Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus (RAD001) in Patients of All Ages With Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma Associated With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)(EXIST-1)

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Everolimus in the Treatment of Patients With Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytomas (SEGA) Associated With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00789828
Acronym
EXIST-1
Enrollment
117
Registered
2008-11-13
Start date
2009-08-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2016-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma, Tuberous Sclerosis

Keywords

SEGA, Tuberous Sclerosis, Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma, mTOR, RAD001, Mamalian Target Rapamycin, Everolimus, TSC

Brief summary

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Everolimus in treating patients with Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytomas associated with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex.

Interventions

DRUGEverolimus

Everolimus was formulated as tablets of 1.0-mg strength and was blisterpacked under aluminum foil in units of 10 tablets.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo was provided as a matching tablet and was blisterpacked under aluminum foil in units of 10.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All Ages * Definite diagnosis of Tuberous Sclerosis according to the modified Gomez criteria * At least one Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma of at least 1 cm in diameter * Evidence of SEGA worsening as compared to prior MRI scans * Females of child bearing potential must use birth control * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* SEGA related surgery is likely to be required in the opinion of the investigator * Recent heart attack, cardiac related chest pain or stroke * Severely impaired lung function * Severe liver dysfunction * Severe kidney dysfunction * Pregnancy or breast feeding * Current infection * History of organ transplant * Surgery within two months prior to study enrollment * Prior therapy with a medication in the same class as Everolimus * Uncontrolled high cholesterol * Uncontrolled diabetes * HIV * Patients with metal implants thus prohibiting MRI evaluations Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytomas (SEGA) ResponseEnd of core period (Week 48), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)Participants were assessed for SEGA response, defined as 50% reduction from baseline in SEGA volume (where SEGA volume was the sum of the volumes of all target SEGA lesions identified at baseline, and confirmed with a second scan performed approximately 12 weeks later), no unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, no new SEGA lesions (≥ 1 cm in longest diameter), and no new or worsening hydrocephalus. Multi-phase brain MRI was utilized to identify SEGA lesions. SEGA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall status was SEGA response as determined by Independent Central Radiology Review. The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for determining time to SEGA response.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to SEGA ProgressionBaseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)Time to SEGA progression was defined as time between randomisation to time to first SEGA progression. SEGA progression was defined as either one or more of the following criteria: 1. increase from nadir of ≥ 25% in SEGA volume to a value greater than baseline SEGA volume (where SEGA volume is the sum of the volumes of all target SEGA lesions identified at baseline, and nadir is the lowest SEGA volume obtained for the participant previously in the trial), 2. unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, 3. appearance of new SEGA lesion ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter, 4. new or worsening hydrocephalus. The median TTSP based on central radiology review was not reached in any treatment arms; Only 6 events of SEGA progressions were observed in the placebo group of core period.
Time to SEGA ResponseBaseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)Participants were assessed for time to SEGA response, defined as 50% reduction from baseline in SEGA volume (where SEGA volume was the sum of the volumes of all target SEGA lesions identified at baseline, and confirmed with a second scan performed approximately 12 weeks later), no unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, no new SEGA lesions (≥ 1 cm in longest diameter), and no new or worsening hydrocephalus. Multi-phase brain MRI was utilised to identify SEGA lesions. SEGA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall status was SEGA response as determined by Independent Central Radiology Review. The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for determining time to SEGA response.
Duration of SEGA ResponseBaseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)Duration of SEGA response was defined as time from the date of the first documented SEGA response until the date of the first documented SEGA progression. Duration of SEGA response was evaluated only for participants who achieved a SEGA response. The time to SEGA progression was censored if SEGA progression was not observed before the first to occur out of (i) analysis cut-off date (ii) the date when systemic anti-SEGA medication is started, (iii) the date of a SEGA-related surgery or (iv) the date of death. Since, no case of SEGA progression was observed in core study which resulted in censored duration of SEGA response. Only 5 SEGA responders experienced a SEGA progression in extension period.
