Skip to content

Effect of Milnacipran on Pain Processing and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation Patterns in Patients With Fibromyalgia

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00793520
Enrollment
2
Registered
2008-11-19
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2010-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Keywords

fibromyalgia, milnacipran, Forest Laboratories

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of milnacipran on how the brain processes pain in patients with fibromyalgia and to assess the relationship between this effect and brain activation patterns during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Interventions

DRUGMilnacipran

Twice daily oral administration of Milnacipran for 5 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo

Twice daily oral administration of placebo for 5 weeks.

Sponsors

Forest Laboratories
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of fibromyalgia defined by 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria * Visual analog pain score between 40 and 90 mm * Right-hand dominance

Exclusion criteria

* Suicidal risk * Substance Abuse * Pulmonary dysfunction * Renal impairment * Active cardiac disease * Autoimmune disease * Uncontrolled narrow-angle glaucoma * Active liver disease * Cancer * Active peptic ulcer disease or a history of inflammatory bowel disease or celiac sprue * Unstable endocrine disease * Prostatic enlargement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Medium Pressure Pain Threshold From Baseline to End of Treatment.Week 0, 5, 7 and 12Pain intensity is rated using the Gracely Box Scale, where 0 is no pain sensation and 20 is extremely intense. Painful blunt pressure is applied to the thumbnail of the patient's left hand. A software system will determine medium(rated as 7 or 8) and high pain (rated as 13 or 14) thresholds at baseline, week 5 and at a second baseline at week 7 and week 12.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect From Baseline to End of Treatment.Weeks 0, 5, 7 and 12DNIC is evaluated using a conditioning stimulus and a test stimulus. Painful blunt pressure is applied to the thumbnail of the patient's left hand for 30 sec. Patient rates pain experienced on numerical scale of 0(no pain) to 100(worst pain) at 10, 20 & 30 sec. This is repeated 3 times and a mean pain score is calculated. 5 minutes following test stimulus, patient's right hand is immersed in 12C water at 30 sec test stimulus is reapplied and a 2nd mean pain score is calculated. The difference in mean pain rating before and after conditioning stimulus indicates presence and magnitude of DNIC

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment period was from November 2008 to April 2009 at one university location.

Pre-assignment details

Of the five enrolled patients, only two received double-blind study medication due to equipment failure at the study site.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Milnacipran to Placebo
Twice daily oral administration of milnacipran for 5 weeks, placebo for 2 weeks, and crossover to placebo for 5 weeks.
1
Placebo to Placebo
Twice daily oral administration of placebo for 5 weeks, placebo for 2 weeks, and crossover to milnacipran for 5 weeks.
1
Total2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo to PlaceboMilnacipran to PlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age Continuous48 years37 years42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.78
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 11 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Medium Pressure Pain Threshold From Baseline to End of Treatment.

Pain intensity is rated using the Gracely Box Scale, where 0 is no pain sensation and 20 is extremely intense. Painful blunt pressure is applied to the thumbnail of the patient's left hand. A software system will determine medium(rated as 7 or 8) and high pain (rated as 13 or 14) thresholds at baseline, week 5 and at a second baseline at week 7 and week 12.

Time frame: Week 0, 5, 7 and 12

Secondary

Change in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect From Baseline to End of Treatment.

DNIC is evaluated using a conditioning stimulus and a test stimulus. Painful blunt pressure is applied to the thumbnail of the patient's left hand for 30 sec. Patient rates pain experienced on numerical scale of 0(no pain) to 100(worst pain) at 10, 20 & 30 sec. This is repeated 3 times and a mean pain score is calculated. 5 minutes following test stimulus, patient's right hand is immersed in 12C water at 30 sec test stimulus is reapplied and a 2nd mean pain score is calculated. The difference in mean pain rating before and after conditioning stimulus indicates presence and magnitude of DNIC

Time frame: Weeks 0, 5, 7 and 12

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026