Skip to content

A Study in Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of LY2216684 and Placebo and Long Term Treatment With LY2216684 in Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00795821
Enrollment
495
Registered
2008-11-21
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2011-03-31
Last updated
2018-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Major

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess whether LY2216684 is superior to placebo in the treatment of adult patients with major depressive disorder.

Interventions

DRUGLY2216684

Flexible Dosing: 6 mg, 9 mg, 12 mg and 18 mg (3 tablets) administered QD for up to 62 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Dose: 3 tablets QD for 10 weeks

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults age 18-65 years * Meet criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-fourth edition-text revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria without psychotic features * Women of child-bearing potential must test negative for pregnancy and agree to use a reliable method of birth control * Grid 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (GRID-HAMD17) total score ≥18 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 * Clinical global impressions of severity (CGI-S) score ≥4 at Visit 1 and Visit 2

Exclusion criteria

* Are currently involved in or discontinued within the last 30 days from a clinical trial involving an off-label use of an investigational drug * Have previously completed or withdrawn from this study or any other study investigating LY2216684 * Have had or currently have any additional ongoing DSM-IV-TR Axis 1 condition other than MDD * Have had any anxiety disorder preceding the onset of depression that was considered the primary diagnosis within 1 year of Visit 1 * Have an Axis II disorder that would interfere with protocol compliance * Have a current or previous diagnosis of Bipolar I or II, psychotic depression, schizophrenia, or other psychotic disorder * Have a history of substance abuse within the past 1 year * Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding * Have had a lack of response of the current depressive episode to 2 or more adequate courses of antidepressant therapy, or in the judgment of the investigator, considered to have treatment-resistant depression * Participants who are judged to be at serious suicidal risk * Have a serious or unstable medical illness * Have any diagnosed medical condition which could be exacerbated by noradrenergic agents including unstable hypertension, unstable heart disease, tachycardia or tachyarrhythmia, narrow angle glaucoma, or urinary hesitation or retention * Have received treatment with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within 14 days prior to Visit 1 * Have a history of severe allergies to more than 1 class of medication or multiple adverse drug reactions * Have a history of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or psychosurgery within the last year * Have a history of any seizure disorder (other than febrile seizures) * Require psychotropic medication other than sedative/hypnotic medication for sleep * Have a thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level outside the established reference range. * Are taking or have received treatment with any excluded medication within 7 days prior to Visit 2 * Initiation or change in intensity of psychotherapy or other non-drug therapies within 6 weeks prior to enrollment * A positive urine drug screen for any substance of abuse at Visit 1 * Have initiated or discontinued hormone therapy within the previous 3 months prior to enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 10Baseline, Week 10The MADRS measured severity of depressive mood symptoms. The 10-item checklist rating scale was 0 to 6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 10Baseline, Week 10The SDS was completed by the participant and used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their work/social/family life. Total of these 3 items=Global Functional Impairment score; scores ranged from 0 to 30, with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 62Baseline (Week 10), Week 62The SDS was completed by the participant and used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their work/social/family life. Total of these 3 items=Global Functional Impairment score; scores ranged from 0 to 30, with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 10Baseline, Week 10CGI-S measured severity of depression at the time of assessment. Scores ranged from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 62Baseline (Week 10), Week 62CGI-S measured severity of depression at the time of assessment. Scores ranged from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 10Baseline, Week 10The QIDS-SR16 was a 16-item participant-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. The total score ranged from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicative of greater severity. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 62Baseline (Week 10), Week 62The QIDS-SR16 was a 16-item participant-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. The total score ranged from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicative of greater severity. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 10Baseline, Week 10The CPFQ was a 7-item participant-rated questionnaire pertaining to a participant's cognitive and physical well-being. It assessed motivation, wakefulness, energy, focus, recall, word-finding difficulty, and mental acuity. Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (greater than normal) to 6 (totally absent); total score ranged from 7 to 42. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 62Baseline (Week 10), Week 62The CPFQ was a 7-item participant-rated questionnaire pertaining to a participant's cognitive and physical well-being. It assessed motivation, wakefulness, energy, focus, recall, word-finding difficulty, and mental acuity. Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (greater than normal) to 6 (totally absent); total score ranged from 7 to 42. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 10Baseline, Week 10EQ-5D was a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality of life (Qol) instrument allowing participants to rate their health state in 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and mood. A single score between 1 and 3 was generated for each domain. For each participant, the outcome rating on the 5 domains was mapped to a single index through an algorithm. The index ranged between 0 and 1, with the higher score indicating a better health state perceived by the participant. