Depression
Conditions
Keywords
Peer Support, Quality of Life, Telephone
Brief summary
We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared the effectiveness of a telephone delivered, recovery focused, peer-support intervention to enhanced usual care for VA patients with depression.
Detailed description
Peer-support interventions have been recommended by prestigious national task forces and incorporated into the VA Comprehensive Mental Health Strategic Plan. Patients who cope with longer term depressive symptoms may benefit from these interventions.This study examines the effectiveness of a feasible, scalable mutual peer-support intervention for VA patients in depression treatment and will inform leaders who are considering implementing peer-support initiatives. In this study, each study participant (a veteran in treatment for depression) was matched with another participating veteran and the pairs were randomized to enhanced usual care or to the telephone based peer-support intervention (DIAL-UP). All study participants received usual care plus written materials outlining depression self-management strategies, behavioral activation, and recovery. DIAL-UP participants also received: a) a peer-support manual that outlined peer support principles and provided peer discussion topics and b) access to a specialized telephone platform that permited free calls to their partners, ready access to mental health staff for back-up and advice, and recorded tips on depression management. Patients were encouraged to call their partners at least once per week during the 6-month intervention period. Patient outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months following enrollment.
Interventions
Patients received a) a peer-support manual that outlines self-management and recovery principles and provides peer discussion topics and b) access to a specialized telephone platform that permits free calls to their partners, ready access to mental health staff for back-up and advice on being effective partners, and recorded tips on depression management. They were asked to call their peer partner at least once a week for 24 weeks.
Patients received their usual mental health care plus a copy of the Depression Helpbook by Wayne Katon and bi-weekly study mailings with depression management tips.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* currently in treatment at Ann Arbor, Detroit, Battle Creek, or Saginaw VA or their associated community based outpatient clinics * not receiving formal mental health services or regularly attending mutual self-help programs outside of the VA * diagnosis of a depressive disorder in the last 24 months that is confirmed by the relevant clinician * being seen less than bi-weekly by clinicians for psychiatric or substance use disorders * past trial of psychotherapy and/or antidepressant trial * have a current PHQ-9 scores \> 10 or WSAS scores \> 10 * have stable access to and ability to communicate by telephone
Exclusion criteria
* diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, MDD with psychotic features, or Bipolar I in the past 24 months. Diagnosis of active substance dependence in the past 12 months or substance abuse in the last 6 months * an immediate risk of suicide, requiring hospitalization or urgent evaluation * clinician assessment that participation in the study could have an adverse impact on the patient or his/her partner.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period | Change over study period | The Veterans Rand 36 Item Health Survey (VR-36) mental health component score (MCS) and physical health component score (PCS) were used as measures of functional status. The MCS and PCS have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating better health. |
| Change in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period | Change over study period | The Veterans Rand 36 Item Health Survey (VR-36) mental health component score (MCS) and physical health component score (PCS) were used as measures of functional status. The MCS and PCS have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating better health. |
| Quality of Life | Change over study period | The 14-item Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF), which has good reliability and has been used in multiple depression studies, was used to assess quality of life. Responses are scored on a 5-point scale ('not at all or never' to 'frequently or all the time'), where higher scores indicate better enjoyment and satisfaction with life (possible range 14-70). |
| Depression Symptoms | Change over study period | The 21-item Beck Depression Inventory-2nd Edition (BDI-II) was used to assess depressive symptoms. Total score of 0-13 is considered minimal range, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe. |
| Recovery Orientation | Change over study period | The 30-item Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM) was used to assess recovery orientation. The MHRM has been fielded among diverse populations and has a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's α =.93) and shows change following engagement in recovery oriented treatments. The MHRM is scored using a 5 point Likert Scale (0 to 4) for each item, yielding a theoretical range from 0 - 120 for Total Score. Higher scores correspond to a higher self-reported level of mental health recovery. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were recruited from a total of 15 VA mental health clinics, located within four VA Healthcare Systems and their affiliated Community Based Outpatient Centers.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Enhanced Usual Care Patients in the enhanced usual care arm received their usual mental health care, a copy of the Depression Helpbook by Wayne Katon and bi-weekly study mailings with depression management tips.
Enhanced Usual Care: Patients received a copy of the Depression Helpbook by Wayne Katon and bi-weekly study mailings with depression management tips. | 243 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support Participants used an IVR telephone system for mutual peer support over a 6-month period of time. Additionally, participants will received a copy of the Depression Helpbook by Wayne Katon and bi-weekly study mailings with depression management tips.
Telephone-based peer support: Patients received a) a peer-support manual that outlines self-management and recovery principles and provides peer discussion topics and b) access to a specialized telephone platform that permits free calls to their partners, ready access to mental health staff for back-up and advice on being effective partners, and recorded tips on depression management. They were asked to call their peer partner at least once a week for 24 weeks.
