Skip to content

Exercise for Low Back Pain in Children

School-Based Specific Exercise Programme Reduces the Prevalence and Intensity of Low Back Pain in 12-13 Year Old Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00786864
Acronym
LBP
Enrollment
72
Registered
2008-11-06
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2007-10-31
Last updated
2008-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Randomised controlled trial, low back pain, exercise, children, school-based, prevalence, intensity

Brief summary

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of an eight-week specific exercise programme in reducing self-reported episodes and intensity of LBP, as well as modifying some of the identified risk factors for LBP, in children.

Interventions

OTHERexercise programme

Specific low back pain exercise programme for children

Sponsors

University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children aged 12-13 years * Complained of LBP in the past three months

Exclusion criteria

* Serious spinal pathologies or deformities (e.g. severe scoliosis, spinal tumours) * Neurological conditions which alter motor tone * Physical disabilities (e.g. spinal cord injuries) which prevent the child from being able to stand up on their own without an orthotic device or brace, or which prevent the child from taking part in normal physical education (PE) classes * Any other serious co-morbidities (e.g. cancer, severe lung pathology) * Provincial sports participants, or children who were currently following a specific training programme with a biokineticist or physiotherapist * Current orthopaedic procedures or fractures of the spine, pelvis, lower or upper limbs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Low Back Pain Prevalence3 months post-interventionAll of the children complained of low back pain at baseline. Low back pain prevalence post-intervention was determined by the number of children still complaining of low back pain post-intervention.
Low Back Pain Intensity3 months post-interventionThe visual analogue scale (standardised 100mm, non-hatched line) was used to determine pain intensity. Scores can range between 0 and 10, with the worst possible pain/score = 10 and no pain/best score = 0. Visual analogue scale is continuous.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neural Mobility3 months post-interventionStraight leg raise test was used to measure neural mobility. The amount of hip flexion (angle between the plinth and femur of the raised leg) was measured using a digital inclinometer. Scores ranged between 3 (worst score) and 90.5 (best score). Continuous data.
Hamstring Flexibility3 months post-interventionStandardised hamstring muscle length test. The child was positioned in supine, with the hip flexed at 90 degrees. The knee was then extended passively. The angle of knee extension \[from horizontal plane (level to plinth) to fibula\] was measured using a digital inclinometer. Continuous data. Scores ranged from -20 (worst score) to 82 (best score).

Countries

South Africa

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruited January 2007 from 2 Government primary schools in the Ekurhuleni West and Johannesburg East Districts of Gauteng

Pre-assignment details

Only children who met the inclusion criteria for the study were included

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Exercise Intervention Group
Experimental Group
39
Control Group
Control group - no intervention
33
Total72

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudySustained serious back injury10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupExercise Intervention GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
33 Participants39 Participants72 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age Continuous12.39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
12.21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.66
12.29 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.68
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
33 participants39 participants72 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants24 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants15 Participants33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / —0 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / —0 / —

Outcome results

Primary

Low Back Pain Intensity

The visual analogue scale (standardised 100mm, non-hatched line) was used to determine pain intensity. Scores can range between 0 and 10, with the worst possible pain/score = 10 and no pain/best score = 0. Visual analogue scale is continuous.

Time frame: 3 months post-intervention

Population: Intention to treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Exercise Intervention GroupLow Back Pain Intensity1.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Control GroupLow Back Pain Intensity3.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
p-value: p<0ANCOVA
Primary

Low Back Pain Prevalence

All of the children complained of low back pain at baseline. Low back pain prevalence post-intervention was determined by the number of children still complaining of low back pain post-intervention.

Time frame: 3 months post-intervention

Population: Intention to treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Exercise Intervention GroupLow Back Pain Prevalence16 participants
Control GroupLow Back Pain Prevalence26 participants
p-value: p=0ANCOVA
Secondary

Hamstring Flexibility

Standardised hamstring muscle length test. The child was positioned in supine, with the hip flexed at 90 degrees. The knee was then extended passively. The angle of knee extension \[from horizontal plane (level to plinth) to fibula\] was measured using a digital inclinometer. Continuous data. Scores ranged from -20 (worst score) to 82 (best score).

Time frame: 3 months post-intervention

Population: Intention to treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Exercise Intervention GroupHamstring Flexibility54.00 degreesStandard Deviation 11.87
Control GroupHamstring Flexibility45.76 degreesStandard Deviation 9.59
p-value: p<0ANCOVA
Secondary

Neural Mobility

Straight leg raise test was used to measure neural mobility. The amount of hip flexion (angle between the plinth and femur of the raised leg) was measured using a digital inclinometer. Scores ranged between 3 (worst score) and 90.5 (best score). Continuous data.

Time frame: 3 months post-intervention

Population: Intention to treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Exercise Intervention GroupNeural Mobility64.41 degreesStandard Deviation 17.1
Control GroupNeural Mobility44.44 degreesStandard Deviation 16.55
p-value: p<0ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026