Skip to content

Panther: A Study Comparing Biweekly and Tailored EC-T Versus Three Weekly FEC-T in Breast Cancer Patients

A Randomised Phase 3 Study Comparing Biweekly and Tailored Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed by Biweekly Tailored Docetaxel Versus Three Weekly Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + 5-fluorouracil Followed by Docetaxel in Lymph Node Positive or High Risk Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00798070
Acronym
PANTHER
Enrollment
2017
Registered
2008-11-25
Start date
2007-02-28
Completion date
2028-01-31
Last updated
2024-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Lymph node positive or high risk lymph node negative breast, cancer

Brief summary

This is an adjuvant, open, prospective, randomized study to compare: A. Individually tailored and two weekly dosed epirubicin + cyclophosphamide followed by a three weeks break followed by biweekly and tailored docetaxel (dtEC→dtT) given every second week, to B. Fixed dosed and three weekly epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil, followed by fixed dosed and three weekly docetaxel (FEC→T). Patients with primary node-positive or high risk lymph node negative breast cancer will be eligible for the study. The primary objective of the phase 3 study is to compare breast cancer relapse-free survival (BCRFS) between the dtEC→dtT and FE100C→T. To detect a five-year BCRFS difference of 0.710 to 0.790 about 1000 patients per arm will be needed. They will be recruited during four years and followed another two years for breast cancer events. Secondary objectives are to compare 1. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) 2. Event-free survival and 3. Overall survival 4. Health-related quality of life and toxicity analyses according to CTC 5. Outcome in relation to tumour biological factors and polymorphism patterns 1. RFS in relation to the Sorlie classes using immunohistochemical markers and/or gene expression profiling comparing A vs B arm 2. RFS with receptor positive disease (analyzed in the local laboratories as described in the CRFs and also analyzed as continuous variables) in the comparison between the A- and B- arms. 3. RFS with high and low proliferation, respectively, (analyzed in the local laboratories as described in the CRFs and also analyzed as a continuous variable, or centrally analyzed), in the comparison between the A- and B-arms. 4. RFS in relation to HER-2/neu status (analyzed in the local laboratories as described in the CRFs) in the primary cancers in the comparison between the A- and B-arms and analyzed whether trastuzumab was given in sequence or concurrently. 5. RFS analyzed in relation to other molecular markers (e.g. gene expression profiling/ sequencing) in the primary cancers and SNPs signatures in normal DNA (related to toxicities for EC/FEC and docetaxel components, respectively, and given dose levels and outcome in relation to these factors and in relation QoL) to outcome per arm. 6. RFS analyzed in relation to tumour associated lymphocytes and Y-box binding protein in the comparison between the A- and B-arms. Tumour tissue will be obtained and stored for studies of prognostication and therapy prediction. Last patient randomized was September 2011.

Detailed description

Are described under the heading Outcome measures

Interventions

DRUGdtEC→dtT

Individually tailored and two weekly dosed epirubicin (start dose 90mg/m2) + cyclophosphamide (start dose 600mg/m2) followed by a three weeks break followed by biweekly and tailored docetaxel (start dose 75mg/m2) given every second week. If toxicity measured by CTC-NCI criteria are grade 2 or less (except haematological toxicity) it will be possible to escalate doses

DRUGFEC→T

Fixed dosed and three weekly epirubicin (100mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (500mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (500mg/m2), followed by fixed dosed and three weekly docetaxel (100mg/m2), no dose escalations.

