Skip to content

A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With mFOLFOX-6 or FOLFOXIRI in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

A Multicentre Randomised Phase II Study to Assess the Safety and Resectability in Patients With Initially Unresectable Liver Metastases Secondary to Colorectal Cancer Receiving First-line Treatment Either With mFOLFOX-6 Plus Bevacizumab or FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab (OLIVIA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00778102
Enrollment
80
Registered
2008-10-23
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2016-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Brief summary

This 2 arm study will compare the resection rate of liver metastases and safety of surgery in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and primarily unresectable liver metastases receiving treatment with Avastin in combination with 5-FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin with irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) or without irinotecan (mFOLFOX-6) as first line treatment. Patients will be randomized to receive Avastin (5mg/kg iv every 2 weeks) in combination with each of these two standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens. The anticipated time on study treatment is until surgery, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal, and the target sample size is \<100 individuals.

Interventions

DRUG5-FU

Bolus 400mg/m2, day 1 every 2 weeks

DRUGIrinotecan

165mg/m2 1-hour iv infusion, day 1 every 2 weeks

DRUGLeucovorin

400mg/m2 2-hour iv infusion, day 1 every 2 weeks

DRUGOxaliplatin

85mg/m2 2-hour iv infusion, day 1 every 2 weeks

DRUGbevacizumab [Avastin]

5mg/kg iv day 1 every 2 weeks

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, \>=18 years of age; * unresectable liver metastasis secondary to cancer of colon or rectum; * scheduled for standard first line chemotherapy; * ECOG performance score of 0 or 1; * condition feasible for major abdominal surgery after first line treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* diagnosis of metastatic disease \>3 months prior to study entry; * evidence of extrahepatic disease, diffuse peritoneal carcinosis or involvement of celiac lymph nodes; * prior systemic or local treatment of metastatic disease; * prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy completed within 6 months prior to study entry; * history or evidence of CNS disease unrelated to cancer.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resection or Residual (Microscopic or Macroscopic) TumorUp to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery)Following resective surgery, participants were evaluated for complete resection (R0) or the presence of microscopic (R1) or macroscopic (R2) residual tumor. The percentage of participants within each residual tumor classification was calculated as \[number of participants with R0, R1, and/or R2 divided by the total number of participants\] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Histopathological ResponseUp to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery)At the time of resective surgery, participants were evaluated for histopathological response as defined through pathologist review of the resected metastatic lesions, including assessment of margin status and tumor cell viability. Histopathological response classification was based upon the percentage of viable tumor cells, where 'Complete response' was considered for those with 0 percent (%) viable tumor cells, 'Major response' for those with 1% to 49% viable tumor cells, 'Minor response' for 50% to 99% viable tumor cells, and 'No response' for 100% viable tumor cells. The response could not be determined in some cases and was documented as 'Unknown.' The percentage of participants within each response category was calculated as \[number of participants with a given response divided by the number of participants who completed the assessment\] multiplied by 100.
Percentage of Participants With Complete or Major Histopathological ResponseUp to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery)At the time of resective surgery, participants were evaluated for histopathological response as defined through pathologist review of the resected metastatic lesions, including assessment of margin status and tumor cell viability. Histopathological response classification was based upon the percentage of viable tumor cells, as described previously. The collective percentage of participants assessed as having a complete or major response was calculated as \[number of participants with complete or major response divided by the number of participants who completed the assessment\] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Relapse Following Curative ResectionUp to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)Among participants with curative resection (complete resection \[R0\] or microscopic residual tumor \[R1\]), relapse was defined as the first new occurrence of cancer or death. The percentage of participants who experienced relapse was calculated as \[number of participants with a relapse event divided by the number of participants initially classified as R0 or R1 following resective surgery\] multiplied by 100.
Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)Up to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)RFS was defined as the time from curative resection (complete resection \[R0\] or microscopic residual tumor \[R1\]) to the date of first diagnosis of relapse. For participants with curative resection and without relapse, RFS was censored at the last known relapse-free assessment. RFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Death or Disease ProgressionUp to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)PD was defined, using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. The percentage of participants experiencing PD or death was calculated as \[number of participants with event divided by the number of participants analyzed\] multiplied by 100.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)PFS was defined, using RECIST version 1.0, as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD or death from any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For participants without documented PD or death, PFS was censored at the time of last tumor assessment. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Time to ResectionUp to 5 years (at Screening; prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; and at time of surgery)Time to resection was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first resective surgery. For participants who did not undergo resective surgery, time to resection was censored at Day 1. Time to resection was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Overall Survival (OS)Up to 5 years (prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. For participants without an event of death, OS was censored at the last-known alive date. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.0Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)Using RECIST version 1.0, participants were considered to have achieved CR upon the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Participants who achieved PR demonstrated at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the Screening sum largest diameter. Responses were confirmed by repeat assessments no less than 4 weeks after criteria for response were first met. The collective percentage of participants with confirmed best overall response of CR or PR was calculated as \[number of participants meeting RECIST criteria for CR or PR divided by the number of participants analyzed\] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time to ResponseUp to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)Time to response according to RECIST version 1.0 was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented CR or PR. Participants were considered to have achieved CR upon the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Participants who achieved PR demonstrated at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the Screening sum largest diameter. Responses were confirmed by repeat assessments no less than 4 weeks after criteria for response were first met. For participants who did not complete a confirmatory tumor assessment, time to response was censored at the date of last tumor assessment, or if unavailable, at the date of first dose. Time to response was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryUp to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)Complications related to the first resective surgery were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 3.0, and classified according to severity. The NCI-CTCAE severity classification criteria are as follows: Grade 5 equals (=) resulting in death; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 2 = moderate; and Grade 1 = mild. The percentage of participants experiencing a given adverse event (AE) by severity grade was calculated as \[number of participants with an AE divided by the number of participants who underwent first resective surgery\] multiplied by 100.
Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryUp to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)Complications related to the second resective surgery were evaluated using the NCI-CTCAE version 3.0, and classified according to severity. The NCI-CTCAE severity classification criteria are as follows: Grade 5 = resulting in death; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 2 = moderate; and Grade 1 = mild. The percentage of participants experiencing a given AE by severity grade was calculated as \[number of participants with an AE divided by the number of participants who underwent second resective surgery\] multiplied by 100.
Percentage of Participants Who DiedUp to 5 years (prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Countries

