Skip to content

The Use of Dual Chamber ICD With Special Programmed Features to Lower the Risk of Inappropriate Shock

Reduction And Prevention of Tachyarrhythmias and Shocks Using Reduced Ventricular Pacing With Atrial Algorithms (The RAPTURE Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00787800
Acronym
RAPTURE
Enrollment
100
Registered
2008-11-10
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2014-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Supraventricular Tachycardia, Ventricular Fibrillation, Ventricular Tachycardia

Keywords

Shock prevention, Single vs. Dual Chamber, Reduce ventricular pacing, Atrial Fibrillation, Remote Monitoring, ICD, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Brief summary

The RAPTURE Study will determine whether dual chamber defibrillators with atrial prevention and termination therapies, minimized ventricular pacing, and remote monitoring will reduce the rate of inappropriate shocks and improve quality of life compared to optimally programmed back-up pacing only single chamber ICDs when used for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death

Detailed description

While implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy has become the gold standard for sudden death prevention in high risk individuals, reduction of device associated morbidity remains a significant problem. Rapidly conducted atrial tachyarrhythmias inappropriately detected as ventricular tachycardia (VT) are the most common cause for inappropriate shocks in ICD recipients, affecting 10 to 40% of patients. Large multicenter trials have shown modest benefits of atrial pacing in preventing atrial fibrillation, however right ventricular (RV) pacing was not limited, thus any favorable effects associated with atrial prevention and treatment may have been offset by the RV pacing. New algorithms to prevent RV pacing are now made available in our current devices. The choice of dual chamber versus single chamber ICD for primary prevention warrants re-assessment of atrial prevention and termination therapies, without the potentially adverse effects of RV pacing. This Multi Center Pilot study will enroll 100 eligible subjects, 50 to single chamber and 50 to dual chamber ICDs. Patients will be followed for one year.

Interventions

DEVICEDual Chamber ICD

Dual Chamber ICD: Atrial therapies and minimized ventricular pacing will be programmed on along with VT/VF detection and therapies with detection enhancements; remote monitoring set to alert for sustained atrial fibrillation Dual Chamber ICD Atrial prevention and termination therapies, Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP)along with VT/VF detection and therapies for dual chamber device.

DEVICESingle Chamber ICD

Single Chamber: Optimally programmed VT/VF detection and therapies will be programmed on including use of detection enhancements. VT/VF detection and therapies with discrimination criteria for single chamber device.

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Candidates for ICD for primary prevention according to American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines who have a clinical indication for ICD implantation for ventricular arrhythmia or sudden death prevention. * The ability to understand the scope of the study, provide written informed consent, and a willingness to complete all study visits and associated procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women * Age \<18 years old * Inability to provide consent * On a heart transplant waiting list * Life expectancy \<1 year * Indication for pacing * Atrioventricular (AV) node ablation * Permanent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter * Indication for cardiac resynchronization * Preexisting, separate pacemaker pulse generator that won't be explanted * Intra-aortic balloon pump or other device * Inotropic drug (not digitalis) necessary for hemodynamic support * Chronic serious bacterial infection * Inability to receive pectoral non-thoracotomy lead ICD * Inability to program device according to protocol * History of Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) or sustained Ventricular Tachycardia as an indication for ICD (secondary prevention indication)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects Inappropriately Shocked by Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD)Baseline to 12 months after ICD implantationAn inappropriate shock is defined as a shock delivered by the ICD during a rhythm other than sustained VT/VF (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Episodes Lasting Over 5 MinutesBaseline to 12 MonthsEpisodes of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) or Atrial Flutter (AFL) greater than 5 minutes duration. A subject may experience multiple episodes.
Number of Appropriate Shocks by ICDBaseline to 12 MonthsAppropriate shocks are delivered during a sustained Ventricular Tachycardic/Ventricular Fibrillation heart rhythm.
Total Cost of ICD Implantation ProcedureBaseline
Number of Subjects With Newly Detected Atrial TachyarrhythmiasBaseline to 12 months after ICD implantation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) BurdenImplantation through 1 yearAF burden is defined as the sum of duration of all atrial arrhythmias divided by total observation time, reported as a percentage value.

