Skip to content

A Pharmacokinetic Study of JK1211(Itraconazole [Itrizole]) Oral Solution in Participants With Deep Mycosis and Those With Febrile Neutropenia Suspected of Fungal Infection

A Pharmacokinetic Study of JK1211 in Patients With Systemic Fungal Infection (SFI) and Patients With Febrile Neutropenia (FN) Suspected of Fungal Infection.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00784368
Enrollment
55
Registered
2008-11-03
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2013-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aspergillosis, Blastomycosis, Candidiasis, Cryptococcosis, Histoplasmosis, Mycoses, Neutropenia

Keywords

Mycoses, Candidiasis, Aspergillosis, Cryptococcosis, Blastomycosis, Histoplasmosis, Neutropenia, Itraconazole, JK1211

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the pharmacokinetics (how the drug is absorbed in the body, distributed within the body, and how it is removed from the body over time) of itraconazole (ITCZ) oral solution in participants with Systemic Fungal Infection (SFI) and those with febrile (with fever) neutropenia (FN, decrease in white blood cells) suspected of fungal infection.

Detailed description

This is an open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention), multicenter (conducted in more than 1 center) and uncontrolled (no competitive drugs involved) study. Participants with SFI will receive treatment with ITCZ oral solution or switch treatment from intravenous (into a vein) infusion of itraconazole (ITCZ-intravenous) to ITCZ oral solution as per Investigator's discretion. All the participants with FN suspected of fungal infection will receive the switch treatment from ITCZ- intravenous to ITCZ oral solution. The study will include 3 periods: Pre-observation period (7 days), Treatment period (85 days for ITCZ oral solution monotherapy and 99 days for switch treatment) and Follow-up observation period (30 days). The participants who receive ITCZ oral solution monotherapy will receive ITCZ oral solution without ITCZ-intravenous in the dose range of 20 milliliter (ml) per day to 40 ml per day for 12 weeks (85 days) and those on the switch treatment will receive 400 milligram (mg) per day ITCZ-intravenous twice for first 2 days followed by 200 mg per day ITCZ-intravenous up to 14 days and then they will be administered treatment as per ITCZ oral solution monotherapy. Efficacy will primarily be evaluated by assessing the pharmacokinetics. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Interventions

DRUGITCZ Oral Solution

ITCZ syrup product containing ITCZ 10 mg per ml in dose range of 20 ml to 40 ml daily for 7 days up to 12 weeks

DRUGITCZ-IV

200 mg IV twice daily for 2 days and once daily for the next 1 to 12 days

Sponsors

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* In case of participants with deep-seated mycosis (systemic fungal infection \[SFI\]) they should be either clinically suspected case or proven case * All participants administered need to be hospitalized during the itraconazole intravenous treatment * For participants with febrile (with fever) neutropenia (a decrease in white blood cells) suspected of fungal infection who have persistent fever (greater than equal to 37.5 degree celsius; greater than equal to 3 days) and have neutrophil count less than 500 per cubic millimeter (or less than 1000 per cubic millimeter and expected to decrease toward less than 500 per cubic millimeter

