Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)
Conditions
Keywords
Angiomyolipoma, AML, Tuberous Sclerosis Complex, TSC, mTOR, RAD001, Mammalian Target of Rapamycin, Everolimus, Afinitor, SEGA, Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma, Seizures, Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), Tuberous sclerosis, benign tumors of brain, kidney, heart, eyes, lungs, skinTSC1, TSC2, hamaratin, tuberin, tumor growth suppressors, gyri, tubers, Sporadic Lymphangioleiomyomatosis., Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), rare lung disease
Brief summary
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of RAD001 in treating patients with Angiomyolipoma associated with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex or Sporadic Lymphangioleiomyomatosis.
Interventions
Everolimus is used in 5 mg strength tablets, blister-packed under aluminum foil in units of ten tablets and dosed on a daily basis. 10mg daily dosing throughout the trial.
Matching placebo was provided as a matching tablet and was also blister-packed under aluminum foil in units of ten.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or Female 18 years or older * Clinically definite diagnosis of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex according to the modified Gomez criteria or sporadic LAM (biopsy-proven or compatible chest CT scan) * Clinically definite diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma * At least one Angiomyolipoma of ≥ 3 cm in its longest diameter using CT or MRI * Females of child bearing potential must use birth control and have documentation of negative pregnancy test * Written informed consent according to local guidelines
Exclusion criteria
* Recent heart attack, cardiac related chest pain or stroke * Severely impaired lung function * Bleeding related to angiomyolipoma or embolization during 6 months prior to randomization * Clinically significant chylous ascites * Clinically significant hematological or hepatic abnormality * Severe liver dysfunction * Severe kidney dysfunction * Pregnancy or breast feeding * Current infection * History of organ transplant * Surgery within two months prior to study enrollment * Prior therapy with a medication in the same class as Everolimus * Recent use of an investigational drug * Bleeding diathesis or on oral anti-vitamin K medication * Uncontrolled high cholesterol * Uncontrolled diabetes * HIV * Inability to attend scheduled clinic visits * Patients with metal implants thus prohibiting MRI evaluations * Angiomyolipoma which requires surgery at the time of randomization * History of malignancy * Severe or uncontrolled medical conditions which would cause an unacceptable safety risk or compromise compliance with the protocol
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Angiomyolipoma Response Rate as Per Central Radiology Review | From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to 5.7 years | Angiomyolipoma response defined as the combination of the following criteria: reduction in angiomyolipoma volume of ≥ 50% relative to baseline, where angiomyolipoma volume was sum of volumes of all target lesions identified at baseline, and with a confirmatory scan performed approximately 12 weeks later (no sooner than 8 weeks later); no new angiomyolipoma lesions ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter were identified; there were no kidney increases in volume \> 20% from nadir. The patient did not have any angiomyolipoma-related bleeding of ≥ grade 2. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the baseline means the latest value on or before starting everolimus. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology Review | From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to about 5.7 years | Time to angiomyolipoma progression (TTAP) is defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documented angiomyolipoma progression. Angiomyolipoma progression was defined as one or more of the following: Increase from nadir of ≥ 25% in angiomyolipoma volume to value greater than baseline; the appearance of a new angiomyolipoma ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter; an increase from nadir of 20% or more in the volume of either kidney to a value greater than baseline; angiomyolipoma-related bleeding grade ≥ 2. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the time to angiomyolipoma progression is defined starting from the start of everolimus. The baseline means the latest value on or before starting everolimus. |
| Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline) | From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to 5.7 years | Skin lesion response rate in the double-blind period was determined only among patients with at least one skin lesion at baseline, and is the percentage of this group of patients with a best overall skin lesion response on the Physician's Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA) of either complete clinical response (CCR) or partial response (PR). A complete clinical response (CCR) requires a grading of 0 indicating the absence of disease (histological confirmation is not required). Grades 1, 2, and 3 constitute partial response, indicating improvement of at least 50 percent, but less than 100 percent improvement. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the baseline means the latest value on or before starting everolimus. |
| Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment | Day 1 up to 28 days after end of treatment | Renal Impairment was measured by glomerular filtration rate which was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Percentage of participants with renal impairment was reported. Severe renal impairment was defined as a GFR of \<30ml/min/1.73m2. |
| Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks 48 weeks, 60 weeks, 72 weeks | Blood samples for biomarker assessment were collected immediately prior to study administration. On-treatment samples was compared to baseline samples with the change from baseline. |
| Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) | Prior to dosing at weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 48 | Cmin values collected prior to dose administration on the same study day and at 20-28 hours after previous dose, at steady state, and patient did not vomit within 4 hours of previous dose. Samples collected during the first 4 days of dosing were excluded from all analyses. |
| Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose | 2 hours post-dose administration at Weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 48 | C2h values collected 1-3 hours after dose administration on the same study day, at steady state, and patient did not vomit between taking previous dose and blood collection. Samples collected during the first 4 days of dosing will be excluded from all analyses. |
