Skip to content

A Study for Treatment of Pain in Patients With Diabetic Neuropathy.

A Phase 2 Study of the Effects of LY545694, an iGluR5 Antagonist, in the Treatment of Subjects With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00785577
Enrollment
273
Registered
2008-11-05
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2012-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test whether a new treatment will be safe and effective in treating pain. Patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy will be included.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

LY545694 placebo BID po for 5 weeks Pregabalin placebo capsules TID po for 6 weeks

DRUGPregabalin

Pregabalin TID po for 6 weeks: 50 mg TID po for Week 1, 100 mg TID po for Weeks 2 - 5, and 50 mg TID po taper for Week 6 LY545694 placebo BID po for 5 weeks

DRUGLY545694 21 mg

LY545694 21 mg BID po for 1 week Pregabalin placebo TID po for 6 weeks

LY545694 escalated to 49 mg BID po for 1 week during Week 2. Pregabalin placebo TID po for 6 weeks.

LY545694 105 mg BID po for 5 weeks Pregabalin placebo TID po for 6 weeks

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have pain due to peripheral neuropathy based on disease diagnostic criteria: must have Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus, pain must being in the feet, with relatively symmetrical onset, daily pain must be present for at least 6 months, and diagnosis must be confirmed by a score of at least 3 on Part B of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument. * Have stable glycemic control, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) less than or equal to 10% * Mean score of at least 4 on the 24-hour average page severity assessment from (from daily diary) Visits 2 to 3. * Fully completed daily diaries for at least 70% of the days between Visit 2 and 3. * Women must test negative for a serum pregnancy test at Visit 1, and must agree to use medically acceptable and reliable means of birth control as determined by the investigator during the study and for 1 month following the last dose of study drug. * Are competent and able to freely give own informed consent. * Have an educational level and degree of understanding such that they can communicate intelligible with the investigator and study coordinator. * Have been judged to be reliable and agree to keep all appointments for clinic visits, tests, and procedures required by the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Have historical exposure to drugs known to cause neuropathy, or a history of a medical condition, including pernicious anemia and hypothyroidism, that could have been responsible for neuropathy. * Have pain that cannot be clearly differentiated from or conditions that interfere with the assessment of diabetic neuropathy pain. * Have had treatment with any centrally active neuroleptic drug within 30 days of visit 3. * Have had intolerance to pregabalin or have frequent and/or severe allergic reactions with multiple medications. * Have current or previous (within the past 1 year) Axis 1 diagnosis of major depressive disorder, mania, bipolar disorder, psychosis, dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorder, alcohol or eating disorders according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria, as determined by the investigator and confirmed by the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). * Have a serious of unstable cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, ophthalmologic, gastrointestinal, or hematologic illness, symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, or other medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator would compromise participation or be likely to lead to hospitalization during the course of the study. * Have alanine aminotransaminase \> 2 times upper limit of normal at Visit 1, based on reference ranges of central lab. * Have prior renal transplant, current renal dialysis, or serum creatinine laboratory values \> 1.5 times upper limit of normal, based on reference ranges of the central lab at Visit 1. * Have a diagnosis or history of glaucoma. * Are taking excluded medication that cannot be stopped and washed out prior to Visit 2. * Have history of substance abuse or dependence within the past year, excluding nicotine and caffeine. * Are judged clinically by the investigator to be at suicidal risk in the opinion of the investigator based upon clinical interview and the Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale. * Have a positive urine drug screen for any substance of abuse or excluded medication. * Are unwilling or unable to comply with the use of a data collection device to directly record data from the subject (daily diary). * Are pregnant or breast-feeding. * Are investigator site personnel directly affiliated with this study and/or their immediate families. * Are Lilly employees. * Have received treatment within the last 30 days with a drug that has not received regulatory approval for any indication at the time of study entry. * Have a history of recurrent seizures other than febrile seizures. * Have a history of severe gastroparesis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksThis scale measured 24-hour APS scores. Data were recorded daily (preferably at bedtime) on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Night Pain Severity Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksThis scale measured night pain APS scores. Data were recorded daily on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
Number of Participants With 30% Reduction in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) ScoreBaseline through 5 weeksThis scale measured the number of participants with a 30% reduction in weekly mean 24-hour APS score from baseline to endpoint. Data were recorded daily (preferably at bedtime) on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Change From Baseline in Average Brief Pain Inventory - Interference (BPI-I) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksAverage BPI-I measured self-reported degree of pain interference on function. Interference scores: 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) on each question assessing interference of pain in past 24 hours for general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Average interference = average of non-missing scores of individual interference items. LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksBPI-S measured self-reported severity of pain. Severity scores: 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) on each question assessing worst pain, least pain, and average pain in past 24 hours, and current pain. LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksCGI-S measured severity of illness at the time of assessment compared with start of treatment. Scores ranged from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at 5 WeeksWeek 5PGI-I measured the participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. The score ranged from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Sensory Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksSF-MPQ consisted of 11 sensory descriptors describing pain that were rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. Three pain scores were derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for sensory descriptors. The SF-MPQ sensory subscale was the sum of the 11 scores (ranged from 0 to 33, with 33 being the worst). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Assessment of Sleep Questionnaire (ASQ) Total Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksASQ consisted of 21 items (including a single item to assess overall sleep quality) and 3 subscales: Sleep Onset and Maintenance (items 1-3, 5-6, 9, 11); Sleep Experience (items 4, 7, 8, 10, 12); and Awakening Experience (items 13-20). Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no sleep at all) to 5 (a lot of sleep). Each subscale was calculated as the mean of the individual items comprising the subscale. A total ASQ score was calculated as the mean of the subscale scores; higher scores represent better sleep.
