Skip to content

Effect of Exenatide, Sitagliptin or Glimepiride on Functional ß -Cell Mass

A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Effect of Exenatide, Sitagliptin or Glimepiride on Functional ß -Cell Mass in Patients With Impaired Fasting Glucose or Early Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00775684
Enrollment
47
Registered
2008-10-20
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2012-11-30
Last updated
2022-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pre-diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

Exenatide, Sitagliptin, Glimepiride, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1, Impaired Fasting Glucose, Type 2 Diabetes, Beta-cell Function, Beta-cell Secretory Capacity, Glucose-potentiated arginine

Brief summary

This study evaluates exenatide, sitagliptin, and glimepiride for the treatment of high blood sugar in patients with impaired fasting glucose or early type 2 diabetes. The purpose of this study is to determine if exenatide and sitagliptin increase the amount of insulin made by the pancreas compared to glimepiride. It is hypothesized that exenatide or sitagliptin will sustain or increase the amount of insulin made by the pancreas in comparison to glimepiride.

Detailed description

The incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has reached epidemic proportions throughout the world. In the United States more than 1.5 million new cases of diabetes were diagnosed in 2005, and the estimated prevalence of the disease was over 20 million. Another 54 million Americans are believed to have impaired fasting glucose, which represents a pre-diabetic state at increased risk for progression to overt diabetes. T2D ultimately results from an inadequate mass of functional beta-cells, where insufficient beta-cell compensation for insulin resistance leads to the development of impaired glucose tolerance and eventually diabetes. Autopsy studies have demonstrated a decreased beta-cell mass occurring with fasting glucose \> 110 mg/dl, consistent with functional studies that demonstrate decreased beta-cell (insulin) secretory capacity beginning in the range of impaired fasting glucose. Strategies that might preserve or expand functional beta-cell mass in vivo would be expected to reverse the progressive deterioration in blood glucose control seen with diabetes. One such strategy involves the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), which is trophic for islet beta-cells, having both pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic effects. However, it is not known whether increasing GLP-1 effects can preserve or enhance functional beta-cell mass in humans. This proposal will determine the effect of increasing GLP-1 levels on functional beta-cell mass in human subjects with impaired fasting glucose (fasting glucose 110 - 126 mg/dl) or early T2D (fasting glucose 127 - 149 mg/dl) where a critical window exists for reversing further beta-cell deterioration. GLP-1 effects will be promoted by administration of either the GLP-1 analog, exenatide, or by increasing endogenous GLP-1 levels through administration of the oral dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitor sitagliptin for a 6-month period. To control for the effect of exenatide and sitagliptin on normalization of blood glucose, subjects will be randomized to receive exenatide, sitagliptin or the sulfonylurea glimepiride, the latter being a first-line anti-diabetogenic agent that will serve as an active comparator.

Interventions

DRUGExenatide

Exenatide (Byetta®)-5 µg injected subcutaneously twice daily and increased after 1 month to 10 µg twice daily as tolerated by gastrointestinal effects

DRUGSitagliptin

Sitagliptin (Januvia®)100 mg by mouth every morning

DRUGGlimepiride

Glimepiride (Amaryl®)-0.5 mg by mouth every morning and then increased by 0.5 - 1.0 mg at each monthly visit to achieve an average fasting glucose \< 110mg/dl

Sponsors

Pennsylvania Department of Health
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female patients age 18 to 70 years. 2. Ability to provide written informed consent 3. Mentally stable and able to comply with the procedures of the study protocol 4. Clinical history compatible with impaired fasting glucose or early T2D as defined by a plasma glucose concentration between 110-159 mg/dl following a 12 hour overnight fast performed off any anti-diabetogenic agent for at least 2 weeks (6 weeks for thiazolidinediones) 5. Stable body weight (+ 5%) for at least 2 weeks 6. Female Patients: Agree to use adequate contraception if reproductively capable. Adequate contraception includes either a hormonal or barrier method, or surgical sterilization.

Exclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes 2. Receiving insulin, exenatide (Byetta®), or sitagliptin (Januvia®) treatment or taking \> 2 oral anti-diabetogenic agents for the treatment of diabetes 3. BMI \> 44 kg/m2 4. Allergy to any sulfa-containing compounds 5. Uncontrolled hypertension (Systolic Blood Pressure \>160 or Diastolic Blood Pressure \> 100 mmHg) 6. Uncontrolled hyperlipidemia (triglycerides \> 500 or LDL \> 160 mg/dl) 7. Elevation of liver function tests \> 2 times the upper limit of normal 8. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) \< 55 ml/min/1.73m2 (46) 9. Hyperkalemia (serum potassium \> 5.5 mmol/L) 10. Moderate anemia (hemoglobin concentration \< 12 g/dl in men and \< 11 g/dl in women) 11. Female patients: pregnant or lactating 12. Hepatic cirrhosis 13. Known active alcohol or substance abuse 14. Active cardiovascular disease 15. Use of any investigational agent within 6 weeks of the baseline visit 16. Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, will interfere with the safe completion of the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (μU/ml)Baseline and 6 monthsThe acute insulin response to arginine (AIRarg) performed during the 340mg/dl glucose clamp allows for estimation of the the beta-cell secretory capacity (AIRmax) or functional beta-cell mass. Changes from baseline to 6 months of AIRmax were compared across groups
Effect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (pg/mL)Baseline and 6 monthsAGRmin is performed during the 340mg/dl glucose clamp allows for estimation of the minimum alpha-cell glucagon secretion. Changes from baseline to 6 months of AGRmin were compared across groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Acute Insulin Response to Arginine. (AIRarg)Baseline and 6 monthsThe changes in B-cell insulin secretion, Acute Insulin Response to arginine (AIRarg) after 6 months were compared to baseline AIRarg for each group. Listed below are AIRarg at baseline and 6 months for each group.
Insulin Sensitivity at Baseline and 6 MonthsBaseline and 6 monthsInsulin sensitivity (M/I) was determined by dividing the mean glucose infusion rate required during the 230 mg/dL glucose clamp (M) by the mean prestimulus insulin level (I) between 40 and 45 min of the glucose infusion The mean difference after 6 months in insulin sensitivity (M/I) were compared
PG 50 (the Plasma Glucose Level at Which Half-maximal Insulin Secretion is Achieved During the Glucose-potentiated Arginine Test) at Baseline and 6 MonthsBaseline and 6 monthsBetween ∼60 and 250 mg/dL, the magnitude of AIRarg is a linear function of the plasma glucose level, so the difference in AIRarg at fasting and 230 mg/dL glucose levels divided by the difference in plasma glucose (ΔAIRarg/ΔPG) gives the glucose-potentiation slope (GPS) (8,24-26). Using the y-intercept (b) from the line created by these two points, the plasma glucose level at which half-maximal insulin secretion is achieved (PG50) is derived from solving the equation 1/2 (AIRmax) = (GPS · PG50) + b, and provides a measure of β-cell sensitivity to glucose The mean difference after 6 months in PG 50 were compared. Listed below are the PG50 values at baseline and 6 months.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment is now closed for this study. All subject follow-up was completed in the spring of 2012. The purpose of the study was to evaluate three medications for the treatment of high blood sugar.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Exenatide
Exenatide (Byetta®)-5 µg injected subcutaneously twice daily and increased after 1 month to 10 µg twice daily as tolerated by gastrointestinal effects Exenatide: Exenatide (Byetta®)-5 µg injected subcutaneously twice daily and increased after 1 month to 10 µg twice daily as tolerated by gastrointestinal effects
17
Sitagliptin
Sitagliptin (Januvia®)-100 mg by mouth every morning Sitagliptin: Sitagliptin (Januvia®)100 mg by mouth every morning
13
Glimepiride
Glimepiride (Amaryl®)-0.5 mg by mouth every morning and then increased by 0.5 - 1.0 mg at each monthly visit to achieve an average fasting glucose \< 110mg/dl Glimepiride: Glimepiride (Amaryl®)-0.5 mg by mouth every morning and then increased by 0.5 - 1.0 mg at each monthly visit to achieve an average fasting glucose \< 110mg/dl
17
Total47