| Time to Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma Response | From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to 5.7 years | Time to angiomyolipoma response was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first documented angiomyolipoma response. Angiomyolipoma response defined as the combination of the following criteria: reduction in angiomyolipoma volume of ≥ 50% relative to baseline, where angiomyolipoma volume was sum of volumes of all target lesions identified at baseline, and with a confirmatory scan performed approximately 12 weeks later (no sooner than 8 weeks later); no new angiomyolipoma lesions ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter were identified; no kidney increases in volume \> 20% from nadir; no angiomyolipoma-related bleeding of ≥ grade 2. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the time to angiomyolipoma response is from the start of everolimus. The baseline in the response definition means the latest value on or before starting everolimus. |
| Duration of Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma Response | From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to about 5.7 years | Duration of angiomyolipoma response was defined as the time from the date of the first documented angiomyolipoma response until the date of the first documented angiomyolipoma progression . Angiomyolipoma response was defined as the combination of the following criteria: reduction in angiomyolipoma volume of ≥ 50% relative to baseline, where angiomyolipoma volume was sum of volumes of all target lesions identified at baseline, and with a confirmatory scan performed approximately 12 weeks later (no sooner than 8 weeks later); no new angiomyolipoma lesions ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter were identified; there were no kidney increases in volume \> 20% from nadir. The patient did not have any angiomyolipoma-related bleeding of ≥ grade 2. |
| Duration of Skin Lesion Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Best Overall Skin Lesion Response of Complete Clinical Response (CCR) or Partial Response (PR) | From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to about 5.7 years | Duration of skin lesion response is defined as the time from the date of the first skin lesion response until the date of the first skin lesion progression, according to the PGA (physician's global assessment of clinical condition). A progression is when the disease is worse than at baseline evaluation by \>=25% or more. |
Countries
Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A multicenter trial conducted at 24 sites in 11 countries. As the primary analysis of the core phase of the study favored everolimus over placebo, an open-label extension phase started: patients randomized in placebo were offered to switch on everolimus and those still receiving everolimus at the end of the core phase could continue the treatment.
Pre-assignment details
The trial had a 2:1 randomization in favor of the everolimus arm. 118 patients were randomized to the core phase of the study. 112 patients received everolimus during core and/or extension phase.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Everolimus Study drug was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets. | 79 |
| Placebo Placebo was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets. | 39 |
| Total | 118 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double-blind Period (Core Phase) | Abnormal lab value (s) | 1 | 0 |
| Double-blind Period (Core Phase) | Administrative problems | 1 | 0 |
| Double-blind Period (Core Phase) | Adverse Event | 2 | 4 |
| Double-blind Period (Core Phase) | Death | 1 | 0 |
| Double-blind Period (Core Phase) | Progressive disease | 0 | 9 |
| Double-blind Period (Core Phase) | Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 |
| Double-blind Period (Core Phase) | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 |
| Everolimus Period (Core or Extension) | Abnormal lab value (s) | 1 | 0 |
| Everolimus Period (Core or Extension) | Administrative problems | 2 | 0 |
| Everolimus Period (Core or Extension) | Adverse Event | 9 | 0 |
| Everolimus Period (Core or Extension) | Death | 1 | 0 |
| Everolimus Period (Core or Extension) | Disease progression | 5 | 0 |
| Everolimus Period (Core or Extension) | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Everolimus Period (Core or Extension) | New treatment | 2 | 0 |
| Everolimus Period (Core or Extension) | Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 |
| Everolimus Period (Core or Extension) | Withdrawal by Subject | 7 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Everolimus | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 32.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.37 | 31.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.64 | 32.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.12 |
| Age, Customized <30 years | 35 Participants | 20 Participants | 55 Participants |
| Age, Customized ≥ 30 years | 44 Participants | 19 Participants | 63 Participants |
| Gender Female | 52 Participants | 26 Participants | 78 Participants |
| Gender Male | 27 Participants | 13 Participants | 40 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 79 / 79 | 33 / 33 | 5 / 6 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 28 / 79 | 17 / 33 | 3 / 6 |
Outcome results
Angiomyolipoma Response Rate as Per Central Radiology Review
Angiomyolipoma response defined as the combination of the following criteria: reduction in angiomyolipoma volume of ≥ 50% relative to baseline, where angiomyolipoma volume was sum of volumes of all target lesions identified at baseline, and with a confirmatory scan performed approximately 12 weeks later (no sooner than 8 weeks later); no new angiomyolipoma lesions ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter were identified; there were no kidney increases in volume \> 20% from nadir. The patient did not have any angiomyolipoma-related bleeding of ≥ grade 2. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the baseline means the latest value on or before starting everolimus.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to 5.7 years
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) is defined according to the Intention-to-Treat principle and consists of all randomized patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Angiomyolipoma Response Rate as Per Central Radiology Review | 41.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Angiomyolipoma Response Rate as Per Central Radiology Review | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Everolimus (Core and/or Extension Period) | Angiomyolipoma Response Rate as Per Central Radiology Review | 58.0 Percentage of Participants |
Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker
Blood samples for biomarker assessment were collected immediately prior to study administration. On-treatment samples was compared to baseline samples with the change from baseline.
