Skip to content

Study Evaluating Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained Release (DVS SR) in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Fixed Doses (25 and 50 mg/Day) of DVS SR Tablets in Adult Outpatients With Major Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00798707
Enrollment
709
Registered
2008-11-26
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2010-04-30
Last updated
2011-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

Major Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the antidepressant efficacy and safety of two doses of DVS SR (25 and 50 mg/day) in the treatment of adults with Major Depressive Disorder. The study will also assess changes in sexual function and general and functional quality of life outcomes.

Interventions

25 mg tablet, once daily dosing for 8 weeks

DRUGplacebo

Matching placebo tablets (25 or 50 mg). Daily dosing for 10 +/- 4 days during a placebo lead-in period, and then 8 weeks during the double-blind period.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult, outpatient with primary diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (depressive symptoms for at least 30 days prior to screening) * Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D 17) total score of \>= 20 * Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity (CGI-S) score of \>= 4

Exclusion criteria

* Clinical instability - 25% or greater increase/decrease in HAM-D 17 total score from screening to baseline * Significant risk of suicide as assessed by clinician judgement, HAM-D 17 and Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale scores Other eligibility criteria also apply

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)HAM-D17: a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)CGI-S: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1 (normal - not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). Higher score = more affected.
Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)MADRS measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms).
Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)HAM-D6: a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 6 items characteristically associated with major depression and is a subset of HAM-D17. HAM-D6 score ranges from 0-22. The scale uses HAM-D17 items: 1, 2, 7, 8, 10 and 13. Item 13 is scored 0-2 and all others are scored 0-4.
Number of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Week 8 (or ET)A HAM-D17 responder was defined as a participant with a 50% or greater decrease from baseline in HAM-D17 score. HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Individual items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.
Number of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Week 8 (or ET)Remission was defined as a HAM-D17 score of less than or equal to 7. HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Individual items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.
Number of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Week 8 (or ET)A MADRS responder was defined as a participant with a 50% or greater decrease from baseline in MADRS score. It measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms).
Number of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Week 8 (or ET)CGI-I responder was defined as a participant with a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the CGI-I. CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Week 8 (or ET)CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)WHO-5 evaluates positive psychological well-being. WHO-5 consists of 5 questions and each is rated on a 6-point scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 25 (0= worst possible quality of life; 25=best possible quality of life).
Percentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Week 8 (or ET)ASEX scale includes 5 questions that evaluate sexual function exclusively during the week prior to completion in the following areas: libido, excitability and ability to reach orgasm. Sexual dysfunction=an ASEX total score of 19 or greater, or a score of 5 or greater on any item, or a score of 4 or greater on any 3 items. Participants who have had no sexual activity during the prior week should be instructed to not complete questions 3 through 5.
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Week 8 (or ET)C-SSRS mapped into C-CASA(1-7) to assess whether participant:completed suicide(1),suicide attempt(2)(response of Yes on Actual Attempt),preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (3)(Yes on Preparatory Acts or Behavior),suicidal ideation (4)(Yes on Wish to be dead,Non-Specific Active Suicidal Thoughts,Active Suicidal Ideation with methods without Intent to Act or Some Intent to Act,without Specific Plan or with Specific Plan and Intent),any suicidal behavior or ideation,self-injurious behaviour(7)(Yes on Has subject engaged in Non-suicidal Self-Injurious Behavior).
Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total ScoreWeek 8 to 10 (or ET)DESS: a clinician-administered 43-item assessment that evaluates discontinuation-emergent symptoms resulting from the withdrawal from test article. The DESS total score is the sum of the number of new symptoms and old (but worse) symptoms (1) and 0 for old and unchanged symptom, absent, or old symptom but improved for a total possible range of 0 to 43. A higher score indicates more symptoms.
Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)SDS: a self-administered tool that measures functional impairment in 3 domains: Work/School, Social Life, and Family Life/Home Responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each of these domains is impaired by his/her symptoms using a 10 point visual analog scale: (0=not at all impaired, 10=extremely impaired) for a total maximum score of 30.
Population Pharmacokinetics for Desvenlafaxine Plasma ConcentrationsWeek 2, 4 and 8 (or ET)Relationship of demographic variables (age, gender, food, race, creatinine, aspartate aminotransaminase, alanine transaminase, bilirubin and concomitant medications) were examined by fitting measured DVS plasma concentrations to a 1 compartment model with first order absorption. Demographic variables were examined for clearance (CL/F), volume of distribution (V/F), Steady Area under Curve (AUC) using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Final parameter estimates for demographic factors effecting CL/F, V/F and AUC were determined.

