Skip to content

Investigation of Efficiency of Breathing With Different Breathing Patterns

Investigation of Efficiency of Breathing With Different Breathing Patterns in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Respiratory Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00784004
Enrollment
26
Registered
2008-11-03
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2014-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breathing Patterns, Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Physiology

Keywords

breathing patterns,, unidirectional breathing,, mask ventilation,, respiratory physiology

Brief summary

Our aim in this study is to investigate the efficiency of the breathing with different breathing patterns. Ten volunteers and twenty patients having respiratory problems will be coached on their breathing through specific masks which will provide four different breathing patterns. These patterns will be 1) Breathing in through the nose only and out through the mouth only 2) Breathing in through the mouth only and out through the nose only 3) Breathing in and out through the nose only 4) Breathing in and out through the mouth only The data obtained from volunteers and patients will be compared within and between the groups.

Interventions

OTHERBreathing Patterns

All subjects will breathe in four different breathing patterns which are provided by specific masks. Patterns are as the following: 1. Breathing in through the nose only and out through the mouth only 2. Breathing in through the mouth only and out through the nose only 3. Breathing in and out through the nose only 4. Breathing in and out through the mouth only

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* For healthy subjects: 1\. Ten healthy adult (\> 18 years of age) volunteers will be recruited from the MGH main campus through intra-hospital e-mail broadcasting. Subjects with the following issues will be excluded from the study. * For patients with respiratory insufficiency: 1. Twenty adult (\> 18 years of age) patients will be recruited. These patients will be either patients in acute respiratory failure resulting from COPD exacerbation breathing spontaneously only receiving nasal oxygen admitted to the medical floors of the MGH; or patients with diagnosed stable COPD on home oxygen therapy seen by pulmonary physicians in the outpatient clinics or coming to the MGH as study subjects.

Exclusion criteria

* For healthy volunteers: 1. Subjects with facial deformity, heavy beard or moustache which prevents good seal between the mask and the face; 2. Subjects who have claustrophobia and cannot wear the mask. * For patients with respiratory insufficiency: 1. Patients with facial deformity, heavy beard or moustache which prevents a good seal between the mask and the face; 2. Patients who have claustrophobia and cannot wear the mask. 3. Patients who are hemodynamically unstable. 4. Patients requiring continuous noninvasive positive pressure ventilation or endotracheal intubation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Determining the anatomic dead space change at variable tidal volumes with four different breathing patterns (nose-in and nose-out, mouth-in and mouth-out, nose-in and mouth-out, mouth-in and nose-out) in healthy volunteers.3 months
Comparing the efficiency of CO2 removal at given minute ventilations with the four different breathing patterns in patients with chronic respiratory failure.6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparing the efficiency of the study mask which forces subjects to breathe in a manner similar to pursed lip breathing and a regular facemask in healthy volunteers and patients with respiratory failure6 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026