Austria, France, Spain, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6
Participants received a chemotherapy regimen of bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX-6. Each drug was administered on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Dosing was as follows: bevacizumab 5 mg/kg via IV infusion; oxaliplatin 85 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion; leucovorin 400 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion; 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2 via IV bolus; and 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2 via continuous 46-hour IV infusion. Following completion of 12 cycles, participants could discontinue oxaliplatin and continue with bevacizumab, leucovorin, and 5-FU. Treatment was continued until resectability, PD, unacceptable toxicity, or participant refusal.
39
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI
Participants received a chemotherapy regimen of bevacizumab plus FOLFOXIRI. Each drug was administered on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Dosing was as follows: bevacizumab 5 mg/kg via IV infusion; oxaliplatin 85 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion; irinotecan 165 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion; leucovorin 200 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion; and 5-FU 3200 mg/m\^2 via continuous 46-hour IV infusion. Following completion of 12 cycles, participants were to discontinue either irinotecan, oxaliplatin, or both. Treatment was continued until resectability, PD, unacceptable toxicity, or participant refusal.
41
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative Reason710
Overall StudyAdverse Event85
Overall StudyDeath11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyRefused Treatment23
Overall StudyViolation of Selection Criteria11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBevacizumab + FOLFOXIRITotalBevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6
Age, Continuous61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.02
59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.87
57.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.32
Gender
Female
12 Participants33 Participants21 Participants
Gender
Male
29 Participants47 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
36 / 3740 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
24 / 3724 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Resection or Residual (Microscopic or Macroscopic) Tumor

Following resective surgery, participants were evaluated for complete resection (R0) or the presence of microscopic (R1) or macroscopic (R2) residual tumor. The percentage of participants within each residual tumor classification was calculated as \[number of participants with R0, R1, and/or R2 divided by the total number of participants\] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method.

Time frame: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery)

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complete Resection or Residual (Microscopic or Macroscopic) TumorR0, R1, or R248.7 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complete Resection or Residual (Microscopic or Macroscopic) TumorR0 or R133.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complete Resection or Residual (Microscopic or Macroscopic) TumorR023.1 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complete Resection or Residual (Microscopic or Macroscopic) TumorR0, R1, or R261.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complete Resection or Residual (Microscopic or Macroscopic) TumorR0 or R151.2 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complete Resection or Residual (Microscopic or Macroscopic) TumorR048.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference between groups in the collective percentage of participants with R0, R1, or R2.p-value: 0.270795% CI: [-11, 35.5]Chi-squared
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. For participants without an event of death, OS was censored at the last-known alive date. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Time frame: Up to 5 years (prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Overall Survival (OS)32.2 months
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIOverall Survival (OS)NA months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Death or Disease Progression