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 62Baseline (Week 10), Week 62EQ-5D was a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality of life (Qol) instrument allowing participants to rate their health state in 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, mood. Single score between 1 and 3 was generated for each domain. For each participant, outcome rating on the 5 domains was mapped to a single index through an algorithm. The index ranged between 0 and 1, with higher score indicating a better health state perceived by the participant. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 10Baseline, Week 10The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Average Score=mean of Items 1-5, 7-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 62Baseline (Week 10), Week 62The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Average Score=mean of Items 1-5, 7-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 10Baseline, Week 10The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Experience Average Score=mean of Items 1 to 5, and 7. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 62Baseline (Week 10), Week 62The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Experience Average Score=mean of Items 1-5, and 7. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 62Baseline (Week 10), Week 62The MADRS measured severity of depressive mood symptoms. The 10-item checklist rating scale was 0 to 6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 62Baseline (Week 10), Week 62The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Impact Average Score=mean of Items 8-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 10Baseline, Week 10The BFI was a participant-rated scale consisting of 9 items: 3 items assessed severity of fatigue at its worst, usual, and now during normal waking hours: 0=no fatigue to 10=fatigue as bad as you can imagine; 6 items assessed the degree to which fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the participant's life during the past 24 hours: 0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes. The BFI Global Total Score was the mean of the 9 item scores and ranged from 0 to 10. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 62Baseline (Week 10), Week 62The BFI was a participant-rated scale consisting of 9 items: 3 items assessed severity of fatigue at its worst, usual, and now during normal waking hours: 0=no fatigue to 10=fatigue as bad as you can imagine; 6 items assessed the degree to which fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the participant's life during the past 24 hours: 0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes. The BFI Global Total Score was the mean of the 9 item scores and ranged from 0 to 10. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 10Baseline, Week 10The VAS-F was a self-rated assessment with 2 items. For the Overall Severity of Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100-millimeter (mm) line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=as severe as I can imagine). For the Interference With Daily Activities Due to Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100 mm line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=complete disability \[unable to do any activities\]). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 62Baseline (Week 10), Week 62The VAS-F was a self-rated assessment with 2 items. For the Overall Severity of Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100-millimeter (mm) line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=as severe as I can imagine). For the Interference With Daily Activities Due to Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100 mm line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=complete disability \[unable to do any activities\]). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10Baseline through Week 10The Resource Utilization form assessed the frequency and type of medical services that participants have used within the last year, or since the last visit. Resources reported by at least 5% of participants in either treatment group were provided.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62Baseline (Week 10) through Week 62The Resource Utilization form assessed the frequency and type of medical services that participants have used within the last year, or since the last visit. Resources reported by at least 5% of participants in either treatment group were provided.
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10Baseline through Week 10C-SSRS scale captured occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. Number of participants with suicidal ideation, behavior, and acts were provided. Suicidal ideation=a yes answer to any 1 of 5 suicidal ideation questions (including wish to be dead) and 4 different categories of active suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior=a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. Suicidal act=a yes answer to actual attempt or completed suicide.
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62Baseline (Week 10) through Week 62C-SSRS scale captured occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. Number of participants with suicidal ideation, behavior, and acts were provided. Suicidal ideation=a yes answer to any 1 of 5 suicidal ideation questions (including wish to be dead) and 4 different categories of active suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior=a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. Suicidal act=a yes answer to actual attempt or completed suicide.
Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 10Baseline, Week 10Blood pressure was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 62Baseline (Week 10), Week 62Blood pressure was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Pulse at Week 10Baseline, Week 10Pulse was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Pulse at Week 62Baseline (Week 10), Week 62Pulse was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of LY2216684Baseline through Week 62Blood samples collected from participants that received LY2216684 were measured to determine the plasma LY2216684 concentrations.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 10Baseline, Week 10The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Impact Average Score=mean of Items 8-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Countries