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy-Specific Quality of Life (NeuroQoL) Questionnaire Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksNeuroQoL had 29 items: 13 assessed specific somatic experiences (pain, lost/reduced feeling, and diffuse sensory-motor symptoms); 14 assessed specific functional, social, and emotional experiences (restrictions in daily living activities, disruptions in social relationships, and emotional distress); 2 items assessed QoL and overall satisfaction. Items reported on a 5-point scale (never/not at all to all of the time/very much). Higher mean scores=more severe symptoms/greater disruption in functioning. First 27 items also associate with 3-point bothersome/importance scale (1=none to 3=very).
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksThe SF-36 Health Status Survey was a generic, health-related scale assessing participants' quality of life on 8 domains (physical functioning, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health, role-physical, role-emotional and general health) and 2 summary scores (mental component summary \[MCS\] and physical component summary \[PCS\]). MCS and PCS scores=0-100 (higher scores indicate better health status). Domain scores: general health=5-25; physical functioning=10-30; role-physical=4-8; role-emotional=3-6; social functioning=2-10; bodily pain=2-11; vitality=4-24; mental health=5-30.
Change From Baseline of European Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at 5 Weeks: United States Population Based Index ScoreBaseline, 5 weeksThe EQ-5D was a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. The profile allowed participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and mood. A single score between 1 and 3 was generated for each domain. For each participant, the outcome rating on the 5 domains was mapped to a single index through an algorithm. The index ranged between 0 and 1, with the higher score indicating a better health state perceived by the participant.
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Impairment Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksThe SDS was completed by the participant and was used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on work/social/family life. Total scores ranged from 0 to 30 with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Worst Daily Pain Severity Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksThis scale measured worst pain APS scores. Data were recorded daily (preferably at bedtime) on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
Number of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Abnormal High or Low Laboratory ValuesBaseline through 5 weeksThe number of participants by treatment group who had abnormal high or low laboratory values was reported by the investigator and summarized as serious adverse events (SAEs) from the Investigations system organ class during the treatment phase of the study. A listing of SAEs is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksParticipants' systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse Rate at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksPulse rate was measured in beats per minute (bpm). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram Change in Heart Rate Using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's (QTcF) FormulasBaseline through 5 weeksThe number of participants having QTcF and QTcB change ≥ 30 msec was summarized.
Percentage of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemic EventsBaseline through 5 weeksPercentage of participants who reported hypoglycemic (lower than normal level of blood glucose) episodes was summarized as other non-serious adverse events (AEs) from the Investigations system organ class (preferred term = hypoglycemia). A listing of AEs is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.
Change From Baseline in Overall Total Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) ScoreBaseline, 5 weeksThe QIDS was a 16-item patient-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. Each item had a 0 to 3 point scale. The total score ranged from 0 to 27 with higher scores indicative of greater severity. QIDS was calculated by summing the scores from the 9 symptom domains of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) major depressive disorder criteria: depressed mood, loss of interest or pleasure, concentration/decision making, self outlook, suicidal ideation, energy/fatigability, sleep, weight/appetite change, and psychomotor changes.
Number of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and IdeationsBaseline through week 5The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) captured occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. Number of participants with suicidal behaviors and ideations were provided. Suicidal behavior = a yes answer to any 1 of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. Suicidal ideation = a yes answer to any 1 of 5 suicidal ideation questions, which included the wish to be dead and 4 different categories of active suicidal ideation.
Number of Participants Reporting Blurry or Hazy Vision Using the Subjective Vision Inventory (SVI) Question 1 (Q1) at 5 WeeksWeek 5This scale first asked if the participant was experiencing hazy or blurry vision or if he/she had difficulty focusing. If the answer was yes, follow-up questions rated the degree to which the issue impaired his/her ability to do work or to read.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Clearance of LY545694 (CLp) and Compound 645838 (CLm)Baseline through 5 weeksClearance is the volume of plasma cleared of study drug LY545694 (CLp) and metabolite compound 645838 (CLm) per unit time. The original PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship outcome measure analysis was not conducted; therefore, only PK data were reported.
Time to ResponseBaseline through 5 weeksTime to response=first visit achieving a 30% reduction of weekly mean 24-hour APS score. Data were recorded daily (preferably at bedtime) on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The number of days at which 50% of the participants at risk had at least 30% response was reported.
Number of Participants With Neurological Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline through 5 weeksThe total number of TEAEs (serious and non-serious) that first occurred or worsened during the treatment period) from the Nervous system disorders system organ class was summarized. A listing of serious AEs (SAEs) and other non-serious AEs is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Therapy (Double-blind) Phase and 1-Week Washout (Follow-up) PhaseBaseline through 6 weeksParticipant discontinuation in the study due to serious and other non-serious AEs was measured during both the therapy (double-blind) phase and 1-week washout (follow-up) phase. A listing of serious and other non-serious AEs is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.