Time frame: 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks 48 weeks, 60 weeks, 72 weeks
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) is defined according to the Intention-to-Treat principle and consists of all randomized patients. The 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each group, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 24 (n:53, 29) | 31.1 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 75.83 |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 48 (n:16, 8) | 55.3 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 80.31 |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 12 (n:56, 29) | 43.4 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 60.62 |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 60 (n:0, 1) | NA pg/mL | — |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 36 (n:26, 18) | 18.0 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 45.07 |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 72 (n:0, 1) | NA pg/mL | — |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 4 (n:56, 28) | 38.7 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 141.89 |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 72 (n:0, 1) | -6.1 pg/mL | — |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 4 (n:56, 28) | 17.6 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 57.51 |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 12 (n:56, 29) | -6.1 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 46.28 |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 24 (n:53, 29) | -4.3 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 44.76 |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 36 (n:26, 18) | 5.4 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 24.01 |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 48 (n:16, 8) | 3.1 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 34.55 |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules - Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Marker | Week 60 (n:0, 1) | -4.12 pg/mL | — |
Duration of Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma Response
Duration of angiomyolipoma response was defined as the time from the date of the first documented angiomyolipoma response until the date of the first documented angiomyolipoma progression . Angiomyolipoma response was defined as the combination of the following criteria: reduction in angiomyolipoma volume of ≥ 50% relative to baseline, where angiomyolipoma volume was sum of volumes of all target lesions identified at baseline, and with a confirmatory scan performed approximately 12 weeks later (no sooner than 8 weeks later); no new angiomyolipoma lesions ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter were identified; there were no kidney increases in volume \> 20% from nadir. The patient did not have any angiomyolipoma-related bleeding of ≥ grade 2.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to about 5.7 years
Population: The analysis was performed on the Full analysis Set for patients in Everolimus arm and who experienced an angiomyolipoma response.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Duration of Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma Response | NA months |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Duration of Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma Response | NA months |
Duration of Skin Lesion Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Best Overall Skin Lesion Response of Complete Clinical Response (CCR) or Partial Response (PR)
Duration of skin lesion response is defined as the time from the date of the first skin lesion response until the date of the first skin lesion progression, according to the PGA (physician's global assessment of clinical condition). A progression is when the disease is worse than at baseline evaluation by \>=25% or more.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to about 5.7 years
Population: The analysis was performed on the Full analysis Set for patients in Everolimus arm and who experienced a best overall skin lesion response CCR or PR.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Duration of Skin Lesion Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Best Overall Skin Lesion Response of Complete Clinical Response (CCR) or Partial Response (PR) | NA months |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Duration of Skin Lesion Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Best Overall Skin Lesion Response of Complete Clinical Response (CCR) or Partial Response (PR) | NA months |
Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose
C2h values collected 1-3 hours after dose administration on the same study day, at steady state, and patient did not vomit between taking previous dose and blood collection. Samples collected during the first 4 days of dosing will be excluded from all analyses.
Time frame: 2 hours post-dose administration at Weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 48
Population: The analysis was performed in the Safety Set population for patients treated only with Everolimus and with a confirmed PK sample.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose | 2 hours post dose administration at Week 2 (n:55) | 33.38 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 15.66 |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose | 2 hours post dose administration at Week 4 (n:49) | 30.89 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 14.96 |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose | 2 hours post dose administration at Week 12 (n:56) | 34.48 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 15.1 |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose | 2 hours post dose administration at Week 24 (n:50) | 39.27 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 22.25 |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentrations (C2h) at 2 Hours Post-dose | 2 hours post dose administration at Week 48 (n:14) | 33.20 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 18.45 |
Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin)
Cmin values collected prior to dose administration on the same study day and at 20-28 hours after previous dose, at steady state, and patient did not vomit within 4 hours of previous dose. Samples collected during the first 4 days of dosing were excluded from all analyses.
