Aspergillosis, Blastomycosis, Candidiasis, Cryptococcosis, Histoplasmosis, Mycoses, Neutropenia
Conditions
Keywords
Mycoses, Candidiasis, Aspergillosis, Cryptococcosis, Blastomycosis, Histoplasmosis, Neutropenia, Itraconazole, JK1211
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the pharmacokinetics (how the drug is absorbed in the body, distributed within the body, and how it is removed from the body over time) of itraconazole (ITCZ) oral solution in participants with Systemic Fungal Infection (SFI) and those with febrile (with fever) neutropenia (FN, decrease in white blood cells) suspected of fungal infection.
Detailed description
This is an open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention), multicenter (conducted in more than 1 center) and uncontrolled (no competitive drugs involved) study. Participants with SFI will receive treatment with ITCZ oral solution or switch treatment from intravenous (into a vein) infusion of itraconazole (ITCZ-intravenous) to ITCZ oral solution as per Investigator's discretion. All the participants with FN suspected of fungal infection will receive the switch treatment from ITCZ- intravenous to ITCZ oral solution. The study will include 3 periods: Pre-observation period (7 days), Treatment period (85 days for ITCZ oral solution monotherapy and 99 days for switch treatment) and Follow-up observation period (30 days). The participants who receive ITCZ oral solution monotherapy will receive ITCZ oral solution without ITCZ-intravenous in the dose range of 20 milliliter (ml) per day to 40 ml per day for 12 weeks (85 days) and those on the switch treatment will receive 400 milligram (mg) per day ITCZ-intravenous twice for first 2 days followed by 200 mg per day ITCZ-intravenous up to 14 days and then they will be administered treatment as per ITCZ oral solution monotherapy. Efficacy will primarily be evaluated by assessing the pharmacokinetics. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.
Interventions
ITCZ syrup product containing ITCZ 10 mg per ml in dose range of 20 ml to 40 ml daily for 7 days up to 12 weeks
200 mg IV twice daily for 2 days and once daily for the next 1 to 12 days
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* In case of participants with deep-seated mycosis (systemic fungal infection \[SFI\]) they should be either clinically suspected case or proven case * All participants administered need to be hospitalized during the itraconazole intravenous treatment * For participants with febrile (with fever) neutropenia (a decrease in white blood cells) suspected of fungal infection who have persistent fever (greater than equal to 37.5 degree celsius; greater than equal to 3 days) and have neutrophil count less than 500 per cubic millimeter (or less than 1000 per cubic millimeter and expected to decrease toward less than 500 per cubic millimeter
Exclusion criteria
* No past history of hypersensitivity to azole antifungal agents * No current medication with antifungal agents such as amphotericin B (intravenous injection \[injection of a substance into a vein\], tablets, syrup), nystatin (tablets), fluconazole (capsules, intravenous injection), flucytosine (oral agent), miconazole (intravenous injection, gel), micafungin (intravenous infusion), fosfluconazole (intravenous injection,) voriconazole (intravenous injection, tablets), liposomal amphotericin B (intravenous injection), posaconazole * No medication with itraconazole in any formulation within the last 28 days * Participants with history of severe hepatic disease (except hepatic dysfunction because of fungal infection) and congestive heart failure * Female participants who are either pregnant, nursing, suspected to be pregnant or will become pregnant during the trial duration
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax) | Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment | The Cmax is defined as the maximum observed analyte concentration. Cmax was measured in microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml). |
| Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24]) | Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment | The AUC(0-24) is area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours post-dose. It is usually calculated by linear trapezoidal method. AUC was measured in mcg\*hour(hr) per ml. |
| Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) | Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment | The MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation. |
| Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC) | Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment | The Cmax is maximum observed analyte concentration and MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation. The Cmax/MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained. |
| Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC) | Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment | The AUC (0-24) is defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (24 hr). It is usually calculated by linear trapezoidal method. MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation. The AUC 0-24/MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained. |
| Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC) | Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment | The T\>MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized Assessment | Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment) | Serological effect against fungi was assessed as changed to negative (if the test values became negative), improved (if the test values decreased), no change (if there was no change in the test values), no change (if there was no change in the test values) , worsened (if the test values increased) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing). |
| Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment) | Serological effect against fungi was assessed as changed to negative (if the test values became negative), improved (if the test values decreased), no change (if there was no change in the test values), worsened (if the test values increased) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing). The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C. |
| Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized Assessment | Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment) | Level of improvement in the clinical symptoms was assessed as: disappeared (if clinical symptoms disappeared), improved (significant improvement in clinical symptoms ), no change (almost no improvement in the clinical symptoms), worsened (if the clinical symptoms worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments). |
| Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment) | Level of Improvement in Endoscopy was assessed as disappeared, decreased, improved, no change, worsened and could not be assessed. The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C. |
| Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized Assessment | Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment) | Level of Improvement in the Endoscopy or Image diagnosis was assessed as disappeared (if the abnormal findings were normalized), decreased (if level of pathogenic fungus was decreased in culture), improved (if significant improvement was observed in the abnormal findings), no change (if no significant improvement was observed in the abnormal findings), worsened (if the abnormal findings were worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing). |
| Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment) | Level of improvement in the clinical symptoms was assessed as: disappeared (if clinical symptoms disappeared), improved (significant improvement in clinical symptoms ), no change (almost no improvement in the clinical symptoms), worsened (if the clinical symptoms worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments). The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, chronic necrotic pulmonary aspergillosis (C.N.P.A), pulmonary aspergilloma (P.A.) and pulmonary cryptococcosis (P.C). |
| Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Centralized Assessment | Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment) | Efficacy rate (E.R.) was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective and cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective multiplied by 100. Treatment success rate (T.S.R.) was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective, cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective and cases for whom the efficacy could not be assessed multiplied by 100. |
| Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment) | E.R. was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective and number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective multiplied by 100. T.S.R. was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective, number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective and number of cases for whom the efficacy could not be assessed multiplied by 100. |
| Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized Assessment | Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment) | Mycological efficacy was assessed as disappeared (if results for pathogenic fungus became negative, or if it was not possible to obtain the appropriate specimens), decreased (if level of pathogenic fungus was decreased in culture), no change (if there was no quantitative change in pathogenic fungus), increased (if there was a quantitative increase in pathogenic fungus, if results for pathogenic fungus became positive after start of dosing or if new pathogenic fungus was identified) , could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above assessment due to lack of detection in tests). |
| Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment) | Mycological efficacy was assessed as disappeared, decreased, no change, increased, could not be assessed. The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C. |
Countries
Japan
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) Participants with deep-seated mycosis (Systemic Fungal Infection \[SFI\]) received itraconazole (ITCZ) oral solution in the dose range of 20 milliliter (ml) per day to 40 ml per day for 12 weeks as per Investigator's discretion. | 15 |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) Participants with SFI received 200 milligram (mg) twice daily itraconazole intravenous infusion (ITCZ-IV) for first 2 days followed by 200 mg per day ITCZ-IV up to 14 days. Participants then received ITCZ oral solution in the dose range of 20 ml per day to 40 ml per day for 12 weeks as per Investigator's discretion. | 16 |
| FN (Switched Treatment) Participants with febrile neutropenia (FN) with suspected fungal infection received 200 mg twice daily ITCZ-IV for first 2 days followed by 200 mg per day ITCZ-IV up to 14 days. Participants then received ITCZ oral solution in the dose range of 20 ml per day to 40 ml per day for 12 weeks as per Investigator's discretion. | 22 |
| Total | 53 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 6 | 9 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Diagnosis of fever | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal of informed consent | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Worsening of complications | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Worsening of symptoms | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | SFI (Switched Treatment) | FN (Switched Treatment) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | 61.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 | 64.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 | 58.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 | 61.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1 Participants | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 14 Participants | 10 Participants | 15 Participants | 39 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 15 / 16 | 16 / 16 | 22 / 23 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 4 / 16 | 8 / 16 | 3 / 23 |
Outcome results
Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC)
The AUC (0-24) is defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (24 hr). It is usually calculated by linear trapezoidal method. MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation. The AUC 0-24/MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained.
Time frame: Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment
Population: The PK analysis set. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively. MIC was not obtained for FN (Switched treatment) and hence the data not given for the same.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC) | 200 mg/day (n=4,1) | 147 hour | Standard Deviation 56.6 |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC) | 300 mg/day (n=0,1) | NA hour | — |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC) | 400 mg/day (n=0,3) | NA hour | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC) | 200 mg/day (n=4,1) | 399 hour | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC) | 300 mg/day (n=0,1) | 129 hour | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Area Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC) | 400 mg/day (n=0,3) | 421 hour | Standard Deviation 478 |
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24])
The AUC(0-24) is area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours post-dose. It is usually calculated by linear trapezoidal method. AUC was measured in mcg\*hour(hr) per ml.
