Skip to content

Fenzian Asthma Multicenter Outcomes Study

Effect of Fenzian™ Treatment on Symptoms, Pulmonary Function and Albuterol/Salbutamol Use in Patients With Mild to Moderate Persistent Asthma: A Multicenter, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00784758
Acronym
FAMOUS
Enrollment
81
Registered
2008-11-04
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2019-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Asthma, Lung Diseases, Respiratory Tract Diseases

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of Fenzian™ treatment on symptoms (such as shortness of breath), lung function (how well the lungs work), and albuterol/salbutamol (rescue medication) use in people with asthma. This will be done by comparing the effects of Fenzian™ treatment to the effects of a sham treatment, which looks the same as the Fenzian™ device but doesn't do anything. The Fenzian™ device is an electrical instrument that the investigators hope will help reduce airway inflammation associated with asthma symptoms by stimulating the nerves with very low electrical currents. The study device will be applied directly to the skin on the back, working along the ribs toward the spine, alternating between left and right sides, and on your face.

Interventions

DEVICEFenzian Device

Three 20-minute treatments with the Fenzian Device per week for 5 weeks (for a total of 15 treatments)

DEVICESham Device

Three 20-minute treatments with the sham device per week for 5 weeks (for a total of 15 treatments) (NOTE: This arm is similar to a placebo arm in a drug trial.)

Sponsors

Fenzian Ltd.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of California, Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ages 12-80 years. \[NOTE: Only the Johns Hopkins site will enroll subjects under 18.\] * Clinical history consistent with asthma (GINA 4 definitions) for at least six months * Current symptoms and features of partly-controlled or uncontrolled asthma, according to GINA classification of asthma control * A stable (1 month) treatment regimen consisting of: * as needed short-acting bronchodilators alone, * as needed short-acting bronchodilators in combination with low- or medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids (\<= 1000 mcg per day beclomethasone or equivalent, * any combination of long acting beta-agonist bronchodilator and low- or medium-dose inhaled corticosteroid (as defined above),as needed short-acting bronchodilators in combination with montelukast or other leukotriene modifier * Willingness to comply with the study protocol and ability to perform the study procedures. * Willingness to attend the study site according to the specified treatment schedule Inclusion Criteria Assessed at Visit 1: * Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) between 60% predicted and the lower limit of normal. * Pre-bronchodilator \[FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC)\] less than the lower limit of normal. * Reversibility of FEV1 of at least 200 ml, 15-20 minutes after 4 puffs of albuterol HFA pressurized metered-dose inhaler pMDI. Inclusion Criteria Assessed at Visit 2: * Reversibility of FEV1 of at least 200ml, 15-30 minutes after 4 puffs of albuterol HFA pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) if not confirmed at Visit 1 plus * Using short-acting bronchodilator therapy on two or more occasions in each of the two weeks preceding Visit 2 plus (Ventolin HFA counter decrease of at least 8 puffs) * Partly controlled or uncontrolled of asthma as indicated by one to three, but not four of the following in each of the two weeks preceding Visit 2: * Daytime symptoms more than twice per week * Any limitation of activity * Any nocturnal symptoms or awakening * peak expiratory flow (PEF)\<80% of predicted on any day