Countries

Japan, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 907 potential participants were screened for this study. 813 participants were enrolled and received single-blind placebo during the screening period prior to randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Matching placebo tablets daily until Day 56 (Week 8) or early termination (ET) .
231
DVS SR 25 mg
Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained Release (DVS SR) 25 mg daily until Day 56 (Week 8) or ET.
232
DVS SR 50 mg
DVS SR 50 mg daily until Day 56 (Week 8) or ET.
236
Total699

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event688
Overall StudyFailed to return220
Overall StudyInvestigator012
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy221
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up566
Overall StudyOther010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation402
Overall StudyRandomized not treated451
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject382

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mgTotal
Age Continuous40.26 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.32
40.19 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.88
38.59 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.08
39.67 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score4.39 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.59
4.35 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.57
4.33 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.56
4.36 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.58
HAM-D6 total score12.58 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.79
12.61 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.77
12.43 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.75
12.54 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.77
Hamilton Psychiatric Scale for Depression-17 item (HAM-D17) total score23.06 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.59
23.08 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.93
22.81 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.61
22.98 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.71
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score28.19 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.74
28.08 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.46
28.21 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.38
28.16 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.52
Participants with Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) total score
Completed Suicide
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Participants with Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) total score
Preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Participants with Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) total score
Suicidal ideation
31 Participants45 Participants37 Participants113 Participants
Participants with Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) total score
Suicide attempt
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Participants with Sexual dysfunction66.4 Percentage of Participants66.1 Percentage of Participants62.3 Percentage of Participants194.8 Percentage of Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
128 Participants127 Participants131 Participants386 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
103 Participants105 Participants105 Participants313 Participants
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score16.31 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.78
17.02 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.34
16.39 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.27
16.57 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.46
World Health Organization 5-Item Well-Being Index (WHO-5)7.21 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.47
6.89 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.99
7.18 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.34
7.09 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.27

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
158 / 231160 / 232174 / 236
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 2311 / 2325 / 236

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

HAM-D17: a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Population:all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation, had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit, last observation carried forward (LOCF) method of imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-8.52 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
DVS SR 25 mgChange From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-8.98 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
DVS SR 50 mgChange From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-10.02 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
Comparison: An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and as a factor and the baseline HAM-D17 total score as a covariate was used to compare each DVS SR dose to placebo. The comparison was performed at the 0.05 level overall.p-value: 0.45295% CI: [-0.75, 1.69]ANCOVA
Comparison: An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and as a factor and the baseline HAM-D17 total score as a covariate was used to compare each DVS SR dose to placebo. The comparison was performed at the 0.05 level overall.p-value: 0.01695% CI: [0.28, 2.72]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

HAM-D6: a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 6 items characteristically associated with major depression and is a subset of HAM-D17. HAM-D6 score ranges from 0-22. The scale uses HAM-D17 items: 1, 2, 7, 8, 10 and 13. Item 13 is scored 0-2 and all others are scored 0-4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)

Population: ITT Population: all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit,LOCF method of imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-4.94 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
DVS SR 25 mgChange From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-5.03 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
DVS SR 50 mgChange From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-5.65 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.80295% CI: [-0.62, 0.8]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.04895% CI: [0.01, 1.43]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

MADRS measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)

Population: ITT Population included all randomly assigned participants who had baseline primary efficacy evaluation, had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind study drug. If participant had a missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-9.23 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
DVS SR 25 mgChange From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-10.23 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
DVS SR 50 mgChange From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-11.29 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.24295% CI: [-0.68, 2.68]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.01695% CI: [0.39, 3.73]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

