Skip to content

Improving Depression Management Through Peer Support

Improving Depression Management Through Peer Support

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00777205
Acronym
DIAL-UP
Enrollment
443
Registered
2008-10-22
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2015-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression

Keywords

Peer Support, Quality of Life, Telephone

Brief summary

We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared the effectiveness of a telephone delivered, recovery focused, peer-support intervention to enhanced usual care for VA patients with depression.

Detailed description

Peer-support interventions have been recommended by prestigious national task forces and incorporated into the VA Comprehensive Mental Health Strategic Plan. Patients who cope with longer term depressive symptoms may benefit from these interventions.This study examines the effectiveness of a feasible, scalable mutual peer-support intervention for VA patients in depression treatment and will inform leaders who are considering implementing peer-support initiatives. In this study, each study participant (a veteran in treatment for depression) was matched with another participating veteran and the pairs were randomized to enhanced usual care or to the telephone based peer-support intervention (DIAL-UP). All study participants received usual care plus written materials outlining depression self-management strategies, behavioral activation, and recovery. DIAL-UP participants also received: a) a peer-support manual that outlined peer support principles and provided peer discussion topics and b) access to a specialized telephone platform that permited free calls to their partners, ready access to mental health staff for back-up and advice, and recorded tips on depression management. Patients were encouraged to call their partners at least once per week during the 6-month intervention period. Patient outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months following enrollment.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTelephone-based peer support

Patients received a) a peer-support manual that outlines self-management and recovery principles and provides peer discussion topics and b) access to a specialized telephone platform that permits free calls to their partners, ready access to mental health staff for back-up and advice on being effective partners, and recorded tips on depression management. They were asked to call their peer partner at least once a week for 24 weeks.

BEHAVIORALEnhanced Usual Care

Patients received their usual mental health care plus a copy of the Depression Helpbook by Wayne Katon and bi-weekly study mailings with depression management tips.

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* currently in treatment at Ann Arbor, Detroit, Battle Creek, or Saginaw VA or their associated community based outpatient clinics * not receiving formal mental health services or regularly attending mutual self-help programs outside of the VA * diagnosis of a depressive disorder in the last 24 months that is confirmed by the relevant clinician * being seen less than bi-weekly by clinicians for psychiatric or substance use disorders * past trial of psychotherapy and/or antidepressant trial * have a current PHQ-9 scores \> 10 or WSAS scores \> 10 * have stable access to and ability to communicate by telephone

Exclusion criteria

* diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, MDD with psychotic features, or Bipolar I in the past 24 months. Diagnosis of active substance dependence in the past 12 months or substance abuse in the last 6 months * an immediate risk of suicide, requiring hospitalization or urgent evaluation * clinician assessment that participation in the study could have an adverse impact on the patient or his/her partner.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month PeriodChange over study periodThe Veterans Rand 36 Item Health Survey (VR-36) mental health component score (MCS) and physical health component score (PCS) were used as measures of functional status. The MCS and PCS have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating better health.
Change in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month PeriodChange over study periodThe Veterans Rand 36 Item Health Survey (VR-36) mental health component score (MCS) and physical health component score (PCS) were used as measures of functional status. The MCS and PCS have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating better health.
Quality of LifeChange over study periodThe 14-item Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF), which has good reliability and has been used in multiple depression studies, was used to assess quality of life. Responses are scored on a 5-point scale ('not at all or never' to 'frequently or all the time'), where higher scores indicate better enjoyment and satisfaction with life (possible range 14-70).
Depression SymptomsChange over study periodThe 21-item Beck Depression Inventory-2nd Edition (BDI-II) was used to assess depressive symptoms. Total score of 0-13 is considered minimal range, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe.
Recovery OrientationChange over study periodThe 30-item Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM) was used to assess recovery orientation. The MHRM has been fielded among diverse populations and has a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's α =.93) and shows change following engagement in recovery oriented treatments. The MHRM is scored using a 5 point Likert Scale (0 to 4) for each item, yielding a theoretical range from 0 - 120 for Total Score. Higher scores correspond to a higher self-reported level of mental health recovery.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from a total of 15 VA mental health clinics, located within four VA Healthcare Systems and their affiliated Community Based Outpatient Centers.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enhanced Usual Care
Patients in the enhanced usual care arm received their usual mental health care, a copy of the Depression Helpbook by Wayne Katon and bi-weekly study mailings with depression management tips. Enhanced Usual Care: Patients received a copy of the Depression Helpbook by Wayne Katon and bi-weekly study mailings with depression management tips.
243
Telephone-based Peer Support
Participants used an IVR telephone system for mutual peer support over a 6-month period of time. Additionally, participants will received a copy of the Depression Helpbook by Wayne Katon and bi-weekly study mailings with depression management tips. Telephone-based peer support: Patients received a) a peer-support manual that outlines self-management and recovery principles and provides peer discussion topics and b) access to a specialized telephone platform that permits free calls to their partners, ready access to mental health staff for back-up and advice on being effective partners, and recorded tips on depression management. They were asked to call their peer partner at least once a week for 24 weeks. Enhanced Usual Care: Patients received a copy of the Depression Helpbook by Wayne Katon and bi-weekly study mailings with depression management tips.
144
Total387

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath02
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up259
Overall StudyProtocol Violation056
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject64

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnhanced Usual CareTelephone-based Peer SupportTotal
Age, Customized
18-44 years
48 participants25 participants73 participants
Age, Customized
45-64 years
161 participants91 participants252 participants
Age, Customized
> 65 years
34 participants28 participants62 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants27 Participants74 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
196 Participants117 Participants313 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2430 / 144
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 2432 / 144

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period

The Veterans Rand 36 Item Health Survey (VR-36) mental health component score (MCS) and physical health component score (PCS) were used as measures of functional status. The MCS and PCS have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating better health.