Exclusion criteria

* Pulmonary disease other than asthma, such as smoking-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), clinically significant bronchiectasis, lung resection, and interstitial lung disease. * Other significant systemic illness which might, in the opinion of the investigator alter the risk or outcome of the study (e.g. cardiovascular arrhythmias or conduction abnormalities, hyperthyroidism, uncontrolled hypertension, cancer) * Tobacco smoking greater than 10 pack-year of cumulative exposure or current smoking within 10 years. * Respiratory tract infection within 6 weeks of the study. * Seasonal allergies causing symptoms within the past 4 weeks. Perennial or out of season allergic rhinitis is acceptable. Nasal corticosteroids and long-acting antihistamines are acceptable. * Any investigational drug or treatment within 30 days. * Use of cromolyn, nedocromil, theophylline, tiotropium, or oral albuterol within 1 week prior to Visit 1 of the study. * Current use of omalizumab or within the last 8 weeks. * Subjects on anti-depressant (mono-amine oxidase inhibitors or tricyclic antidepressants) treatment within 8 weeks. * Non-potassium sparing diuretics unless in fixed combination with potassium-sparing diuretics within one week. * Digoxin, within one week, unless levels have been monitored previously while taking albuterol or long-acting beta2-agonist (LABAs). * Presence of an implanted cardiac pacemaker or neurostimulator. A removable transcutaneous nerve stimulator, not used during the treatment sessions is acceptable. * Non-selective beta agonists. (acceptable choices include: bisprolol, betaxolol, atenolol, acebutolol and metoprolol) * Subjects who are pregnant or breast feeding. * Persons employed by or related to those employed by the investigative site (e.g. Pulmonary Division). * Prior Fenzian treatment for any indication * Hypersensitivity or intolerance of albuterol HFA pMDI (Ventolin) or its components. Note: if the subject is using ipratropium bromide for rescue short-acting bronchodilator, they must specifically not have been placed on that treatment due to intolerance of albuterol/salbutamol. * Inability to withhold, before and during each visit (except the initial consent visit), xanthine-containing foods (coffee, tea, cola, chocolate, etc.) and alcohol for 6 hours, and short-acting bronchodilators for 8 hours. * Unwillingness to stop use of non-study supplied albuterol (nebulized, chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) or HFA), other short-acting beta agonists (e.g. epinephrine, levalbuterol, metaproterenol, pirbuterol, terbutaline) and ipratropium during the study (after consent through visit 4). * Inability to coordinate the timing for doses of long-acting beta agonists (withhold period at least 12 hours prior to visit) with Visits 1, 2, 3 or 4

