Skip to content

Continuous Versus Interrupted Sutures for Repair of Episiotomy or Second Degree Tears: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Continuous Versus Interrupted Sutures for Repair of Episiotomy or Second Degree Tears: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00777270
Enrollment
445
Registered
2008-10-22
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2007-10-31
Last updated
2008-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

episiotomy, perineal lesion, vaginal trauma

Brief summary

The best technique for this repair would be that which requires least time in realisation, least consumption of material for the repair and that which produces less pain at short and long-term permitting the resumption of intercourse quicker and with less pain thereby requiring less necessity to take out the stitches and less frequency of re stitching. The investigators research is looking for a technique for repairing the perineum more advantageously.

Detailed description

445 women who participated in the project had undergone normal deliveries with episiotomy or second-grade tearing of the perineum. One group was repaired with continuous non-locking suture in the vagina, perineum and subcutaneous tissue. The other group used continuous locking suture of the vagina, interrupted sutures in the perineum muscle and interrupted transcutaneous suture. The threads used for stitching were identical in both groups. The same questions were asked concerning the sensation of pain and the use of painkillers, the second and the tenth day and at the three months.

Interventions

PROCEDURErepair of episiotomy or second degree tears

continuous suture technique with continuous non-locking suture in the vagina, perineum and subcutaneous tissue.

Sponsors

Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* vaginal childbirth * at least 37 weeks of gestation * assistance by one of the 4 matrons who participated in the project * have been subjected to an episiotomy or the appearance of tearing that affected skin and muscle * The newborn child had to be alive, viable

Exclusion criteria

* instrumentation * produce injury in the anal sphincter or in the rectum. * serious congenital malformations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain at that moment (pain now)the second and the tenth day and at the three months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
If sexual intercourse had been re initiated, how long after childbirth, if pain had been experienced the first time and if this continued.at the three months.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026