Time to SEGA WorseningBaseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)Time to SEGA worsening was defined as the time from the start of everolimus to date of the first SEGA worsening. SEGA worsening was defined as either; increase from nadir of ≥ 25% in SEGA volume or unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, or appearance of new SEGA lesion ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter, or new or worsening hydrocephalus. The median value was not reached in either treatment arm of core period as SEGA worsening was observed in less participants (everolimus - 7 and placebo - 8).
Change From Baseline in Frequency of Total Seizure Events Per 24 Hours at Week 24 in Both Core and Extension PeriodBaseline (Core period) to Week 24 (Core period), Baseline (Extension period, Week 24 post-core baseline) to Week 24 (Extension period, Week 48 post-core baseline)Seizure frequency per 24 hours was defined as the number of seizures in the electroencephalography (EEG) divided by the number of hours in the EEG, multiplied by 24. Seizure frequency was evaluated using a 24-hour video-EEG. Seizure frequency was listed as missing if the actual EEG recording duration was \< 18 hours.
Duration of Skin Lesion Response in Everolimus Treated ParticipantsBaseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)Duration of skin lesion response was defined as the time from the first skin lesion response until the first skin lesion progression, defined as worsening of lesion by \> 25% or more from baseline.
Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose2 hours post dose on Week 6, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96, Week 144, and Week 240The participants were assessed for everolimus blood concentration at 2 hours time point after dose administration on the same day, if the participant did not vomit between previous dose and blood sample collection. Tandem liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was used for evaluation. C2h values were categorized as \< 20 ng/mL, 20-50 ng/mL, and \> 50 ng/mL, concentrations below the lower limit of quantification were entered as 0 ng/mL.
Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose24 hours post dose on Week 6, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, Week 144, and Week 240The participants were assessed for everolimus trough concentration (Cmin) at 24 hours time point after previous dose administration, at a steady state following 5 days of consistent dosing, if the participant did not vomit within 4 hours of previous dose. Tandem liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was used for evaluation. Cmin values were categorized as \<5 ng/mL, 5-10 ng/mL, and \>10 ng/mL, concentrations below the lower limit of quantification were entered as 0 ng/mL.
Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core PeriodDay 1 up to 28 days after end of treatment (Core period)Renal function was assessed using glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on age measure; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula for participants aged 18 years or older, defined as GFR equal to 32788\*(serum creatinine (micromol/L)\^-1.154)\*(age\^-0.203 )\*(0.742, if female)\*(1.210, if black), and Schwartz formula for participants less than 18 years defined as GFR equal to 0.41\*height (cm)/ Serum creatinine (mg/dL). Participants with severe renal impairment defined as GFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 and participants with National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) grade 3/4 serum creatinine were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Skin Lesions Assessed Using Physician's Global Assessement Overall ScoreEnd of core period (Week 48), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)Skin lesions included hypomelanotic macules, the shagreen patch, periungual or subungual fibromas, facial angiofibromas and/or forehead plaques. Response was evaluated using the Physician's Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA) on a 7-point scale: Grade 0 = complete clinical response, indicated absence of disease, Grade 1, 2, and 3 = partial response, indicated improvements of ≥ 50% but \< 100%, Grade 4, 5 = stable disease, indicated some or no improvements of 25% - \< 50% and 6 = progressive disease, indicated worse than at baseline evaluation by \> 25%. Response rate was determined for participants with ≥ 1 skin lesion at baseline, defined as the percentage of participants with overall status as complete clinical response or partial response.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 24 centers in 10 countries.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 117 participants were enrolled and randomized into the core period. Only 111 participants completing the core period, continued in the open-label extension period of the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Everolimus (Core Period)
Participants received oral dose of everolimus 4.5 mg/m\^2 daily as an initial starting dose to attain the whole blood trough concentrations in range of 5-15 ng/mL. Dose adjustments were permitted based on safety and whole blood trough concentrations.
78
Placebo (Core Period)
Participants received oral dose of placebo matching to everolimus daily.
39
Total117