Countries

Mexico, Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Study Period 1 was an up to 5-week screening phase when participants stopped use of excluded medications (525 participants entered; 252 discontinued ). Study Period 2 was a 5-week, double-blind therapy period when randomization and dispensing of study drug occurred. Study Period 3 was a 1-week washout phase when all study medication was stopped.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
LY545694 placebo twice daily (BID) oral (po) for 5 weeks and pregabalin placebo capsules three times daily (TID) po for 6 weeks.
89
Pregabalin
Pregabalin thrice daily TID po for 6 weeks: 50 mg TID po for Week 1, 100 mg TID po for Weeks 2 - 5, and 50 mg TID po taper for Week 6.
45
LY545694 21 mg
LY545694 21 milligrams (mg) BID po for 1 week.
43
LY545694 49 mg
LY545694 escalated to 49 mg BID po during Week 2; possible titration down to 21 mg BID po within 1 week of escalation for remainder of study treatment.
49
LY545694 105 mg
LY545694 escalated to 105 mg BID po during Week 3 through Week 5; possible titration down to 49 mg BID po within 1 week of escalation for the remainder of study treatment.
47
Total273

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Study Period 2: Therapy PhaseAdverse Event57141017
Study Period 2: Therapy PhaseEntry Criteria Exclusion10110
Study Period 2: Therapy PhaseLack of Efficacy00001
Study Period 2: Therapy PhaseLost to Follow-up00010
Study Period 2: Therapy PhasePhysician Decision10000
Study Period 2: Therapy PhaseProtocol Violation11101
Study Period 2: Therapy PhaseSponsor Decision10110
Study Period 2: Therapy PhaseWithdrawal by Subject21101
Study Period 3: 1-Week Washout PhaseAdverse Event00010
Study Period 3: 1-Week Washout PhaseDeath00001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboPregabalinLY545694 21 mgLY545694 49 mgLY545694 105 mgTotal
Age Continuous55.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
56.89 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.19
56.95 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.35
58.59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.71
56.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.77
56.62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.71
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
7 participants4 participants2 participants4 participants2 participants19 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
10 participants6 participants9 participants4 participants8 participants37 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
1 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants1 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
71 participants35 participants30 participants40 participants35 participants211 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
26 participants13 participants12 participants16 participants16 participants83 participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
6 participants3 participants3 participants4 participants3 participants19 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
57 participants29 participants28 participants29 participants28 participants171 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants17 Participants20 Participants25 Participants19 Participants118 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants28 Participants23 Participants24 Participants28 Participants155 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
53 / 8933 / 4343 / 4940 / 4731 / 4515 / 894 / 437 / 497 / 476 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 891 / 431 / 491 / 470 / 450 / 890 / 430 / 491 / 470 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) Score at 5 Weeks

