Skip to content

Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Therapy for Lupus Nephritis

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Phase II Multicenter Trial of CTLA4Ig (Abatacept) Plus Cyclophosphamide vs Cyclophosphamide Alone in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00774852
Acronym
ACCESS
Enrollment
137
Registered
2008-10-17
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2016-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lupus Nephritis, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

Keywords

lupus, systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus nephritis, SLE, abatacept, CTLA4, CTLA4Ig, glomerulonephritis

Brief summary

This study is for individuals with lupus who have developed complications in their kidneys, or lupus nephritis. The study will determine whether adding the experimental medication abatacept to standard cyclophosphamide therapy is more effective in improving lupus nephritis than standard cyclophosphamide therapy by itself.

Detailed description

Lupus nephritis is an inflammation of the kidney that occurs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is caused by the immune system attacking the kidney and is among the most serious complications of SLE: left untreated it can cause long term damage to the kidneys or, in some cases, result in kidney failure. One of the more common treatments for lupus nephritis is the Euro-lupus therapy. In this therapy, patients receive three different drugs - cyclophosphamide, azathioprine and prednisone - over the course of several months. However, some patients do not respond to this therapy and many only show some improvement. In this ACCESS trial for lupus nephritis, an experimental medication known as abatacept will be added to the Euro-lupus therapy to assess if it works better than Euro-lupus therapy alone. Abatacept is a man-made protein that suppresses parts of the immune system that can cause autoimmune disease. While abatacept is experimental for lupus, it has been approved by the FDA to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Abatacept is also being studied for use in other autoimmune diseases, like multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes. Participants in the ACCESS trial for lupus nephritis will receive bi-weekly intravenous infusions of cyclophosphamide for 3 months, then will take azathioprine tablets daily for at least 3 months more. Abatacept or a placebo will be administered every 2 weeks initially, then every 4 weeks for at least the first 6 months. Treatment of abatacept or placebo and azathioprine may continue for the remainder of the year. All participants will take prednisone tablets daily during the entire study. Because the ACCESS trial is a randomized, controlled study, each participant has a 50-50 chance (like flipping a coin) of receiving abatacept. Others will receive an inactive, placebo form of the drug. Note however, that all participants will receive the Euro-lupus therapy. As a blinded (masked) study, neither participants nor study physicians will know to which group a person has been assigned. All participants will undergo regular physical examinations, medical history and various blood and urine tests. Many of these tests will be repeated throughout the study. Participants will be asked to attend 18 study visits in the first year, and one study visit at the end of the second year. The study will reimburse participants for certain expenses incurred as part of the study.

Interventions

DRUGabatacept

Intravenous infusion (500-1000 mg, dep on weight) at weeks 0, 2, and 4, then every 4 weeks until week 24; continue to week 48 only if partial response at 24 weeks

DRUGcyclophosphamide

500 mg intravenous infusion every 2 weeks for 12 weeks

DRUGazathioprine

2 mg/kg/day orally from weeks 12-28; continue until week 52 if only partial response observed at week 24

DRUGprednisone

60 mg/day for 2 weeks, then taper to 10 mg/day by 12 weeks, then continue on stable dose

Intravenous infusion at weeks 0, 2, and 4, then every 4 weeks until week 24; continue to week 48 only if partial response at 24 weeks

Oral capsule, daily from weeks 28 to 52, only if complete response observed at week 24

Sponsors

Immune Tolerance Network (ITN)
CollaboratorNETWORK
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria * Active lupus nephritis (defined by: kidney biopsy documentation within the last 12 months using International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classification- proliferative nephritis, active urinary sediment, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio \> 1, low complement C3) * Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test result at time of study entry