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) 7 ScoreBaseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeksAsthma Control Questionnaire (QOL Technologies 2004) Elizabeth Juniper, (Eur Respir J 1999; 14:902-7). Range 0-6, 0 is no symptoms, 6 is maximal symptoms. 0.5 is considered a minimally important difference, 0.75 or less is associated with a 85% chance that the subject's asthma is well controlled, 1.50 or greater is associated with a 88% chance that the subject's asthma is not well controlled. The ACQ consists of 6 patient/subject reported questions on symptoms and a question completed by the staff for categorization of the patient/subjects forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) from spirometry.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Short-acting Bronchodilator (Albuterol/Salbutamol) Free Days2 weeks after completion of treatment (weeks 10 -11)Percent of rescue-free days during a two week period after completing treatment phase
Change in Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 ScoreBaseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeksAsthma Control Questionnaire (QOL Technologies 2004) Elizabeth Juniper, (Eur Respir J 1999; 14:902-7). Range 0-6, 0 is no symptoms, 6 is maximal symptoms. 0.5 is considered a minimally important difference, 0.75 or less is associated with a 85% chance that the subject's asthma is well controlled, 1.50 or greater is associated with a 88% chance that the subject's asthma is not well controlled. The ACQ consists of 6 patient/subject reported questions on symptoms.
Change in Spirometry - FEV1Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks
Change in Spirometry - Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks
Change in Spirometry - FEV1/FVCBaseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks
Change in Spirometry FEF25-75%Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeksA measure of forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25-75%)
Change in Asthma Control Test ScoreBaseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeksThe Asthma Control Test is a 5-item questionnaire using 1-5 point Likert scales; maximum score 25 = complete control of asthma; minimum score 5 = poor control of asthma.
Change in Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Score (to Evaluate Quality of Life)Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeksThe mini AQLQ is a questionnaire specifically designed to assess health status in patients with asthma. The mini-AQLQ consists of 15 questions covering symptoms and activities. Each question is scaled from 1 (poorly controlled asthma) to 7(maximally controlled asthma) where 7 reflects a higher quality of life. Total score is the sum of 15 items and may range from 15-105. An increase in the AQLQ score indicates a better quality of life.
Daily Short-acting Bronchodilator (Albuterol/Salbutamol) Use2 weeks after completion of treatment (weeks 9-11)Daily short-acting bronchodilator use during the 2 weeks, modeled as a zero-modified negative binomial (usually 2 puffs/day)
Change in SNOT-22 Nasal Sub-scoreBaseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeksSino-nasal outcome test-22 nasal sub-score. The nasal subscore consists of 8 questions, each on a scale of 0 (no problems) to 5 (as bad as it can be). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms of rhinosinusitis.
Daytime Symptom Score7 days prior to final assessment visit at week 15Daytime symptoms due to asthma were assessed via the electronic diary (AM2+ Asthma Monitor) each evening for 7 days prior to the study visit at Week 15. Daily scores were derived from five questions relating to 1) frequency of asthma symptoms, 2) impact of asthma symptoms, 3) activity, 4) impact of asthma on activity, and 5) breathlessness. Each question was scored from 0 (best) to 6 (worst), with the average of 5 questions providing a daily score ranging from 0 (best) to 6 (worst). Each participant's symptom score was calculated as the average of 7 daily scores. Thus, the range of possible scores is from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).
Change in Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) - Functional ImpairmentBaseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeksThe TDI is an interviewer-administered instrument which measures the changes in the participant's dyspnea from Baseline. The scores in the TDI evaluate ratings for 3 different categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task in exertional capacity, and magnitude of effort). TDI category scores range from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement)
Change in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Task at Visit 3Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeksThe TDI is an interviewer-administered instrument which measures the changes in the participant's dyspnea from Baseline. The scores in the TDI evaluate ratings for 3 different categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task in exertional capacity, and magnitude of effort). TDI category scores range from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement)
Change in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Effort at Visit 3Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeksThe TDI is an interviewer-administered instrument which measures the changes in the participant's dyspnea from Baseline. The scores in the TDI evaluate ratings for 3 different categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task in exertional capacity, and magnitude of effort). TDI category scores range from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement)
Change in Transition Dyspnea Index - Functional ImpairmentBaseline to final assessment visit (15 weeks)The TDI is an interviewer-administered instrument which measures the changes in the participant's dyspnea from Baseline. The scores in the TDI evaluate ratings for 3 different categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task in exertional capacity, and magnitude of effort). TDI category scores range from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement)
Change in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of TaskBaseline to final assessment visit (15 weeks)The TDI is an interviewer-administered instrument which measures the changes in the participant's dyspnea from Baseline. The scores in the TDI evaluate ratings for 3 different categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task in exertional capacity, and magnitude of effort). TDI category scores range from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement)
Change in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of EffortBaseline to final assessment visit (15 weeks)The TDI is an interviewer-administered instrument which measures the changes in the participant's dyspnea from Baseline. The scores in the TDI evaluate ratings for 3 different categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task in exertional capacity, and magnitude of effort). TDI category scores range from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement)
Change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) - Total ScoreBaseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeksThe SNOT-22 is a disease-specific quality of life score for rhinosinusitis. SNOT22 is a validated scale which measures sinonasal symptoms for sinusitis patients. The 22 questions are rated on a scale of 0-5 for a maximum total score of 110. Higher scores represent more symptomatic patients.

Countries

South Africa, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited at six clinical sites using flyers, newspaper, radio and campus advertising, and by contacting participants of prior studies whom agreed to future contacts. The recruitment period lasted from June 2009 to December 17, 2010.

Pre-assignment details

Participants who signed consent and passed screening were enrolled into the study and randomized to a treatment arm. One of 42 active treatment participants withdrew consent after being randomized but prior to receiving treatment. He/she did not provide a reason.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fenzian Device
20-minute treatments with the Fenzian device, 3 times per week for 5 weeks (15 treatments total).
42
Sham Device
20-minute treatments with the sham device, 3 times per week for 5 weeks (15 treatments total).
39
Total81

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFenzian DeviceSham DeviceTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
41 Participants39 Participants80 Participants
Age, Continuous36.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
37.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
37.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
26 participants22 participants48 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
6 participants8 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants9 participants19 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants16 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants23 Participants44 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 400 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 4021 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 400 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) 7 Score

Asthma Control Questionnaire (QOL Technologies 2004) Elizabeth Juniper, (Eur Respir J 1999; 14:902-7). Range 0-6, 0 is no symptoms, 6 is maximal symptoms. 0.5 is considered a minimally important difference, 0.75 or less is associated with a 85% chance that the subject's asthma is well controlled, 1.50 or greater is associated with a 88% chance that the subject's asthma is not well controlled. The ACQ consists of 6 patient/subject reported questions on symptoms and a question completed by the staff for categorization of the patient/subjects forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) from spirometry.