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExenatideSitagliptinGlimepirideTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
17 Participants13 Participants17 Participants47 Participants
Age, Continuous57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 participants13 participants17 participants47 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants4 Participants7 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants9 Participants10 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 130 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 130 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 130 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Effect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (pg/mL)

AGRmin is performed during the 340mg/dl glucose clamp allows for estimation of the minimum alpha-cell glucagon secretion. Changes from baseline to 6 months of AGRmin were compared across groups.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in 40 adult subjects with early Type 2 diabetes (T2D) who received the~glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) analog exenatide, the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor sitagliptin or the sulfonylurea glimepiride as an active comparator insulin secretagogue for 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExenatideEffect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (pg/mL)Acute Glucose Response (AGRmin) Baseline51 pg/mLStandard Error 12
ExenatideEffect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (pg/mL)Acute Glucose Response (AGRmin) 6 Months52 pg/mLStandard Error 12
SitagliptinEffect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (pg/mL)Acute Glucose Response (AGRmin) Baseline55 pg/mLStandard Error 8
SitagliptinEffect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (pg/mL)Acute Glucose Response (AGRmin) 6 Months59 pg/mLStandard Error 19
GlimepirideEffect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (pg/mL)Acute Glucose Response (AGRmin) Baseline37 pg/mLStandard Error 6
GlimepirideEffect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (pg/mL)Acute Glucose Response (AGRmin) 6 Months59 pg/mLStandard Error 8
Primary

Effect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (μU/ml)

The acute insulin response to arginine (AIRarg) performed during the 340mg/dl glucose clamp allows for estimation of the the beta-cell secretory capacity (AIRmax) or functional beta-cell mass. Changes from baseline to 6 months of AIRmax were compared across groups

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in 40 adult subjects with early Type 2 diabetes (T2D) who received the~glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) analog exenatide, the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor sitagliptin or the sulfonylurea glimepiride as an active comparator insulin secretagogue for 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExenatideEffect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (μU/ml)Acute Insulin Response (AIRmax)Baseline214 μU/mlStandard Error 60
ExenatideEffect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (μU/ml)Acute Insulin Response (AIRmax) 6 Months188.5 μU/mlStandard Error 34.6
SitagliptinEffect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (μU/ml)Acute Insulin Response (AIRmax)Baseline149 μU/mlStandard Error 20
SitagliptinEffect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (μU/ml)Acute Insulin Response (AIRmax) 6 Months158.3 μU/mlStandard Error 30.3
GlimepirideEffect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (μU/ml)Acute Insulin Response (AIRmax)Baseline133 μU/mlStandard Error 19
GlimepirideEffect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (μU/ml)Acute Insulin Response (AIRmax) 6 Months202.5 μU/mlStandard Error 35.1
Comparison: Student t testp-value: =0.1t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Repeated measure (baseline and 6 months)p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Acute Insulin Response to Arginine. (AIRarg)

The changes in B-cell insulin secretion, Acute Insulin Response to arginine (AIRarg) after 6 months were compared to baseline AIRarg for each group. Listed below are AIRarg at baseline and 6 months for each group.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExenatideChange in Acute Insulin Response to Arginine. (AIRarg)Acute Insulin Response (AIRarg) Baseline52 uU/mLStandard Error 14
ExenatideChange in Acute Insulin Response to Arginine. (AIRarg)Acute Insulin Response (AIRarg) 6 Months52 uU/mLStandard Error 11
SitagliptinChange in Acute Insulin Response to Arginine. (AIRarg)Acute Insulin Response (AIRarg) Baseline35 uU/mLStandard Error 4
SitagliptinChange in Acute Insulin Response to Arginine. (AIRarg)Acute Insulin Response (AIRarg) 6 Months34 uU/mLStandard Error 6
GlimepirideChange in Acute Insulin Response to Arginine. (AIRarg)Acute Insulin Response (AIRarg) Baseline44 uU/mLStandard Error 6
GlimepirideChange in Acute Insulin Response to Arginine. (AIRarg)Acute Insulin Response (AIRarg) 6 Months42 uU/mLStandard Error 4
Comparison: Within group changes over 6 months (delta= final - baseline) were compared.p-value: >0.1t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Insulin Sensitivity at Baseline and 6 Months

