Skip to content

Nilotinib in TKI Resistant or Intolerant Patients With Metastatic Mucosal, Acral, or Chronically Sun Damaged Melanoma

A Phase II Study of Nilotinib (AMN107) In TKI Resistant or Intolerant Patients With Metastatic Mucosal, Acral or Chronically Sun Damaged Melanoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00788775
Enrollment
20
Registered
2008-11-11
Start date
2009-01-23
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2018-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acral Melanoma, Melanoma, Mucosal Lentiginous Melanoma

Keywords

nilotinib

Brief summary

Given the poor prognosis and limited treatment options available for patients with mucosal or acral/lentiginous melanomas who develop metastatic disease, genetic discoveries of KIT mutations in these cancers present the need to test multi-targeted kinase inhibitors with potent KIT inhibitory activity in this patient population. Imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have the potential to be effective in this patient population, but patients may develop resistance to treatment. Therefore, in this study, we propose to test nilotinib in patients with metastatic mucosal, acral, or chronically sun-damaged melanoma following treatment with another TKI.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary \* To estimate the proportion of patients, with metastatic mucosal, acral, or chronically sun damaged melanomas, whose tumors have KIT aberrations, and who progressed or could not tolerate a KIT targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (e.g. including but not limited to imatinib mesylate, sunitinib, or dasatanib), who are alive and without progression of disease four months after beginning treatment with nilotinib. Secondary * To determine early evidence of biologic and clinical activity by best overall response rate. * To estimate time to progression of disease and overall survival. * To determine the tolerability of nilotinib. * To evaluate the use of FDG-PET scanning in determining early biologic response to therapy. * To correlate c-kit mutational status and amplification status with response to therapy. * To evaluate the feasibility of nilotinib. * To evaluate the tolerability of nilotinib in patients with brain metastases.

Interventions

DRUGNilotinib

Sponsors

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER
Brigham and Women's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Novartis
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * Histologically documented diagnosis of mucosal melanoma or acral melanoma or chronically sun damaged melanoma as evidenced by solar elastosis on pathology * Patient's tumor with evidence for KIT mutation or amplification. Patient tumors that already have documented mutations or amplification do not have to have tissue submitted again for analysis to confirm eligibility * Have failed, progressed, or not been able to tolerate other tyrosine kinase inhibitors including but not limited to imatinib mesylate, sunitinib or dasatinib treatment. * At least one measurable site of disease * ECOG Performance Status 0, 1 or 2 * Adequate organ function as outlined in the protocol * Negative pregnancy test for female patients of childbearing potential

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has received any other investigational agents within 28 days of first day of study drug dosing unless the disease is rapidly progressing * Patient is \< 5 years free of another primary malignancy except: if the other primary malignancy is not currently clinically significant nor requiring active intervention, or if other primary malignancy is a basal cell skin cancer or a cervical carcinoma in situ * Female patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding * Patient has a severe and/or uncontrolled medical disease * Patient has a rare hereditary problem of galactose intolerance, severe lactase deficiency or of glucose-galactose malabsorption * Patient with electrolyte abnormality unless the level can be corrected to normal levels prior to initiating study drug * Known brain metastasis * Known chronic liver disease * Patient has received chemotherapy within 4 weeks prior to study entry, unless the disease is rapidly progressing (6 weeks for nitrosourea or mitomycin-C) * Patient previously received radiotherapy to 25% or greater of the bone marrow * Patient had a major surgery within 2 weeks prior to study entry * Impaired cardiac function * QTc \> 450msec on screening ECG * Myocardial infarction within one year prior to starting nilotinib * Other clinically significant heart disease * Patients who are currently receiving treatment with any of the medications that have the potential to prolong QT interval * Patients who are currently receiving Warfarin \> 1mg/day * Patient with any significant history of non-compliance to medical regimens or with the inability to grant reliable informed consent * Prior therapy with nilotinib

