Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of RAD001 in Patients Aged 18 and Over With Angiomyolipoma Associated With Either Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) or Sporadic Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of RAD0001 in the Treatment of Angiomyolipoma in Patients With Either Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) or Sporadic Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00790400
Acronym
EXIST-2
Enrollment
118
Registered
2008-11-13
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2015-11-30
Last updated
2017-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)

Keywords

Angiomyolipoma, AML, Tuberous Sclerosis Complex, TSC, mTOR, RAD001, Mammalian Target of Rapamycin, Everolimus, Afinitor, SEGA, Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma, Seizures, Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), Tuberous sclerosis, benign tumors of brain, kidney, heart, eyes, lungs, skinTSC1, TSC2, hamaratin, tuberin, tumor growth suppressors, gyri, tubers, Sporadic Lymphangioleiomyomatosis., Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), rare lung disease

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of RAD001 in treating patients with Angiomyolipoma associated with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex or Sporadic Lymphangioleiomyomatosis.

Interventions

DRUGEverolimus (RAD001)

Everolimus is used in 5 mg strength tablets, blister-packed under aluminum foil in units of ten tablets and dosed on a daily basis. 10mg daily dosing throughout the trial.

Matching placebo was provided as a matching tablet and was also blister-packed under aluminum foil in units of ten.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or Female 18 years or older * Clinically definite diagnosis of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex according to the modified Gomez criteria or sporadic LAM (biopsy-proven or compatible chest CT scan) * Clinically definite diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma * At least one Angiomyolipoma of ≥ 3 cm in its longest diameter using CT or MRI * Females of child bearing potential must use birth control and have documentation of negative pregnancy test * Written informed consent according to local guidelines

Exclusion criteria

* Recent heart attack, cardiac related chest pain or stroke * Severely impaired lung function * Bleeding related to angiomyolipoma or embolization during 6 months prior to randomization * Clinically significant chylous ascites * Clinically significant hematological or hepatic abnormality * Severe liver dysfunction * Severe kidney dysfunction * Pregnancy or breast feeding * Current infection * History of organ transplant * Surgery within two months prior to study enrollment * Prior therapy with a medication in the same class as Everolimus * Recent use of an investigational drug * Bleeding diathesis or on oral anti-vitamin K medication * Uncontrolled high cholesterol * Uncontrolled diabetes * HIV * Inability to attend scheduled clinic visits * Patients with metal implants thus prohibiting MRI evaluations * Angiomyolipoma which requires surgery at the time of randomization * History of malignancy * Severe or uncontrolled medical conditions which would cause an unacceptable safety risk or compromise compliance with the protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angiomyolipoma Response Rate as Per Central Radiology ReviewFrom date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to 5.7 yearsAngiomyolipoma response defined as the combination of the following criteria: reduction in angiomyolipoma volume of ≥ 50% relative to baseline, where angiomyolipoma volume was sum of volumes of all target lesions identified at baseline, and with a confirmatory scan performed approximately 12 weeks later (no sooner than 8 weeks later); no new angiomyolipoma lesions ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter were identified; there were no kidney increases in volume \> 20% from nadir. The patient did not have any angiomyolipoma-related bleeding of ≥ grade 2. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the baseline means the latest value on or before starting everolimus.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology ReviewFrom date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to about 5.7 yearsTime to angiomyolipoma progression (TTAP) is defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documented angiomyolipoma progression. Angiomyolipoma progression was defined as one or more of the following: Increase from nadir of ≥ 25% in angiomyolipoma volume to value greater than baseline; the appearance of a new angiomyolipoma ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter; an increase from nadir of 20% or more in the volume of either kidney to a value greater than baseline; angiomyolipoma-related bleeding grade ≥ 2. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the time to angiomyolipoma progression is defined starting from the start of everolimus. The baseline means the latest value on or before starting everolimus.
Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline)From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to 5.7 yearsSkin lesion response rate in the double-blind period was determined only among patients with at least one skin lesion at baseline, and is the percentage of this group of patients with a best overall skin lesion response on the Physician's Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA) of either complete clinical response (CCR) or partial response (PR). A complete clinical response (CCR) requires a grading of 0 indicating the absence of disease (histological confirmation is not required). Grades 1, 2, and 3 constitute partial response, indicating improvement of at least 50 percent, but less than 100 percent improvement. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the baseline means the latest value on or before starting everolimus.
Percentage of Participants With Renal ImpairmentDay 1 up to 28 days after end of treatmentRenal Impairment was measured by glomerular filtration rate which was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Percentage of participants with renal impairment was reported. Severe renal impairment was defined as a GFR of \<30ml/min/1.73m2.
Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks 48 weeks, 60 weeks, 72 weeksBlood samples for biomarker assessment were collected immediately prior to study administration. On-treatment samples was compared to baseline samples with the change from baseline.
Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin)Prior to dosing at weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 48Cmin values collected prior to dose administration on the same study day and at 20-28 hours after previous dose, at steady state, and patient did not vomit within 4 hours of previous dose. Samples collected during the first 4 days of dosing were excluded from all analyses.
Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post-dose administration at Weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 48C2h values collected 1-3 hours after dose administration on the same study day, at steady state, and patient did not vomit between taking previous dose and blood collection. Samples collected during the first 4 days of dosing will be excluded from all analyses.
Time to Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma ResponseFrom date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to 5.7 yearsTime to angiomyolipoma response was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first documented angiomyolipoma response. Angiomyolipoma response defined as the combination of the following criteria: reduction in angiomyolipoma volume of ≥ 50% relative to baseline, where angiomyolipoma volume was sum of volumes of all target lesions identified at baseline, and with a confirmatory scan performed approximately 12 weeks later (no sooner than 8 weeks later); no new angiomyolipoma lesions ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter were identified; no kidney increases in volume \> 20% from nadir; no angiomyolipoma-related bleeding of ≥ grade 2. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the time to angiomyolipoma response is from the start of everolimus. The baseline in the response definition means the latest value on or before starting everolimus.
Duration of Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma ResponseFrom date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to about 5.7 yearsDuration of angiomyolipoma response was defined as the time from the date of the first documented angiomyolipoma response until the date of the first documented angiomyolipoma progression . Angiomyolipoma response was defined as the combination of the following criteria: reduction in angiomyolipoma volume of ≥ 50% relative to baseline, where angiomyolipoma volume was sum of volumes of all target lesions identified at baseline, and with a confirmatory scan performed approximately 12 weeks later (no sooner than 8 weeks later); no new angiomyolipoma lesions ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter were identified; there were no kidney increases in volume \> 20% from nadir. The patient did not have any angiomyolipoma-related bleeding of ≥ grade 2.
Duration of Skin Lesion Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Best Overall Skin Lesion Response of Complete Clinical Response (CCR) or Partial Response (PR)From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to about 5.7 yearsDuration of skin lesion response is defined as the time from the date of the first skin lesion response until the date of the first skin lesion progression, according to the PGA (physician's global assessment of clinical condition). A progression is when the disease is worse than at baseline evaluation by \>=25% or more.