Time frame: Prior to dosing at weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 48
Population: The analysis was performed in the Safety Set population for patients treated only with Everolimus and with a confirmed PK sample.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) | Prior to dosing at Week 2 (n:43) | 7.63 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 4.32 |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) | Prior to dosing Week 4 (n:44) | 7.72 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 4.35 |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) | Prior to dosing Week 12 (n:49) | 8.79 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 6.75 |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) | Prior to dosing Week 24 (n:46) | 9.37 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 8.83 |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) | Prior to dosing Week 48 (n:15) | 11.49 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 12.01 |
Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment
Renal Impairment was measured by glomerular filtration rate which was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Percentage of participants with renal impairment was reported. Severe renal impairment was defined as a GFR of \<30ml/min/1.73m2.
Time frame: Day 1 up to 28 days after end of treatment
Population: Safety set consists of all patients who received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug with a valid post-baseline assessment. For the everolimus (core/extension) treatment arm, patients received at least 1 dose of everolimus with a valid post-baseline assessment, where baseline was defined as the assessment just before start of everolimus.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment | Glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73m^2 | 2.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment | Glomerular filtration rate≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m^2 | 97.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment | Glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73m^2 | 7.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment | Glomerular filtration rate≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m^2 | 92.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Everolimus (Core and/or Extension Period) | Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment | Glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73m^2 | 7.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Everolimus (Core and/or Extension Period) | Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment | Glomerular filtration rate≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m^2 | 92.9 Percentage of Participants |
Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline)
Skin lesion response rate in the double-blind period was determined only among patients with at least one skin lesion at baseline, and is the percentage of this group of patients with a best overall skin lesion response on the Physician's Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA) of either complete clinical response (CCR) or partial response (PR). A complete clinical response (CCR) requires a grading of 0 indicating the absence of disease (histological confirmation is not required). Grades 1, 2, and 3 constitute partial response, indicating improvement of at least 50 percent, but less than 100 percent improvement. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the baseline means the latest value on or before starting everolimus.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to 5.7 years
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) is defined according to the Intention-to-Treat principle and consists of all randomized patients. Only patients with at least one skin lesion at baseline are included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline) | 26 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (Core and/or Extension Period) | Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline) | 68.2 Percentage of participants |
Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology Review
Time to angiomyolipoma progression (TTAP) is defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documented angiomyolipoma progression. Angiomyolipoma progression was defined as one or more of the following: Increase from nadir of ≥ 25% in angiomyolipoma volume to value greater than baseline; the appearance of a new angiomyolipoma ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter; an increase from nadir of 20% or more in the volume of either kidney to a value greater than baseline; angiomyolipoma-related bleeding grade ≥ 2. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the time to angiomyolipoma progression is defined starting from the start of everolimus. The baseline means the latest value on or before starting everolimus.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to about 5.7 years
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) is defined according to the Intention-to-Treat principle and consists of all randomized patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology Review | NA months |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology Review | 11.37 months |
| Everolimus (Core and/or Extension Period) | Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology Review | NA months |
Time to Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma Response
Time to angiomyolipoma response was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first documented angiomyolipoma response. Angiomyolipoma response defined as the combination of the following criteria: reduction in angiomyolipoma volume of ≥ 50% relative to baseline, where angiomyolipoma volume was sum of volumes of all target lesions identified at baseline, and with a confirmatory scan performed approximately 12 weeks later (no sooner than 8 weeks later); no new angiomyolipoma lesions ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter were identified; no kidney increases in volume \> 20% from nadir; no angiomyolipoma-related bleeding of ≥ grade 2. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the time to angiomyolipoma response is from the start of everolimus. The baseline in the response definition means the latest value on or before starting everolimus.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or up to 5.7 years
Population: The analysis was performed on the Full analysis Set for patients in Everolimus arm and who experienced an angiomyolipoma response.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus Randomized (Core Period) | Time to Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma Response | 2.86 months |
| Placebo Randomized (Core Period) | Time to Angiomyolipoma Response - Only Everolimus Patients With Angiomyolipoma Response | 2.89 months |