This scale measured 24-hour APS scores. Data were recorded daily (preferably at bedtime) on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was conducted on the primary efficacy measure modified ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) Score at 5 Weeks-2.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) Score at 5 Weeks-2.22 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) Score at 5 Weeks-2.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) Score at 5 Weeks-2.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Assessment of Sleep Questionnaire (ASQ) Total Score at 5 Weeks

ASQ consisted of 21 items (including a single item to assess overall sleep quality) and 3 subscales: Sleep Onset and Maintenance (items 1-3, 5-6, 9, 11); Sleep Experience (items 4, 7, 8, 10, 12); and Awakening Experience (items 13-20). Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no sleep at all) to 5 (a lot of sleep). Each subscale was calculated as the mean of the individual items comprising the subscale. A total ASQ score was calculated as the mean of the subscale scores; higher scores represent better sleep.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Assessment of Sleep Questionnaire (ASQ) Total Score at 5 Weeks0.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Assessment of Sleep Questionnaire (ASQ) Total Score at 5 Weeks0.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Assessment of Sleep Questionnaire (ASQ) Total Score at 5 Weeks0.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Assessment of Sleep Questionnaire (ASQ) Total Score at 5 Weeks0.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Assessment of Sleep Questionnaire (ASQ) Total Score at 5 Weeks0.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Brief Pain Inventory - Interference (BPI-I) Subscale Score at 5 Weeks

Average BPI-I measured self-reported degree of pain interference on function. Interference scores: 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) on each question assessing interference of pain in past 24 hours for general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Average interference = average of non-missing scores of individual interference items. LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Brief Pain Inventory - Interference (BPI-I) Subscale Score at 5 Weeks-2.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Average Brief Pain Inventory - Interference (BPI-I) Subscale Score at 5 Weeks-2.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Average Brief Pain Inventory - Interference (BPI-I) Subscale Score at 5 Weeks-2.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Average Brief Pain Inventory - Interference (BPI-I) Subscale Score at 5 Weeks-2.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Average Brief Pain Inventory - Interference (BPI-I) Subscale Score at 5 Weeks-2.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 Weeks

BPI-S measured self-reported severity of pain. Severity scores: 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) on each question assessing worst pain, least pain, and average pain in past 24 hours, and current pain. LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Worst Pain-2.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Least Pain-1.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Average Pain-2.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Current Pain-2.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Worst Pain-3.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Current Pain-3.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Least Pain-2.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Average Pain-2.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Current Pain-2.66 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Least Pain-1.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Average Pain-2.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Worst Pain-3.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Worst Pain-2.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Least Pain-2.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Current Pain-2.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Average Pain-2.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Current Pain-2.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Average Pain-2.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Least Pain-1.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBPI-S Worst Pain-3.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at 5 Weeks

CGI-S measured severity of illness at the time of assessment compared with start of treatment. Scores ranged from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at 5 Weeks-1.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at 5 Weeks-1.02 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at 5 Weeks-1.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at 5 Weeks-1.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at 5 Weeks-1.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neuropathy-Specific Quality of Life (NeuroQoL) Questionnaire Score at 5 Weeks

NeuroQoL had 29 items: 13 assessed specific somatic experiences (pain, lost/reduced feeling, and diffuse sensory-motor symptoms); 14 assessed specific functional, social, and emotional experiences (restrictions in daily living activities, disruptions in social relationships, and emotional distress); 2 items assessed QoL and overall satisfaction. Items reported on a 5-point scale (never/not at all to all of the time/very much). Higher mean scores=more severe symptoms/greater disruption in functioning. First 27 items also associate with 3-point bothersome/importance scale (1=none to 3=very).