Exclusion criteria

* End stage renal disease * Use of cyclophosphamide in the past year * Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, moderately severe anemia * Active infection, including HIV, hepatitis B or C * History of cancer, except carcinoma in situ and treated basal and squamous cell carcinomas * Pregnant or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Complete ResponseWeek 24Complete response definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to \<=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as CR failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a Complete or Partial ResponseWeek 52Complete response: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to \<=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder. Partial response: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement \>= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol. Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis. Partial responders showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response by Week 24 and Maintained the Complete Response Through Week 52Week 52Complete response definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to \<=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and had minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Complete ResponseWeek 24A complete proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as urine protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5 and prednisone dose tapered to \<= 10mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Complete responders are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Partial ResponseWeek 24A partial proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as an improvement (reduction) of \>=50% in the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio at either visit -1 or 0, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the StudyWeek 104A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response or a partial response at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the site investigator judged that the participant could benefit from continued participation. Non responders did not respond to treatment and lupus activity is moderate to severe.
Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study , Achieving a Complete or Partial ResponseWeek 52A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the investigator judged that the participant may benefit from continued participation. CR definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to \<=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a CR. PR definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline, and improvement (reduction) \>= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day.
Lupus Disease Activity - Participants Who Were Anti-dsDNA Positive at Baseline and Negative at Week 104Week 104Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. One measure used to assess disease activity is the number of participants who were anti-dsDNA positive at baseline but negative at Week 104. Going from positive to negative is indicative of lowered lupus activity.
Lupus Disease Activity - Negative Anti-dsDNAWeek 104Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. This measure was the number of participants who had negative anti-dsDNA at Week 104. Having a negative score is indicative of low lupus disease activity.
Number of Participants With Partial ResponseWeek 24Outcome measure description: Partial response definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement (reduction) \>= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol. Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as complete response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Lupus Disease Activity - Frequency of FlaresWeek 52Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Flares can be renal or non-renal. A renal flare is defined as two successive evaluations at least 1 week apart as proteinuria \>1 gm/24h for participants who attain a complete response at Week 12 and for all other participants either 1) Increasing serum creatinine and persistent proteinuria, or 2) Worsening proteinuria. A non-renal flare is defined as any new post-baseline BILAG A in a non-renal organ system using BILAG-2004. This outcome measures the number of participants with the presence of renal and non-renal flares from Week 24 through Week 52 by response status. Having flares is indicative of more lupus disease activity.
Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global AssessmentWeek 104Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.
Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment Percent Change From BaselineWeek 104Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.
Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 ScoresWeek 104Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.
Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores Percent Change From BaselineWeek 104Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.
Lupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-2004Week 52BILAG-2004 has 5 categories of scoring.Category A:defined by severe disease activity requiring any of the following treatments: 1) systemic high dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) IV pulse glucocorticoids, 3) systemic immunomodulators, or 4)therapeutic high dose anticoagulation in the presence of high dose steroids or immunomodulators. Category B:defined by moderate disease activity requiring any of the following treatments:1) systemic low dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) intramuscular or intra-articular or soft tissue glucocorticoids injection,3) topical glucocorticoids, 4) topical immunomodulators,5) antimalarials or thalidomide or prasterone or acitretin, or 6) symptomatic therapy.Category C:defined by mild disease.Category D is defined by inactive disease, previously affected.Category E is defined as the system never being involved.The categories are converted to a numeric score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) and treated as a continuous variable. Higher score= more severe disease activity.
Proportion of Vaccinated Participants With a Competent Immune ResponseWeek 52Among participants who are vaccinated, the number of who have a competent immune response at Week 52 as defined as having met both of the following criteria: 1. Pneumococcal vaccination response - absolute value \>= 0.35 ug/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a \>=2-fold increase from baseline in serotype-specific antibody titer for at least 50% of the serotypes tested. 2. Tetanus toxoid vaccination response - absolute value \>=0.015 IU/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a 2-fold increase from baseline in antigen-specific antibody titer Competent immune response is indicative of low disease activity.
Lupus Disease Activity - Presence of HypocomplementemiaWeek 104Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Participants were categorized as having hypocomplementemia if their serum complement test results (C3, and C4) were below the normal range at the site. Below normal complement test results are indicative of active lupus erythematosus.

