Depressive Disorder, Major
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to assess whether LY2216684 is superior to placebo in the treatment of adult patients with major depressive disorder.
Interventions
Flexible Dosing: 6 mg, 9 mg, 12 mg and 18 mg (3 tablets) administered QD for up to 62 weeks
Dose: 3 tablets QD for 10 weeks
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adults age 18-65 years * Meet criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-fourth edition-text revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria without psychotic features * Women of child-bearing potential must test negative for pregnancy and agree to use a reliable method of birth control * Grid 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (GRID-HAMD17) total score ≥18 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 * Clinical global impressions of severity (CGI-S) score ≥4 at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Exclusion criteria
* Are currently involved in or discontinued within the last 30 days from a clinical trial involving an off-label use of an investigational drug * Have previously completed or withdrawn from this study or any other study investigating LY2216684 * Have had or currently have any additional ongoing DSM-IV-TR Axis 1 condition other than MDD * Have had any anxiety disorder preceding the onset of depression that was considered the primary diagnosis within 1 year of Visit 1 * Have an Axis II disorder that would interfere with protocol compliance * Have a current or previous diagnosis of Bipolar I or II, psychotic depression, schizophrenia, or other psychotic disorder * Have a history of substance abuse within the past 1 year * Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding * Have had a lack of response of the current depressive episode to 2 or more adequate courses of antidepressant therapy, or in the judgment of the investigator, considered to have treatment-resistant depression * Participants who are judged to be at serious suicidal risk * Have a serious or unstable medical illness * Have any diagnosed medical condition which could be exacerbated by noradrenergic agents including unstable hypertension, unstable heart disease, tachycardia or tachyarrhythmia, narrow angle glaucoma, or urinary hesitation or retention * Have received treatment with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within 14 days prior to Visit 1 * Have a history of severe allergies to more than 1 class of medication or multiple adverse drug reactions * Have a history of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or psychosurgery within the last year * Have a history of any seizure disorder (other than febrile seizures) * Require psychotropic medication other than sedative/hypnotic medication for sleep * Have a thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level outside the established reference range. * Are taking or have received treatment with any excluded medication within 7 days prior to Visit 2 * Initiation or change in intensity of psychotherapy or other non-drug therapies within 6 weeks prior to enrollment * A positive urine drug screen for any substance of abuse at Visit 1 * Have initiated or discontinued hormone therapy within the previous 3 months prior to enrollment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 10 | Baseline, Week 10 | The MADRS measured severity of depressive mood symptoms. The 10-item checklist rating scale was 0 to 6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 10 | Baseline, Week 10 | The SDS was completed by the participant and used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their work/social/family life. Total of these 3 items=Global Functional Impairment score; scores ranged from 0 to 30, with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10), Week 62 | The SDS was completed by the participant and used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their work/social/family life. Total of these 3 items=Global Functional Impairment score; scores ranged from 0 to 30, with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 10 | Baseline, Week 10 | CGI-S measured severity of depression at the time of assessment. Scores ranged from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10), Week 62 | CGI-S measured severity of depression at the time of assessment. Scores ranged from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 10 | Baseline, Week 10 | The QIDS-SR16 was a 16-item participant-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. The total score ranged from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicative of greater severity. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10), Week 62 | The QIDS-SR16 was a 16-item participant-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. The total score ranged from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicative of greater severity. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 10 | Baseline, Week 10 | The CPFQ was a 7-item participant-rated questionnaire pertaining to a participant's cognitive and physical well-being. It assessed motivation, wakefulness, energy, focus, recall, word-finding difficulty, and mental acuity. Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (greater than normal) to 6 (totally absent); total score ranged from 7 to 42. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score. |
| Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10), Week 62 | The CPFQ was a 7-item participant-rated questionnaire pertaining to a participant's cognitive and physical well-being. It assessed motivation, wakefulness, energy, focus, recall, word-finding difficulty, and mental acuity. Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (greater than normal) to 6 (totally absent); total score ranged from 7 to 42. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 10 | Baseline, Week 10 | EQ-5D was a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality of life (Qol) instrument allowing participants to rate their health state in 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and mood. A single score between 1 and 3 was generated for each domain. For each participant, the outcome rating on the 5 domains was mapped to a single index through an algorithm. The index ranged between 0 and 1, with the higher score indicating a better health state perceived by the participant. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score. |
| Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10), Week 62 | EQ-5D was a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality of life (Qol) instrument allowing participants to rate their health state in 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, mood. Single score between 1 and 3 was generated for each domain. For each participant, outcome rating on the 5 domains was mapped to a single index through an algorithm. The index ranged between 0 and 1, with higher score indicating a better health state perceived by the participant. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 10 | Baseline, Week 10 | The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Average Score=mean of Items 1-5, 7-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10), Week 62 | The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Average Score=mean of Items 1-5, 7-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 10 | Baseline, Week 10 | The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Experience Average Score=mean of Items 1 to 5, and 7. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10), Week 62 | The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Experience Average Score=mean of Items 1-5, and 7. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10), Week 62 | The MADRS measured severity of depressive mood symptoms. The 10-item checklist rating scale was 0 to 6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10), Week 62 | The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Impact Average Score=mean of Items 8-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 10 | Baseline, Week 10 | The BFI was a participant-rated scale consisting of 9 items: 3 items assessed severity of fatigue at its worst, usual, and now during normal waking hours: 0=no fatigue to 10=fatigue as bad as you can imagine; 6 items assessed the degree to which fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the participant's life during the past 24 hours: 0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes. The BFI Global Total Score was the mean of the 9 item scores and ranged from 0 to 10. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score. |
| Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10), Week 62 | The BFI was a participant-rated scale consisting of 9 items: 3 items assessed severity of fatigue at its worst, usual, and now during normal waking hours: 0=no fatigue to 10=fatigue as bad as you can imagine; 6 items assessed the degree to which fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the participant's life during the past 24 hours: 0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes. The BFI Global Total Score was the mean of the 9 item scores and ranged from 0 to 10. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 10 | Baseline, Week 10 | The VAS-F was a self-rated assessment with 2 items. For the Overall Severity of Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100-millimeter (mm) line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=as severe as I can imagine). For the Interference With Daily Activities Due to Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100 mm line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=complete disability \[unable to do any activities\]). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10), Week 62 | The VAS-F was a self-rated assessment with 2 items. For the Overall Severity of Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100-millimeter (mm) line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=as severe as I can imagine). For the Interference With Daily Activities Due to Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100 mm line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=complete disability \[unable to do any activities\]). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10 | Baseline through Week 10 | The Resource Utilization form assessed the frequency and type of medical services that participants have used within the last year, or since the last visit. Resources reported by at least 5% of participants in either treatment group were provided. |
| Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10) through Week 62 | The Resource Utilization form assessed the frequency and type of medical services that participants have used within the last year, or since the last visit. Resources reported by at least 5% of participants in either treatment group were provided. |
| Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10 | Baseline through Week 10 | C-SSRS scale captured occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. Number of participants with suicidal ideation, behavior, and acts were provided. Suicidal ideation=a yes answer to any 1 of 5 suicidal ideation questions (including wish to be dead) and 4 different categories of active suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior=a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. Suicidal act=a yes answer to actual attempt or completed suicide. |
| Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10) through Week 62 | C-SSRS scale captured occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. Number of participants with suicidal ideation, behavior, and acts were provided. Suicidal ideation=a yes answer to any 1 of 5 suicidal ideation questions (including wish to be dead) and 4 different categories of active suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior=a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. Suicidal act=a yes answer to actual attempt or completed suicide. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 10 | Baseline, Week 10 | Blood pressure was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10), Week 62 | Blood pressure was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Pulse at Week 10 | Baseline, Week 10 | Pulse was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Pulse at Week 62 | Baseline (Week 10), Week 62 | Pulse was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
| Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of LY2216684 | Baseline through Week 62 | Blood samples collected from participants that received LY2216684 were measured to determine the plasma LY2216684 concentrations. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 10 | Baseline, Week 10 | The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Impact Average Score=mean of Items 8-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit. |
Countries
Argentina, Finland, Poland, Russia, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
The Screening Phase (Week -1 through Week 0) assessed participant eligibility for not less than 3 days and not more than 30 days. At Week 0, those participants who met entry criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either LY2216684 (dose range 6 milligram \[mg\] to 18 mg once daily \[QD\]) or placebo.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| LY2216684 10-week Acute Treatment Phase: Day after Week 0=start of 6 milligram (mg) once daily (QD) dosing; Week 1=all participants titrated to 9 mg QD; After Week 1=dose increased, maintained, or decreased to a minimum of 6 mg QD and maximum of 18 mg QD, depending on participant's tolerance of study drug.
