Skip to content

Efficacy of Natural Extract 2007RD01 Combined With Saw Palmetto in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients Compared to Saw Palmetto

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00797394
Enrollment
110
Registered
2008-11-25
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2011-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Keywords

prostate, dietary supplements, saw palmetto, canada

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the combination of 2007RD01, a natural extract, and saw palmetto lipidic extract, is more effective at treating lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia than saw palmetto lipidic extract alone.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCombination of 2007RD01 and saw palmetto lipidic extract

Oral administration of one capsule containing a combination of 250 mg of 2007RD01 (a natural extract) and 160 mg of saw palmetto lipidic extract plus inactive fillers, twice a day between meals

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTSaw palmetto lipidic extract

Oral administration of one capsule of 160 mg of saw palmetto lipidic extract plus inactive fillers, twice a day between meals

Sponsors

innoVactiv Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient must be an adult man aged between 50 and 75 * Patient must have Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia symptoms

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has a malfunction of the urinary tract, is suffering from acute urinary retention, or is suffering from prostate cancer or urinary tract infection * Patient has been subjected to surgery of the prostate, bladder or urethra * Patient has taken a 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor in the 6-month period preceding screening * Patient has taken an alpha-blocker in the 2-week period preceding screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Absolute and relative (%) change in IPSS between baseline and end of study90 days ±7 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Absolute and relative (%) change in IPSS between baseline and day 30 of follow-up30 days ±7 days
Absolute and relative (%) change in peak urinary flow between baseline and after 30 or 90 days of follow-up30 days ±7 days , 90 days ±7 days
Absolute and relative (%) change in post-void residual volume between baseline and after 30 or 90 days of follow-up30 days ±7 days , 90 days ±7 days
Change in health related quality of life between baseline and after 30 or 90 days of follow-up30 days ±7 days , 90 days ±7 days
Change in sexual function between baseline and after 30 or 90 days of follow-up30 days ±7 days , 90 days ±7 days

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026