Skip to content

Exposure, D-Cycloserine Enhancement, and Genetic Modulators in Panic Disorder

Exposure, D-Cycloserine Enhancement, and Genetic Modulators in Panic Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00790868
Acronym
DCSPanic
Enrollment
180
Registered
2008-11-14
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2018-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Panic Disorder

Keywords

Panic Disorder, Anxiety, D-cycloserine, DCS, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, CBT

Brief summary

This is a 5-year double blind, randomized, controlled, trial conducted at three treatment sites, aimed at showing the acute and longer-term effects of DCS augmentation of exposure-based CBT for panic disorder relative to placebo augmentation. By demonstrating that DCS can enhance the results of even a brief treatment strategy, the investigators are seeking to validate an approach that fits well with the practice limitations and applications of CBT in effectiveness studies.

Detailed description

In this application, the investigators propose to further validate and expand upon one of the apparent striking successes of translational research. Specifically, basic research on the neural circuitry underlying fear extinction led to the examination of d-cycloserine (DCS), a partial agonist of the NMDA receptor in the amygdala, as an agent capable of enhancing extinction learning (Davis et al., 2006; Davis et al., in press). Following successful validation of this strategy in the animal laboratory (see Ledgerwood et al., 2005; Richardson et al., 2004), Ressler et al. (2004) showed that single doses of d-cycloserine (DCS) could enhance extinction in a human exposure paradigm for height phobic adults. This exciting initial finding was replicated by this research team for the treatment of social anxiety disorder (Hofmann et al., 2006), as well as an initial pilot study of the treatment of panic disorder (Tolin et al., 2006). As discussed by Anderson and Insel (2006), these findings have the potential to foster significant advances in the treatment of anxiety disorders. The present study represents the further application of DCS for augmenting the effects of exposure-based cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT), now applied to the treatment of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. In the current application, the investigators propose a five-year study to show the acute and longer-term effects of DCS augmentation of exposure-based CBT relative to placebo augmentation. This study is noteworthy for the use of a brief treatment strategy that has been shown to be successful in previous trials (e.g., Clark et al., 1999; Roy-Byrne et al., 2005) and has served as the basis for the DCS augmentation effect seen in a pilot study for this application. By demonstrating that DCS can enhance the results of even a brief treatment strategy, the investigators are seeking to validate an approach that fits well with the practice limitations and applications of CBT in effectiveness studies (e.g., Katon et al., 2006; Roy-Byrne et al. 2005). Furthermore, by studying the genetic predictors of the overall response to CBT, and DCS augmentation in particular, the investigators hope to further elucidate the nature of DCS augmentation and the selection of particularly responsive subgroups of patients in need. This agenda is in accords with the ultimate goal of personalized therapy: identifying individual patterns of pathophysiology that indicate which pharmacological or behavioral treatment will be most useful for any individual patient (Anderson & Insel, 2006, p. 320). The study design is a double blind, randomized, controlled, trial conducted at three treatment sites. Patient with panic disorder will randomly receive DCS or placebo 1 hour prior to sessions 3-5 of a 5-session CBT protocol that includes 2 additional booster sessions over the course of follow-up. Patients will be enrolled over 5 years with the identical treatment protocol followed at each of the sites. Sites will nonetheless differ with respect to study management and analysis procedures.

Interventions

DRUGd-cycloserine

50mg

DRUGplacebo

50mg

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Boston University Charles River Campus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female outpatients \> 18 years of age with a primary psychiatric diagnosis of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia * CGI-severity score of 4 or higher * Physical examination and laboratory findings without clinically significant abnormalities * Off concurrent psychotropic medication for at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of randomized treatment, OR stable on current medication for a minimum of 6 weeks and willing to maintain a stable dose * Willingness and ability to comply with the requirements of the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