1-year Long-term Extension Phase: Day after Week 10=start of same LY2216684 dose participant was taking at the end of Acute Treatment Phase; After Week 11=dose increased, maintained, or decreased to minimum of 6 mg QD and maximum of 18 mg QD based on investigator's judgment of safety and tolerability (up to Week 62). | 250 |
| Placebo 10-week Acute Treatment Phase: 3 tablets QD for 10 weeks
1-year Long-term Extension Phase: Day after Week 10=6 mg LY2216684; After 1 week=dose escalated to 9 mg QD; After Week 11=dose increased, maintained, or decreased to minimum of 6 mg QD and maximum of 18 mg QD based on investigator's judgment of safety and tolerability (up to Week 62). | 245 |
| Total | 495 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute Treatment Phase | Adverse Event | 23 | 4 |
| Acute Treatment Phase | Death | 1 | 0 |
| Acute Treatment Phase | Lack of Efficacy | 5 | 2 |
| Acute Treatment Phase | Lost to Follow-up | 9 | 12 |
| Acute Treatment Phase | Physician Decision | 1 | 1 |
| Acute Treatment Phase | Protocol Violation | 1 | 2 |
| Acute Treatment Phase | Withdrawal by Subject | 16 | 10 |
| Long-term Extension Phase | Adverse Event | 25 | 32 |
| Long-term Extension Phase | Lack of Efficacy | 16 | 12 |
| Long-term Extension Phase | Lost to Follow-up | 20 | 16 |
| Long-term Extension Phase | Physician Decision | 1 | 2 |
| Long-term Extension Phase | Protocol Violation | 3 | 5 |
| Long-term Extension Phase | Withdrawal by Subject | 25 | 25 |
| Taper Phase | Adverse Event | 2 | 0 |
| Taper Phase | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Taper Phase | Physician Decision | 2 | 0 |
| Taper Phase | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | LY2216684 | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 44.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.32 | 45.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.61 | 44.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.47 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 31 Participants | 25 Participants | 56 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 200 Participants | 200 Participants | 400 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 19 Participants | 20 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 45 Participants | 44 Participants | 89 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 9 Participants | 7 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 191 Participants | 187 Participants | 378 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Argentina | 13 Participants | 13 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Finland | 42 Participants | 43 Participants | 85 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 44 Participants | 45 Participants | 89 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Russia | 11 Participants | 9 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 140 Participants | 135 Participants | 275 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 160 Participants | 143 Participants | 303 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 90 Participants | 102 Participants | 192 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 171 / 250 | 133 / 245 | 126 / 190 | 155 / 207 | 15 / 240 | 0 / 6 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 250 | 2 / 245 | 6 / 190 | 5 / 207 | 0 / 240 | 0 / 6 |
Outcome results
Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 10
The MADRS measured severity of depressive mood symptoms. The 10-item checklist rating scale was 0 to 6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 10 | -13.30 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.563 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 10 | -9.82 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.544 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 10
CGI-S measured severity of depression at the time of assessment. Scores ranged from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 10 | -1.48 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.075 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 10 | -1.08 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.072 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 10
The SDS was completed by the participant and used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their work/social/family life. Total of these 3 items=Global Functional Impairment score; scores ranged from 0 to 30, with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 10 | -8.21 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.499 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 10 | -5.79 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.484 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Pulse at Week 10
Pulse was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Pulse at Week 10 | 9.72 beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Error 0.677 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Pulse at Week 10 | -0.11 beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Error 0.655 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 10
Blood pressure was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 10 | Supine systolic | 1.45 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) | Standard Error 0.708 |
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 10 | Supine diastolic | 3.54 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) | Standard Error 0.527 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 10 | Supine systolic | -1.57 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) | Standard Error 0.683 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 10 | Supine diastolic | -0.64 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) | Standard Error 0.51 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 10
The QIDS-SR16 was a 16-item participant-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. The total score ranged from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicative of greater severity. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value in the Per Protocol population, defined as the subset of randomized participants who had baseline and post-baseline data collected using the correct version of the QIDS-SR16 worksheet.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 10 | -6.50 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.366 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 10 | -4.93 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.36 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 10
The BFI was a participant-rated scale consisting of 9 items: 3 items assessed severity of fatigue at its worst, usual, and now during normal waking hours: 0=no fatigue to 10=fatigue as bad as you can imagine; 6 items assessed the degree to which fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the participant's life during the past 24 hours: 0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes. The BFI Global Total Score was the mean of the 9 item scores and ranged from 0 to 10. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 10 | -2.25 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.147 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 10 | -1.74 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.148 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 10
EQ-5D was a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality of life (Qol) instrument allowing participants to rate their health state in 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and mood. A single score between 1 and 3 was generated for each domain. For each participant, the outcome rating on the 5 domains was mapped to a single index through an algorithm. The index ranged between 0 and 1, with the higher score indicating a better health state perceived by the participant. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 10 | 0.12 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.011 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 10 | 0.09 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.011 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 10