Argentina, Finland, Poland, Russia, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The Screening Phase (Week -1 through Week 0) assessed participant eligibility for not less than 3 days and not more than 30 days. At Week 0, those participants who met entry criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either LY2216684 (dose range 6 milligram \[mg\] to 18 mg once daily \[QD\]) or placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LY2216684
10-week Acute Treatment Phase: Day after Week 0=start of 6 milligram (mg) once daily (QD) dosing; Week 1=all participants titrated to 9 mg QD; After Week 1=dose increased, maintained, or decreased to a minimum of 6 mg QD and maximum of 18 mg QD, depending on participant's tolerance of study drug. 1-year Long-term Extension Phase: Day after Week 10=start of same LY2216684 dose participant was taking at the end of Acute Treatment Phase; After Week 11=dose increased, maintained, or decreased to minimum of 6 mg QD and maximum of 18 mg QD based on investigator's judgment of safety and tolerability (up to Week 62).
250
Placebo
10-week Acute Treatment Phase: 3 tablets QD for 10 weeks 1-year Long-term Extension Phase: Day after Week 10=6 mg LY2216684; After 1 week=dose escalated to 9 mg QD; After Week 11=dose increased, maintained, or decreased to minimum of 6 mg QD and maximum of 18 mg QD based on investigator's judgment of safety and tolerability (up to Week 62).
245
Total495

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Acute Treatment PhaseAdverse Event234
Acute Treatment PhaseDeath10
Acute Treatment PhaseLack of Efficacy52
Acute Treatment PhaseLost to Follow-up912
Acute Treatment PhasePhysician Decision11
Acute Treatment PhaseProtocol Violation12
Acute Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject1610
Long-term Extension PhaseAdverse Event2532
Long-term Extension PhaseLack of Efficacy1612
Long-term Extension PhaseLost to Follow-up2016
Long-term Extension PhasePhysician Decision12
Long-term Extension PhaseProtocol Violation35
Long-term Extension PhaseWithdrawal by Subject2525
Taper PhaseAdverse Event20
Taper PhaseLost to Follow-up10
Taper PhasePhysician Decision20
Taper PhaseWithdrawal by Subject40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLY2216684PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous44.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.32
45.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.61
44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.47
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants25 Participants56 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
200 Participants200 Participants400 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
19 Participants20 Participants39 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
45 Participants44 Participants89 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
191 Participants187 Participants378 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
13 Participants13 Participants26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
42 Participants43 Participants85 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
44 Participants45 Participants89 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
11 Participants9 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
140 Participants135 Participants275 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
160 Participants143 Participants303 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
90 Participants102 Participants192 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
171 / 250133 / 245126 / 190155 / 20715 / 2400 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 2502 / 2456 / 1905 / 2070 / 2400 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 10

The MADRS measured severity of depressive mood symptoms. The 10-item checklist rating scale was 0 to 6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 10-13.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.563
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 10-9.82 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.544
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 10

CGI-S measured severity of depression at the time of assessment. Scores ranged from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 10-1.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.075
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 10-1.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.072
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 10

The SDS was completed by the participant and used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their work/social/family life. Total of these 3 items=Global Functional Impairment score; scores ranged from 0 to 30, with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 10-8.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.499
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 10-5.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.484
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Pulse at Week 10

Pulse was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Pulse at Week 109.72 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.677
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Supine Pulse at Week 10-0.11 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.655
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 10

Blood pressure was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 10Supine systolic1.45 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg)Standard Error 0.708
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 10Supine diastolic3.54 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg)Standard Error 0.527
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 10Supine systolic-1.57 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg)Standard Error 0.683
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 10Supine diastolic-0.64 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg)Standard Error 0.51
p-value: 0.002Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 10

The QIDS-SR16 was a 16-item participant-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. The total score ranged from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicative of greater severity. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value in the Per Protocol population, defined as the subset of randomized participants who had baseline and post-baseline data collected using the correct version of the QIDS-SR16 worksheet.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 10-6.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.366
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 10-4.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
p-value: 0.002Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 10

The BFI was a participant-rated scale consisting of 9 items: 3 items assessed severity of fatigue at its worst, usual, and now during normal waking hours: 0=no fatigue to 10=fatigue as bad as you can imagine; 6 items assessed the degree to which fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the participant's life during the past 24 hours: 0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes. The BFI Global Total Score was the mean of the 9 item scores and ranged from 0 to 10. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 10-2.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.147
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 10-1.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.148
p-value: 0.009ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 10