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathy-Specific Quality of Life (NeuroQoL) Questionnaire Score at 5 Weeks-0.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy-Specific Quality of Life (NeuroQoL) Questionnaire Score at 5 Weeks-0.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy-Specific Quality of Life (NeuroQoL) Questionnaire Score at 5 Weeks-0.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy-Specific Quality of Life (NeuroQoL) Questionnaire Score at 5 Weeks-0.59 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy-Specific Quality of Life (NeuroQoL) Questionnaire Score at 5 Weeks-0.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Overall Total Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Score

The QIDS was a 16-item patient-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. Each item had a 0 to 3 point scale. The total score ranged from 0 to 27 with higher scores indicative of greater severity. QIDS was calculated by summing the scores from the 9 symptom domains of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) major depressive disorder criteria: depressed mood, loss of interest or pleasure, concentration/decision making, self outlook, suicidal ideation, energy/fatigability, sleep, weight/appetite change, and psychomotor changes.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Overall Total Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Score-1.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Overall Total Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Score-1.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Overall Total Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Score-0.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Overall Total Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Score-0.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Overall Total Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Score0.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Impairment Score at 5 Weeks

The SDS was completed by the participant and was used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on work/social/family life. Total scores ranged from 0 to 30 with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Impairment Score at 5 Weeks-2.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Impairment Score at 5 Weeks-2.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.94
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Impairment Score at 5 Weeks-2.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.99
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Impairment Score at 5 Weeks-1.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.95
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Impairment Score at 5 Weeks-3.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.95
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain Score at 5 Weeks

The SF-36 Health Status Survey was a generic, health-related scale assessing participants' quality of life on 8 domains (physical functioning, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health, role-physical, role-emotional and general health) and 2 summary scores (mental component summary \[MCS\] and physical component summary \[PCS\]). MCS and PCS scores=0-100 (higher scores indicate better health status). Domain scores: general health=5-25; physical functioning=10-30; role-physical=4-8; role-emotional=3-6; social functioning=2-10; bodily pain=2-11; vitality=4-24; mental health=5-30.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain Score at 5 Weeks7.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.94
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain Score at 5 Weeks10.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.26
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain Score at 5 Weeks8.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.32
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain Score at 5 Weeks5.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.24
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain Score at 5 Weeks6.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.26
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Sensory Subscale Score at 5 Weeks

SF-MPQ consisted of 11 sensory descriptors describing pain that were rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. Three pain scores were derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for sensory descriptors. The SF-MPQ sensory subscale was the sum of the 11 scores (ranged from 0 to 33, with 33 being the worst). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Sensory Subscale Score at 5 Weeks-8.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Sensory Subscale Score at 5 Weeks-8.60 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.01
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Sensory Subscale Score at 5 Weeks-8.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Sensory Subscale Score at 5 Weeks-8.95 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.02
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Sensory Subscale Score at 5 Weeks-7.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse Rate at 5 Weeks

Pulse rate was measured in beats per minute (bpm). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse Rate at 5 Weeks-1.06 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 1.05
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse Rate at 5 Weeks-3.60 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 1.49
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse Rate at 5 Weeks0.87 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 1.72
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse Rate at 5 Weeks1.47 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 1.51
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse Rate at 5 Weeks1.66 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 1.61
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 5 Weeks

Participants' systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 5 WeeksSystolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)-1.82 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 1.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 5 WeeksDiastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)-0.87 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 0.88
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 5 WeeksSystolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)-3.18 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 1.93
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 5 WeeksDiastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)-3.60 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 1.25
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 5 WeeksSystolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)0.22 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 2.26
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 5 WeeksDiastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)-0.07 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 1.46
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 5 WeeksDiastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)1.88 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 1.26
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 5 WeeksSystolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)-0.24 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 1.96
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 5 WeeksSystolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)0.08 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 2.1
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 5 WeeksDiastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)0.77 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 1.36
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Night Pain Severity Score at 5 Weeks