The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Average Score=mean of Items 1-5, 7-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 10 | -0.99 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.059 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 10 | -0.74 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.057 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 10
The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Experience Average Score=mean of Items 1 to 5, and 7. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 10 | -0.96 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 10 | -0.69 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.058 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 10
The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Impact Average Score=mean of Items 8-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 10 | -1.02 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.062 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 10 | -0.77 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 10
The CPFQ was a 7-item participant-rated questionnaire pertaining to a participant's cognitive and physical well-being. It assessed motivation, wakefulness, energy, focus, recall, word-finding difficulty, and mental acuity. Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (greater than normal) to 6 (totally absent); total score ranged from 7 to 42. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 10 | -6.61 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.435 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 10 | -5.04 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.437 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 10
The VAS-F was a self-rated assessment with 2 items. For the Overall Severity of Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100-millimeter (mm) line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=as severe as I can imagine). For the Interference With Daily Activities Due to Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100 mm line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=complete disability \[unable to do any activities\]). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 10 | Severity of Overall Fatigue | -23.30 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.813 |
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 10 | Fatigue Interference With Daily Activities | -24.48 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.831 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 10 | Severity of Overall Fatigue | -16.69 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.757 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 10 | Fatigue Interference With Daily Activities | -18.62 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.775 |
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 62
The BFI was a participant-rated scale consisting of 9 items: 3 items assessed severity of fatigue at its worst, usual, and now during normal waking hours: 0=no fatigue to 10=fatigue as bad as you can imagine; 6 items assessed the degree to which fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the participant's life during the past 24 hours: 0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes. The BFI Global Total Score was the mean of the 9 item scores and ranged from 0 to 10. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 62 | -1.28 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.202 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 62 | -1.59 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.187 |
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 62
CGI-S measured severity of depression at the time of assessment. Scores ranged from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 62 | -1.03 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.087 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 62 | -1.24 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.085 |
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 62
The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Average Score=mean of Items 1-5, 7-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 62 | -0.51 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.076 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 62 | -0.65 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.073 |
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 62
The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Experience Average Score=mean of Items 1-5, and 7. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 62 | -0.50 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 62 | -0.70 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.078 |
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 62
The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Impact Average Score=mean of Items 8-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 62 | -0.51 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.078 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 62 | -0.58 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.081 |
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 62
The MADRS measured severity of depressive mood symptoms. The 10-item checklist rating scale was 0 to 6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 62 | -7.44 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.674 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 62 | -9.43 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.666 |
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 62
The SDS was completed by the participant and used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their work/social/family life. Total of these 3 items=Global Functional Impairment score; scores ranged from 0 to 30, with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 62 | -3.06 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.654 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 62 | -4.56 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.591 |
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Pulse at Week 62
Pulse was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Pulse at Week 62 | -1.15 beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Error 0.97 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Pulse at Week 62 | 7.33 beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Error 0.875 |
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 62
Blood pressure was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 62 | Supine systolic | 0.52 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) | Standard Error 1.017 |
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 62 | Supine diastolic | -0.68 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) | Standard Error 0.724 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 62 | Supine systolic | 2.55 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) | Standard Error 1.064 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 62 | Supine diastolic | 2.25 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) | Standard Error 0.71 |
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 62
The QIDS-SR16 was a 16-item participant-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. The total score ranged from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicative of greater severity. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 62 | -2.64 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.422 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 62 | -3.33 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.399 |
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 62
EQ-5D was a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality of life (Qol) instrument allowing participants to rate their health state in 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, mood. Single score between 1 and 3 was generated for each domain. For each participant, outcome rating on the 5 domains was mapped to a single index through an algorithm. The index ranged between 0 and 1, with higher score indicating a better health state perceived by the participant. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 62 | 0.08 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.015 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 62 | 0.06 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.014 |