Countries

Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A multicenter trial conducted at 24 sites in 11 countries. As the primary analysis of the core phase of the study favored everolimus over placebo, an open-label extension phase started: patients randomized in placebo were offered to switch on everolimus and those still receiving everolimus at the end of the core phase could continue the treatment.

Pre-assignment details

The trial had a 2:1 randomization in favor of the everolimus arm. 118 patients were randomized to the core phase of the study. 112 patients received everolimus during core and/or extension phase.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Everolimus
Study drug was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets.
79
Placebo
Placebo was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets.
39
Total118

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double-blind Period (Core Phase)Abnormal lab value (s)10
Double-blind Period (Core Phase)Administrative problems10
Double-blind Period (Core Phase)Adverse Event24
Double-blind Period (Core Phase)Death10
Double-blind Period (Core Phase)Progressive disease09
Double-blind Period (Core Phase)Protocol Violation10
Double-blind Period (Core Phase)Withdrawal by Subject10
Everolimus Period (Core or Extension)Abnormal lab value (s)10
Everolimus Period (Core or Extension)Administrative problems20
Everolimus Period (Core or Extension)Adverse Event90
Everolimus Period (Core or Extension)Death10
Everolimus Period (Core or Extension)Disease progression50
Everolimus Period (Core or Extension)Lost to Follow-up10
Everolimus Period (Core or Extension)New treatment20
Everolimus Period (Core or Extension)Protocol Violation10
Everolimus Period (Core or Extension)Withdrawal by Subject70

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEverolimusPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous32.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.37
31.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.64
32.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.12
Age, Customized
<30 years
35 Participants20 Participants55 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 30 years
44 Participants19 Participants63 Participants
Gender
Female
52 Participants26 Participants78 Participants
Gender
Male
27 Participants13 Participants40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
79 / 7933 / 335 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
28 / 7917 / 333 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Angiomyolipoma Response Rate as Per Central Radiology Review

Angiomyolipoma response defined as the combination of the following criteria: reduction in angiomyolipoma volume of ≥ 50% relative to baseline, where angiomyolipoma volume was sum of volumes of all target lesions identified at baseline, and with a confirmatory scan performed approximately 12 weeks later (no sooner than 8 weeks later); no new angiomyolipoma lesions ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter were identified; there were no kidney increases in volume \> 20% from nadir. The patient did not have any angiomyolipoma-related bleeding of ≥ grade 2. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the baseline means the latest value on or before starting everolimus.