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Core Period (48 Weeks)Administrative problems01
Core Period (48 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up01
Core Period (48 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject04
Open-label Extension Period (4 Years)Administrative problems70
Open-label Extension Period (4 Years)Adverse Event100
Open-label Extension Period (4 Years)Death10
Open-label Extension Period (4 Years)Disease progression10
Open-label Extension Period (4 Years)Lost to Follow-up30
Open-label Extension Period (4 Years)New treatment for indication under study10
Open-label Extension Period (4 Years)Withdrawal by Subject60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEverolimus (Core Period)Placebo (Core Period)Total
Age, Continuous10.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
10.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
10.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
Age, Customized
≥18 years
10 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
Age, Customized
3-18 years
55 Participants26 Participants81 Participants
Age, Customized
<3 years
13 Participants7 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants21 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants18 Participants67 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
77 / 7833 / 336 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
33 / 7817 / 333 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytomas (SEGA) Response

Participants were assessed for SEGA response, defined as 50% reduction from baseline in SEGA volume (where SEGA volume was the sum of the volumes of all target SEGA lesions identified at baseline, and confirmed with a second scan performed approximately 12 weeks later), no unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, no new SEGA lesions (≥ 1 cm in longest diameter), and no new or worsening hydrocephalus. Multi-phase brain MRI was utilized to identify SEGA lesions. SEGA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall status was SEGA response as determined by Independent Central Radiology Review. The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for determining time to SEGA response.

Time frame: End of core period (Week 48), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)

Population: The primary analysis was performed in Full Analysis Set (FAS) population, defined as all randomized participants involved in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytomas (SEGA) Response34.6 Percentage of participants
Placebo (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytomas (SEGA) Response0.0 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (Extension Period)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytomas (SEGA) Response57.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Frequency of Total Seizure Events Per 24 Hours at Week 24 in Both Core and Extension Period

Seizure frequency per 24 hours was defined as the number of seizures in the electroencephalography (EEG) divided by the number of hours in the EEG, multiplied by 24. Seizure frequency was evaluated using a 24-hour video-EEG. Seizure frequency was listed as missing if the actual EEG recording duration was \< 18 hours.

Time frame: Baseline (Core period) to Week 24 (Core period), Baseline (Extension period, Week 24 post-core baseline) to Week 24 (Extension period, Week 48 post-core baseline)

Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population. Missing values were imputed using last observation carried forward approach for core period while raw count for extension period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Frequency of Total Seizure Events Per 24 Hours at Week 24 in Both Core and Extension Period-1.24 Seizure frequencyStandard Deviation 6.12
Placebo (Core Period)Change From Baseline in Frequency of Total Seizure Events Per 24 Hours at Week 24 in Both Core and Extension Period-0.24 Seizure frequencyStandard Deviation 5.7
Everolimus (Extension Period)Change From Baseline in Frequency of Total Seizure Events Per 24 Hours at Week 24 in Both Core and Extension Period-6.07 Seizure frequencyStandard Deviation 9.719
Secondary

Duration of SEGA Response

Duration of SEGA response was defined as time from the date of the first documented SEGA response until the date of the first documented SEGA progression. Duration of SEGA response was evaluated only for participants who achieved a SEGA response. The time to SEGA progression was censored if SEGA progression was not observed before the first to occur out of (i) analysis cut-off date (ii) the date when systemic anti-SEGA medication is started, (iii) the date of a SEGA-related surgery or (iv) the date of death. Since, no case of SEGA progression was observed in core study which resulted in censored duration of SEGA response. Only 5 SEGA responders experienced a SEGA progression in extension period.

Time frame: Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)

Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population. Here, Number of participants analysed signifies the participants assessed for SEGA progression during the study for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus (Core Period)Duration of SEGA ResponseNA months
Placebo (Core Period)Duration of SEGA ResponseNA months
Secondary

Duration of Skin Lesion Response in Everolimus Treated Participants

Duration of skin lesion response was defined as the time from the first skin lesion response until the first skin lesion progression, defined as worsening of lesion by \> 25% or more from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)

Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population. Here, Number of participants analysed signifies everolimus treated responders with best overall skin lesion response during the core and extension period, respectively.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus (Core Period)Duration of Skin Lesion Response in Everolimus Treated ParticipantsNA months
Placebo (Core Period)Duration of Skin Lesion Response in Everolimus Treated ParticipantsNA months
Secondary

Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post Dose

The participants were assessed for everolimus blood concentration at 2 hours time point after dose administration on the same day, if the participant did not vomit between previous dose and blood sample collection. Tandem liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was used for evaluation. C2h values were categorized as \< 20 ng/mL, 20-50 ng/mL, and \> 50 ng/mL, concentrations below the lower limit of quantification were entered as 0 ng/mL.

