Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma, Tuberous Sclerosis
Conditions
Keywords
SEGA, Tuberous Sclerosis, Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma, mTOR, RAD001, Mamalian Target Rapamycin, Everolimus, TSC
Brief summary
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Everolimus in treating patients with Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytomas associated with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex.
Interventions
Everolimus was formulated as tablets of 1.0-mg strength and was blisterpacked under aluminum foil in units of 10 tablets.
Placebo was provided as a matching tablet and was blisterpacked under aluminum foil in units of 10.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* All Ages * Definite diagnosis of Tuberous Sclerosis according to the modified Gomez criteria * At least one Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma of at least 1 cm in diameter * Evidence of SEGA worsening as compared to prior MRI scans * Females of child bearing potential must use birth control * Written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* SEGA related surgery is likely to be required in the opinion of the investigator * Recent heart attack, cardiac related chest pain or stroke * Severely impaired lung function * Severe liver dysfunction * Severe kidney dysfunction * Pregnancy or breast feeding * Current infection * History of organ transplant * Surgery within two months prior to study enrollment * Prior therapy with a medication in the same class as Everolimus * Uncontrolled high cholesterol * Uncontrolled diabetes * HIV * Patients with metal implants thus prohibiting MRI evaluations Other protocol-defined inclusion/
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytomas (SEGA) Response | End of core period (Week 48), and end of extension period (up to 4 years) | Participants were assessed for SEGA response, defined as 50% reduction from baseline in SEGA volume (where SEGA volume was the sum of the volumes of all target SEGA lesions identified at baseline, and confirmed with a second scan performed approximately 12 weeks later), no unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, no new SEGA lesions (≥ 1 cm in longest diameter), and no new or worsening hydrocephalus. Multi-phase brain MRI was utilized to identify SEGA lesions. SEGA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall status was SEGA response as determined by Independent Central Radiology Review. The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for determining time to SEGA response. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to SEGA Progression | Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years) | Time to SEGA progression was defined as time between randomisation to time to first SEGA progression. SEGA progression was defined as either one or more of the following criteria: 1. increase from nadir of ≥ 25% in SEGA volume to a value greater than baseline SEGA volume (where SEGA volume is the sum of the volumes of all target SEGA lesions identified at baseline, and nadir is the lowest SEGA volume obtained for the participant previously in the trial), 2. unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, 3. appearance of new SEGA lesion ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter, 4. new or worsening hydrocephalus. The median TTSP based on central radiology review was not reached in any treatment arms; Only 6 events of SEGA progressions were observed in the placebo group of core period. |
| Time to SEGA Response | Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years) | Participants were assessed for time to SEGA response, defined as 50% reduction from baseline in SEGA volume (where SEGA volume was the sum of the volumes of all target SEGA lesions identified at baseline, and confirmed with a second scan performed approximately 12 weeks later), no unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, no new SEGA lesions (≥ 1 cm in longest diameter), and no new or worsening hydrocephalus. Multi-phase brain MRI was utilised to identify SEGA lesions. SEGA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall status was SEGA response as determined by Independent Central Radiology Review. The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for determining time to SEGA response. |
| Duration of SEGA Response | Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years) | Duration of SEGA response was defined as time from the date of the first documented SEGA response until the date of the first documented SEGA progression. Duration of SEGA response was evaluated only for participants who achieved a SEGA response. The time to SEGA progression was censored if SEGA progression was not observed before the first to occur out of (i) analysis cut-off date (ii) the date when systemic anti-SEGA medication is started, (iii) the date of a SEGA-related surgery or (iv) the date of death. Since, no case of SEGA progression was observed in core study which resulted in censored duration of SEGA response. Only 5 SEGA responders experienced a SEGA progression in extension period. |
| Time to SEGA Worsening | Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years) | Time to SEGA worsening was defined as the time from the start of everolimus to date of the first SEGA worsening. SEGA worsening was defined as either; increase from nadir of ≥ 25% in SEGA volume or unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, or appearance of new SEGA lesion ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter, or new or worsening hydrocephalus. The median value was not reached in either treatment arm of core period as SEGA worsening was observed in less participants (everolimus - 7 and placebo - 8). |