* Agoraphobia sufficiently severe as to limit patient's ability to travel to and participate in weekly sessions Posttraumatic stress disorder, substance use disorder, eating disorder, or organic mental disorder within the past 6 months * Lifetime history of psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, or developmental disorder * Significant suicidal ideation or suicidal behaviors within the past 6 months * Significant personality dysfunction likely to interfere with study participation * Serious medical illness or instability for which hospitalization may be likely within the next year * Patients with a current or past history of seizures (other than febrile seizures in childhood) * Pregnant women, lactating women, and women of childbearing potential who are not using medically accepted forms of contraception * Concurrent psychotherapy initiated within 3 months of baseline, or ongoing psychotherapy of any duration directed specifically toward treatment of the panic disorder other than general supportive therapy initiated at least 3 months prior to study * Prior adequate trial of CBT for panic disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)baseline, mid-TX, post-TX, follow-up visits 1-4The percent change in PDSS score from baseline to the relevant assessment points is the continuous primary outcome measure. The PDSS consists of seven items, each rated on a 0 to 4 scale (0 denoting none, and higher ratings reflecting greater degrees of symptom severity; for a possible range in scores from 0 to 28). In the tabular data below we present the total scores (sum of items).
Remission StatusPre-treatment, Post-Treatment, and each follow-up sessionsRemission status will be used as the primary categorical outcome variable. The CGI-S was used in determining whether patients met the CGI-S of 1 or 2 component of the remission status criteria (i.e., zero panic attacks and CGI-S of 1 or 2 at endpoint). No values are missing because remission must be confirmed; missing status is assigned to disorder status. Hence results are for the full randomized sample.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depression SeverityBaseline, Tx Endpoint, Each of 4 follow-up assessmentsDepression severity was assessed with the MADRS, with scores ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater depression.
Quality of Life RatingsBaseline, Tx Endpoint, Each of 4 follow-up assessmentsQuality of life as assessed by the Q-LES-Q. Scores range from 14-70 for total raw score, higher scores indicate higher quality of life ratings.
Role FunctioningBaseline, Tx Endpoint, Each of 4 follow-up assessmentsLIFE-RIFT. For this clinician-rated measure, total scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater impairment

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited and enrolled at Boston University (n = 68), the Institute of Living in Hartford, Connecticut (n = 59), and a combined site of Massachusetts General Hospital and Rush University Medical Center (n = 53). Results presented here are for all sites.

Pre-assignment details

293 individuals completed baseline evaluations. Of these, 98 were deemed ineligible (e.g., other primary diagnosis, medication exclusion) at the initial screening visit. An additional 15 participants were not randomized due to withdrawal (n = 4), lost to follow-up (n = 10), and changes to medication (n = 1). 180 participants were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
D-cycloserine
DCS-augmented CBT D-cycloserine: 50mg
88
Placebo
Placebo-augmented CBT Placebo: 50mg
92
Total180

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up212
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject45

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicD-cycloserinePlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
85 Participants90 Participants175 Participants
Age, Continuous35.75 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.59
35.18 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.84
35.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants12 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
81 Participants79 Participants160 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
81 Participants85 Participants166 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
Boston University
33 Participants35 Participants68 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
Institute of Living in Hartford, Connecticut
29 Participants30 Participants59 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
Massachusetts General Hospital/Rush
26 Participants27 Participants53 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants58 Participants107 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
39 Participants34 Participants73 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 880 / 92
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 8818 / 92
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 881 / 92

Outcome results

Primary

Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)

The percent change in PDSS score from baseline to the relevant assessment points is the continuous primary outcome measure. The PDSS consists of seven items, each rated on a 0 to 4 scale (0 denoting none, and higher ratings reflecting greater degrees of symptom severity; for a possible range in scores from 0 to 28). In the tabular data below we present the total scores (sum of items).

Time frame: baseline, mid-TX, post-TX, follow-up visits 1-4

Population: Seventeen subjects out of 92 (five during treatment and 12 during follow-up, 20% total) in the control group compared to six out of 88 (four during treatment and two during follow-up, 10% total) in the DCS group dropped out.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
D-cycloserinePanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)Baseline13.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
D-cycloserinePanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)TX Endpoint5.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.52
D-cycloserinePanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)Follow-Up 14.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.82
D-cycloserinePanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)Follow-Up 24.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
D-cycloserinePanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)Follow-Up 34.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.76
D-cycloserinePanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)Follow-Up 43.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.44
D-cycloserinePanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)TX Midpoint7.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.92
PlaceboPanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)Follow-Up 34.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.07
PlaceboPanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)Follow-Up 43.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.78
PlaceboPanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)TX Endpoint6.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.63
PlaceboPanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)Baseline13.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.39
PlaceboPanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)Follow-Up 15.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.36
PlaceboPanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)TX Midpoint8.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.19
PlaceboPanic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)Follow-Up 24.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.03
Primary

Remission Status

Remission status will be used as the primary categorical outcome variable. The CGI-S was used in determining whether patients met the CGI-S of 1 or 2 component of the remission status criteria (i.e., zero panic attacks and CGI-S of 1 or 2 at endpoint). No values are missing because remission must be confirmed; missing status is assigned to disorder status. Hence results are for the full randomized sample.