CGI-S: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1 (normal - not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). Higher score = more affected.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)

Population: ITT Population included all randomly assigned participants who had baseline primary efficacy evaluation, had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind study drug. If participant had a missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-1.03 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
DVS SR 25 mgChange From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-1.22 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
DVS SR 50 mgChange From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-1.24 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.06695% CI: [-0.01, 0.39]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.03895% CI: [0.01, 0.41]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

Remission was defined as a HAM-D17 score of less than or equal to 7. HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Individual items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.

Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

Population: ITT Population: all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)44 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)40 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)62 Participants
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using a logistic regression model with treatment as a factor and baseline HAM-D17 score as a covariate.p-value: 0.592995% CI: [0.54, 1.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using a logistic regression model with treatment as a factor and baseline HAM-D17 score as a covariate.p-value: 0.085295% CI: [0.95, 2.29]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

CGI-I responder was defined as a participant with a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the CGI-I. CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.

Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

Population: ITT Population: all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)109 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)118 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)130 Participants
Comparison: Analysis was conducted with a logistic regression model with treatment as a factor.p-value: 0.431395% CI: [0.8, 1.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Analysis was conducted with a logistic regression model with treatment as a factor.p-value: 0.088895% CI: [0.95, 1.97]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

A HAM-D17 responder was defined as a participant with a 50% or greater decrease from baseline in HAM-D17 score. HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Individual items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.

Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

Population: ITT Population: all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)80 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)97 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)109 Participants
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using a logistic regression model with treatment as a factor and baseline HAM-D17 score as a covariate.p-value: 0.109995% CI: [0.93, 1.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using a logistic regression model with treatment as a factor and baseline HAM-D17 score as a covariate.p-value: 0.015495% CI: [1.09, 2.32]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

A MADRS responder was defined as a participant with a 50% or greater decrease from baseline in MADRS score. It measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms).

Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

Population: ITT Population: all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)68 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)81 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)102 Participants
Comparison: Analysis was conducted with a logistic regression model with treatment as a factor and baseline MADRS score as a covariate.p-value: 0.223295% CI: [0.86, 1.89]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Analysis was conducted with a logistic regression model with treatment as a factor and baseline MADRS score as a covariate.p-value: 0.002295% CI: [1.24, 2.69]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.

Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

Population: ITT Population included all randomly assigned participants who had baseline primary efficacy evaluation, had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind study drug. If participant had a missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)2=Much improved61 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)5=Minimally worse4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)4=No change52 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)1=Very much improved48 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)7=Very much worse1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)6=Much worse3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)3=Minimally improved62 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)4=No change37 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)1=Very much improved57 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)2=Much improved61 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)3=Minimally improved70 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)5=Minimally worse5 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)6=Much worse1 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)7=Very much worse1 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)5=Minimally worse4 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)2=Much improved62 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)7=Very much worse0 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)6=Much worse5 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)4=No change36 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)3=Minimally improved61 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)1=Very much improved68 Participants
Comparison: Each DVS SR dose was separately compared to placebo. To control the study-wise type I error rate across the primary and the key secondary endpoints, as well as across the 2 active dose arms, testing of the key secondary hypothesis occurred only when both active doses were superior to placebo on the primary endpoint.p-value: 0.16Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Each DVS SR dose was separately compared to placebo. To control the study-wise type I error rate across the primary and the key secondary endpoints, as well as across the 2 active dose arms, testing of the key secondary hypothesis occurred only when both active doses were superior to placebo on the primary endpoint.p-value: 0.028Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

SDS: a self-administered tool that measures functional impairment in 3 domains: Work/School, Social Life, and Family Life/Home Responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each of these domains is impaired by his/her symptoms using a 10 point visual analog scale: (0=not at all impaired, 10=extremely impaired) for a total maximum score of 30.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)