Insulin sensitivity (M/I) was determined by dividing the mean glucose infusion rate required during the 230 mg/dL glucose clamp (M) by the mean prestimulus insulin level (I) between 40 and 45 min of the glucose infusion The mean difference after 6 months in insulin sensitivity (M/I) were compared

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExenatideInsulin Sensitivity at Baseline and 6 MonthsM/I Baseline0.3 ((mg/kg) /min) /uU/mLStandard Error 0.1
ExenatideInsulin Sensitivity at Baseline and 6 MonthsM/I 6 Months0.3 ((mg/kg) /min) /uU/mLStandard Error 0.1
SitagliptinInsulin Sensitivity at Baseline and 6 MonthsM/I Baseline0.3 ((mg/kg) /min) /uU/mLStandard Error 0
SitagliptinInsulin Sensitivity at Baseline and 6 MonthsM/I 6 Months0.3 ((mg/kg) /min) /uU/mLStandard Error 0.1
GlimepirideInsulin Sensitivity at Baseline and 6 MonthsM/I Baseline0.3 ((mg/kg) /min) /uU/mLStandard Error 0.1
GlimepirideInsulin Sensitivity at Baseline and 6 MonthsM/I 6 Months0.3 ((mg/kg) /min) /uU/mLStandard Error 0.1
Comparison: To determine if exenatide or sitagliptin induced significant changes from baseline, the change for each measure (Δ = final - baseline) for each group was compared with the change in the glimepiride group using independent Student t testsp-value: >0.1t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

PG 50 (the Plasma Glucose Level at Which Half-maximal Insulin Secretion is Achieved During the Glucose-potentiated Arginine Test) at Baseline and 6 Months

Between ∼60 and 250 mg/dL, the magnitude of AIRarg is a linear function of the plasma glucose level, so the difference in AIRarg at fasting and 230 mg/dL glucose levels divided by the difference in plasma glucose (ΔAIRarg/ΔPG) gives the glucose-potentiation slope (GPS) (8,24-26). Using the y-intercept (b) from the line created by these two points, the plasma glucose level at which half-maximal insulin secretion is achieved (PG50) is derived from solving the equation 1/2 (AIRmax) = (GPS · PG50) + b, and provides a measure of β-cell sensitivity to glucose The mean difference after 6 months in PG 50 were compared. Listed below are the PG50 values at baseline and 6 months.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExenatidePG 50 (the Plasma Glucose Level at Which Half-maximal Insulin Secretion is Achieved During the Glucose-potentiated Arginine Test) at Baseline and 6 MonthsPG50 Baseline175 mg/dLStandard Error 13
ExenatidePG 50 (the Plasma Glucose Level at Which Half-maximal Insulin Secretion is Achieved During the Glucose-potentiated Arginine Test) at Baseline and 6 MonthsPG50 6 Months190 mg/dLStandard Error 14
SitagliptinPG 50 (the Plasma Glucose Level at Which Half-maximal Insulin Secretion is Achieved During the Glucose-potentiated Arginine Test) at Baseline and 6 MonthsPG50 Baseline226 mg/dLStandard Error 12
SitagliptinPG 50 (the Plasma Glucose Level at Which Half-maximal Insulin Secretion is Achieved During the Glucose-potentiated Arginine Test) at Baseline and 6 MonthsPG50 6 Months209 mg/dLStandard Error 16
GlimepiridePG 50 (the Plasma Glucose Level at Which Half-maximal Insulin Secretion is Achieved During the Glucose-potentiated Arginine Test) at Baseline and 6 MonthsPG50 Baseline168 mg/dLStandard Error 17
GlimepiridePG 50 (the Plasma Glucose Level at Which Half-maximal Insulin Secretion is Achieved During the Glucose-potentiated Arginine Test) at Baseline and 6 MonthsPG50 6 Months182 mg/dLStandard Error 10
p-value: >0.1t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026