Time frame: Pre-treatment, Post-Treatment, and each follow-up sessions

Population: Full sample of 180 randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
D-cycloserineRemission StatusFollow Up-247 Participants
D-cycloserineRemission StatusFollow Up-348 Participants
D-cycloserineRemission StatusMid-Treatment8 Participants
D-cycloserineRemission StatusTx Endpoint23 Participants
D-cycloserineRemission StatusFollow Up-142 Participants
D-cycloserineRemission StatusFollow Up-454 Participants
PlaceboRemission StatusFollow Up-134 Participants
PlaceboRemission StatusFollow Up-249 Participants
PlaceboRemission StatusTx Endpoint26 Participants
PlaceboRemission StatusFollow Up-352 Participants
PlaceboRemission StatusFollow Up-463 Participants
PlaceboRemission StatusMid-Treatment4 Participants
Secondary

Depression Severity

Depression severity was assessed with the MADRS, with scores ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater depression.

Time frame: Baseline, Tx Endpoint, Each of 4 follow-up assessments

Population: Randomized participants with panic disorder

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
D-cycloserineDepression SeverityFollow Up-17.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
D-cycloserineDepression SeverityTreatment Endpoint6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
D-cycloserineDepression SeverityFollow Up-27.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
D-cycloserineDepression SeverityFollow Up-37.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
D-cycloserineDepression SeverityFollow Up-46.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
D-cycloserineDepression SeverityBaseline11.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
PlaceboDepression SeverityFollow Up-46.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
PlaceboDepression SeverityFollow Up-36.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
PlaceboDepression SeverityTreatment Endpoint7.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
PlaceboDepression SeverityFollow Up-18.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
PlaceboDepression SeverityBaseline11.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.8
PlaceboDepression SeverityFollow Up-27.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
Secondary

Quality of Life Ratings

Quality of life as assessed by the Q-LES-Q. Scores range from 14-70 for total raw score, higher scores indicate higher quality of life ratings.

Time frame: Baseline, Tx Endpoint, Each of 4 follow-up assessments

Population: Randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
D-cycloserineQuality of Life RatingsFollow Up-455.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
D-cycloserineQuality of Life RatingsBaseline47.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
D-cycloserineQuality of Life RatingsTX - Endpoint54.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
D-cycloserineQuality of Life RatingsFollow Up-153.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
D-cycloserineQuality of Life RatingsFollow Up-254.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
D-cycloserineQuality of Life RatingsFollow Up-354.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
PlaceboQuality of Life RatingsFollow Up-253.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
PlaceboQuality of Life RatingsFollow Up-454.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
PlaceboQuality of Life RatingsFollow Up-152.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
PlaceboQuality of Life RatingsBaseline47.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
PlaceboQuality of Life RatingsFollow Up-355.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
PlaceboQuality of Life RatingsTX - Endpoint52.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Secondary

Role Functioning

LIFE-RIFT. For this clinician-rated measure, total scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater impairment

Time frame: Baseline, Tx Endpoint, Each of 4 follow-up assessments

Population: Randomized sample

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
D-cycloserineRole FunctioningFollow Up-47.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
D-cycloserineRole FunctioningBaseline9.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
D-cycloserineRole FunctioningFollow Up-17.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
D-cycloserineRole FunctioningTX - Endpoint7.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
D-cycloserineRole FunctioningFollow Up-37.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
D-cycloserineRole FunctioningFollow Up-27.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
PlaceboRole FunctioningFollow Up-47.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
PlaceboRole FunctioningFollow Up-17.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
PlaceboRole FunctioningFollow Up-27.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
PlaceboRole FunctioningFollow Up-36.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
PlaceboRole FunctioningBaseline9.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
PlaceboRole FunctioningTX - Endpoint8.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026