Time frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to 5.7 years

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) is defined according to the Intention-to-Treat principle and consists of all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Angiomyolipoma Response Rate as Per Central Radiology Review41.8 Percentage of Participants
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Angiomyolipoma Response Rate as Per Central Radiology Review0 Percentage of Participants
Everolimus (Core and/or Extension Period)Angiomyolipoma Response Rate as Per Central Radiology Review58.0 Percentage of Participants
p-value: <0.0001Clopper-Pearson
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker

Blood samples for biomarker assessment were collected immediately prior to study administration. On-treatment samples was compared to baseline samples with the change from baseline.

Time frame: 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks 48 weeks, 60 weeks, 72 weeks

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) is defined according to the Intention-to-Treat principle and consists of all randomized patients. The 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 24 (n:53, 29)31.1 pg/mLStandard Deviation 75.83
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 48 (n:16, 8)55.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 80.31
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 12 (n:56, 29)43.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 60.62
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 60 (n:0, 1)NA pg/mL
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 36 (n:26, 18)18.0 pg/mLStandard Deviation 45.07
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 72 (n:0, 1)NA pg/mL
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 4 (n:56, 28)38.7 pg/mLStandard Deviation 141.89
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 72 (n:0, 1)-6.1 pg/mL
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 4 (n:56, 28)17.6 pg/mLStandard Deviation 57.51
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 12 (n:56, 29)-6.1 pg/mLStandard Deviation 46.28
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 24 (n:53, 29)-4.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 44.76
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 36 (n:26, 18)5.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 24.01
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 48 (n:16, 8)3.1 pg/mLStandard Deviation 34.55
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) MarkerWeek 60 (n:0, 1)-4.12 pg/mL
Secondary

Duration of Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma Response

Duration of angiomyolipoma response was defined as the time from the date of the first documented angiomyolipoma response until the date of the first documented angiomyolipoma progression . Angiomyolipoma response was defined as the combination of the following criteria: reduction in angiomyolipoma volume of ≥ 50% relative to baseline, where angiomyolipoma volume was sum of volumes of all target lesions identified at baseline, and with a confirmatory scan performed approximately 12 weeks later (no sooner than 8 weeks later); no new angiomyolipoma lesions ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter were identified; there were no kidney increases in volume \> 20% from nadir. The patient did not have any angiomyolipoma-related bleeding of ≥ grade 2.

Time frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to about 5.7 years

Population: The analysis was performed on the Full analysis Set for patients in Everolimus arm and who experienced an angiomyolipoma response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Duration of Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma ResponseNA months
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Duration of Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma ResponseNA months
Secondary

Duration of Skin Lesion Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Best Overall Skin Lesion Response of Complete Clinical Response (CCR) or Partial Response (PR)

Duration of skin lesion response is defined as the time from the date of the first skin lesion response until the date of the first skin lesion progression, according to the PGA (physician's global assessment of clinical condition). A progression is when the disease is worse than at baseline evaluation by \>=25% or more.

Time frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to about 5.7 years

Population: The analysis was performed on the Full analysis Set for patients in Everolimus arm and who experienced a best overall skin lesion response CCR or PR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Duration of Skin Lesion Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Best Overall Skin Lesion Response of Complete Clinical Response (CCR) or Partial Response (PR)NA months
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Duration of Skin Lesion Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Best Overall Skin Lesion Response of Complete Clinical Response (CCR) or Partial Response (PR)NA months
Secondary

Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose

C2h values collected 1-3 hours after dose administration on the same study day, at steady state, and patient did not vomit between taking previous dose and blood collection. Samples collected during the first 4 days of dosing will be excluded from all analyses.

Time frame: 2 hours post-dose administration at Weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 48

Population: The analysis was performed in the Safety Set population for patients treated only with Everolimus and with a confirmed PK sample.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post dose administration at Week 2 (n:55)33.38 ng/mLStandard Deviation 15.66
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post dose administration at Week 4 (n:49)30.89 ng/mLStandard Deviation 14.96
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post dose administration at Week 12 (n:56)34.48 ng/mLStandard Deviation 15.1
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post dose administration at Week 24 (n:50)39.27 ng/mLStandard Deviation 22.25
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post dose administration at Week 48 (n:14)33.20 ng/mLStandard Deviation 18.45
Secondary

Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin)

Cmin values collected prior to dose administration on the same study day and at 20-28 hours after previous dose, at steady state, and patient did not vomit within 4 hours of previous dose. Samples collected during the first 4 days of dosing were excluded from all analyses.