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 62
The CPFQ was a 7-item participant-rated questionnaire pertaining to a participant's cognitive and physical well-being. It assessed motivation, wakefulness, energy, focus, recall, word-finding difficulty, and mental acuity. Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (greater than normal) to 6 (totally absent); total score ranged from 7 to 42. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 62 | -2.79 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.534 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 62 | -3.72 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.48 |
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 62
The VAS-F was a self-rated assessment with 2 items. For the Overall Severity of Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100-millimeter (mm) line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=as severe as I can imagine). For the Interference With Daily Activities Due to Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100 mm line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=complete disability \[unable to do any activities\]). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 62 | Overall Severity of Fatigue | -12.72 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.277 |
| LY2216684 | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 62 | Fatigue Interference With Daily Activities | -13.89 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.229 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 62 | Overall Severity of Fatigue | -18.69 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.99 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 62 | Fatigue Interference With Daily Activities | -17.47 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.996 |
Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10
The Resource Utilization form assessed the frequency and type of medical services that participants have used within the last year, or since the last visit. Resources reported by at least 5% of participants in either treatment group were provided.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10 | Use of Primary Doctor | 13.3 percentage of participants |
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10 | Use of Specialist | 5.8 percentage of participants |
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10 | Other Diagnostic Tests | 6.6 percentage of participants |
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10 | Prescribed Medication | 34.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10 | Prescribed Medication | 29.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10 | Use of Primary Doctor | 10.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10 | Other Diagnostic Tests | 5.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10 | Use of Specialist | 5.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62
The Resource Utilization form assessed the frequency and type of medical services that participants have used within the last year, or since the last visit. Resources reported by at least 5% of participants in either treatment group were provided.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10) through Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62 | Special Scans/Tests | 5.2 percentage of participants |
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62 | Use of Primary Doctor | 27.3 percentage of participants |
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62 | Other Diagnostic Tests | 19.2 percentage of participants |
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62 | Use of ER or Urgent Care: Other Reason | 5.8 percentage of participants |
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62 | Prescribed Medications | 39.5 percentage of participants |
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62 | Use of Specialist | 14.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62 | Prescribed Medications | 35.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62 | Use of Specialist | 13.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62 | Use of ER or Urgent Care: Other Reason | 5.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62 | Special Scans/Tests | 3.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62 | Other Diagnostic Tests | 15.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62 | Use of Primary Doctor | 24.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10
C-SSRS scale captured occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. Number of participants with suicidal ideation, behavior, and acts were provided. Suicidal ideation=a yes answer to any 1 of 5 suicidal ideation questions (including wish to be dead) and 4 different categories of active suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior=a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. Suicidal act=a yes answer to actual attempt or completed suicide.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 10
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline C-SSRS value.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10 | Suicidal ideation | 7.3 percentage of participants |
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10 | Suicidal behavior | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10 | Suicidal acts | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10 | Suicidal ideation | 8.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10 | Suicidal behavior | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10 | Suicidal acts | 0.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62
C-SSRS scale captured occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. Number of participants with suicidal ideation, behavior, and acts were provided. Suicidal ideation=a yes answer to any 1 of 5 suicidal ideation questions (including wish to be dead) and 4 different categories of active suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior=a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. Suicidal act=a yes answer to actual attempt or completed suicide.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 10) through Week 62
Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62 | Suicidal ideation | 5.9 percentage of participants |
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62 | Suicidal behavior | 1.1 percentage of participants |
| LY2216684 | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62 | Suicidal acts | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62 | Suicidal ideation | 6.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62 | Suicidal behavior | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62 | Suicidal acts | 0.5 percentage of participants |
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of LY2216684
Blood samples collected from participants that received LY2216684 were measured to determine the plasma LY2216684 concentrations.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 62
Population: N=number of participants analyzed (N=365); n=number of plasma LY2216684 concentration observations. The sum of the individual 'n' values for each dose group does not equal 365 since the same participant could have received various doses during his/her participation in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LY2216684 | Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of LY2216684 | 6 mg LY2216684 | 12.3 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 8.55 |
| LY2216684 | Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of LY2216684 | 9 mg LY2216684 | 18.2 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 13.6 |
| LY2216684 | Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of LY2216684 | 12 mg LY2216684 | 26.0 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 17.3 |
| LY2216684 | Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of LY2216684 | 18 mg LY2216684 | 40.0 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 25.5 |