| Change From Baseline in Frequency of Total Seizure Events Per 24 Hours at Week 24 in Both Core and Extension Period | Baseline (Core period) to Week 24 (Core period), Baseline (Extension period, Week 24 post-core baseline) to Week 24 (Extension period, Week 48 post-core baseline) | Seizure frequency per 24 hours was defined as the number of seizures in the electroencephalography (EEG) divided by the number of hours in the EEG, multiplied by 24. Seizure frequency was evaluated using a 24-hour video-EEG. Seizure frequency was listed as missing if the actual EEG recording duration was \< 18 hours. |
| Duration of Skin Lesion Response in Everolimus Treated Participants | Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years) | Duration of skin lesion response was defined as the time from the first skin lesion response until the first skin lesion progression, defined as worsening of lesion by \> 25% or more from baseline. |
| Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose | 2 hours post dose on Week 6, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96, Week 144, and Week 240 | The participants were assessed for everolimus blood concentration at 2 hours time point after dose administration on the same day, if the participant did not vomit between previous dose and blood sample collection. Tandem liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was used for evaluation. C2h values were categorized as \< 20 ng/mL, 20-50 ng/mL, and \> 50 ng/mL, concentrations below the lower limit of quantification were entered as 0 ng/mL. |
| Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | 24 hours post dose on Week 6, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, Week 144, and Week 240 | The participants were assessed for everolimus trough concentration (Cmin) at 24 hours time point after previous dose administration, at a steady state following 5 days of consistent dosing, if the participant did not vomit within 4 hours of previous dose. Tandem liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was used for evaluation. Cmin values were categorized as \<5 ng/mL, 5-10 ng/mL, and \>10 ng/mL, concentrations below the lower limit of quantification were entered as 0 ng/mL. |
| Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core Period | Day 1 up to 28 days after end of treatment (Core period) | Renal function was assessed using glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on age measure; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula for participants aged 18 years or older, defined as GFR equal to 32788\*(serum creatinine (micromol/L)\^-1.154)\*(age\^-0.203 )\*(0.742, if female)\*(1.210, if black), and Schwartz formula for participants less than 18 years defined as GFR equal to 0.41\*height (cm)/ Serum creatinine (mg/dL). Participants with severe renal impairment defined as GFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 and participants with National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) grade 3/4 serum creatinine were reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Skin Lesions Assessed Using Physician's Global Assessement Overall Score | End of core period (Week 48), and end of extension period (up to 4 years) | Skin lesions included hypomelanotic macules, the shagreen patch, periungual or subungual fibromas, facial angiofibromas and/or forehead plaques. Response was evaluated using the Physician's Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA) on a 7-point scale: Grade 0 = complete clinical response, indicated absence of disease, Grade 1, 2, and 3 = partial response, indicated improvements of ≥ 50% but \< 100%, Grade 4, 5 = stable disease, indicated some or no improvements of 25% - \< 50% and 6 = progressive disease, indicated worse than at baseline evaluation by \> 25%. Response rate was determined for participants with ≥ 1 skin lesion at baseline, defined as the percentage of participants with overall status as complete clinical response or partial response. |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was conducted at 24 centers in 10 countries.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 117 participants were enrolled and randomized into the core period. Only 111 participants completing the core period, continued in the open-label extension period of the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Everolimus (Core Period) Participants received oral dose of everolimus 4.5 mg/m\^2 daily as an initial starting dose to attain the whole blood trough concentrations in range of 5-15 ng/mL. Dose adjustments were permitted based on safety and whole blood trough concentrations. | 78 |
| Placebo (Core Period) Participants received oral dose of placebo matching to everolimus daily. | 39 |
| Total | 117 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Period (48 Weeks) | Administrative problems | 0 | 1 |
| Core Period (48 Weeks) | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 |
| Core Period (48 Weeks) | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 4 |
| Open-label Extension Period (4 Years) | Administrative problems | 7 | 0 |
| Open-label Extension Period (4 Years) | Adverse Event | 10 | 0 |
| Open-label Extension Period (4 Years) | Death | 1 | 0 |
| Open-label Extension Period (4 Years) | Disease progression | 1 | 0 |
| Open-label Extension Period (4 Years) | Lost to Follow-up | 3 | 0 |
| Open-label Extension Period (4 Years) | New treatment for indication under study | 1 | 0 |
| Open-label Extension Period (4 Years) | Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Everolimus (Core Period) | Placebo (Core Period) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 10.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 | 10.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 | 10.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 |
