Skip to content

Effectiveness of Ergonomic Intervention

Effectiveness of an Ergonomic Intervention on Work-Related Posture and Low Back Pain in Video Display Terminal Operators: a 3 Year Cross-Over Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00791596
Enrollment
200
Registered
2008-11-14
Start date
2005-01-31
Completion date
2007-12-31
Last updated
2008-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain, Lower Extremity, Neck Pain, Upper Extremity

Keywords

Ergonomic intervention, Musculoskeletal disorders, Low back pain, Posture, Video display terminal

Brief summary

This Research study aims to investigate the long term effectiveness of a workstation ergonomic intervention for work-related posture and low back pain (LBP) of Video Display Terminal (VDT) workers

Detailed description

A non-randomized, crossover trial design was used with follow-up repeated 6, 12, and 30 months from baseline in the first intervention period and then beginning at 6 months following the crossover. The administrative offices in the two main buildings of the town hall of Forlì, Italy. The study population was composed of 400 employees, who used VDTs for at least 20 hours a week, of whom we randomly selected 100 participants from each building. Of the 200 initial participants, 153 completed the study; the dropouts were due to illness/injury or maternity. Participants were assigned to intervention or control during the first period and then crossed over after a 30-month washout. The intervention used in this investigation was an ergonomic adjustment of the VDT workstation design. Our study showed that the workstation ergonomic adjustment improved work-related posture and in reducing LBP in VDT operators among subjects who received the intervention both in the first period and in the crossover, and maintained these positive effects for at least 30 months.

Interventions

The intervention used in this investigation was an ergonomic adjustment of the VDT workstation design

Sponsors

University of Bologna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The study population was composed of 400 employees, who used VDTs for at least 20 hours a week

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects were excluded if pregnant or had a medical history of serious injury, spinal surgery, malignant pathology, or severe disability

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
R.E.B.A. (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) methodBaseline, 6 months, 12 months, 30 months, 36 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain Drawing with a Visual Analogue ScaleBaseline, 6 months, 12 months, 30 months, 36 months

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026