EQ-5D was a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality of life (Qol) instrument allowing participants to rate their health state in 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and mood. A single score between 1 and 3 was generated for each domain. For each participant, the outcome rating on the 5 domains was mapped to a single index through an algorithm. The index ranged between 0 and 1, with the higher score indicating a better health state perceived by the participant. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 100.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.011
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 100.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.011
p-value: 0.056ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 10

The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Average Score=mean of Items 1-5, 7-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 10-0.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.059
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 10-0.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.057
p-value: 0.002Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 10

The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Experience Average Score=mean of Items 1 to 5, and 7. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 10-0.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 10-0.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.058
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 10

The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Impact Average Score=mean of Items 8-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 10-1.02 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.062
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 10-0.77 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
p-value: 0.003Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 10

The CPFQ was a 7-item participant-rated questionnaire pertaining to a participant's cognitive and physical well-being. It assessed motivation, wakefulness, energy, focus, recall, word-finding difficulty, and mental acuity. Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (greater than normal) to 6 (totally absent); total score ranged from 7 to 42. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 10-6.61 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.435
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 10-5.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.437
p-value: 0.007ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 10

The VAS-F was a self-rated assessment with 2 items. For the Overall Severity of Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100-millimeter (mm) line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=as severe as I can imagine). For the Interference With Daily Activities Due to Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100 mm line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=complete disability \[unable to do any activities\]). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, visit, treatment-by-visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 10Severity of Overall Fatigue-23.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.813
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 10Fatigue Interference With Daily Activities-24.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.831
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 10Severity of Overall Fatigue-16.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.757
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 10Fatigue Interference With Daily Activities-18.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.775
p-value: 0.008Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.024Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 62

The BFI was a participant-rated scale consisting of 9 items: 3 items assessed severity of fatigue at its worst, usual, and now during normal waking hours: 0=no fatigue to 10=fatigue as bad as you can imagine; 6 items assessed the degree to which fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the participant's life during the past 24 hours: 0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes. The BFI Global Total Score was the mean of the 9 item scores and ranged from 0 to 10. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 62-1.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.202
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Total Score at Week 62-1.59 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.187
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 62

CGI-S measured severity of depression at the time of assessment. Scores ranged from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 62-1.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.087
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-Severity) Scale at Week 62-1.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 62

The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Average Score=mean of Items 1-5, 7-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 62-0.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.076
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Average Score at Week 62-0.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.073
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 62

The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Experience Average Score=mean of Items 1-5, and 7. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 62-0.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Experience Average Score at Week 62-0.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.078
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 62

The FAsD was a participant-rated scale with 7 items that asked how often they experience different aspects of fatigue: responses from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); 9 items that asked how often fatigue impacts various aspects of their lives: responses from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Fatigue Impact Average Score=mean of Items 8-12, 14, and 16. Scores ranged from 1 to 5. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 62-0.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.078
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Fatigue Associated With Depression (FAsD) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Fatigue Impact Average Score at Week 62-0.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.081
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 62

The MADRS measured severity of depressive mood symptoms. The 10-item checklist rating scale was 0 to 6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 62-7.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.674
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 62-9.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.666
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 62

The SDS was completed by the participant and used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their work/social/family life. Total of these 3 items=Global Functional Impairment score; scores ranged from 0 to 30, with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 62-3.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.654
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment at Week 62-4.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.591
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Pulse at Week 62

Pulse was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Pulse at Week 62-1.15 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.97
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Pulse at Week 627.33 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.875
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 62

Blood pressure was collected while the participant was in the supine position. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 62Supine systolic0.52 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg)Standard Error 1.017
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 62Supine diastolic-0.68 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg)Standard Error 0.724
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 62Supine systolic2.55 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg)Standard Error 1.064
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 62Supine diastolic2.25 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg)Standard Error 0.71
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 62

The QIDS-SR16 was a 16-item participant-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. The total score ranged from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicative of greater severity. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 62-2.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.422
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR16) at Week 62-3.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.399
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 62

EQ-5D was a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality of life (Qol) instrument allowing participants to rate their health state in 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, mood. Single score between 1 and 3 was generated for each domain. For each participant, outcome rating on the 5 domains was mapped to a single index through an algorithm. The index ranged between 0 and 1, with higher score indicating a better health state perceived by the participant. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 620.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.015
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the EuroQol Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) United States (US) Index Score at Week 620.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.014
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 62