| Age, Customized ≥18 years | 10 Participants | 6 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Age, Customized 3-18 years | 55 Participants | 26 Participants | 81 Participants |
| Age, Customized <3 years | 13 Participants | 7 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 29 Participants | 21 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 49 Participants | 18 Participants | 67 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 77 / 78 | 33 / 33 | 6 / 6 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 33 / 78 | 17 / 33 | 3 / 6 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytomas (SEGA) Response
Participants were assessed for SEGA response, defined as 50% reduction from baseline in SEGA volume (where SEGA volume was the sum of the volumes of all target SEGA lesions identified at baseline, and confirmed with a second scan performed approximately 12 weeks later), no unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, no new SEGA lesions (≥ 1 cm in longest diameter), and no new or worsening hydrocephalus. Multi-phase brain MRI was utilized to identify SEGA lesions. SEGA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall status was SEGA response as determined by Independent Central Radiology Review. The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for determining time to SEGA response.
Time frame: End of core period (Week 48), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)
Population: The primary analysis was performed in Full Analysis Set (FAS) population, defined as all randomized participants involved in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytomas (SEGA) Response | 34.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytomas (SEGA) Response | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (Extension Period) | Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytomas (SEGA) Response | 57.7 Percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in Frequency of Total Seizure Events Per 24 Hours at Week 24 in Both Core and Extension Period
Seizure frequency per 24 hours was defined as the number of seizures in the electroencephalography (EEG) divided by the number of hours in the EEG, multiplied by 24. Seizure frequency was evaluated using a 24-hour video-EEG. Seizure frequency was listed as missing if the actual EEG recording duration was \< 18 hours.
Time frame: Baseline (Core period) to Week 24 (Core period), Baseline (Extension period, Week 24 post-core baseline) to Week 24 (Extension period, Week 48 post-core baseline)
Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population. Missing values were imputed using last observation carried forward approach for core period while raw count for extension period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Frequency of Total Seizure Events Per 24 Hours at Week 24 in Both Core and Extension Period | -1.24 Seizure frequency | Standard Deviation 6.12 |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Change From Baseline in Frequency of Total Seizure Events Per 24 Hours at Week 24 in Both Core and Extension Period | -0.24 Seizure frequency | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| Everolimus (Extension Period) | Change From Baseline in Frequency of Total Seizure Events Per 24 Hours at Week 24 in Both Core and Extension Period | -6.07 Seizure frequency | Standard Deviation 9.719 |
Duration of SEGA Response
Duration of SEGA response was defined as time from the date of the first documented SEGA response until the date of the first documented SEGA progression. Duration of SEGA response was evaluated only for participants who achieved a SEGA response. The time to SEGA progression was censored if SEGA progression was not observed before the first to occur out of (i) analysis cut-off date (ii) the date when systemic anti-SEGA medication is started, (iii) the date of a SEGA-related surgery or (iv) the date of death. Since, no case of SEGA progression was observed in core study which resulted in censored duration of SEGA response. Only 5 SEGA responders experienced a SEGA progression in extension period.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)
Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population. Here, Number of participants analysed signifies the participants assessed for SEGA progression during the study for each arm, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Duration of SEGA Response | NA months |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Duration of SEGA Response | NA months |
Duration of Skin Lesion Response in Everolimus Treated Participants
Duration of skin lesion response was defined as the time from the first skin lesion response until the first skin lesion progression, defined as worsening of lesion by \> 25% or more from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)
Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population. Here, Number of participants analysed signifies everolimus treated responders with best overall skin lesion response during the core and extension period, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Duration of Skin Lesion Response in Everolimus Treated Participants | NA months |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Duration of Skin Lesion Response in Everolimus Treated Participants | NA months |
Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose
The participants were assessed for everolimus blood concentration at 2 hours time point after dose administration on the same day, if the participant did not vomit between previous dose and blood sample collection. Tandem liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was used for evaluation. C2h values were categorized as \< 20 ng/mL, 20-50 ng/mL, and \> 50 ng/mL, concentrations below the lower limit of quantification were entered as 0 ng/mL.