Time frame: Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 3 (5 weeks of treatment) were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) 7 Score-0.35 ACQ7 scoreStandard Error 0.08
Sham DeviceChange in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) 7 Score-0.29 ACQ7 scoreStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Change in Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 Score

Asthma Control Questionnaire (QOL Technologies 2004) Elizabeth Juniper, (Eur Respir J 1999; 14:902-7). Range 0-6, 0 is no symptoms, 6 is maximal symptoms. 0.5 is considered a minimally important difference, 0.75 or less is associated with a 85% chance that the subject's asthma is well controlled, 1.50 or greater is associated with a 88% chance that the subject's asthma is not well controlled. The ACQ consists of 6 patient/subject reported questions on symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 Score-0.40 ACQ6 scoreStandard Error 0.09
Sham DeviceChange in Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 Score-0.29 ACQ6 scoreStandard Error 0.09
Secondary

Change in Asthma Control Test Score

The Asthma Control Test is a 5-item questionnaire using 1-5 point Likert scales; maximum score 25 = complete control of asthma; minimum score 5 = poor control of asthma.

Time frame: Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Asthma Control Test Score1.49 ACT scoreStandard Error 0.37
Sham DeviceChange in Asthma Control Test Score0.69 ACT scoreStandard Error 0.37
Secondary

Change in Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Score (to Evaluate Quality of Life)

The mini AQLQ is a questionnaire specifically designed to assess health status in patients with asthma. The mini-AQLQ consists of 15 questions covering symptoms and activities. Each question is scaled from 1 (poorly controlled asthma) to 7(maximally controlled asthma) where 7 reflects a higher quality of life. Total score is the sum of 15 items and may range from 15-105. An increase in the AQLQ score indicates a better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Score (to Evaluate Quality of Life)0.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.99
Sham DeviceChange in Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Score (to Evaluate Quality of Life)0.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) - Total Score

The SNOT-22 is a disease-specific quality of life score for rhinosinusitis. SNOT22 is a validated scale which measures sinonasal symptoms for sinusitis patients. The 22 questions are rated on a scale of 0-5 for a maximum total score of 110. Higher scores represent more symptomatic patients.

Time frame: Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) - Total Score0.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Sham DeviceChange in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) - Total Score0.02 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Secondary

Change in SNOT-22 Nasal Sub-score

Sino-nasal outcome test-22 nasal sub-score. The nasal subscore consists of 8 questions, each on a scale of 0 (no problems) to 5 (as bad as it can be). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms of rhinosinusitis.

Time frame: Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in SNOT-22 Nasal Sub-score0.26 SNOT22 scoreStandard Error 0.37
Sham DeviceChange in SNOT-22 Nasal Sub-score0.23 SNOT22 scoreStandard Error 0.4
Secondary

Change in Spirometry FEF25-75%

A measure of forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25-75%)

Time frame: Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks

Population: All subjects who completed treatment (weeks 5-9) were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Spirometry FEF25-75%0.01 L/sStandard Error 0.07
Sham DeviceChange in Spirometry FEF25-75%0.19 L/sStandard Error 0.06
Secondary

Change in Spirometry - FEV1

Time frame: Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Spirometry - FEV10.00 LStandard Error 0.04
Sham DeviceChange in Spirometry - FEV10.09 LStandard Error 0.04
Secondary

Change in Spirometry - FEV1/FVC

Time frame: Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Spirometry - FEV1/FVC0.81 RatioStandard Error 1.14
Sham DeviceChange in Spirometry - FEV1/FVC1.97 RatioStandard Error 1.13
Secondary

Change in Spirometry - Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Time frame: Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Spirometry - Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)-0.07 LStandard Error 0.04
Sham DeviceChange in Spirometry - Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)0.04 LStandard Error 0.04
Secondary

Change in Transition Dyspnea Index - Functional Impairment

The TDI is an interviewer-administered instrument which measures the changes in the participant's dyspnea from Baseline. The scores in the TDI evaluate ratings for 3 different categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task in exertional capacity, and magnitude of effort). TDI category scores range from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement)

Time frame: Baseline to final assessment visit (15 weeks)