Sponsors

Swedish Breast Cancer Group
CollaboratorOTHER
Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group
CollaboratorNETWORK
GBG Forschungs GmbH
CollaboratorOTHER
Karolinska University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histological proven invasive primary breast cancer, with at least 5 (recommended 10) removed axillary lymph nodes OR negative sentinel node biopsy performed for the node negative cohort. Interval between definitive surgery that includes axillary lymph node dissection and registration must be less than 60 days. Paraffin block from the primary tumour must be retained (not mandatory for Austrian sites). Frozen tumour tissue is strongly recommended to be stored. * Receptor negative or positive tumours with 1 or more positive axillary lymph nodes (more than 0.2 mm) OR axillary node negative breast cancers if the primary tumour is larger than 20 mm and receptor negative (Er and Pgr with no receptor content) and being Elston grade III. In Germany high risk node negative breast cancer patients are not eligible until labelling for docetaxel includes node-negative disease. * A primary breast cancer patient being 35 years or younger considered suitable for adjuvant chemotherapy (may be receptor negative or positive, HER-2/neu negative or positive, with or without axillary lymph node metastases). * Macroscopically and microscopically free margins after radical surgery (no cancer cells at borders of resection). * No proven distant metastases (negative chest/pulmonary X-ray, bone scintigram (when clinical signs of skeletal metastases or elevated ALP) supplemented with normal conventional X-ray of hot spots, normal liver function test and haematological function tests; when abnormal values, CT or ultrasound of the liver, patient can be included if no metastases are demonstrated. * Female age 18-65. * Ambulant patients (ECOG 1 or less). * No major cardiovascular morbidity NYHA I or II. (Appendix 3). * Written informed consent according to the local ethics committee requirements. * Patients of childbearing potential should have a negative pregnancy test within seven days of registration. (In Austria, pregnancy tests have to be repeated monthly during the treatment phase).

Exclusion criteria

* Previous neo-adjuvant treatment. * Non-radical surgery (histopathological positive margins). * Proven distant metastases. * Pregnancy or lactation. * Other serious medical condition. * Previous or concurrent malignancies at other sites, except basal cell carcinoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma in situ of the skin or cervix. Patients with previous breast cancer (invasive and/or ductal carcinoma in situ) in the other breast without loco-regional (large lung volumes) radiotherapy, without objective findings for relapse, with \> 5 years since diagnosis can be included. * Abnormal laboratory values precluding the possibility to safely deliver the used cytotoxic agents in the study. * Hypersensitivity to drugs formulated in polysorbate 80. * Peripheral neuropathy grade ≥2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Breast cancer relapse-free survival2 yearsBreast cancer recurrence free survival is defined as time from randomization to the first of the events; local-, regional- or distant breast cancer recurrence or death due to breast cancer or last date of follow-up if no event has occurred. This was defined already in the phase 2 protocol (1 Sept 2004).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distant disease-free survival2 yearsDistant disease free survival is defined as time from randomization to the first of distant metastases or death due to breast cancer.
Event-free survival2 yearsEvent-free survival is defined as time from randomization to the first of the events breast cancer recurrence (any type), contra-lateral breast cancer, other malignancy or any cause of death.
Outcome in relation to tumour biological factors and polymorphism patterns2 yearsComparing arm A vs B regarding: 1. RFS in relation to the Sorlie classes using immunohistochemical markers and/or gene expression profiling comparing A vs B arm; 2. RFS with receptor positive disease in the comparison between the A- and B arms; 3. RFS with high and low proliferation, respectively, in the comparison between the A- and B-arms.; 4. RFS in relation to HER-2/neu status in the primary cancers in the comparison between the A- and B-arms and analyzed whether trastuzumab was given in sequence or concurrently; 5. RFS analyzed in relation to other molecular markers in the primary cancers and SNPs signatures in normal DNA to outcome per arm; 6. RFS analyzed in relation to tumour associated lymphocytes and Y-box binding protein in the comparison between the A- and B-arms. Description of a to e are more detailed in the protocol, shortened here due to space limitation.
Health-related quality of life and toxicity analyses according to CTC2 years
BCRFS in arm A in relation to given dose levels2 yearsBreast cancer relapse free survival
Overall survival2 yearsOverall survival is defined as time from randomization to any death.

Countries

Austria, Germany, Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026