Exclusion criteria

* No past history of hypersensitivity to azole antifungal agents * No current medication with antifungal agents such as amphotericin B (intravenous injection \[injection of a substance into a vein\], tablets, syrup), nystatin (tablets), fluconazole (capsules, intravenous injection), flucytosine (oral agent), miconazole (intravenous injection, gel), micafungin (intravenous infusion), fosfluconazole (intravenous injection,) voriconazole (intravenous injection, tablets), liposomal amphotericin B (intravenous injection), posaconazole * No medication with itraconazole in any formulation within the last 28 days * Participants with history of severe hepatic disease (except hepatic dysfunction because of fungal infection) and congestive heart failure * Female participants who are either pregnant, nursing, suspected to be pregnant or will become pregnant during the trial duration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax)Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatmentThe Cmax is defined as the maximum observed analyte concentration. Cmax was measured in microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml).
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24])Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatmentThe AUC(0-24) is area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours post-dose. It is usually calculated by linear trapezoidal method. AUC was measured in mcg\*hour(hr) per ml.
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatmentThe MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation.
Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC)Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatmentThe Cmax is maximum observed analyte concentration and MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation. The Cmax/MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained.
Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC)Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatmentThe AUC (0-24) is defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (24 hr). It is usually calculated by linear trapezoidal method. MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation. The AUC 0-24/MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained.
Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC)Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatmentThe T\>MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized AssessmentBaseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)Serological effect against fungi was assessed as changed to negative (if the test values became negative), improved (if the test values decreased), no change (if there was no change in the test values), no change (if there was no change in the test values) , worsened (if the test values increased) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing).
Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)Serological effect against fungi was assessed as changed to negative (if the test values became negative), improved (if the test values decreased), no change (if there was no change in the test values), worsened (if the test values increased) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing). The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C.
Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized AssessmentBaseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)Level of improvement in the clinical symptoms was assessed as: disappeared (if clinical symptoms disappeared), improved (significant improvement in clinical symptoms ), no change (almost no improvement in the clinical symptoms), worsened (if the clinical symptoms worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments).
Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)Level of Improvement in Endoscopy was assessed as disappeared, decreased, improved, no change, worsened and could not be assessed. The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C.
Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized AssessmentBaseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)Level of Improvement in the Endoscopy or Image diagnosis was assessed as disappeared (if the abnormal findings were normalized), decreased (if level of pathogenic fungus was decreased in culture), improved (if significant improvement was observed in the abnormal findings), no change (if no significant improvement was observed in the abnormal findings), worsened (if the abnormal findings were worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing).
Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)Level of improvement in the clinical symptoms was assessed as: disappeared (if clinical symptoms disappeared), improved (significant improvement in clinical symptoms ), no change (almost no improvement in the clinical symptoms), worsened (if the clinical symptoms worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments). The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, chronic necrotic pulmonary aspergillosis (C.N.P.A), pulmonary aspergilloma (P.A.) and pulmonary cryptococcosis (P.C).
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Centralized AssessmentBaseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)Efficacy rate (E.R.) was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective and cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective multiplied by 100. Treatment success rate (T.S.R.) was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective, cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective and cases for whom the efficacy could not be assessed multiplied by 100.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)E.R. was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective and number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective multiplied by 100. T.S.R. was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective, number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective and number of cases for whom the efficacy could not be assessed multiplied by 100.
Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized AssessmentBaseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)Mycological efficacy was assessed as disappeared (if results for pathogenic fungus became negative, or if it was not possible to obtain the appropriate specimens), decreased (if level of pathogenic fungus was decreased in culture), no change (if there was no quantitative change in pathogenic fungus), increased (if there was a quantitative increase in pathogenic fungus, if results for pathogenic fungus became positive after start of dosing or if new pathogenic fungus was identified) , could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above assessment due to lack of detection in tests).
Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)Mycological efficacy was assessed as disappeared, decreased, no change, increased, could not be assessed. The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)
Participants with deep-seated mycosis (Systemic Fungal Infection \[SFI\]) received itraconazole (ITCZ) oral solution in the dose range of 20 milliliter (ml) per day to 40 ml per day for 12 weeks as per Investigator's discretion.
15
SFI (Switched Treatment)
Participants with SFI received 200 milligram (mg) twice daily itraconazole intravenous infusion (ITCZ-IV) for first 2 days followed by 200 mg per day ITCZ-IV up to 14 days. Participants then received ITCZ oral solution in the dose range of 20 ml per day to 40 ml per day for 12 weeks as per Investigator's discretion.
16
FN (Switched Treatment)
Participants with febrile neutropenia (FN) with suspected fungal infection received 200 mg twice daily ITCZ-IV for first 2 days followed by 200 mg per day ITCZ-IV up to 14 days. Participants then received ITCZ oral solution in the dose range of 20 ml per day to 40 ml per day for 12 weeks as per Investigator's discretion.
22
Total53

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event692
Overall StudyDiagnosis of fever001
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy201
Overall StudyPhysician Decision006
Overall StudyWithdrawal of informed consent010
Overall StudyWorsening of complications001
Overall StudyWorsening of symptoms010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)SFI (Switched Treatment)FN (Switched Treatment)Total
Age Continuous61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
58.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants6 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants10 Participants15 Participants39 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 1616 / 1622 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 168 / 163 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC)

The AUC (0-24) is defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (24 hr). It is usually calculated by linear trapezoidal method. MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation. The AUC 0-24/MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained.

Time frame: Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment

Population: The PK analysis set. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively. MIC was not obtained for FN (Switched treatment) and hence the data not given for the same.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC)200 mg/day (n=4,1)147 hourStandard Deviation 56.6
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC)300 mg/day (n=0,1)NA hour
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC)400 mg/day (n=0,3)NA hour
SFI (Switched Treatment)Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC)200 mg/day (n=4,1)399 hour
SFI (Switched Treatment)Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC)300 mg/day (n=0,1)129 hour
SFI (Switched Treatment)Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC)400 mg/day (n=0,3)421 hourStandard Deviation 478
Primary

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24])

The AUC(0-24) is area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours post-dose. It is usually calculated by linear trapezoidal method. AUC was measured in mcg\*hour(hr) per ml.