Time frame: 2 hours post dose on Week 6, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96, Week 144, and Week 240

Population: The analysis was performed in the Safety Set population (Only evaluable PK Samples), defined as participants who received at least one dose of the double-blind study drug, with a valid post baseline assessment. The 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post DoseWeek 6 (n= 37, 47)27.52 ng/mLStandard Deviation 15.24
Everolimus (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post DoseWeek 24 (n= 11, 13)38.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 15.76
Everolimus (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post DoseWeek 48 (n= 1, 3)23.2 ng/mL
Everolimus (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post DoseWeek 96 (n= 0, 6)NA ng/mL
Everolimus (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post DoseWeek 144 (n= 0, 6)NA ng/mL
Everolimus (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post DoseWeek 240 (n= 0, 0)NA ng/mL
Placebo (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post DoseWeek 144 (n= 0, 6)26.33 ng/mLStandard Deviation 11.908
Placebo (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post DoseWeek 6 (n= 37, 47)27.74 ng/mLStandard Deviation 16.202
Placebo (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post DoseWeek 96 (n= 0, 6)31.63 ng/mLStandard Deviation 21.902
Placebo (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post DoseWeek 24 (n= 11, 13)39.25 ng/mLStandard Deviation 14.662
Placebo (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post DoseWeek 240 (n= 0, 0)NA ng/mL
Placebo (Core Period)Everolimus Blood Concentration (C2h) at 2 Hours Post DoseWeek 48 (n= 1, 3)49.73 ng/mLStandard Deviation 28.884
Secondary

Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last Dose

The participants were assessed for everolimus trough concentration (Cmin) at 24 hours time point after previous dose administration, at a steady state following 5 days of consistent dosing, if the participant did not vomit within 4 hours of previous dose. Tandem liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was used for evaluation. Cmin values were categorized as \<5 ng/mL, 5-10 ng/mL, and \>10 ng/mL, concentrations below the lower limit of quantification were entered as 0 ng/mL.

Time frame: 24 hours post dose on Week 6, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, Week 144, and Week 240

Population: The analysis was performed in the Safety Set population. The 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 48 (n= 23, 86)7.28 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.11
Everolimus (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 96 (n= 0, 83)NA ng/mL
Everolimus (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 24 (n= 64, 89)6.59 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.43
Everolimus (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 144 (n= 0, 69)NA ng/mL
Everolimus (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 72 (n= 4, 92)6.08 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2.19
Everolimus (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 240 (n= 0, 13)NA ng/mL
Everolimus (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 6 (n= 64, 94)5.8 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.68
Placebo (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 240 (n= 0, 13)5.85 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2.507
Placebo (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 6 (n= 64, 94)6.09 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.708
Placebo (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 24 (n= 64, 89)6.86 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.504
Placebo (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 48 (n= 23, 86)7.07 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.214
Placebo (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 72 (n= 4, 92)7.25 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.66
Placebo (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 96 (n= 0, 83)7.09 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.697
Placebo (Core Period)Everolimus Trough Concentrations (Cmin) at 24 Hours After Last DoseWeek 144 (n= 0, 69)7.28 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.35
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core Period

Renal function was assessed using glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on age measure; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula for participants aged 18 years or older, defined as GFR equal to 32788\*(serum creatinine (micromol/L)\^-1.154)\*(age\^-0.203 )\*(0.742, if female)\*(1.210, if black), and Schwartz formula for participants less than 18 years defined as GFR equal to 0.41\*height (cm)/ Serum creatinine (mg/dL). Participants with severe renal impairment defined as GFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 and participants with National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) grade 3/4 serum creatinine were reported.

