Skip to content

Non-acute Coronary occlusIon Treated By Everolimus ELuting Stent

Randomized Comparison Between Sirolimus-eluting and Everolimus-eluting Coronary Stents in Chronic Coronary Occlusions

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00793221
Acronym
CIBELES
Enrollment
207
Registered
2008-11-19
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Occlusion, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Keywords

Coronary stent., Restenosis., Coronary artery disease., Chronic total occlusion.

Brief summary

Chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) have an especially high risk of angiographic restenosis, and need for new revascularization procedures. Drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) have demonstrated to significantly reduce the risk of restenosis and new revascularization procedures in comparison with bare-metal stents. Most data on the efficacy of DES come from the sirolimus-eluting coronary stent Cypher (Cordis corp.), and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent Taxus (Boston Sci.), and the Cypher stent is the only DES that has been randomly tested in CTO. Among second-generation DES, everolimus-eluting stent (EES) has shown excellent angiographic and clinical results, but this DES has not been studied in unfavourable scenario (such as CTO). The aim of the CIBELES trial is to demonstrate the hypothesis that EES are equally effective in comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of CTO, in terms of angiographic efficacy considered as in-stent late lumen loss.

Interventions

DEVICEImplantation of sirolimus-eluting coronary stent

Implantation of sirolimus-eluting coronary stent after dilatation of the coronary occlusion

DEVICEImplantation of everolimus-eluting coronary stent

Implantation of everolimus-eluting coronary stent after dilatation of the coronary occlusion

Sponsors

Raul Moreno
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients ≥ 18 year-old. * A total occlusion (TIMI 0-1) with an estimated time of occlusion \> 2 weeks. * Symptomatic or silent ischaemia, or viable myocardium. * The occlusion is suitable for percutaneous coronary intervention. * The guidewire has crossed the occlusion, and the occlusion has been dilated with balloon or other device.

Exclusion criteria

* Acute myocardial infarction in the myocardial area supplied by the target vessel within 2 weeks before the inclusion in the study. * The lesion can not be crossed with the guidewire and balloon angioplasty. * The vessel has been previously treated percutaneously. * The lesion is not suitable for a 2.25-3.5 coronary stent implantation. * The patient is not willing to undergo an angiographic follow-up. * The patient has contraindications for prolonged double (aspirin plus clopidogrel) anti-platelet therapy (e.g. allergy to aspirin, need for chronic oral anti-coagulation, or scheduled surgical intervention within 12 months. * Pregnancy or absence of pregnancy test in women of childbearing age. * Chronic renal failure (creatinine plasmatic values \> 3.0 mg/dl). * Plasmatic platelet count \< 100.000 mm-3 or \> 700.000 mm-3. * The patient has a severe non-cardiac disease that limits his/her life expectancy to \< 1 year. * The patient is currently included in other randomized trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
In-stent late lumen loss at 9-month angiographic follow-up9 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Angiographic: rate of binary angiographic restenosis, rate of vessel re-occlusion, and in-segment late loss, at 9 months9 and 12 months
Clinical: death, myocardial infarction, new revascularization, and angina status at 1 year.9 and 12 months

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026