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
4-month Progression-Free Survival RateDisease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Treatment continued for 12 months unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Relevant for this endpoint was disease status at 4 months.4-month progression-free survival rate was defined as the proportion of patients absent death or progression based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) before 4 months. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free SurvivalDisease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment and long-term every 3 months until first progression, death or lost to follow-up. Mean treatment duration was 5.5 months (range 0-45; no/with CNS mets 7.4m/ 3m).Progression-free survival (PFS) based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.
Overall SurvivalPatients were followed long-term every 3 months until first progression, death or lost to follow-up. Median survival follow-up was 16.2 months (90%CI 11.7-17.7 months; no/with CNS mets 16.2m/ 11.7m).Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive.
Best Overall ResponseDisease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment and long-term every 3 months until first progression, death or lost to follow-up. Mean treatment duration was 5.5 months (range 0-45; no/with CNS mets 7.4m/ 3m).Best overall response (BOR) on treatment was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria. For target lesions, complete response (CR) is complete disappearance of all target lesions and partial response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. CR or PR confirmation required within 4 weeks. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum LD of target lesions from smallest sum LD as reference or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Stable disease (SD) is neither meeting PR or PD. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. CR is disappearance of all non-target lesions.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was activated on January 23, 2009 and closed early in December 2011 due to slow accrual. Patients enrolled from 8 medical centers beginning March 2009 through June 2011.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
No CNS Metastastic Cohort
Nilotinib was given at a dose of 400 mg orally daily (200 mg pills twice per day). Patients received treatment up to 12 months as long as they were receiving clinical benefit. Patients were classified into two cohorts based upon presence or absence of measurable brain metastases.
11
CNS Metastatic Cohort
Nilotinib was given at a dose of 400 mg orally daily (200 mg pills twice per day). Patients received treatment up to 12 months as long as they were receiving clinical benefit. Patients were classified into two cohorts based upon presence or absence of measurable brain metastases.
8
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPatient Non-Compliance10
Overall StudyPatient's measurable disease resected.10
Overall StudyProgressive Disease86
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCNS Metastatic CohortTotalNo CNS Metastastic Cohort
Age, Continuous60 years67 years68 years
CNS Metastatic Status
CNS Metastaic: No
0 Participants11 Participants11 Participants
CNS Metastatic Status
CNS Metastaic: Yes
8 Participants8 Participants0 Participants
ECOG Performance Status
ECOG PS0
4 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
ECOG Performance Status
ECOG PS1
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
ECOG Performance Status
ECOG PS2
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants10 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Melanoma Type
Acral
3 participants6 participants3 participants
Melanoma Type
Chronically Sun-Damaged (CSD)
1 participants3 participants2 participants
Melanoma Type
Mucosal
4 participants10 participants6 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants16 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 Participants19 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants14 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 116 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 111 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

4-month Progression-Free Survival Rate

4-month progression-free survival rate was defined as the proportion of patients absent death or progression based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) before 4 months. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Treatment continued for 12 months unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Relevant for this endpoint was disease status at 4 months.

Population: The analysis dataset is comprised of treated patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
No CNS Metastastic Cohort4-month Progression-Free Survival Rate0.27 proportion of patients
CNS Metastatic Cohort4-month Progression-Free Survival Rate0.125 proportion of patients
Secondary

Best Overall Response

Best overall response (BOR) on treatment was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria. For target lesions, complete response (CR) is complete disappearance of all target lesions and partial response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. CR or PR confirmation required within 4 weeks. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum LD of target lesions from smallest sum LD as reference or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Stable disease (SD) is neither meeting PR or PD. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. CR is disappearance of all non-target lesions.

Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment and long-term every 3 months until first progression, death or lost to follow-up. Mean treatment duration was 5.5 months (range 0-45; no/with CNS mets 7.4m/ 3m).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
No CNS Metastastic CohortBest Overall ResponseUnevaluable1 participants
No CNS Metastastic CohortBest Overall ResponseComplete Response0 participants
No CNS Metastastic CohortBest Overall ResponsePartial Response2 participants
No CNS Metastastic CohortBest Overall ResponseStable Disease4 participants
No CNS Metastastic CohortBest Overall ResponseProgressive Disease4 participants
CNS Metastatic CohortBest Overall ResponseProgressive Disease1 participants
CNS Metastatic CohortBest Overall ResponseStable Disease6 participants
CNS Metastatic CohortBest Overall ResponseComplete Response0 participants
CNS Metastatic CohortBest Overall ResponseUnevaluable1 participants
CNS Metastatic CohortBest Overall ResponsePartial Response0 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive.

Time frame: Patients were followed long-term every 3 months until first progression, death or lost to follow-up. Median survival follow-up was 16.2 months (90%CI 11.7-17.7 months; no/with CNS mets 16.2m/ 11.7m).

Population: The analysis dataset is comprised of treated patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
No CNS Metastastic CohortOverall Survival14.2 months
CNS Metastatic CohortOverall Survival4.3 months
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment and long-term every 3 months until first progression, death or lost to follow-up. Mean treatment duration was 5.5 months (range 0-45; no/with CNS mets 7.4m/ 3m).

Population: The analysis dataset is comprised of treated patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
No CNS Metastastic CohortProgression-Free Survival3.4 months
CNS Metastatic CohortProgression-Free Survival2.4 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026