Time frame: Change over study period

Population: Fifty-six of the patients randomized to the telephone-based peer support intervention were excluded from main study analyses because of an unforeseen disruption in their 6-month intervention that was unrelated to patient characteristics.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual CareChange in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month PeriodBaseline32.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.91
Enhanced Usual CareChange in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period3-month34.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.59
Enhanced Usual CareChange in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period6-month36.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.48
Enhanced Usual CareChange in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period12-month36.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Telephone-based Peer SupportChange in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period12-month37.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.14
Telephone-based Peer SupportChange in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month PeriodBaseline33.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.97
Telephone-based Peer SupportChange in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period6-month37.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.65
Telephone-based Peer SupportChange in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period3-month36.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.23
p-value: <0.0595% CI: [-1.57, 2.01]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period

The Veterans Rand 36 Item Health Survey (VR-36) mental health component score (MCS) and physical health component score (PCS) were used as measures of functional status. The MCS and PCS have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating better health.

Time frame: Change over study period

Population: Fifty-six of the patients randomized to the telephone-based peer support intervention were excluded from main study analyses because of an unforeseen disruption in their 6-month intervention that was unrelated to patient characteristics.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual CareChange in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month PeriodBaseline36.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.64
Enhanced Usual CareChange in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period3-month37.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Enhanced Usual CareChange in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period6-month36.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.89
Enhanced Usual CareChange in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period12-month36.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.16
Telephone-based Peer SupportChange in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period12-month35.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.13
Telephone-based Peer SupportChange in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month PeriodBaseline34.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.44
Telephone-based Peer SupportChange in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period6-month34.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.31
Telephone-based Peer SupportChange in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period3-month35.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.18
p-value: <0.0595% CI: [-2.03, 1.24]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Depression Symptoms

The 21-item Beck Depression Inventory-2nd Edition (BDI-II) was used to assess depressive symptoms. Total score of 0-13 is considered minimal range, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe.

Time frame: Change over study period

Population: Fifty-six of the patients randomized to the telephone-based peer support intervention were excluded from main study analyses because of an unforeseen disruption in their 6-month intervention that was unrelated to patient characteristics.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual CareDepression SymptomsBaseline25.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.29
Enhanced Usual CareDepression Symptoms3-Month20.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.72
Enhanced Usual CareDepression Symptoms6-month18.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.63
Enhanced Usual CareDepression Symptoms12-month17.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.73
Telephone-based Peer SupportDepression Symptoms12-month17.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.86
Telephone-based Peer SupportDepression SymptomsBaseline25.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.34
Telephone-based Peer SupportDepression Symptoms6-month18.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.29
Telephone-based Peer SupportDepression Symptoms3-Month19.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.23
p-value: <0.0595% CI: [-2.66, 1.89]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Quality of Life

The 14-item Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF), which has good reliability and has been used in multiple depression studies, was used to assess quality of life. Responses are scored on a 5-point scale ('not at all or never' to 'frequently or all the time'), where higher scores indicate better enjoyment and satisfaction with life (possible range 14-70).

Time frame: Change over study period

Population: Fifty-six of the patients randomized to the telephone-based peer support intervention were excluded from main study analyses because of an unforeseen disruption in their 6-month intervention that was unrelated to patient characteristics.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual CareQuality of LifeBaseline38.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.74
Enhanced Usual CareQuality of Life3-Month41.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.07
Enhanced Usual CareQuality of Life6-Month41.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.76
Enhanced Usual CareQuality of Life12-month42.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.97
Telephone-based Peer SupportQuality of Life12-month42.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.55
Telephone-based Peer SupportQuality of LifeBaseline38.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.22
Telephone-based Peer SupportQuality of Life6-Month42.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.66
Telephone-based Peer SupportQuality of Life3-Month41.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.42
p-value: <0.0595% CI: [-0.93, 2.55]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Recovery Orientation

The 30-item Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM) was used to assess recovery orientation. The MHRM has been fielded among diverse populations and has a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's α =.93) and shows change following engagement in recovery oriented treatments. The MHRM is scored using a 5 point Likert Scale (0 to 4) for each item, yielding a theoretical range from 0 - 120 for Total Score. Higher scores correspond to a higher self-reported level of mental health recovery.

Time frame: Change over study period

Population: Fifty-six of the patients randomized to the telephone-based peer support intervention were excluded from main study analyses because of an unforeseen disruption in their 6-month intervention that was unrelated to patient characteristics.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual CareRecovery OrientationBaseline64.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.89
Enhanced Usual CareRecovery Orientation3-Month67.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.98
Enhanced Usual CareRecovery Orientation6-month71.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.51
Enhanced Usual CareRecovery Orientation12-month73.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.82
Telephone-based Peer SupportRecovery Orientation12-month69.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.66
Telephone-based Peer SupportRecovery OrientationBaseline64.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.73
Telephone-based Peer SupportRecovery Orientation6-month70.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.08
Telephone-based Peer SupportRecovery Orientation3-Month68.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.47
95% CI: [-3.31, 3.16]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026