Skip to content

Intravenous Administration of Metoprolol Versus Biatrial Pacing in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery

Intravenous Metoprolol Versus Biatrial Pacing in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00783900
Enrollment
316
Registered
2008-11-03
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2017-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Biatrial Pacing, Metoprolol

Keywords

Prevention

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare the effectiviness of biatrial pacing versus intravenous administration of metoprolol in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

Interventions

OTHERmetoprolol, biatrial pacing

Prevention, atrial fibrillation, cardiac surgery, biatrial pacing, metoprolol

Sponsors

Oulu University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Cordia, Kuopio, Finland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Kuopio University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* elective CABG and aortic valve cardiac patients, * previous use of beta blocker

Exclusion criteria

* Previous episodes of Atrial fibrillation or flutter, * II or II degree atrioventricular block, uncontrolled heart failure * Sick sinus syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
biatriac pacing48 hours
Incidence of atrial fibrillation48 hours

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026