Time frame: Day 1 up to 28 days after end of treatment (Core period)

Population: The analysis was performed in the SAF population. Here, Number of participants analysed signifies the participants assessed for renal function during the study for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core PeriodGrade 3 or 40 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core PeriodGrade 1 or 23.8 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core PeriodGrade 096.2 Percentage of participants
Placebo (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core PeriodGrade 3 or 40 Percentage of participants
Placebo (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core PeriodGrade 1 or 20 Percentage of participants
Placebo (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment During Core PeriodGrade 0100 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Skin Lesions Assessed Using Physician's Global Assessement Overall Score

Skin lesions included hypomelanotic macules, the shagreen patch, periungual or subungual fibromas, facial angiofibromas and/or forehead plaques. Response was evaluated using the Physician's Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA) on a 7-point scale: Grade 0 = complete clinical response, indicated absence of disease, Grade 1, 2, and 3 = partial response, indicated improvements of ≥ 50% but \< 100%, Grade 4, 5 = stable disease, indicated some or no improvements of 25% - \< 50% and 6 = progressive disease, indicated worse than at baseline evaluation by \> 25%. Response rate was determined for participants with ≥ 1 skin lesion at baseline, defined as the percentage of participants with overall status as complete clinical response or partial response.

Time frame: End of core period (Week 48), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)

Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population. Here, Number of participants analysed signifies the participants assessed for skin lesion response during the study for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Skin Lesions Assessed Using Physician's Global Assessement Overall Score41.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo (Core Period)Percentage of Participants With Skin Lesions Assessed Using Physician's Global Assessement Overall Score10.5 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (Extension Period)Percentage of Participants With Skin Lesions Assessed Using Physician's Global Assessement Overall Score58.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to SEGA Progression

Time to SEGA progression was defined as time between randomisation to time to first SEGA progression. SEGA progression was defined as either one or more of the following criteria: 1. increase from nadir of ≥ 25% in SEGA volume to a value greater than baseline SEGA volume (where SEGA volume is the sum of the volumes of all target SEGA lesions identified at baseline, and nadir is the lowest SEGA volume obtained for the participant previously in the trial), 2. unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, 3. appearance of new SEGA lesion ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter, 4. new or worsening hydrocephalus. The median TTSP based on central radiology review was not reached in any treatment arms; Only 6 events of SEGA progressions were observed in the placebo group of core period.

Time frame: Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)

Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population. Here Number of participants analysed signifies the participants assessed for time to SEGA progression during the study for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus (Core Period)Time to SEGA ProgressionNA months
Placebo (Core Period)Time to SEGA ProgressionNA months
Everolimus (Extension Period)Time to SEGA ProgressionNA months
Secondary

Time to SEGA Response

Participants were assessed for time to SEGA response, defined as 50% reduction from baseline in SEGA volume (where SEGA volume was the sum of the volumes of all target SEGA lesions identified at baseline, and confirmed with a second scan performed approximately 12 weeks later), no unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, no new SEGA lesions (≥ 1 cm in longest diameter), and no new or worsening hydrocephalus. Multi-phase brain MRI was utilised to identify SEGA lesions. SEGA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall status was SEGA response as determined by Independent Central Radiology Review. The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for determining time to SEGA response.

Time frame: Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)

Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus (Core Period)Time to SEGA Response2.99 months
Placebo (Core Period)Time to SEGA Response5.32 months
Secondary

Time to SEGA Worsening

Time to SEGA worsening was defined as the time from the start of everolimus to date of the first SEGA worsening. SEGA worsening was defined as either; increase from nadir of ≥ 25% in SEGA volume or unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, or appearance of new SEGA lesion ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter, or new or worsening hydrocephalus. The median value was not reached in either treatment arm of core period as SEGA worsening was observed in less participants (everolimus - 7 and placebo - 8).

Time frame: Baseline up to week 48 (end of core period), and end of extension period (up to 4 years)

Population: The analysis was performed in the FAS population. Here, Number of participants analysed signifies the participants assessed for time to SEGA worsening during the study for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus (Core Period)Time to SEGA WorseningNA months
Placebo (Core Period)Time to SEGA WorseningNA months
Everolimus (Extension Period)Time to SEGA Worsening55.72 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026