PD was defined, using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. The percentage of participants experiencing PD or death was calculated as \[number of participants with event divided by the number of participants analyzed\] multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants Experiencing Death or Disease Progression89.7 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants Experiencing Death or Disease Progression68.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Relapse Following Curative Resection

Among participants with curative resection (complete resection \[R0\] or microscopic residual tumor \[R1\]), relapse was defined as the first new occurrence of cancer or death. The percentage of participants who experienced relapse was calculated as \[number of participants with a relapse event divided by the number of participants initially classified as R0 or R1 following resective surgery\] multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Up to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Population: ITT Population; only participants with a residual tumor classification of R0 or R1 after first resection were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants Experiencing Relapse Following Curative Resection76.9 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants Experiencing Relapse Following Curative Resection57.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Died

Time frame: Up to 5 years (prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants Who Died48.7 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants Who Died19.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.0

Using RECIST version 1.0, participants were considered to have achieved CR upon the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Participants who achieved PR demonstrated at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the Screening sum largest diameter. Responses were confirmed by repeat assessments no less than 4 weeks after criteria for response were first met. The collective percentage of participants with confirmed best overall response of CR or PR was calculated as \[number of participants meeting RECIST criteria for CR or PR divided by the number of participants analyzed\] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method.

Time frame: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.061.5 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With a Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.080.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference between groups in the collective percentage of participants with confirmed best overall response of CR or PR.p-value: 0.061295% CI: [-2.1, 40]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complete or Major Histopathological Response

At the time of resective surgery, participants were evaluated for histopathological response as defined through pathologist review of the resected metastatic lesions, including assessment of margin status and tumor cell viability. Histopathological response classification was based upon the percentage of viable tumor cells, as described previously. The collective percentage of participants assessed as having a complete or major response was calculated as \[number of participants with complete or major response divided by the number of participants who completed the assessment\] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method.

Time frame: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery)

Population: ITT Population; only participants with a histopathological assessment after the first resective surgery were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complete or Major Histopathological Response57.1 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complete or Major Histopathological Response52.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference between groups in the collective percentage of participants with complete or major histopathological response.p-value: 0.781795% CI: [-43, 33.5]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective Surgery

Complications related to the first resective surgery were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 3.0, and classified according to severity. The NCI-CTCAE severity classification criteria are as follows: Grade 5 equals (=) resulting in death; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 2 = moderate; and Grade 1 = mild. The percentage of participants experiencing a given adverse event (AE) by severity grade was calculated as \[number of participants with an AE divided by the number of participants who underwent first resective surgery\] multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Up to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Population: Safety Population (First Surgery Subpopulation): All participants who underwent a first resective surgery and who received at least one dose of trial medication, whether prematurely withdrawn or not. Participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment they received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryAny complication, Total73.7 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 115.8 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 236.8 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 310.5 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 40 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 510.5 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryBleeding, Total15.8 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryBleeding, Grade 15.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryBleeding, Grade 25.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryBleeding, Grade 35.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryCardiovascular, Total10.5 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryCardiovascular, Grade 20 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryCardiovascular, Grade 35.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryCardiovascular, Grade 45.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryInfections, Total26.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryInfections, Grade 110.5 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryInfections, Grade 25.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryInfections, Grade 35.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryInfections, Grade 45.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryLiver insufficiency, Total10.5 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryLiver insufficiency, Grade 510.5 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryNeural disorder, Total5.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryNeural disorder, Grade 25.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryNoninfected perihepatic fluid collections, Total0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryNoninfected perihepatic fluid collections, Grade 20 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryOther complication, Total52.6 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryOther complication, Grade 126.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryOther complication, Grade 221.1 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryOther complication, Grade 30 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryOther complication, Grade 45.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryPulmonary, Total5.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryPulmonary, Grade 35.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryRenal impairment, Total10.5 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryRenal impairment, Grade 25.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryRenal impairment, Grade 45.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryWound healing, Total5.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryWound healing, Grade 15.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryWound healing, Grade 30 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryWound healing, Grade 40 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryLiver insufficiency, Total0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryAny complication, Total52.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryOther complication, Grade 40 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 14.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryLiver insufficiency, Grade 50 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 212.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryRenal impairment, Grade 40 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 324.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryNeural disorder, Total0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 412.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryPulmonary, Total4.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 50 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryNeural disorder, Grade 20 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryBleeding, Total8.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryWound healing, Grade 48.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryBleeding, Grade 10 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryNoninfected perihepatic fluid collections, Total4.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryBleeding, Grade 24.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryPulmonary, Grade 34.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryBleeding, Grade 34.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryNoninfected perihepatic fluid collections, Grade 24.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryCardiovascular, Total4.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryWound healing, Total12.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryCardiovascular, Grade 24.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryOther complication, Total28.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryCardiovascular, Grade 30 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryRenal impairment, Total4.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryCardiovascular, Grade 40 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryOther complication, Grade 18.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryInfections, Total32.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryWound healing, Grade 34.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryInfections, Grade 112.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryOther complication, Grade 28.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryInfections, Grade 20 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryRenal impairment, Grade 24.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryInfections, Grade 316.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryOther complication, Grade 312.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryInfections, Grade 44.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective SurgeryWound healing, Grade 10 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective Surgery