Enhanced Usual Care: Patients received a copy of the Depression Helpbook by Wayne Katon and bi-weekly study mailings with depression management tips. | 144 |
| Total | 387 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 25 | 9 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 0 | 56 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Enhanced Usual Care | Telephone-based Peer Support | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 18-44 years | 48 participants | 25 participants | 73 participants |
| Age, Customized 45-64 years | 161 participants | 91 participants | 252 participants |
| Age, Customized > 65 years | 34 participants | 28 participants | 62 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 47 Participants | 27 Participants | 74 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 196 Participants | 117 Participants | 313 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 243 | 0 / 144 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 243 | 2 / 144 |
Outcome results
Change in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period
The Veterans Rand 36 Item Health Survey (VR-36) mental health component score (MCS) and physical health component score (PCS) were used as measures of functional status. The MCS and PCS have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating better health.
Time frame: Change over study period
Population: Fifty-six of the patients randomized to the telephone-based peer support intervention were excluded from main study analyses because of an unforeseen disruption in their 6-month intervention that was unrelated to patient characteristics.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period | Baseline | 32.71 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.91 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period | 3-month | 34.77 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.59 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period | 6-month | 36.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.48 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period | 12-month | 36.99 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Change in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period | 12-month | 37.24 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.14 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Change in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period | Baseline | 33.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.97 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Change in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period | 6-month | 37.52 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.65 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Change in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period | 3-month | 36.58 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.23 |
Change in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period
The Veterans Rand 36 Item Health Survey (VR-36) mental health component score (MCS) and physical health component score (PCS) were used as measures of functional status. The MCS and PCS have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating better health.
Time frame: Change over study period
Population: Fifty-six of the patients randomized to the telephone-based peer support intervention were excluded from main study analyses because of an unforeseen disruption in their 6-month intervention that was unrelated to patient characteristics.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period | Baseline | 36.63 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.64 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period | 3-month | 37.68 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.1 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period | 6-month | 36.91 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.89 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period | 12-month | 36.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.16 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Change in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period | 12-month | 35.48 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.13 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Change in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period | Baseline | 34.62 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.44 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Change in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period | 6-month | 34.64 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.31 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Change in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period | 3-month | 35.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.18 |
Depression Symptoms
The 21-item Beck Depression Inventory-2nd Edition (BDI-II) was used to assess depressive symptoms. Total score of 0-13 is considered minimal range, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe.
Time frame: Change over study period
Population: Fifty-six of the patients randomized to the telephone-based peer support intervention were excluded from main study analyses because of an unforeseen disruption in their 6-month intervention that was unrelated to patient characteristics.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Usual Care | Depression Symptoms | Baseline | 25.60 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.29 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Depression Symptoms | 3-Month | 20.77 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.72 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Depression Symptoms | 6-month | 18.86 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.63 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Depression Symptoms | 12-month | 17.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.73 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Depression Symptoms | 12-month | 17.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.86 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Depression Symptoms | Baseline | 25.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.34 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Depression Symptoms | 6-month | 18.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.29 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Depression Symptoms | 3-Month | 19.51 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.23 |
Quality of Life
The 14-item Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF), which has good reliability and has been used in multiple depression studies, was used to assess quality of life. Responses are scored on a 5-point scale ('not at all or never' to 'frequently or all the time'), where higher scores indicate better enjoyment and satisfaction with life (possible range 14-70).
Time frame: Change over study period
Population: Fifty-six of the patients randomized to the telephone-based peer support intervention were excluded from main study analyses because of an unforeseen disruption in their 6-month intervention that was unrelated to patient characteristics.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Usual Care | Quality of Life | Baseline | 38.80 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.74 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Quality of Life | 3-Month | 41.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.07 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Quality of Life | 6-Month | 41.89 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.76 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Quality of Life | 12-month | 42.69 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.97 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Quality of Life | 12-month | 42.55 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.55 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Quality of Life | Baseline | 38.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.22 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Quality of Life | 6-Month | 42.55 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.66 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Quality of Life | 3-Month | 41.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.42 |
Recovery Orientation
The 30-item Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM) was used to assess recovery orientation. The MHRM has been fielded among diverse populations and has a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's α =.93) and shows change following engagement in recovery oriented treatments. The MHRM is scored using a 5 point Likert Scale (0 to 4) for each item, yielding a theoretical range from 0 - 120 for Total Score. Higher scores correspond to a higher self-reported level of mental health recovery.
Time frame: Change over study period
Population: Fifty-six of the patients randomized to the telephone-based peer support intervention were excluded from main study analyses because of an unforeseen disruption in their 6-month intervention that was unrelated to patient characteristics.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Usual Care | Recovery Orientation | Baseline | 64.23 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.89 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Recovery Orientation | 3-Month | 67.37 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.98 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Recovery Orientation | 6-month | 71.25 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.51 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Recovery Orientation | 12-month | 73.06 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.82 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Recovery Orientation | 12-month | 69.81 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.66 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Recovery Orientation | Baseline | 64.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.73 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Recovery Orientation | 6-month | 70.50 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.08 |
| Telephone-based Peer Support | Recovery Orientation | 3-Month | 68.47 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.47 |