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 4 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Transition Dyspnea Index - Functional Impairment0.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Sham DeviceChange in Transition Dyspnea Index - Functional Impairment0.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Change in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Effort

The TDI is an interviewer-administered instrument which measures the changes in the participant's dyspnea from Baseline. The scores in the TDI evaluate ratings for 3 different categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task in exertional capacity, and magnitude of effort). TDI category scores range from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement)

Time frame: Baseline to final assessment visit (15 weeks)

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 4 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Effort0.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Sham DeviceChange in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Effort0.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Change in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Effort at Visit 3

The TDI is an interviewer-administered instrument which measures the changes in the participant's dyspnea from Baseline. The scores in the TDI evaluate ratings for 3 different categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task in exertional capacity, and magnitude of effort). TDI category scores range from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement)

Time frame: Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Effort at Visit 30.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Sham DeviceChange in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Effort at Visit 30.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Secondary

Change in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Task

The TDI is an interviewer-administered instrument which measures the changes in the participant's dyspnea from Baseline. The scores in the TDI evaluate ratings for 3 different categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task in exertional capacity, and magnitude of effort). TDI category scores range from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement)

Time frame: Baseline to final assessment visit (15 weeks)

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 4 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Task0.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Sham DeviceChange in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Task0.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Change in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Task at Visit 3

The TDI is an interviewer-administered instrument which measures the changes in the participant's dyspnea from Baseline. The scores in the TDI evaluate ratings for 3 different categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task in exertional capacity, and magnitude of effort). TDI category scores range from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement)

Time frame: Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Task at Visit 30.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Sham DeviceChange in Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Task at Visit 30.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Secondary

Change in Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) - Functional Impairment

The TDI is an interviewer-administered instrument which measures the changes in the participant's dyspnea from Baseline. The scores in the TDI evaluate ratings for 3 different categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task in exertional capacity, and magnitude of effort). TDI category scores range from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement)

Time frame: Baseline to completion of treatment at 9 weeks

Population: All subjects who completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceChange in Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) - Functional Impairment0.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Sham DeviceChange in Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) - Functional Impairment0.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Secondary

Daily Short-acting Bronchodilator (Albuterol/Salbutamol) Use

Daily short-acting bronchodilator use during the 2 weeks, modeled as a zero-modified negative binomial (usually 2 puffs/day)

Time frame: 2 weeks after completion of treatment (weeks 9-11)

Population: All subjects whose short-acting bronchodilator counters were functioning and who completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceDaily Short-acting Bronchodilator (Albuterol/Salbutamol) Use0.83 Puffs/dayStandard Deviation 1.58
Sham DeviceDaily Short-acting Bronchodilator (Albuterol/Salbutamol) Use0.71 Puffs/dayStandard Deviation 1.23
Secondary

Daytime Symptom Score

Daytime symptoms due to asthma were assessed via the electronic diary (AM2+ Asthma Monitor) each evening for 7 days prior to the study visit at Week 15. Daily scores were derived from five questions relating to 1) frequency of asthma symptoms, 2) impact of asthma symptoms, 3) activity, 4) impact of asthma on activity, and 5) breathlessness. Each question was scored from 0 (best) to 6 (worst), with the average of 5 questions providing a daily score ranging from 0 (best) to 6 (worst). Each participant's symptom score was calculated as the average of 7 daily scores. Thus, the range of possible scores is from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).

Time frame: 7 days prior to final assessment visit at week 15

Population: All subjects whose diaries were functioning and who completed diary assessments and completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fenzian DeviceDaytime Symptom Score0.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Sham DeviceDaytime Symptom Score0.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Secondary

Short-acting Bronchodilator (Albuterol/Salbutamol) Free Days

Percent of rescue-free days during a two week period after completing treatment phase

Time frame: 2 weeks after completion of treatment (weeks 10 -11)

Population: All subjects whose short-acting bronchodilator counters were functioning and who completed Visit 3 were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Fenzian DeviceShort-acting Bronchodilator (Albuterol/Salbutamol) Free Days63 Percent of days
Sham DeviceShort-acting Bronchodilator (Albuterol/Salbutamol) Free Days60 Percent of days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026