This scale measured night pain APS scores. Data were recorded daily on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean Night Pain Severity Score at 5 Weeks-2.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean Night Pain Severity Score at 5 Weeks-2.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean Night Pain Severity Score at 5 Weeks-2.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean Night Pain Severity Score at 5 Weeks-2.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean Night Pain Severity Score at 5 Weeks-2.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Worst Daily Pain Severity Score at 5 Weeks

This scale measured worst pain APS scores. Data were recorded daily (preferably at bedtime) on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean Worst Daily Pain Severity Score at 5 Weeks-2.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean Worst Daily Pain Severity Score at 5 Weeks-2.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean Worst Daily Pain Severity Score at 5 Weeks-2.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean Worst Daily Pain Severity Score at 5 Weeks-2.77 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean Worst Daily Pain Severity Score at 5 Weeks-2.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Secondary

Change From Baseline of European Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at 5 Weeks: United States Population Based Index Score

The EQ-5D was a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. The profile allowed participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and mood. A single score between 1 and 3 was generated for each domain. For each participant, the outcome rating on the 5 domains was mapped to a single index through an algorithm. The index ranged between 0 and 1, with the higher score indicating a better health state perceived by the participant.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline of European Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at 5 Weeks: United States Population Based Index Score0.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
LY545694 21 mgChange From Baseline of European Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at 5 Weeks: United States Population Based Index Score0.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
LY545694 49 mgChange From Baseline of European Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at 5 Weeks: United States Population Based Index Score0.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline of European Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at 5 Weeks: United States Population Based Index Score0.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
LY545694 105 mgChange From Baseline of European Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at 5 Weeks: United States Population Based Index Score0.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Blurry or Hazy Vision Using the Subjective Vision Inventory (SVI) Question 1 (Q1) at 5 Weeks

This scale first asked if the participant was experiencing hazy or blurry vision or if he/she had difficulty focusing. If the answer was yes, follow-up questions rated the degree to which the issue impaired his/her ability to do work or to read.

Time frame: Week 5

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with only postbaseline data collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Reporting Blurry or Hazy Vision Using the Subjective Vision Inventory (SVI) Question 1 (Q1) at 5 WeeksYES8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Reporting Blurry or Hazy Vision Using the Subjective Vision Inventory (SVI) Question 1 (Q1) at 5 WeeksNO71 participants
LY545694 21 mgNumber of Participants Reporting Blurry or Hazy Vision Using the Subjective Vision Inventory (SVI) Question 1 (Q1) at 5 WeeksYES8 participants
LY545694 21 mgNumber of Participants Reporting Blurry or Hazy Vision Using the Subjective Vision Inventory (SVI) Question 1 (Q1) at 5 WeeksNO29 participants
LY545694 49 mgNumber of Participants Reporting Blurry or Hazy Vision Using the Subjective Vision Inventory (SVI) Question 1 (Q1) at 5 WeeksYES3 participants
LY545694 49 mgNumber of Participants Reporting Blurry or Hazy Vision Using the Subjective Vision Inventory (SVI) Question 1 (Q1) at 5 WeeksNO23 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants Reporting Blurry or Hazy Vision Using the Subjective Vision Inventory (SVI) Question 1 (Q1) at 5 WeeksNO32 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants Reporting Blurry or Hazy Vision Using the Subjective Vision Inventory (SVI) Question 1 (Q1) at 5 WeeksYES3 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants Reporting Blurry or Hazy Vision Using the Subjective Vision Inventory (SVI) Question 1 (Q1) at 5 WeeksYES4 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants Reporting Blurry or Hazy Vision Using the Subjective Vision Inventory (SVI) Question 1 (Q1) at 5 WeeksNO26 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Therapy (Double-blind) Phase and 1-Week Washout (Follow-up) Phase

Participant discontinuation in the study due to serious and other non-serious AEs was measured during both the therapy (double-blind) phase and 1-week washout (follow-up) phase. A listing of serious and other non-serious AEs is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.

