Skip to content

The Efficacy and Tolerability of Oleogel-S-10 in Patients With Actinic Keratoses

Randomized, Multicenter, Double Blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of Oleogel-S-10 for 3 Month Versus Placebo Only in Patients With Mild to Moderate Actinic Keratoses Located at the Face and Head Oleogel-S-10 in Actinic Keratoses Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00786994
Enrollment
165
Registered
2008-11-06
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2010-11-30
Last updated
2015-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Actinic Keratoses

Keywords

Actinic Keratoses

Brief summary

In this study the impact of Oleogel-S-10 versus placebo on actinic keratoses over a treatment period of 3 months will be tested. Additionally, once and twice daily applications are tested.

Detailed description

Oleogel-S-10 has shown efficacy and was well tolerated in two previous clinical trials. In the second open label phase II trial the efficacy of Oleogel-S-10 alone was similar compared to a more invasive treatment with cryotherapy. Response rates of 85% with a clear-ance of more than 75 % of the lesions of the patients treated with Oleogel-S-10 over three months were reported. These encouraging results led to the present randomized, multicenter, double blind phase II trial. The efficacy of the treatment shall be tested in a double blind placebo controlled (petroleum jelly) fashion in order to obtain more reliable results for the planning of a phase III study.

Interventions

DRUGOleogel-S10 100 mg/g

topical use once or twice daily

DRUGPlacebo (petroleum jelly)

topical use once or twice daily

Sponsors

University Hospital Tuebingen
CollaboratorOTHER
Birken AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least two mild to moderate actinic keratoses located at the facial skin or the head (except lips) * Actinic keratoses with a diameter of 0,5 - 2 cm, * that are definitely distinguished from other lesions and display a minimum distance of 0,5 cm to neighbored lesions * that are evaluated as histopathological grade 1 to 3 * histologically proven AK within three months before study entry * prepared and able to give written informed consent * ≥ 18 years of age * In case of females: postmenopause defined as * natural menopause with menses \> 1 year ago * serum FSH (\> 20 IU/l) and E2 levels in the postmenopausal range or * patients who had bilateral oophorectomy * prepared and comply with all study requirements, including the following: * application of Oleogel-S10 on the treatment area once or twice a day * 4 clinic visits during the pre-study, treatment, post-treatment, and follow-up period * pre- and post-treatment biopsy for histological confirmation (of clearance) of AK-diagnosis * Representative histologic slide and tissue block were shipped

Exclusion criteria

* Active immunosuppressive therapy * data of clinically significant, unstable, cardiovascular or hematologic, hepatic, neurologic, renal, endocrine, collagen-vascular, or gastrointestinal abnormalities or diseases Note: Patients with clinically stable medical conditions including, but not limited to, controlled hypertension, diabetes mellitus type II, hypercholesterolemia, or osteoarthritis will be allowed to enter the study * known allergies to any excipient in the study drug * any dermatological disease and/or condition in the treatment or surrounding area (3 cm distances from treatment area) that may be exacerbated by treatment with Oleogel-S-10 or cause difficulty with examination * active chemical dependency or alcoholism, as assessed by the investigator * pregnant and lactating women * currently participating in another clinical study or have completed another clinical study with an investigational drug within the past 30 days * received topical treatment at the treatment area with diclofenac gel, imiquimod or 5-FU within a time period of 1 month * Concomitant existence of non-treated (non-excised) basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma or malignant melanoma * Invasive tumors within the treatment area, e.g.: merkel cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, the latter is accepted if completely surgically removed Note: A biopsy of any lesion within the treatment or surrounding area suggestive of malignancy should be performed at the pre-study screening visit. If invasive SCC or other malignant conditions are confirmed within the treatment area, the patient will not be included in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response of the Marker Actinic Keratosis, Defined as Histologically Complete or Partial Clearance.18 weeksObjective response of the marker actinic keratosis, defined as histologically complete or partial clearance (partial clearance = down-grading in Cockerell-classification). The marker actinic keratosis is defined as an initially selected lesion within the target area that will be used for final biopsy. The Cockerell classification refers to a single lesion, graded as the presence of atypical cells in the lower third of the epidermis (grade I), involvement of at least the lower two-thirds (grade II) or atypical keratinocytic proliferation in the entire epidermis (grade III). Thus a down-grading from a higher Cockerell grade (e.g., III) to a lower Cockerell grade (e.g., I) represents a positive outcome and treatment success.