Population: ITT Population included all randomly assigned participants who had baseline primary efficacy evaluation,had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug,had at least 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug.'n' is participants who received drug and were evaluated for measure at timepoint for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Family Life/Home Responsibilities (n=14,2,13)-0.54 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Work/Studies Component (n=227,225,235)-0.77 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Social Life Component (n=229,231,235)-0.86 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Total Score (n=227,224,235)-2.17 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
DVS SR 25 mgChange From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Work/Studies Component (n=227,225,235)-1.07 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
DVS SR 25 mgChange From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Social Life Component (n=229,231,235)-1.26 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
DVS SR 25 mgChange From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Total Score (n=227,224,235)-3.26 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
DVS SR 25 mgChange From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Family Life/Home Responsibilities (n=14,2,13)-1.83 Units on a scaleStandard Error 2.12
DVS SR 50 mgChange From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Social Life Component (n=229,231,235)-1.21 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
DVS SR 50 mgChange From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Total Score (n=227,224,235)-3.23 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
DVS SR 50 mgChange From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Family Life/Home Responsibilities (n=14,2,13)-0.97 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.89
DVS SR 50 mgChange From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Work/Studies Component (n=227,225,235)-1.12 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate for total score.p-value: 0.07395% CI: [-0.1, 2.29]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate for total score.p-value: 0.07895% CI: [-0.12, 2.24]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate for work/studies component score.p-value: 0.17695% CI: [-0.13, 0.73]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate for work/studies component score.p-value: 0.10995% CI: [-0.08, 0.77]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate for social life component score.p-value: 0.06495% CI: [-0.02, 0.84]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate for social life component score.p-value: 0.10495% CI: [-0.07, 0.78]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate for family life/home responsibilities component score.p-value: 0.53895% CI: [-2.98, 5.57]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate for family life/home responsibilities component scorep-value: 0.68995% CI: [-1.76, 2.62]ANCOVA
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

WHO-5 evaluates positive psychological well-being. WHO-5 consists of 5 questions and each is rated on a 6-point scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 25 (0= worst possible quality of life; 25=best possible quality of life).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)

Population: ITT Population: all randomly assigned participants with baseline primary efficacy evaluation had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind drug and 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose of double-blind drug. If participant had missing value at any visit, LOCF method of imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)2.62 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
DVS SR 25 mgChange From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)3.43 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
DVS SR 50 mgChange From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)3.25 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.1595% CI: [-1.48, 0.23]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment as a factor and corresponding baseline value as a covariate.p-value: 0.06695% CI: [-1.67, 0.05]ANCOVA
Other Pre-specified

Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score

DESS: a clinician-administered 43-item assessment that evaluates discontinuation-emergent symptoms resulting from the withdrawal from test article. The DESS total score is the sum of the number of new symptoms and old (but worse) symptoms (1) and 0 for old and unchanged symptom, absent, or old symptom but improved for a total possible range of 0 to 43. A higher score indicates more symptoms.

Time frame: Week 8 to 10 (or ET)

