Major Depressive Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
Major Depressive Disorder
Brief summary
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the antidepressant efficacy and safety of two doses of DVS SR (25 and 50 mg/day) in the treatment of adults with Major Depressive Disorder. The study will also assess changes in sexual function and general and functional quality of life outcomes.
Interventions
25 mg tablet, once daily dosing for 8 weeks
Matching placebo tablets (25 or 50 mg). Daily dosing for 10 +/- 4 days during a placebo lead-in period, and then 8 weeks during the double-blind period.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult, outpatient with primary diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (depressive symptoms for at least 30 days prior to screening) * Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D 17) total score of \>= 20 * Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity (CGI-S) score of \>= 4
Exclusion criteria
* Clinical instability - 25% or greater increase/decrease in HAM-D 17 total score from screening to baseline * Significant risk of suicide as assessed by clinician judgement, HAM-D 17 and Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale scores Other eligibility criteria also apply
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Baseline and Week 8 (or ET) | HAM-D17: a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Baseline and Week 8 (or ET) | CGI-S: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1 (normal - not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). Higher score = more affected. |
| Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Baseline and Week 8 (or ET) | MADRS measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms). |
| Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Baseline and Week 8 (or ET) | HAM-D6: a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 6 items characteristically associated with major depression and is a subset of HAM-D17. HAM-D6 score ranges from 0-22. The scale uses HAM-D17 items: 1, 2, 7, 8, 10 and 13. Item 13 is scored 0-2 and all others are scored 0-4. |
| Number of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Week 8 (or ET) | A HAM-D17 responder was defined as a participant with a 50% or greater decrease from baseline in HAM-D17 score. HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Individual items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50. |
| Number of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Week 8 (or ET) | Remission was defined as a HAM-D17 score of less than or equal to 7. HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Individual items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50. |
| Number of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Week 8 (or ET) | A MADRS responder was defined as a participant with a 50% or greater decrease from baseline in MADRS score. It measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms). |
| Number of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Week 8 (or ET) | CGI-I responder was defined as a participant with a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the CGI-I. CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected. |
| Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Week 8 (or ET) | CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Baseline and Week 8 (or ET) | WHO-5 evaluates positive psychological well-being. WHO-5 consists of 5 questions and each is rated on a 6-point scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 25 (0= worst possible quality of life; 25=best possible quality of life). |
| Percentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Week 8 (or ET) | ASEX scale includes 5 questions that evaluate sexual function exclusively during the week prior to completion in the following areas: libido, excitability and ability to reach orgasm. Sexual dysfunction=an ASEX total score of 19 or greater, or a score of 5 or greater on any item, or a score of 4 or greater on any 3 items. Participants who have had no sexual activity during the prior week should be instructed to not complete questions 3 through 5. |
| Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Week 8 (or ET) | C-SSRS mapped into C-CASA(1-7) to assess whether participant:completed suicide(1),suicide attempt(2)(response of Yes on Actual Attempt),preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (3)(Yes on Preparatory Acts or Behavior),suicidal ideation (4)(Yes on Wish to be dead,Non-Specific Active Suicidal Thoughts,Active Suicidal Ideation with methods without Intent to Act or Some Intent to Act,without Specific Plan or with Specific Plan and Intent),any suicidal behavior or ideation,self-injurious behaviour(7)(Yes on Has subject engaged in Non-suicidal Self-Injurious Behavior). |
| Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score | Week 8 to 10 (or ET) | DESS: a clinician-administered 43-item assessment that evaluates discontinuation-emergent symptoms resulting from the withdrawal from test article. The DESS total score is the sum of the number of new symptoms and old (but worse) symptoms (1) and 0 for old and unchanged symptom, absent, or old symptom but improved for a total possible range of 0 to 43. A higher score indicates more symptoms. |
| Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Baseline and Week 8 (or ET) | SDS: a self-administered tool that measures functional impairment in 3 domains: Work/School, Social Life, and Family Life/Home Responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each of these domains is impaired by his/her symptoms using a 10 point visual analog scale: (0=not at all impaired, 10=extremely impaired) for a total maximum score of 30. |
| Population Pharmacokinetics for Desvenlafaxine Plasma Concentrations | Week 2, 4 and 8 (or ET) | Relationship of demographic variables (age, gender, food, race, creatinine, aspartate aminotransaminase, alanine transaminase, bilirubin and concomitant medications) were examined by fitting measured DVS plasma concentrations to a 1 compartment model with first order absorption. Demographic variables were examined for clearance (CL/F), volume of distribution (V/F), Steady Area under Curve (AUC) using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Final parameter estimates for demographic factors effecting CL/F, V/F and AUC were determined. |
Countries
Japan, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
A total of 907 potential participants were screened for this study. 813 participants were enrolled and received single-blind placebo during the screening period prior to randomization.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Matching placebo tablets daily until Day 56 (Week 8) or early termination (ET) . | 231 |
| DVS SR 25 mg Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained Release (DVS SR) 25 mg daily until Day 56 (Week 8) or ET. | 232 |
| DVS SR 50 mg DVS SR 50 mg daily until Day 56 (Week 8) or ET. | 236 |
| Total | 699 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| Overall Study | Failed to return | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Investigator | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Other | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Randomized not treated | 4 | 5 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 8 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | DVS SR 25 mg | DVS SR 50 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | 40.26 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.32 | 40.19 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.88 | 38.59 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.08 | 39.67 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 |
| Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score | 4.39 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.59 | 4.35 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.57 | 4.33 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.56 | 4.36 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.58 |
| HAM-D6 total score | 12.58 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.79 | 12.61 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.77 | 12.43 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.75 | 12.54 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.77 |
| Hamilton Psychiatric Scale for Depression-17 item (HAM-D17) total score | 23.06 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.59 | 23.08 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.93 | 22.81 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.61 | 22.98 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.71 |
| Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score | 28.19 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.74 | 28.08 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.46 | 28.21 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.38 | 28.16 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.52 |
| Participants with Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) total score Completed Suicide | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Participants with Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) total score Preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Participants with Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) total score Suicidal ideation | 31 Participants | 45 Participants | 37 Participants | 113 Participants |
| Participants with Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) total score Suicide attempt | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Participants with Sexual dysfunction | 66.4 Percentage of Participants | 66.1 Percentage of Participants | 62.3 Percentage of Participants | 194.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 128 Participants | 127 Participants | 131 Participants | 386 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 103 Participants | 105 Participants | 105 Participants | 313 Participants |
| Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score | 16.31 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.78 | 17.02 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.34 | 16.39 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.27 | 16.57 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.46 |
| World Health Organization 5-Item Well-Being Index (WHO-5) | 7.21 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.47 | 6.89 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.99 | 7.18 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.34 | 7.09 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.27 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 158 / 231 | 160 / 232 | 174 / 236 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 231 | 1 / 232 | 5 / 236 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
HAM-D17: a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)
Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Population:all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation, had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit, last observation carried forward (LOCF) method of imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | -8.52 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.44 |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Change From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | -8.98 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.44 |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Change From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | -10.02 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.44 |
Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
HAM-D6: a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 6 items characteristically associated with major depression and is a subset of HAM-D17. HAM-D6 score ranges from 0-22. The scale uses HAM-D17 items: 1, 2, 7, 8, 10 and 13. Item 13 is scored 0-2 and all others are scored 0-4.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)
Population: ITT Population: all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit,LOCF method of imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | -4.94 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.26 |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | -5.03 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.26 |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | -5.65 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.25 |
Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
MADRS measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)
Population: ITT Population included all randomly assigned participants who had baseline primary efficacy evaluation, had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind study drug. If participant had a missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | -9.23 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.61 |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | -10.23 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.6 |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | -11.29 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.6 |
Change From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
CGI-S: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1 (normal - not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). Higher score = more affected.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)
Population: ITT Population included all randomly assigned participants who had baseline primary efficacy evaluation, had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind study drug. If participant had a missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | -1.03 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.07 |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Change From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | -1.22 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.07 |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Change From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | -1.24 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.07 |
Number of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
Remission was defined as a HAM-D17 score of less than or equal to 7. HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Individual items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.
Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)
Population: ITT Population: all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 44 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 40 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 62 Participants |
Number of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
CGI-I responder was defined as a participant with a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the CGI-I. CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)
Population: ITT Population: all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 109 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 118 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 130 Participants |
Number of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
A HAM-D17 responder was defined as a participant with a 50% or greater decrease from baseline in HAM-D17 score. HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Individual items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.
Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)
Population: ITT Population: all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 80 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 97 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 109 Participants |
Number of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
A MADRS responder was defined as a participant with a 50% or greater decrease from baseline in MADRS score. It measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms).
Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)
Population: ITT Population: all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 68 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 81 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 102 Participants |
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)
Population: ITT Population included all randomly assigned participants who had baseline primary efficacy evaluation, had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind study drug. If participant had a missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 2=Much improved | 61 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 5=Minimally worse | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 4=No change | 52 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 1=Very much improved | 48 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 7=Very much worse | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 6=Much worse | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 3=Minimally improved | 62 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 4=No change | 37 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 1=Very much improved | 57 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 2=Much improved | 61 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 3=Minimally improved | 70 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 5=Minimally worse | 5 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 6=Much worse | 1 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 7=Very much worse | 1 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 5=Minimally worse | 4 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 2=Much improved | 62 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 7=Very much worse | 0 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 6=Much worse | 5 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 4=No change | 36 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 3=Minimally improved | 61 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 1=Very much improved | 68 Participants |
Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
SDS: a self-administered tool that measures functional impairment in 3 domains: Work/School, Social Life, and Family Life/Home Responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each of these domains is impaired by his/her symptoms using a 10 point visual analog scale: (0=not at all impaired, 10=extremely impaired) for a total maximum score of 30.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)
Population: ITT Population included all randomly assigned participants who had baseline primary efficacy evaluation,had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug,had at least 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug.'n' is participants who received drug and were evaluated for measure at timepoint for each group respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Family Life/Home Responsibilities (n=14,2,13) | -0.54 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.88 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Work/Studies Component (n=227,225,235) | -0.77 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.16 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Social Life Component (n=229,231,235) | -0.86 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.16 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Total Score (n=227,224,235) | -2.17 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.43 |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Work/Studies Component (n=227,225,235) | -1.07 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.15 |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Social Life Component (n=229,231,235) | -1.26 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.15 |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Total Score (n=227,224,235) | -3.26 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.43 |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Family Life/Home Responsibilities (n=14,2,13) | -1.83 Units on a scale | Standard Error 2.12 |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Social Life Component (n=229,231,235) | -1.21 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.15 |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Total Score (n=227,224,235) | -3.23 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.42 |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Family Life/Home Responsibilities (n=14,2,13) | -0.97 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.89 |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Work/Studies Component (n=227,225,235) | -1.12 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.15 |
Change From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
WHO-5 evaluates positive psychological well-being. WHO-5 consists of 5 questions and each is rated on a 6-point scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 25 (0= worst possible quality of life; 25=best possible quality of life).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)
Population: ITT Population: all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 2.62 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.31 |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Change From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 3.43 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.31 |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Change From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 3.25 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.31 |
Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score
DESS: a clinician-administered 43-item assessment that evaluates discontinuation-emergent symptoms resulting from the withdrawal from test article. The DESS total score is the sum of the number of new symptoms and old (but worse) symptoms (1) and 0 for old and unchanged symptom, absent, or old symptom but improved for a total possible range of 0 to 43. A higher score indicates more symptoms.