Time frame: Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment

Population: The PK analysis set included all participants who received ITCZ-OS and had plasma concentration data. One participant without any infection evidence was also included in the PK population, for SFI (ITCZ-OS). Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24])300 mg/day (n=4,2,0)207 mcg*hr per mlStandard Deviation 54.7
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24])200 mg/day (n=11,5,12)55.8 mcg*hr per mlStandard Deviation 34.4
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24])400mg/day (n=1,6,10)19.0 mcg*hr per ml
SFI (Switched Treatment)Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24])300 mg/day (n=4,2,0)129 mcg*hr per ml
SFI (Switched Treatment)Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24])200 mg/day (n=11,5,12)41.0 mcg*hr per mlStandard Deviation 25.6
SFI (Switched Treatment)Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24])400mg/day (n=1,6,10)137 mcg*hr per mlStandard Deviation 71.3
FN (Switched Treatment)Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24])200 mg/day (n=11,5,12)31.4 mcg*hr per mlStandard Deviation 14.1
FN (Switched Treatment)Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24])400mg/day (n=1,6,10)50.4 mcg*hr per mlStandard Deviation 23.5
FN (Switched Treatment)Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24])300 mg/day (n=4,2,0)NA mcg*hr per ml
Primary

Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC)

The Cmax is maximum observed analyte concentration and MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation. The Cmax/MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained.

Time frame: Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment

Population: The PK analysis set. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively. MIC was not obtained for FN (Switched treatment) and hence the data not given for the same.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC)200 mg/day (n=4,1)7.21 ratioStandard Deviation 2.13
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC)300 mg/day (n=0,1)NA ratio
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC)400 mg/day (n=0,3)NA ratio
SFI (Switched Treatment)Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC)200 mg/day (n=4,1)28.8 ratio
SFI (Switched Treatment)Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC)300 mg/day (n=0,1)5.81 ratio
SFI (Switched Treatment)Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC)400 mg/day (n=0,3)18.9 ratioStandard Deviation 21.6
Primary

Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax)

The Cmax is defined as the maximum observed analyte concentration. Cmax was measured in microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml).

Time frame: Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants who received ITCZ-OS and had plasma concentration data. One participant without any infection evidence was also included in the PK population for SFI (ITCZ-OS). 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax)300 mg/day (n=4,2,0)9.20 mcg/mlStandard Deviation 2.39
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax)200 mg/day (n=11,5,12)2.90 mcg/mlStandard Deviation 1.48
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax)400mg/day (n=1,6,10)0.948 mcg/ml
SFI (Switched Treatment)Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax)300 mg/day (n=4,2,0)58.2 mcg/ml
SFI (Switched Treatment)Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax)200 mg/day (n=11,5,12)2.30 mcg/mlStandard Deviation 1.12
SFI (Switched Treatment)Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax)400mg/day (n=1,6,10)6.10 mcg/mlStandard Deviation 3.12
FN (Switched Treatment)Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax)200 mg/day (n=11,5,12)1.79 mcg/mlStandard Deviation 0.682
FN (Switched Treatment)Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax)400mg/day (n=1,6,10)2.44 mcg/mlStandard Deviation 0.996
FN (Switched Treatment)Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax)300 mg/day (n=4,2,0)NA mcg/ml
Primary

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation.

Time frame: Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment

Population: The PK analysis set. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively. MIC was not obtained for FN (Switched treatment) and hence the data not given for the same.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)200 mg/day (n=4,1)0.438 mcg per mlStandard Deviation 0.125
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)300 mg/day (n=0,1)NA mcg per ml
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)400mg/day (n=0,3)NA mcg per ml
SFI (Switched Treatment)Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)200 mg/day (n=4,1)0.06 mcg per ml
SFI (Switched Treatment)Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)300 mg/day (n=0,1)1.00 mcg per ml
SFI (Switched Treatment)Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)400mg/day (n=0,3)0.71 mcg per mlStandard Deviation 0.51
Primary

Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC)

The T\>MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained.

Time frame: Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment

Population: The PK analysis set. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively. MIC was not obtained for FN (Switched treatment) and hence the data not given for the same.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC)200 mg/day (n=4,1)100 percent timeStandard Deviation 0
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC)300 mg/day (n=0,1)NA percent time
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC)400 mg/day (n=0,3)NA percent time
SFI (Switched Treatment)Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC)200 mg/day (n=4,1)100 percent time
SFI (Switched Treatment)Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC)300 mg/day (n=0,1)100 percent time
SFI (Switched Treatment)Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC)400 mg/day (n=0,3)100 percent timeStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized Assessment

Level of improvement in the clinical symptoms was assessed as: disappeared (if clinical symptoms disappeared), improved (significant improvement in clinical symptoms ), no change (almost no improvement in the clinical symptoms), worsened (if the clinical symptoms worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments).

Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)

Population: FAS population included all participants except those who did not meet main eligibility criteria, who did not receive ITCZ-IV or ITCZ-OS and participants without efficacy data. As per planned analysis both SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) and SFI (Switched Treatment) arms were combined for all efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized AssessmentImproved12 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized AssessmentWorsened2 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized AssessmentDisappeared7 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized AssessmentCould not be assessed3 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized AssessmentNo change7 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized AssessmentCould not be assessed2 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized AssessmentDisappeared6 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized AssessmentImproved12 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized AssessmentNo change2 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized AssessmentWorsened0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)

Level of improvement in the clinical symptoms was assessed as: disappeared (if clinical symptoms disappeared), improved (significant improvement in clinical symptoms ), no change (almost no improvement in the clinical symptoms), worsened (if the clinical symptoms worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments). The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, chronic necrotic pulmonary aspergillosis (C.N.P.A), pulmonary aspergilloma (P.A.) and pulmonary cryptococcosis (P.C).

Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)

Population: The FAS population. As per planned analysis both SFI arms were combined for efficacy analyses; participants with FN with suspected fungal infection were not planned to be analyzed for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Candidemia: Improved (n=1)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Esophageal candidiasis: Disappeared (n=3)3 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Invasive aspergillosis: Disappeared (n=5)2 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Invasive aspergillosis: Improved (n=5)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Invasive aspergillosis: Worsened (n=5)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Invasive aspergillosis:Could not be assessed (n=5)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)C.N.P.A: Improved (n= 8)5 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)C.N.P.A: No change (n=8)3 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.A.: Improved (n=10)4 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.A.: No change (n=10)4 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.A.: Could not be assessed (n=10)2 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.C.: Disappeared (n=4)2 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.C.: Improved (n=4)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.C.: Worsened (n=4)1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized Assessment

Level of Improvement in the Endoscopy or Image diagnosis was assessed as disappeared (if the abnormal findings were normalized), decreased (if level of pathogenic fungus was decreased in culture), improved (if significant improvement was observed in the abnormal findings), no change (if no significant improvement was observed in the abnormal findings), worsened (if the abnormal findings were worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing).

Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)

Population: The FAS population included all participants except those who did not meet main eligibility criteria, who did not receive ITCZ-IV or ITCZ-OS and participants without efficacy data. As per planned analysis both SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) and SFI (Switched Treatment) arms were combined for all efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized AssessmentImproved12 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized AssessmentWorsened4 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized AssessmentNo change7 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized AssessmentCould not be assessed5 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized AssessmentDisappeared3 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized AssessmentCould not be assessed21 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized AssessmentDisappeared0 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized AssessmentImproved0 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized AssessmentNo change0 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized AssessmentWorsened1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)

Level of Improvement in Endoscopy was assessed as disappeared, decreased, improved, no change, worsened and could not be assessed. The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C.

Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)

Population: The FAS population. As per planned analysis both SFI arms were combined for efficacy analyses; participants with FN with suspected fungal infection were not planned to be analyzed for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.A.: Could not be assessed (n=10)3 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Candidemia: Could not be assessed (n=1)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Esophageal candidiasis: Disappeared (n=3)3 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Invasive aspergillosis: Improved (n=5)3 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Invasive aspergillosis: Worsened (n=5)2 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)C.N.P.A: Improved (n=8)3 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)C.N.P.A: No change (n=8)3 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)C.N.P.A: Worsened (n=8)2 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.A.:Improved (n=10)3 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.A.:No change (n=10)4 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.C.: Improved (n=4)3 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.C.: Could not be assessed (n=4)1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized Assessment

Mycological efficacy was assessed as disappeared (if results for pathogenic fungus became negative, or if it was not possible to obtain the appropriate specimens), decreased (if level of pathogenic fungus was decreased in culture), no change (if there was no quantitative change in pathogenic fungus), increased (if there was a quantitative increase in pathogenic fungus, if results for pathogenic fungus became positive after start of dosing or if new pathogenic fungus was identified) , could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above assessment due to lack of detection in tests).

Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)

Population: The FAS population included all participants except those who did not meet main eligibility criteria, who did not receive ITCZ-IV or ITCZ-OS and participants without efficacy data. As per planned analysis both SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) and SFI (Switched Treatment) arms were combined for all efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized AssessmentDisappeared6 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized AssessmentNo change1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized AssessmentCould not be assessed24 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized AssessmentDisappeared0 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized AssessmentNo change0 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized AssessmentCould not be assessed22 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)

Mycological efficacy was assessed as disappeared, decreased, no change, increased, could not be assessed. The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C.

Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)

Population: The FAS population. As per planned analysis both SFI arms were combined for efficacy analyses; participants with FN with suspected fungal infection were not planned to be analyzed for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Candidemia: Could not be assessed (n=1)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Esophageal candidiasis: Disappeared (n=3)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Esophageal candidiasis:Could not be assessed (n=3)2 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Invasive aspergillosis:Could not be assessed (n=5)5 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)C.N.P.A: Disappeared (n=8)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)C.N.P.A: No change (n=8)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)C.N.P.A: Could not be assessed (n=8)6 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.A.: Disappeared (n=10)3 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.A.: Could not be assessed (n=10)7 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.C.: Disappeared (n=4)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.C.: Could not be assessed (n=4)3 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized Assessment

Serological effect against fungi was assessed as changed to negative (if the test values became negative), improved (if the test values decreased), no change (if there was no change in the test values), no change (if there was no change in the test values) , worsened (if the test values increased) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing).

Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)

Population: The FAS population included all participants except those who did not meet main eligibility criteria, who did not receive ITCZ-IV or ITCZ-OS and participants without efficacy data. As per planned analysis both SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) and SFI (Switched Treatment) arms were combined for all efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized AssessmentChanged to negative1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized AssessmentWorsened2 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized AssessmentNo change5 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized AssessmentCould not be assessed20 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized AssessmentImproved3 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized AssessmentCould not be assessed19 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized AssessmentChanged to negative0 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized AssessmentImproved0 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized AssessmentNo change1 participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized AssessmentWorsened2 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)

Serological effect against fungi was assessed as changed to negative (if the test values became negative), improved (if the test values decreased), no change (if there was no change in the test values), worsened (if the test values increased) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing). The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C.

Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)

Population: The FAS population. As per planned analysis both SFI arms were combined for efficacy analyses; participants with FN with suspected fungal infection were not planned to be analyzed for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Candidemia: Changed to negative (n=1)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Esophageal candidiasis:Could not be assessed (n=3)3 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Invasive aspergillosis: No change (n=5)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Invasive aspergillosis: Worsened (n=5)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Invasive aspergillosis:Could not be assessed (n=5)3 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)C.N.P.A: Improved (n=8)2 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)C.N.P.A: Worsened (n=8)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)C.N.P.A: Could not be assessed (n=8)5 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.A.:No change (n=10)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.A.: Could not be assessed (n=10)9 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.C.: Improved (n=4)1 participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)P.C.: No change (n=4)3 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Centralized Assessment

Efficacy rate (E.R.) was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective and cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective multiplied by 100. Treatment success rate (T.S.R.) was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective, cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective and cases for whom the efficacy could not be assessed multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)

Population: The FAS population included all participants except those who did not meet main eligibility criteria, who did not receive ITCZ-IV or ITCZ-OS and participants without efficacy data. As per planned analysis both SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) and SFI (Switched Treatment) arms were combined for all efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Centralized AssessmentE.R.62.1 percentage of participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Centralized AssessmentT.S.R58.1 percentage of participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Centralized AssessmentE.R.80.0 percentage of participants
SFI (Switched Treatment)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Centralized AssessmentT.S.R72.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)

E.R. was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective and number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective multiplied by 100. T.S.R. was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective, number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective and number of cases for whom the efficacy could not be assessed multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)

Population: The FAS population. As per planned analysis both SFI arms were combined for efficacy analyses; participants with FN with suspected fungal infection were not planned to be analyzed for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)E.R.: Candidemia (n=1)100.0 percentage of participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)E.R.: Esophageal candidiasis (n=3)100.0 percentage of participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)E.R.: Invasive aspergillosis (n=5)60.0 percentage of participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)E.R.: C.N.P.A (n=8)62.5 percentage of participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)E.R.: P.A. (n=10)50.0 percentage of participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)E.R.: P.C. (n=4)50.0 percentage of participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)T.S.R. : Candidemia (n=1)100.0 percentage of participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)T.S.R. : Esophageal candidiasis (n=3)100.0 percentage of participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)T.S.R. : Invasive aspergillosis (n=5)60.0 percentage of participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)T.S.R. : C.N.P.A (n=8)62.5 percentage of participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)T.S.R. : P.A. (n=10)40.0 percentage of participants
SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)T.S.R. : P.C. (n=4)50.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026