Time frame: 2 hours post dose on Week 6, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96, Week 144, and Week 240
Population: The analysis was performed in the Safety Set population (Only evaluable PK Samples), defined as participants who received at least one dose of the double-blind study drug, with a valid post baseline assessment. The 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each group, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose | Week 6 (n= 37, 47) | 27.52 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 15.24 |
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose | Week 24 (n= 11, 13) | 38.7 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 15.76 |
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose | Week 48 (n= 1, 3) | 23.2 ng/mL | — |
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose | Week 96 (n= 0, 6) | NA ng/mL | — |
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose | Week 144 (n= 0, 6) | NA ng/mL | — |
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose | Week 240 (n= 0, 0) | NA ng/mL | — |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose | Week 144 (n= 0, 6) | 26.33 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 11.908 |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose | Week 6 (n= 37, 47) | 27.74 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 16.202 |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose | Week 96 (n= 0, 6) | 31.63 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 21.902 |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose | Week 24 (n= 11, 13) | 39.25 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 14.662 |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose | Week 240 (n= 0, 0) | NA ng/mL | — |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose | Week 48 (n= 1, 3) | 49.73 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 28.884 |
Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose
The participants were assessed for everolimus trough concentration (Cmin) at 24 hours time point after previous dose administration, at a steady state following 5 days of consistent dosing, if the participant did not vomit within 4 hours of previous dose. Tandem liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was used for evaluation. Cmin values were categorized as \<5 ng/mL, 5-10 ng/mL, and \>10 ng/mL, concentrations below the lower limit of quantification were entered as 0 ng/mL.
Time frame: 24 hours post dose on Week 6, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, Week 144, and Week 240
Population: The analysis was performed in the Safety Set population. The 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each group, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 48 (n= 23, 86) | 7.28 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 3.11 |
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 96 (n= 0, 83) | NA ng/mL | — |
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 24 (n= 64, 89) | 6.59 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 3.43 |
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 144 (n= 0, 69) | NA ng/mL | — |
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 72 (n= 4, 92) | 6.08 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 2.19 |
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 240 (n= 0, 13) | NA ng/mL | — |
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 6 (n= 64, 94) | 5.8 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 3.68 |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 240 (n= 0, 13) | 5.85 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 2.507 |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 6 (n= 64, 94) | 6.09 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 3.708 |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 24 (n= 64, 89) | 6.86 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 3.504 |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 48 (n= 23, 86) | 7.07 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 3.214 |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 72 (n= 4, 92) | 7.25 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 3.66 |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 96 (n= 0, 83) | 7.09 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 3.697 |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose | Week 144 (n= 0, 69) | 7.28 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 3.35 |
Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core Period
Renal function was assessed using glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on age measure; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula for participants aged 18 years or older, defined as GFR equal to 32788\*(serum creatinine (micromol/L)\^-1.154)\*(age\^-0.203 )\*(0.742, if female)\*(1.210, if black), and Schwartz formula for participants less than 18 years defined as GFR equal to 0.41\*height (cm)/ Serum creatinine (mg/dL). Participants with severe renal impairment defined as GFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 and participants with National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) grade 3/4 serum creatinine were reported.