Countries

Israel, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

From 2008 to 2010, patients who were undergoing Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICD) device implantation at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota and Jacksonville, Florida and at two Israeli medical center sites, Sheba Medical Center in Ramat Gan and Carmel Medical Center in Haifa, were screened for entry into this open-label study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dual Chamber ICD
Dual chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD): Atrial therapies and minimized ventricular pacing will be programmed on along with VT/VF detection and therapies with detection enhancements; remote monitoring set to alert for sustained atrial fibrillation.
50
Single Chamber ICD
Single chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: Optimally programmed VT/VF detection and therapies will be programmed on including use of detection enhancements.
50
Total100

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject35

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle Chamber ICDDual Chamber ICDTotal
Age, Continuous59.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
61.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
Cardiac Disease
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
20 Participants16 Participants36 Participants
Cardiac Disease
Coronary Artery Disease
36 Participants35 Participants71 Participants
Cardiac Disease
Dilated Cardiomyopathy
10 Participants13 Participants23 Participants
Cardiac Disease
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Cardiac Disease
Myocardial Infarction
35 Participants31 Participants66 Participants
Cardiac Disease
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
27 Participants23 Participants50 Participants
Co-morbidities
Diabetes
18 participants15 participants33 participants
Co-morbidities
History of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
3 participants6 participants9 participants
Co-morbidities
Hyperlipidemia
36 participants34 participants70 participants
Co-morbidities
Hypertension
26 participants32 participants58 participants
Co-morbidities
Pulmonary Disease
7 participants1 participants8 participants
Co-morbidities
Stroke
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Co-morbidities
Transient Ischemic Attack
3 participants0 participants3 participants
Concomitant Medications
Amiodarone
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Concomitant Medications
Beta Blocker
44 Participants47 Participants91 Participants
Concomitant Medications
Calcium Channel Blocker
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
LV Ejection Fraction29.6 Percentage of LV blood volume
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
30.1 Percentage of LV blood volume
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
29.9 Percentage of LV blood volume
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
NYHA Classification
Heart Failure present but NYHA class not recorded
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
NYHA Classification
III-Limitation with less than daily activity
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
NYHA Classification
II- Limitation with ordinary activity
23 Participants24 Participants47 Participants
NYHA Classification
I- No limitation
11 Participants8 Participants19 Participants
NYHA Classification
IV-Symptoms at rest
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
NYHA Classification
NA-No heart failure
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
41 Participants42 Participants83 Participants
Ventricular Depolarization (QRS) Duration103.9 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
112.1 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.3
108.4 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 505 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 508 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects Inappropriately Shocked by Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD)

An inappropriate shock is defined as a shock delivered by the ICD during a rhythm other than sustained VT/VF (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation).

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months after ICD implantation

Population: Intent to Treat population analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dual Chamber ICDNumber of Subjects Inappropriately Shocked by Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD)1 Participants
Single Chamber ICDNumber of Subjects Inappropriately Shocked by Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD)1 Participants
p-value: 1Log Rank
Secondary

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Burden

AF burden is defined as the sum of duration of all atrial arrhythmias divided by total observation time, reported as a percentage value.

Time frame: Implantation through 1 year

Population: Intent to treat analysis population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dual Chamber ICDAtrial Fibrillation (AF) Burden0.02 Percentage of atrial arrhythmias per minStandard Deviation 0.07
Single Chamber ICDAtrial Fibrillation (AF) Burden0 Percentage of atrial arrhythmias per minStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Number of Appropriate Shocks by ICD

Appropriate shocks are delivered during a sustained Ventricular Tachycardic/Ventricular Fibrillation heart rhythm.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 Months

Population: Intent to Treat population analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dual Chamber ICDNumber of Appropriate Shocks by ICD31 Shocks
Single Chamber ICDNumber of Appropriate Shocks by ICD1 Shocks
p-value: 0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Episodes Lasting Over 5 Minutes

Episodes of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) or Atrial Flutter (AFL) greater than 5 minutes duration. A subject may experience multiple episodes.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 Months

Population: Intent to Treat population analyzed. 37 episodes in 5 subjects (all in dual chamber arm).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dual Chamber ICDNumber of Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Episodes Lasting Over 5 Minutes37 Episodes
Single Chamber ICDNumber of Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Episodes Lasting Over 5 Minutes0 Episodes
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Newly Detected Atrial Tachyarrhythmias

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months after ICD implantation

Population: Intent to Treat population analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dual Chamber ICDNumber of Subjects With Newly Detected Atrial Tachyarrhythmias12 Participants
Single Chamber ICDNumber of Subjects With Newly Detected Atrial Tachyarrhythmias0 Participants
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Total Cost of ICD Implantation Procedure

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Only the 45 subjects enrolled at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota were analyzed for ICD implantation costs.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Dual Chamber ICDTotal Cost of ICD Implantation Procedure16,579 US Dollars
Single Chamber ICDTotal Cost of ICD Implantation Procedure14,249 US Dollars

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026