Time frame: Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment
Population: The PK analysis set included all participants who received ITCZ-OS and had plasma concentration data. One participant without any infection evidence was also included in the PK population, for SFI (ITCZ-OS). Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24]) | 300 mg/day (n=4,2,0) | 207 mcg*hr per ml | Standard Deviation 54.7 |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24]) | 200 mg/day (n=11,5,12) | 55.8 mcg*hr per ml | Standard Deviation 34.4 |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24]) | 400mg/day (n=1,6,10) | 19.0 mcg*hr per ml | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24]) | 300 mg/day (n=4,2,0) | 129 mcg*hr per ml | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24]) | 200 mg/day (n=11,5,12) | 41.0 mcg*hr per ml | Standard Deviation 25.6 |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24]) | 400mg/day (n=1,6,10) | 137 mcg*hr per ml | Standard Deviation 71.3 |
| FN (Switched Treatment) | Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24]) | 200 mg/day (n=11,5,12) | 31.4 mcg*hr per ml | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| FN (Switched Treatment) | Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24]) | 400mg/day (n=1,6,10) | 50.4 mcg*hr per ml | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
| FN (Switched Treatment) | Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24]) | 300 mg/day (n=4,2,0) | NA mcg*hr per ml | — |
Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC)
The Cmax is maximum observed analyte concentration and MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation. The Cmax/MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained.
Time frame: Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment
Population: The PK analysis set. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively. MIC was not obtained for FN (Switched treatment) and hence the data not given for the same.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC) | 200 mg/day (n=4,1) | 7.21 ratio | Standard Deviation 2.13 |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC) | 300 mg/day (n=0,1) | NA ratio | — |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC) | 400 mg/day (n=0,3) | NA ratio | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC) | 200 mg/day (n=4,1) | 28.8 ratio | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC) | 300 mg/day (n=0,1) | 5.81 ratio | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC) | 400 mg/day (n=0,3) | 18.9 ratio | Standard Deviation 21.6 |
Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax)
The Cmax is defined as the maximum observed analyte concentration. Cmax was measured in microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml).
Time frame: Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment
Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants who received ITCZ-OS and had plasma concentration data. One participant without any infection evidence was also included in the PK population for SFI (ITCZ-OS). 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax) | 300 mg/day (n=4,2,0) | 9.20 mcg/ml | Standard Deviation 2.39 |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax) | 200 mg/day (n=11,5,12) | 2.90 mcg/ml | Standard Deviation 1.48 |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax) | 400mg/day (n=1,6,10) | 0.948 mcg/ml | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax) | 300 mg/day (n=4,2,0) | 58.2 mcg/ml | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax) | 200 mg/day (n=11,5,12) | 2.30 mcg/ml | Standard Deviation 1.12 |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax) | 400mg/day (n=1,6,10) | 6.10 mcg/ml | Standard Deviation 3.12 |
| FN (Switched Treatment) | Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax) | 200 mg/day (n=11,5,12) | 1.79 mcg/ml | Standard Deviation 0.682 |
| FN (Switched Treatment) | Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax) | 400mg/day (n=1,6,10) | 2.44 mcg/ml | Standard Deviation 0.996 |
| FN (Switched Treatment) | Maximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax) | 300 mg/day (n=4,2,0) | NA mcg/ml | — |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)
The MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation.
Time frame: Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment
Population: The PK analysis set. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively. MIC was not obtained for FN (Switched treatment) and hence the data not given for the same.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) | 200 mg/day (n=4,1) | 0.438 mcg per ml | Standard Deviation 0.125 |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) | 300 mg/day (n=0,1) | NA mcg per ml | — |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) | 400mg/day (n=0,3) | NA mcg per ml | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) | 200 mg/day (n=4,1) | 0.06 mcg per ml | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) | 300 mg/day (n=0,1) | 1.00 mcg per ml | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) | 400mg/day (n=0,3) | 0.71 mcg per ml | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC)
The T\>MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained.
Time frame: Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment
Population: The PK analysis set. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively. MIC was not obtained for FN (Switched treatment) and hence the data not given for the same.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC) | 200 mg/day (n=4,1) | 100 percent time | Standard Deviation 0 |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC) | 300 mg/day (n=0,1) | NA percent time | — |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC) | 400 mg/day (n=0,3) | NA percent time | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC) | 200 mg/day (n=4,1) | 100 percent time | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC) | 300 mg/day (n=0,1) | 100 percent time | — |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Time Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC) | 400 mg/day (n=0,3) | 100 percent time | Standard Deviation 0 |
Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized Assessment
Level of improvement in the clinical symptoms was assessed as: disappeared (if clinical symptoms disappeared), improved (significant improvement in clinical symptoms ), no change (almost no improvement in the clinical symptoms), worsened (if the clinical symptoms worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments).
Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)
Population: FAS population included all participants except those who did not meet main eligibility criteria, who did not receive ITCZ-IV or ITCZ-OS and participants without efficacy data. As per planned analysis both SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) and SFI (Switched Treatment) arms were combined for all efficacy analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized Assessment | Improved | 12 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized Assessment | Worsened | 2 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized Assessment | Disappeared | 7 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized Assessment | Could not be assessed | 3 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized Assessment | No change | 7 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized Assessment | Could not be assessed | 2 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized Assessment | Disappeared | 6 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized Assessment | Improved | 12 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized Assessment | No change | 2 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized Assessment | Worsened | 0 participants |
Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)
Level of improvement in the clinical symptoms was assessed as: disappeared (if clinical symptoms disappeared), improved (significant improvement in clinical symptoms ), no change (almost no improvement in the clinical symptoms), worsened (if the clinical symptoms worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments). The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, chronic necrotic pulmonary aspergillosis (C.N.P.A), pulmonary aspergilloma (P.A.) and pulmonary cryptococcosis (P.C).
Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)
Population: The FAS population. As per planned analysis both SFI arms were combined for efficacy analyses; participants with FN with suspected fungal infection were not planned to be analyzed for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Candidemia: Improved (n=1) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Esophageal candidiasis: Disappeared (n=3) | 3 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Invasive aspergillosis: Disappeared (n=5) | 2 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Invasive aspergillosis: Improved (n=5) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Invasive aspergillosis: Worsened (n=5) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Invasive aspergillosis:Could not be assessed (n=5) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | C.N.P.A: Improved (n= 8) | 5 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | C.N.P.A: No change (n=8) | 3 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.A.: Improved (n=10) | 4 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.A.: No change (n=10) | 4 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.A.: Could not be assessed (n=10) | 2 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.C.: Disappeared (n=4) | 2 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.C.: Improved (n=4) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.C.: Worsened (n=4) | 1 participants |
Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized Assessment
Level of Improvement in the Endoscopy or Image diagnosis was assessed as disappeared (if the abnormal findings were normalized), decreased (if level of pathogenic fungus was decreased in culture), improved (if significant improvement was observed in the abnormal findings), no change (if no significant improvement was observed in the abnormal findings), worsened (if the abnormal findings were worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing).
Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)
Population: The FAS population included all participants except those who did not meet main eligibility criteria, who did not receive ITCZ-IV or ITCZ-OS and participants without efficacy data. As per planned analysis both SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) and SFI (Switched Treatment) arms were combined for all efficacy analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized Assessment | Improved | 12 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized Assessment | Worsened | 4 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized Assessment | No change | 7 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized Assessment | Could not be assessed | 5 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized Assessment | Disappeared | 3 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized Assessment | Could not be assessed | 21 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized Assessment | Disappeared | 0 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized Assessment | Improved | 0 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized Assessment | No change | 0 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized Assessment | Worsened | 1 participants |
Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)
Level of Improvement in Endoscopy was assessed as disappeared, decreased, improved, no change, worsened and could not be assessed. The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C.
Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)
Population: The FAS population. As per planned analysis both SFI arms were combined for efficacy analyses; participants with FN with suspected fungal infection were not planned to be analyzed for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.A.: Could not be assessed (n=10) | 3 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Candidemia: Could not be assessed (n=1) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Esophageal candidiasis: Disappeared (n=3) | 3 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Invasive aspergillosis: Improved (n=5) | 3 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Invasive aspergillosis: Worsened (n=5) | 2 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | C.N.P.A: Improved (n=8) | 3 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | C.N.P.A: No change (n=8) | 3 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | C.N.P.A: Worsened (n=8) | 2 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.A.:Improved (n=10) | 3 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.A.:No change (n=10) | 4 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.C.: Improved (n=4) | 3 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.C.: Could not be assessed (n=4) | 1 participants |
Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized Assessment
Mycological efficacy was assessed as disappeared (if results for pathogenic fungus became negative, or if it was not possible to obtain the appropriate specimens), decreased (if level of pathogenic fungus was decreased in culture), no change (if there was no quantitative change in pathogenic fungus), increased (if there was a quantitative increase in pathogenic fungus, if results for pathogenic fungus became positive after start of dosing or if new pathogenic fungus was identified) , could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above assessment due to lack of detection in tests).
Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)
Population: The FAS population included all participants except those who did not meet main eligibility criteria, who did not receive ITCZ-IV or ITCZ-OS and participants without efficacy data. As per planned analysis both SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) and SFI (Switched Treatment) arms were combined for all efficacy analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized Assessment | Disappeared | 6 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized Assessment | No change | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized Assessment | Could not be assessed | 24 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized Assessment | Disappeared | 0 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized Assessment | No change | 0 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized Assessment | Could not be assessed | 22 participants |
Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)
Mycological efficacy was assessed as disappeared, decreased, no change, increased, could not be assessed. The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C.
Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)
Population: The FAS population. As per planned analysis both SFI arms were combined for efficacy analyses; participants with FN with suspected fungal infection were not planned to be analyzed for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Candidemia: Could not be assessed (n=1) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Esophageal candidiasis: Disappeared (n=3) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Esophageal candidiasis:Could not be assessed (n=3) | 2 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Invasive aspergillosis:Could not be assessed (n=5) | 5 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | C.N.P.A: Disappeared (n=8) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | C.N.P.A: No change (n=8) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | C.N.P.A: Could not be assessed (n=8) | 6 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.A.: Disappeared (n=10) | 3 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.A.: Could not be assessed (n=10) | 7 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.C.: Disappeared (n=4) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.C.: Could not be assessed (n=4) | 3 participants |
Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized Assessment
Serological effect against fungi was assessed as changed to negative (if the test values became negative), improved (if the test values decreased), no change (if there was no change in the test values), no change (if there was no change in the test values) , worsened (if the test values increased) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing).
Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)
Population: The FAS population included all participants except those who did not meet main eligibility criteria, who did not receive ITCZ-IV or ITCZ-OS and participants without efficacy data. As per planned analysis both SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) and SFI (Switched Treatment) arms were combined for all efficacy analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized Assessment | Changed to negative | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized Assessment | Worsened | 2 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized Assessment | No change | 5 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized Assessment | Could not be assessed | 20 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized Assessment | Improved | 3 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized Assessment | Could not be assessed | 19 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized Assessment | Changed to negative | 0 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized Assessment | Improved | 0 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized Assessment | No change | 1 participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Number of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized Assessment | Worsened | 2 participants |
Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)
Serological effect against fungi was assessed as changed to negative (if the test values became negative), improved (if the test values decreased), no change (if there was no change in the test values), worsened (if the test values increased) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing). The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C.
Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)
Population: The FAS population. As per planned analysis both SFI arms were combined for efficacy analyses; participants with FN with suspected fungal infection were not planned to be analyzed for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Candidemia: Changed to negative (n=1) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Esophageal candidiasis:Could not be assessed (n=3) | 3 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Invasive aspergillosis: No change (n=5) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Invasive aspergillosis: Worsened (n=5) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | Invasive aspergillosis:Could not be assessed (n=5) | 3 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | C.N.P.A: Improved (n=8) | 2 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | C.N.P.A: Worsened (n=8) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | C.N.P.A: Could not be assessed (n=8) | 5 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.A.:No change (n=10) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.A.: Could not be assessed (n=10) | 9 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.C.: Improved (n=4) | 1 participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Number of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | P.C.: No change (n=4) | 3 participants |
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Centralized Assessment
Efficacy rate (E.R.) was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective and cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective multiplied by 100. Treatment success rate (T.S.R.) was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective, cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective and cases for whom the efficacy could not be assessed multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)
Population: The FAS population included all participants except those who did not meet main eligibility criteria, who did not receive ITCZ-IV or ITCZ-OS and participants without efficacy data. As per planned analysis both SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) and SFI (Switched Treatment) arms were combined for all efficacy analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Centralized Assessment | E.R. | 62.1 percentage of participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Centralized Assessment | T.S.R | 58.1 percentage of participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Centralized Assessment | E.R. | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| SFI (Switched Treatment) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Centralized Assessment | T.S.R | 72.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)
E.R. was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective and number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective multiplied by 100. T.S.R. was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective, number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective and number of cases for whom the efficacy could not be assessed multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)
Population: The FAS population. As per planned analysis both SFI arms were combined for efficacy analyses; participants with FN with suspected fungal infection were not planned to be analyzed for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time points for each arm group respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | E.R.: Candidemia (n=1) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | E.R.: Esophageal candidiasis (n=3) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | E.R.: Invasive aspergillosis (n=5) | 60.0 percentage of participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | E.R.: C.N.P.A (n=8) | 62.5 percentage of participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | E.R.: P.A. (n=10) | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | E.R.: P.C. (n=4) | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | T.S.R. : Candidemia (n=1) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | T.S.R. : Esophageal candidiasis (n=3) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | T.S.R. : Invasive aspergillosis (n=5) | 60.0 percentage of participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | T.S.R. : C.N.P.A (n=8) | 62.5 percentage of participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | T.S.R. : P.A. (n=10) | 40.0 percentage of participants |
| SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy) | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment) | T.S.R. : P.C. (n=4) | 50.0 percentage of participants |