Femur Fracture, Humerus Fracture, Tibia Fracture
Conditions
Keywords
Angular stable locking system, Handling test, Complications
Brief summary
In many cases, the existing locking bolts and screws in intramedullary nails do not provide sufficient stability. Due to the play between screw and nail, the reduction can be lost and the instability can result in malunions, nonunions, or pseudoarthrosis. Consequently, secondary angular fracture dislocation (defined as a difference of the angle of 10° or more from the post-operative to the follow-up x-rays) can be observed in approximately 30% of patients after conventional intramedullary nailing of proximal third tibial fractures and in approximately 0-2% in patients with distal third tibial fractures. Therefore, an Angular Stable Locking System for Intramedullary Nails (ASLS) was developed to reduce the risk of secondary loss of reduction by providing axial and angular stability. ASLS provides angular stable fixation between nails and screws with resorbable sleeves used as dowels in the nail locking holes. The present study evaluates the handling of ASLS and the surgeon's compliance as well as any complications occurring during the baseline and the follow-up period in patients with proximal and distal tibial, femoral and humeral fractures treated with intramedullary nails. Furthermore, the relationship of any occurred complications to ASLS will be assessed.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Synthes Inc.
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation
Study design
Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* The patient is ≥ 18 years old * One of the following bones is fractured so that the fracture is affecting the proximal or the distal third of the bone without affecting the joint surface: Humerus, Femur, Tibia * The fracture is fixed with one of the following cannulated implants Humerus: Expert HN, Expert PHN. Femur: Expert LFN, Expert RAFN, CFN, DFN, AFN. Tibia: Expert TN, CTN. * The patient is willing and able to participate in the study follow-up according to the CIP. * The patient is able to understand and read local language at elementary level. * The patient is willing and able to give written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria
* The patient is legally incompetent. * Preexistent malunion or nonunion of the bone that is planned to be treated with ASLS. * The patient suffers from a polytrauma (multiple injuries, whereof one or the combination of several injuries is life-threatening). * The patient suffers from active malignancy. * The patient is affected by drug or alcohol abuse. * The patient has participated in any other device or drug related clinical trial within the previous month.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Surgeon's compliance and handling-oriented questionnaire | During surgery |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| General pain and pain at fracture site assessed by VAS | 6 months |
| Walking ability in patients with femoral or tibial fractures using the Parker mobility score | 6 months |
| Rate of Complications | 6 months |
Countries
Austria, Germany
Outcome results
None listed