Countries

Germany, Greece

Participant flow

Recruitment details

165 patients were recruited.

Pre-assignment details

157 patients were evaluated in the ITT population. 8 of 165 recruited patients were excluded from ITT evaluation due to a deviation from the inclusion and exclusion criteria. For safety evaluations, all 165 patients had received treatment with study medication and all 165 patients were assessed for adverse events.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
A - Oleogel-S10 Once Daily
Oleogel-S10 ointment for three months once a day (54 patients) Oleogel-S10: topical use once or twice daily
53
B - Oleogel-S10 Twice Daily
Oleogel-S10 vehicle for three months twice a day (54 patients) Oleogel-S10: topical use once or twice daily
51
C - Placebo Once Daily
Placebo (petroleum jelly) for three months once a day (27 patients) Placebo (petroleum jelly)
25
D - Placebo Twice Daily
Placebo (petroleum jelly) for three months twice a day (27 patients) Placebo (petroleum jelly)
28
Total157

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicA - Oleogel-S10 Once DailyTotalD - Placebo Twice DailyC - Placebo Once DailyB - Oleogel-S10 Twice Daily
Actinic keratosis baseline severity index
Mild
22 participants62 participants13 participants9 participants18 participants
Actinic keratosis baseline severity index
Moderate
31 participants95 participants15 participants16 participants33 participants
Age, Continuous72 years72 years72 years69 years74 years
Histopathological grading
Grade I
9 participants17 participants2 participants2 participants4 participants
Histopathological grading
Grade II
11 participants37 participants12 participants4 participants10 participants
Histopathological grading
Grade III
32 participants100 participants13 participants19 participants36 participants
Histopathological grading
not done
1 participants3 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants128 Participants25 Participants20 Participants42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants29 Participants3 Participants5 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 577 / 543 / 263 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 573 / 540 / 260 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Response of the Marker Actinic Keratosis, Defined as Histologically Complete or Partial Clearance.

Objective response of the marker actinic keratosis, defined as histologically complete or partial clearance (partial clearance = down-grading in Cockerell-classification). The marker actinic keratosis is defined as an initially selected lesion within the target area that will be used for final biopsy. The Cockerell classification refers to a single lesion, graded as the presence of atypical cells in the lower third of the epidermis (grade I), involvement of at least the lower two-thirds (grade II) or atypical keratinocytic proliferation in the entire epidermis (grade III). Thus a down-grading from a higher Cockerell grade (e.g., III) to a lower Cockerell grade (e.g., I) represents a positive outcome and treatment success.

Time frame: 18 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A - Oleogel-S10 Once DailyObjective Response of the Marker Actinic Keratosis, Defined as Histologically Complete or Partial Clearance.Success: Downgrading or clearance22 participants
A - Oleogel-S10 Once DailyObjective Response of the Marker Actinic Keratosis, Defined as Histologically Complete or Partial Clearance.Failure: No downgrading or clearance25 participants
B - Oleogel-S10 Twice DailyObjective Response of the Marker Actinic Keratosis, Defined as Histologically Complete or Partial Clearance.Success: Downgrading or clearance17 participants
B - Oleogel-S10 Twice DailyObjective Response of the Marker Actinic Keratosis, Defined as Histologically Complete or Partial Clearance.Failure: No downgrading or clearance22 participants
C/D - Placebo Once or Twice DailyObjective Response of the Marker Actinic Keratosis, Defined as Histologically Complete or Partial Clearance.Success: Downgrading or clearance19 participants
C/D - Placebo Once or Twice DailyObjective Response of the Marker Actinic Keratosis, Defined as Histologically Complete or Partial Clearance.Failure: No downgrading or clearance27 participants
Comparison: A vs C/Dp-value: 0.6Mantel Haenszel
Comparison: B vs. C/Dp-value: 0.83Mantel Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026