Time frame: Week 8 to 10 (or ET)
Population: Analysis included completers for exposure (those whose exposure duration was at least 53 days) among safety population. 'n' is participants who received drug and were evaluated for measure at timepoint for each group respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score | Week 10 (or ET + 2 weeks) (n=83,76,89) | 0.94 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.28 |
| Placebo | Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score | Week 9 (or ET + 1 week) (n=93,84,98) | 1.08 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.68 |
| Placebo | Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score | Week 8 (or ET) (n=96,88,100) | 0.67 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.62 |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score | Week 10 (or ET + 2 weeks) (n=83,76,89) | 0.74 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.23 |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score | Week 8 (or ET) (n=96,88,100) | 0.63 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score | Week 9 (or ET + 1 week) (n=93,84,98) | 1.38 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.58 |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score | Week 10 (or ET + 2 weeks) (n=83,76,89) | 0.63 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score | Week 9 (or ET + 1 week) (n=93,84,98) | 1.50 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.81 |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score | Week 8 (or ET) (n=96,88,100) | 0.62 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.53 |
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
C-SSRS mapped into C-CASA(1-7) to assess whether participant:completed suicide(1),suicide attempt(2)(response of Yes on Actual Attempt),preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (3)(Yes on Preparatory Acts or Behavior),suicidal ideation (4)(Yes on Wish to be dead,Non-Specific Active Suicidal Thoughts,Active Suicidal Ideation with methods without Intent to Act or Some Intent to Act,without Specific Plan or with Specific Plan and Intent),any suicidal behavior or ideation,self-injurious behaviour(7)(Yes on Has subject engaged in Non-suicidal Self-Injurious Behavior).
Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)
Population: The safety population included all participants randomly assigned to treatment who had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Completed suicide | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Suicide attempt | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Suicidal ideation | 42 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Any suicidal behavior and/or ideation | 42 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent | 0 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent | 1 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Completed suicide | 0 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Suicidal ideation | 50 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Any suicidal behavior and/or ideation | 50 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Suicide attempt | 0 Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior | 0 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Suicide attempt | 1 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior | 0 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent | 1 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Suicidal ideation | 47 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Completed suicide | 0 Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | Any suicidal behavior and/or ideation | 47 Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
ASEX scale includes 5 questions that evaluate sexual function exclusively during the week prior to completion in the following areas: libido, excitability and ability to reach orgasm. Sexual dysfunction=an ASEX total score of 19 or greater, or a score of 5 or greater on any item, or a score of 4 or greater on any 3 items. Participants who have had no sexual activity during the prior week should be instructed to not complete questions 3 through 5.
Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)
Population: The safety population included all participants randomly assigned to treatment who had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 55.0 Percentage of Participants |
| DVS SR 25 mg | Percentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 52.7 Percentage of Participants |
| DVS SR 50 mg | Percentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET) | 55.8 Percentage of Participants |
Population Pharmacokinetics for Desvenlafaxine Plasma Concentrations
Relationship of demographic variables (age, gender, food, race, creatinine, aspartate aminotransaminase, alanine transaminase, bilirubin and concomitant medications) were examined by fitting measured DVS plasma concentrations to a 1 compartment model with first order absorption. Demographic variables were examined for clearance (CL/F), volume of distribution (V/F), Steady Area under Curve (AUC) using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Final parameter estimates for demographic factors effecting CL/F, V/F and AUC were determined.
Time frame: Week 2, 4 and 8 (or ET)
Population: PK population; data was insufficient examine the effect of demographic variables on the PK of desvenlafaxine. Parameter values were calculated for variables altering CL/F, AUC and V/F. Population parameters from nonlinear mixed effects modeling were not summarized as descriptive statistics.