Time frame: Baseline through 6 weeks

Population: The safety analysis population included all 273 participants randomized to study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Therapy (Double-blind) Phase and 1-Week Washout (Follow-up) PhaseTherapy (Double-blind) Phase5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Therapy (Double-blind) Phase and 1-Week Washout (Follow-up) Phase1-Week Washout (Follow-up) Phase0 participants
LY545694 21 mgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Therapy (Double-blind) Phase and 1-Week Washout (Follow-up) PhaseTherapy (Double-blind) Phase7 participants
LY545694 21 mgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Therapy (Double-blind) Phase and 1-Week Washout (Follow-up) Phase1-Week Washout (Follow-up) Phase0 participants
LY545694 49 mgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Therapy (Double-blind) Phase and 1-Week Washout (Follow-up) PhaseTherapy (Double-blind) Phase14 participants
LY545694 49 mgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Therapy (Double-blind) Phase and 1-Week Washout (Follow-up) Phase1-Week Washout (Follow-up) Phase0 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Therapy (Double-blind) Phase and 1-Week Washout (Follow-up) Phase1-Week Washout (Follow-up) Phase1 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Therapy (Double-blind) Phase and 1-Week Washout (Follow-up) PhaseTherapy (Double-blind) Phase10 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Therapy (Double-blind) Phase and 1-Week Washout (Follow-up) PhaseTherapy (Double-blind) Phase17 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Therapy (Double-blind) Phase and 1-Week Washout (Follow-up) Phase1-Week Washout (Follow-up) Phase1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With 30% Reduction in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) Score

This scale measured the number of participants with a 30% reduction in weekly mean 24-hour APS score from baseline to endpoint. Data were recorded daily (preferably at bedtime) on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

Time frame: Baseline through 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure. LOCF was conducted on the primary efficacy measure modified ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 30% Reduction in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) Score38 participants
LY545694 21 mgNumber of Participants With 30% Reduction in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) Score18 participants
LY545694 49 mgNumber of Participants With 30% Reduction in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) Score21 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With 30% Reduction in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) Score21 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram Change in Heart Rate Using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's (QTcF) Formulas

The number of participants having QTcF and QTcB change ≥ 30 msec was summarized.

Time frame: Baseline through 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram Change in Heart Rate Using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's (QTcF) FormulasQTcB ≥30 msec4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram Change in Heart Rate Using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's (QTcF) FormulasQTcF ≥30 msec3 participants
LY545694 21 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram Change in Heart Rate Using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's (QTcF) FormulasQTcB ≥30 msec0 participants
LY545694 21 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram Change in Heart Rate Using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's (QTcF) FormulasQTcF ≥30 msec0 participants
LY545694 49 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram Change in Heart Rate Using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's (QTcF) FormulasQTcB ≥30 msec2 participants
LY545694 49 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram Change in Heart Rate Using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's (QTcF) FormulasQTcF ≥30 msec1 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram Change in Heart Rate Using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's (QTcF) FormulasQTcF ≥30 msec0 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram Change in Heart Rate Using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's (QTcF) FormulasQTcB ≥30 msec1 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram Change in Heart Rate Using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's (QTcF) FormulasQTcB ≥30 msec1 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram Change in Heart Rate Using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's (QTcF) FormulasQTcF ≥30 msec1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Neurological Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

The total number of TEAEs (serious and non-serious) that first occurred or worsened during the treatment period) from the Nervous system disorders system organ class was summarized. A listing of serious AEs (SAEs) and other non-serious AEs is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.

Time frame: Baseline through 5 weeks

Population: The safety analysis population included all 273 participants randomized to study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)17 participants
LY545694 21 mgNumber of Participants With Neurological Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)22 participants
LY545694 49 mgNumber of Participants With Neurological Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)16 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Neurological Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)24 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Neurological Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)23 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Abnormal High or Low Laboratory Values

The number of participants by treatment group who had abnormal high or low laboratory values was reported by the investigator and summarized as serious adverse events (SAEs) from the Investigations system organ class during the treatment phase of the study. A listing of SAEs is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.