Population: Analysis included completers for exposure (those whose exposure duration was at least 53 days) among safety population. 'n' is participants who received drug and were evaluated for measure at timepoint for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboDiscontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total ScoreWeek 10 (or ET + 2 weeks) (n=83,76,89)0.94 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
PlaceboDiscontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total ScoreWeek 9 (or ET + 1 week) (n=93,84,98)1.08 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
PlaceboDiscontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total ScoreWeek 8 (or ET) (n=96,88,100)0.67 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
DVS SR 25 mgDiscontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total ScoreWeek 10 (or ET + 2 weeks) (n=83,76,89)0.74 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
DVS SR 25 mgDiscontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total ScoreWeek 8 (or ET) (n=96,88,100)0.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
DVS SR 25 mgDiscontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total ScoreWeek 9 (or ET + 1 week) (n=93,84,98)1.38 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
DVS SR 50 mgDiscontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total ScoreWeek 10 (or ET + 2 weeks) (n=83,76,89)0.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
DVS SR 50 mgDiscontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total ScoreWeek 9 (or ET + 1 week) (n=93,84,98)1.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
DVS SR 50 mgDiscontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total ScoreWeek 8 (or ET) (n=96,88,100)0.62 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Comparison: To address the multiplicity effect inherent in these comparisons, adjusted p-values based on the false discovery rate were used at Week 8 (or ET).p-value: 0.847t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To address the multiplicity effect inherent in these comparisons, adjusted p-values based on the false discovery rate were used at Week 8 (or ET).p-value: 0.847t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To address the multiplicity effect inherent in these comparisons, adjusted p-values based on the false discovery rate were used at Week 9 (or ET + 1 week).p-value: 0.72t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To address the multiplicity effect inherent in these comparisons, adjusted p-values based on the false discovery rate were used at Week 9 (or ET + 1 week).p-value: 0.72t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To address the multiplicity effect inherent in these comparisons, adjusted p-values based on the false discovery rate were used at Week 10 (or ET + 2 weeks).p-value: 0.72t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To address the multiplicity effect inherent in these comparisons, adjusted p-values based on the false discovery rate were used at Week 10 (or ET + 2 weeks).p-value: 0.72t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

C-SSRS mapped into C-CASA(1-7) to assess whether participant:completed suicide(1),suicide attempt(2)(response of Yes on Actual Attempt),preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (3)(Yes on Preparatory Acts or Behavior),suicidal ideation (4)(Yes on Wish to be dead,Non-Specific Active Suicidal Thoughts,Active Suicidal Ideation with methods without Intent to Act or Some Intent to Act,without Specific Plan or with Specific Plan and Intent),any suicidal behavior or ideation,self-injurious behaviour(7)(Yes on Has subject engaged in Non-suicidal Self-Injurious Behavior).

Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

Population: The safety population included all participants randomly assigned to treatment who had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Completed suicide0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Suicide attempt0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Suicidal ideation42 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Any suicidal behavior and/or ideation42 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent0 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent1 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Completed suicide0 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Suicidal ideation50 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Any suicidal behavior and/or ideation50 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Suicide attempt0 Participants
DVS SR 25 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior0 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Suicide attempt1 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior0 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent1 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Suicidal ideation47 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Completed suicide0 Participants
DVS SR 50 mgNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)Any suicidal behavior and/or ideation47 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

ASEX scale includes 5 questions that evaluate sexual function exclusively during the week prior to completion in the following areas: libido, excitability and ability to reach orgasm. Sexual dysfunction=an ASEX total score of 19 or greater, or a score of 5 or greater on any item, or a score of 4 or greater on any 3 items. Participants who have had no sexual activity during the prior week should be instructed to not complete questions 3 through 5.

Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

Population: The safety population included all participants randomly assigned to treatment who had taken at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)55.0 Percentage of Participants
DVS SR 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)52.7 Percentage of Participants
DVS SR 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)55.8 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using a logistic regression model with treatment and gender as factors and baseline sexual dysfunction status as a covariate.p-value: 0.875895% CI: [0.51, 1.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Analysis was conducted using a logistic regression model with treatment and gender as factors and baseline sexual dysfunction status as a covariate.p-value: 0.639795% CI: [0.61, 2.21]Regression, Logistic
Other Pre-specified

Population Pharmacokinetics for Desvenlafaxine Plasma Concentrations

Relationship of demographic variables (age, gender, food, race, creatinine, aspartate aminotransaminase, alanine transaminase, bilirubin and concomitant medications) were examined by fitting measured DVS plasma concentrations to a 1 compartment model with first order absorption. Demographic variables were examined for clearance (CL/F), volume of distribution (V/F), Steady Area under Curve (AUC) using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Final parameter estimates for demographic factors effecting CL/F, V/F and AUC were determined.

Time frame: Week 2, 4 and 8 (or ET)

Population: PK population; data was insufficient examine the effect of demographic variables on the PK of desvenlafaxine. Parameter values were calculated for variables altering CL/F, AUC and V/F. Population parameters from nonlinear mixed effects modeling were not summarized as descriptive statistics.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026