Complications related to the second resective surgery were evaluated using the NCI-CTCAE version 3.0, and classified according to severity. The NCI-CTCAE severity classification criteria are as follows: Grade 5 = resulting in death; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 2 = moderate; and Grade 1 = mild. The percentage of participants experiencing a given AE by severity grade was calculated as \[number of participants with an AE divided by the number of participants who underwent second resective surgery\] multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Up to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Population: Safety Population (Second Surgery Subpopulation): All participants who underwent a second resective surgery and who received at least one dose of trial medication, whether prematurely withdrawn or not. Participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment they received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryAny complication, Total100.0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 10 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 266.7 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 30 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 3a33.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryBleeding, Total33.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryBleeding, Grade 10 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryBleeding, Grade 233.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryBleeding, Grade 20 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryAny complication, Total66.7 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 3a0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 133.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryBleeding, Grade 133.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 20 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryBleeding, Total33.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective SurgeryAny complication, Grade 333.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Histopathological Response

At the time of resective surgery, participants were evaluated for histopathological response as defined through pathologist review of the resected metastatic lesions, including assessment of margin status and tumor cell viability. Histopathological response classification was based upon the percentage of viable tumor cells, where 'Complete response' was considered for those with 0 percent (%) viable tumor cells, 'Major response' for those with 1% to 49% viable tumor cells, 'Minor response' for 50% to 99% viable tumor cells, and 'No response' for 100% viable tumor cells. The response could not be determined in some cases and was documented as 'Unknown.' The percentage of participants within each response category was calculated as \[number of participants with a given response divided by the number of participants who completed the assessment\] multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery)

Population: ITT Population; only participants with a histopathological assessment after the first resective surgery were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Histopathological ResponseMajor response57.1 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Histopathological ResponseNo response0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Histopathological ResponseMinor response28.6 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Histopathological ResponseUnknown14.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Percentage of Participants With Histopathological ResponseComplete response0 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Histopathological ResponseUnknown14.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Histopathological ResponseComplete response4.8 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Histopathological ResponseMajor response47.6 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Histopathological ResponseMinor response33.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIPercentage of Participants With Histopathological ResponseNo response0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined, using RECIST version 1.0, as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD or death from any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For participants without documented PD or death, PFS was censored at the time of last tumor assessment. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Time frame: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Progression-Free Survival (PFS)11.5 months
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIProgression-Free Survival (PFS)18.6 months
Secondary

Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)

RFS was defined as the time from curative resection (complete resection \[R0\] or microscopic residual tumor \[R1\]) to the date of first diagnosis of relapse. For participants with curative resection and without relapse, RFS was censored at the last known relapse-free assessment. RFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Time frame: Up to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Population: ITT Population; only participants with a residual tumor classification of R0 or R1 after first resection were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)8.1 months
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRIRelapse-Free Survival (RFS)17.1 months
Secondary

Time to Resection

Time to resection was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first resective surgery. For participants who did not undergo resective surgery, time to resection was censored at Day 1. Time to resection was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Time frame: Up to 5 years (at Screening; prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; and at time of surgery)

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Time to Resection4.4 months
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRITime to Resection4.3 months
Secondary

Time to Response

Time to response according to RECIST version 1.0 was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented CR or PR. Participants were considered to have achieved CR upon the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Participants who achieved PR demonstrated at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the Screening sum largest diameter. Responses were confirmed by repeat assessments no less than 4 weeks after criteria for response were first met. For participants who did not complete a confirmatory tumor assessment, time to response was censored at the date of last tumor assessment, or if unavailable, at the date of first dose. Time to response was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Time frame: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6Time to Response3.1 months
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRITime to Response3.1 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026