Time frame: Prior to dosing at weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 48

Population: The analysis was performed in the Safety Set population for patients treated only with Everolimus and with a confirmed PK sample.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin)Prior to dosing at Week 2 (n:43)7.63 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4.32
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin)Prior to dosing Week 4 (n:44)7.72 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4.35
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin)Prior to dosing Week 12 (n:49)8.79 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6.75
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin)Prior to dosing Week 24 (n:46)9.37 ng/mLStandard Deviation 8.83
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin)Prior to dosing Week 48 (n:15)11.49 ng/mLStandard Deviation 12.01
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment

Renal Impairment was measured by glomerular filtration rate which was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Percentage of participants with renal impairment was reported. Severe renal impairment was defined as a GFR of \<30ml/min/1.73m2.

Time frame: Day 1 up to 28 days after end of treatment

Population: Safety set consists of all patients who received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug with a valid post-baseline assessment. For the everolimus (core/extension) treatment arm, patients received at least 1 dose of everolimus with a valid post-baseline assessment, where baseline was defined as the assessment just before start of everolimus.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Renal ImpairmentGlomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73m^22.5 Percentage of Participants
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Renal ImpairmentGlomerular filtration rate≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m^297.5 Percentage of Participants
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Renal ImpairmentGlomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73m^27.7 Percentage of Participants
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Renal ImpairmentGlomerular filtration rate≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m^292.3 Percentage of Participants
Everolimus (Core and/or Extension Period)Percentage of Participants With Renal ImpairmentGlomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73m^27.1 Percentage of Participants
Everolimus (Core and/or Extension Period)Percentage of Participants With Renal ImpairmentGlomerular filtration rate≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m^292.9 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline)

Skin lesion response rate in the double-blind period was determined only among patients with at least one skin lesion at baseline, and is the percentage of this group of patients with a best overall skin lesion response on the Physician's Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA) of either complete clinical response (CCR) or partial response (PR). A complete clinical response (CCR) requires a grading of 0 indicating the absence of disease (histological confirmation is not required). Grades 1, 2, and 3 constitute partial response, indicating improvement of at least 50 percent, but less than 100 percent improvement. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the baseline means the latest value on or before starting everolimus.

Time frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to 5.7 years

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) is defined according to the Intention-to-Treat principle and consists of all randomized patients. Only patients with at least one skin lesion at baseline are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline)26 Percentage of participants
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline)0 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (Core and/or Extension Period)Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline)68.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology Review

Time to angiomyolipoma progression (TTAP) is defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documented angiomyolipoma progression. Angiomyolipoma progression was defined as one or more of the following: Increase from nadir of ≥ 25% in angiomyolipoma volume to value greater than baseline; the appearance of a new angiomyolipoma ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter; an increase from nadir of 20% or more in the volume of either kidney to a value greater than baseline; angiomyolipoma-related bleeding grade ≥ 2. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the time to angiomyolipoma progression is defined starting from the start of everolimus. The baseline means the latest value on or before starting everolimus.

Time frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to about 5.7 years

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) is defined according to the Intention-to-Treat principle and consists of all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology ReviewNA months
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology Review11.37 months
Everolimus (Core and/or Extension Period)Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology ReviewNA months
Secondary

Time to Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma Response

Time to angiomyolipoma response was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first documented angiomyolipoma response. Angiomyolipoma response defined as the combination of the following criteria: reduction in angiomyolipoma volume of ≥ 50% relative to baseline, where angiomyolipoma volume was sum of volumes of all target lesions identified at baseline, and with a confirmatory scan performed approximately 12 weeks later (no sooner than 8 weeks later); no new angiomyolipoma lesions ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter were identified; no kidney increases in volume \> 20% from nadir; no angiomyolipoma-related bleeding of ≥ grade 2. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the time to angiomyolipoma response is from the start of everolimus. The baseline in the response definition means the latest value on or before starting everolimus.

Time frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to 5.7 years

Population: The analysis was performed on the Full analysis Set for patients in Everolimus arm and who experienced an angiomyolipoma response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus Randomized (Core Period)Time to Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma Response2.86 months
Placebo Randomized (Core Period)Time to Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma Response2.89 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026