Time frame: Baseline through 5 weeks

Population: The safety analysis population included all 273 participants randomized to study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Abnormal High or Low Laboratory ValuesAlanine aminotransferase (ALT) abnormal0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Abnormal High or Low Laboratory ValuesAspartate aminotransferase (AST) abnormal0 participants
LY545694 21 mgNumber of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Abnormal High or Low Laboratory ValuesAspartate aminotransferase (AST) abnormal0 participants
LY545694 21 mgNumber of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Abnormal High or Low Laboratory ValuesAlanine aminotransferase (ALT) abnormal0 participants
LY545694 49 mgNumber of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Abnormal High or Low Laboratory ValuesAlanine aminotransferase (ALT) abnormal0 participants
LY545694 49 mgNumber of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Abnormal High or Low Laboratory ValuesAspartate aminotransferase (AST) abnormal0 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Abnormal High or Low Laboratory ValuesAspartate aminotransferase (AST) abnormal0 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Abnormal High or Low Laboratory ValuesAlanine aminotransferase (ALT) abnormal0 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Abnormal High or Low Laboratory ValuesAspartate aminotransferase (AST) abnormal1 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Abnormal High or Low Laboratory ValuesAlanine aminotransferase (ALT) abnormal1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and Ideations

The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) captured occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. Number of participants with suicidal behaviors and ideations were provided. Suicidal behavior = a yes answer to any 1 of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. Suicidal ideation = a yes answer to any 1 of 5 suicidal ideation questions, which included the wish to be dead and 4 different categories of active suicidal ideation.

Time frame: Baseline through week 5

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and IdeationsSuicidal behaviors0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and IdeationsSuicidal ideations1 participants
LY545694 21 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and IdeationsSuicidal behaviors0 participants
LY545694 21 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and IdeationsSuicidal ideations0 participants
LY545694 49 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and IdeationsSuicidal behaviors0 participants
LY545694 49 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and IdeationsSuicidal ideations1 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and IdeationsSuicidal ideations0 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and IdeationsSuicidal behaviors0 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and IdeationsSuicidal behaviors0 participants
LY545694 105 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and IdeationsSuicidal ideations1 participants
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at 5 Weeks

PGI-I measured the participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. The score ranged from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Week 5

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with only postbaseline data collected.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at 5 Weeks2.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
LY545694 21 mgPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at 5 Weeks2.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
LY545694 49 mgPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at 5 Weeks2.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
LY545694 105 mgPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at 5 Weeks2.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
LY545694 105 mgPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at 5 Weeks2.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemic Events

Percentage of participants who reported hypoglycemic (lower than normal level of blood glucose) episodes was summarized as other non-serious adverse events (AEs) from the Investigations system organ class (preferred term = hypoglycemia). A listing of AEs is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.

Time frame: Baseline through 5 weeks

Population: The safety analysis population included all 273 participants randomized to study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemic Events1.12 percentage of participants
LY545694 21 mgPercentage of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemic Events0.00 percentage of participants
LY545694 49 mgPercentage of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemic Events0.00 percentage of participants
LY545694 105 mgPercentage of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemic Events2.13 percentage of participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Clearance of LY545694 (CLp) and Compound 645838 (CLm)

Clearance is the volume of plasma cleared of study drug LY545694 (CLp) and metabolite compound 645838 (CLm) per unit time. The original PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship outcome measure analysis was not conducted; therefore, only PK data were reported.

Time frame: Baseline through 5 weeks

Population: The PK dataset for population modeling consisted of quantifiable plasma LY545694 and Compound 64538 concentrations from participants following daily oral doses of LY545694 21 mg to LY545694 105 mg.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboPharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Clearance of LY545694 (CLp) and Compound 645838 (CLm)79.1 Liters per hour (L/hr)
LY545694 21 mgPharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Clearance of LY545694 (CLp) and Compound 645838 (CLm)39.8 Liters per hour (L/hr)
Secondary

Time to Response

Time to response=first visit achieving a 30% reduction of weekly mean 24-hour APS score. Data were recorded daily (preferably at bedtime) on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The number of days at which 50% of the participants at risk had at least 30% response was reported.

Time frame: Baseline through 5 weeks

Population: The analysis population was a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as participants who received either study drug with both baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboTime to Response36 time (days)
LY545694 21 mgTime to Response30 time (days)
LY545694 49 mgTime to Response30 time (days)
LY545694 105 mgTime to Response30 time (days)
LY545694 105 mgTime to Response30 time (days)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026