Time frame: Day 1 up to 28 days after end of treatment (Core period)
Population: The analysis was performed in the SAF population. Here, Number of participants analysed signifies the participants assessed for renal function during the study for each arm, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core Period | Grade 3 or 4 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core Period | Grade 1 or 2 | 3.8 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core Period | Grade 0 | 96.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core Period | Grade 3 or 4 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core Period | Grade 1 or 2 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core Period | Grade 0 | 100 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Skin Lesions Assessed Using Physician's Global Assessement Overall Score
Skin lesions included hypomelanotic macules, the shagreen patch, periungual or subungual fibromas, facial angiofibromas and/or forehead plaques. Response was evaluated using the Physician's Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA) on a 7-point scale: Grade 0 = complete clinical response, indicated absence of disease, Grade 1, 2, and 3 = partial response, indicated improvements of ≥ 50% but \< 100%, Grade 4, 5 = stable disease, indicated some or no improvements of 25% - \< 50% and 6 = progressive disease, indicated worse than at baseline evaluation by \> 25%. Response rate was determined for participants with ≥ 1 skin lesion at baseline, defined as the percentage of participants with overall status as complete clinical response or partial response.
Time frame: End of core period (Week 48), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)
Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population. Here, Number of participants analysed signifies the participants assessed for skin lesion response during the study for each arm, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Skin Lesions Assessed Using Physician's Global Assessement Overall Score | 41.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Percentage of Participants With Skin Lesions Assessed Using Physician's Global Assessement Overall Score | 10.5 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (Extension Period) | Percentage of Participants With Skin Lesions Assessed Using Physician's Global Assessement Overall Score | 58.1 Percentage of participants |
Time to SEGA Progression
Time to SEGA progression was defined as time between randomisation to time to first SEGA progression. SEGA progression was defined as either one or more of the following criteria: 1. increase from nadir of ≥ 25% in SEGA volume to a value greater than baseline SEGA volume (where SEGA volume is the sum of the volumes of all target SEGA lesions identified at baseline, and nadir is the lowest SEGA volume obtained for the participant previously in the trial), 2. unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, 3. appearance of new SEGA lesion ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter, 4. new or worsening hydrocephalus. The median TTSP based on central radiology review was not reached in any treatment arms; Only 6 events of SEGA progressions were observed in the placebo group of core period.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)
Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population. Here Number of participants analysed signifies the participants assessed for time to SEGA progression during the study for each arm, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Time to SEGA Progression | NA months |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Time to SEGA Progression | NA months |
| Everolimus (Extension Period) | Time to SEGA Progression | NA months |
Time to SEGA Response
Participants were assessed for time to SEGA response, defined as 50% reduction from baseline in SEGA volume (where SEGA volume was the sum of the volumes of all target SEGA lesions identified at baseline, and confirmed with a second scan performed approximately 12 weeks later), no unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, no new SEGA lesions (≥ 1 cm in longest diameter), and no new or worsening hydrocephalus. Multi-phase brain MRI was utilised to identify SEGA lesions. SEGA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall status was SEGA response as determined by Independent Central Radiology Review. The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for determining time to SEGA response.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)
Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Time to SEGA Response | 2.99 months |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Time to SEGA Response | 5.32 months |
Time to SEGA Worsening
Time to SEGA worsening was defined as the time from the start of everolimus to date of the first SEGA worsening. SEGA worsening was defined as either; increase from nadir of ≥ 25% in SEGA volume or unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, or appearance of new SEGA lesion ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter, or new or worsening hydrocephalus. The median value was not reached in either treatment arm of core period as SEGA worsening was observed in less participants (everolimus - 7 and placebo - 8).
Time frame: Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)
Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population. Here, Number of participants analysed signifies the participants assessed for time to SEGA worsening during the study for each arm, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (Core Period) | Time to SEGA Worsening | NA months |
| Placebo (Core Period) | Time to SEGA Worsening | NA months |
| Everolimus (Extension Period) | Time to SEGA Worsening | 55.72 months |