The CPFQ was a 7-item participant-rated questionnaire pertaining to a participant's cognitive and physical well-being. It assessed motivation, wakefulness, energy, focus, recall, word-finding difficulty, and mental acuity. Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (greater than normal) to 6 (totally absent); total score ranged from 7 to 42. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 62-2.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.534
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) at Week 62-3.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 62

The VAS-F was a self-rated assessment with 2 items. For the Overall Severity of Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100-millimeter (mm) line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=as severe as I can imagine). For the Interference With Daily Activities Due to Fatigue item, the participant placed a vertical mark on a 100 mm line between 2 anchors (0=not at all to 100=complete disability \[unable to do any activities\]). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for investigator, visit, baseline score, and baseline-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10), Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 62Overall Severity of Fatigue-12.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.277
LY2216684Mean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 62Fatigue Interference With Daily Activities-13.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.229
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 62Overall Severity of Fatigue-18.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.99
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (Week 10) in the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F) Overall Severity and Interference With Daily Activities Scores at Week 62Fatigue Interference With Daily Activities-17.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.996
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10

The Resource Utilization form assessed the frequency and type of medical services that participants have used within the last year, or since the last visit. Resources reported by at least 5% of participants in either treatment group were provided.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LY2216684Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10Use of Primary Doctor13.3 percentage of participants
LY2216684Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10Use of Specialist5.8 percentage of participants
LY2216684Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10Other Diagnostic Tests6.6 percentage of participants
LY2216684Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10Prescribed Medication34.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10Prescribed Medication29.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10Use of Primary Doctor10.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10Other Diagnostic Tests5.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 10Use of Specialist5.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.261Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.868Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.495Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.189Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62

The Resource Utilization form assessed the frequency and type of medical services that participants have used within the last year, or since the last visit. Resources reported by at least 5% of participants in either treatment group were provided.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10) through Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LY2216684Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62Special Scans/Tests5.2 percentage of participants
LY2216684Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62Use of Primary Doctor27.3 percentage of participants
LY2216684Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62Other Diagnostic Tests19.2 percentage of participants
LY2216684Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62Use of ER or Urgent Care: Other Reason5.8 percentage of participants
LY2216684Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62Prescribed Medications39.5 percentage of participants
LY2216684Percentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62Use of Specialist14.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62Prescribed Medications35.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62Use of Specialist13.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62Use of ER or Urgent Care: Other Reason5.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62Special Scans/Tests3.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62Other Diagnostic Tests15.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Resource Utilization at Week 62Use of Primary Doctor24.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10

C-SSRS scale captured occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. Number of participants with suicidal ideation, behavior, and acts were provided. Suicidal ideation=a yes answer to any 1 of 5 suicidal ideation questions (including wish to be dead) and 4 different categories of active suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior=a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. Suicidal act=a yes answer to actual attempt or completed suicide.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 10

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline C-SSRS value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LY2216684Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10Suicidal ideation7.3 percentage of participants
LY2216684Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10Suicidal behavior0.0 percentage of participants
LY2216684Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10Suicidal acts0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10Suicidal ideation8.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10Suicidal behavior0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 10Suicidal acts0.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.737Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62

C-SSRS scale captured occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. Number of participants with suicidal ideation, behavior, and acts were provided. Suicidal ideation=a yes answer to any 1 of 5 suicidal ideation questions (including wish to be dead) and 4 different categories of active suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior=a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. Suicidal act=a yes answer to actual attempt or completed suicide.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 10) through Week 62

Population: The analysis population included all participants in the Long-term Extension Phase with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LY2216684Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62Suicidal ideation5.9 percentage of participants
LY2216684Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62Suicidal behavior1.1 percentage of participants
LY2216684Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62Suicidal acts0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62Suicidal ideation6.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62Suicidal behavior0.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation, Behavior, and Acts Based on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 62Suicidal acts0.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of LY2216684

Blood samples collected from participants that received LY2216684 were measured to determine the plasma LY2216684 concentrations.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 62

Population: N=number of participants analyzed (N=365); n=number of plasma LY2216684 concentration observations. The sum of the individual 'n' values for each dose group does not equal 365 since the same participant could have received various doses during his/her participation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LY2216684Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of LY22166846 mg LY221668412.3 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 8.55
LY2216684Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of LY22166849 mg LY221668418.2 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 13.6
LY2216684Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of LY221668412 mg LY221668426.0 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 17.3
LY2216684Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of LY221668418 mg LY221668440.0 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 25.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026