Skip to content

Neuroimaging of the Effects of Concerta in the Treatment of ADHD

Functional Neuroimaging of Acute Concerta Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Differences Across Development

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00778310
Enrollment
76
Registered
2008-10-23
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2012-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity

Keywords

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, ADHD

Brief summary

A number of brain regions have been down to be altered in both structure and function in patients with ADHD, including prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, caudate and cerebellum. Patients with ADHD often show reduced levels of activity in the frontal and cingulate regions of brain while performing measures of inhibitory control during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). While stimulant medications robustly improve the clinical symptoms of ADHD, there are only a small number of studies examining the effects of these commonly prescribed medications on brain activity. We propose to obtain fMRI in patients with ADHD on placebo and on their individualized dose of OROS methylphenidate (Concerta). Our hypothesis is that Concerta will increase the activity of the brain in the frontal, cingulate and amygdala of the brain and that these brain changes will be associated with clinical improvement of symptoms.

Detailed description

Three age groups of subjects will be studied: school age children (aged 9-12), older adolescents (age 15-17 years) and young adults (age 20-25 years). Twenty subjects will be studied in each group. All subjects must meet criteria for ADHD, combined type and be either treatment naïve or currently taking and responding well to Concerta. Child and adolescent patients taking Concerta will have their current levels of ADHD symptoms assessed with the Dupaul ADHD rating scale (11); adults taking Concerta will be assessed with Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS). Patients whose symptoms are in remission as evidenced by scores in the normal range on these scales may proceed directly to the neuroimaging portion of the study. Subjects who are treatment naïve or are treated but are not in remission shall under a three week open label trial of Concerta to determine the optimal dose for treatment of their symptoms. Subjects will have two fMRI sessions on different days. During each fMRI session, they will perform both the Stop Signal Task and the Emotional Conflict Resolution Task . On the morning of the scan, placebo and Concerta will be administered in a double-blind, crossover design, with order of medication and placebo randomized. The scan sessions will take place between 3 and 7 hours after medication administration. After each scan, the subject and a research assistant will go to a quiet room in the imaging center; the subjects will be given arithmetic level set at a level of difficulty that the subject has mastered. The subject will be given 15 minutes to complete as many problems as possible.

Interventions

DRUGmethylphenidate-OROS

The collaborator (Ortho-McNiel Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC) will provide capsules of Concerta that are made to appear similar to placebo capsules. The subject will be administered their usual dose of Concerta the morning of the scan.

DRUGPlacebo

The collaborator (Ortho-McNiel Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC) will provide capsules of placebo that are made to appear similar to Concerta capsules. The subject will be administered placebo the morning of the scan.

Sponsors

Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meets DSM-IV criteria for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder * Current clinical responder to Concerta (OROS-methylphenidate)

Exclusion criteria

* IQ \< 95 * Presence of Learning Disorder * Presence of an Affective or Psychotic Disorder * Presence of a Substance/Alcohol Abuse/Dependence Disorder * Presence of an Autism Spectrum Disorder * Presence of a Tic Disorder * Taking any psychotropic medication other than Concerta * A medical condition requiring daily medication * Previous adverse or non response to Concerta

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Brain Oxygenation Level Dependent Signal in the Fusiform Gyrus and the Amygdala on Concerta vs. PlaceboPlacebo and Drug day, 1-2 weeks apartEach subject viewed shapes and faces on multiple trials. The subject matched faces or shapes on each trial. BOLD activity during shape trials was subtracted from BOLD activity during Face trials and this value was compared on drug vs. placebo trials.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 75 patients were enrolled from 11/4/2008 t0 8/12/2010. Patients were recruited from advertisements in local papers as well as flyers in the UTHSCSA psychiatric clinic.

Pre-assignment details

Psychiatric assessment was performed to confirm the diagnosis of ADHD. Fifteen (15) patients were screen failures. Five (5) patients did not respond to an open label trial of Concerta were excluded. 11 withdrew consent or lost to follow up. (1) withdrew to claustrophobia. 43 were exposed to study drug (Concerta and placebo) in crossover design.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Adults
These were participants between the age of 21-25 years. They underwent 2 FMRI studies, once on placebo and once on Concerta in a double blind randomized crossover design.
17
Children
These were participants between the age of 3- 17 years. They underwent 2 FMRI studies, once on placebo and once on Concerta in a double blind randomized crossover design.
26
Total43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicChildrenAdultsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
26 Participants0 Participants26 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants17 Participants17 Participants
Age Continuous11.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
22.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.78
15.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants17 participants43 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants15 Participants33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Brain Oxygenation Level Dependent Signal in the Fusiform Gyrus and the Amygdala on Concerta vs. Placebo

Each subject viewed shapes and faces on multiple trials. The subject matched faces or shapes on each trial. BOLD activity during shape trials was subtracted from BOLD activity during Face trials and this value was compared on drug vs. placebo trials.

Time frame: Placebo and Drug day, 1-2 weeks apart

Population: The number who completed both fMRI one week apart (crossover study, scanned twice

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adults Drug ConditionBrain Oxygenation Level Dependent Signal in the Fusiform Gyrus and the Amygdala on Concerta vs. PlaceboAmygdala1.79 Face-Shape BOLD signal differenceStandard Deviation 1.06
Adults Drug ConditionBrain Oxygenation Level Dependent Signal in the Fusiform Gyrus and the Amygdala on Concerta vs. PlaceboFusiform Gyrus1.46 Face-Shape BOLD signal differenceStandard Deviation 1.36
Adults Placebo ConditionBrain Oxygenation Level Dependent Signal in the Fusiform Gyrus and the Amygdala on Concerta vs. PlaceboFusiform Gyrus1.64 Face-Shape BOLD signal differenceStandard Deviation 1.21
Adults Placebo ConditionBrain Oxygenation Level Dependent Signal in the Fusiform Gyrus and the Amygdala on Concerta vs. PlaceboAmygdala0.58 Face-Shape BOLD signal differenceStandard Deviation 1.09
Children Drug ConditionBrain Oxygenation Level Dependent Signal in the Fusiform Gyrus and the Amygdala on Concerta vs. PlaceboAmygdala1.43 Face-Shape BOLD signal differenceStandard Deviation 1.08
Children Drug ConditionBrain Oxygenation Level Dependent Signal in the Fusiform Gyrus and the Amygdala on Concerta vs. PlaceboFusiform Gyrus1.99 Face-Shape BOLD signal differenceStandard Deviation 1.1
Children Placebo ConditionBrain Oxygenation Level Dependent Signal in the Fusiform Gyrus and the Amygdala on Concerta vs. PlaceboAmygdala0.77 Face-Shape BOLD signal differenceStandard Deviation 1.36
Children Placebo ConditionBrain Oxygenation Level Dependent Signal in the Fusiform Gyrus and the Amygdala on Concerta vs. PlaceboFusiform Gyrus1.06 Face-Shape BOLD signal differenceStandard Deviation 1.12

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026