 alone in type 2 diabetics inadequately controlled with sulfonylurea (SU) +/ biguanide therapy

Interventions

DRUGrepaglinide
DRUGinsulin NPH

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HbA1c: 7.5-11.0% on current therapy * OHA (oral hypoglycaemic agent) treatment for a minimum of two years * BMI (body mass index): 25-32 kg/m2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
HbA1cafter 20 weeks of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Fasting blood glucose (FBG)
Incidence of hypoglycaemic episodes
Adverse events

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026