Countries

Mexico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants ages 16 and older with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who met entry criteria were enrolled into the study between November 2008 and June 2012.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Abatacept
Subjects received abatacept IV dosed according to body weight (\<60 kg, 500mg; 60-100 kg, 750 mg; or \>100 kg, 1 g) at the following visits: Weeks (wks) 0, 2, and 4, then every 4 wks until Wk 24. Subjects also received: 1) cyclophosphamide 500 mg IV every 2 wks for 6 doses followed by azathioprine 2 mg/kg/day by mouth dosed by body weight at Visit 6 (rounded to the nearest 25 mg and to a maximum dose of 200 mg) for 16 wks; 2) prednisone 60 mg/day for the first 2 wks (subjects less than 60 kg could receive 1 mg/kg/day).\* Prednisone was tapered until Wk 12 to a dose of 10 mg/day. This dose was continued until Wk 24 unless the subject had a prednisone-related toxicity requiring further reduction.\* After Wk 24, prednisone was permitted to be tapered further to 5mg/day.\* Subjects who achieved a complete response discontinued abatacept and switched to azathioprine placebo up to Wk 52 (to assess response durability). \*Based on principal investigator \[PI\] judgment.
66
Placebo
Subjects received abatacept placebo IV at the following visits: Weeks (wks) 0, 2 and 4, then every 4 wks until Wk 24. Subjects also received: 1) cyclophosphamide 500 mg IV every 2 wks for 6 doses followed by azathioprine 2 mg/kg/day by mouth dosed according to body weight at Visit 6 (rounded to the nearest 25 mg and to a maximum dose of 200 mg) for 16 wks; 2) prednisone 60 mg/day for the first two wks (subjects less than 60 kg could receive 1 mg/kg/day.\*Prednisone was tapered until Wk 12 to a dose of 10 mg/day. This dose was continued until Wk 24 unless the subject had a prednisone-related toxicity that required further reduction.\* After Wk 24, prednisone was permitted to be tapered further to 5mg/day.\* Subjects who achieved a complete response discontinued abatacept placebo and continued azathioprine up to Wk 52. \*Based on principal investigator \[PI\] judgment.
68
Total134

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event96
Overall StudyDeath21
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy37
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up95
Overall StudyNon-responder1511
Overall StudyPhysician Decision26
Overall StudyPregnancy12
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudySubject non-compliance01
Overall StudySubject received prohibited medication10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboAbatacept
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
132 Participants67 Participants65 Participants
Age, Continuous32.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
32.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
32.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Age, Customized
18-20 Years
12 participants5 participants7 participants
Age, Customized
<18 Years
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Age, Customized
21-24 Years
25 participants15 participants10 participants
Age, Customized
>24 Years
96 participants48 participants48 participants
Anti-dsDNA
Equivocal (borderline)
4 participants2 participants2 participants
Anti-dsDNA
Negative
29 participants15 participants14 participants
Anti-dsDNA
Positive
99 participants50 participants49 participants
Average Daily Prednisone Dose42.8 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8
39.0 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.3
47.0 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5
Duration of Lupus Nephritis
<1 Year
95 participants48 participants47 participants
Duration of Lupus Nephritis
>=1 Year
39 participants20 participants19 participants
eGFR61.4 mL/min/1.73m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.2
58.4 mL/min/1.73m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.8
64.6 mL/min/1.73m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.2
Participants with Hypocomplementemia
C3 hypocomplementemia
91 participants44 participants47 participants
Participants with Hypocomplementemia
C4 hypocomplementemia
76 participants37 participants39 participants
Participants with Hypocomplementemia
CH50 hypocomplementemia
52 participants23 participants29 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
17 participants9 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
117 participants59 participants58 participants
Serum Complement Test C367.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.1
70.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.4
64.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.5
Serum Complement Test C413.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
13.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
13.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Serum Complement Test CH5054.3 units/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47.5
61.3 units/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 52.2
47.0 units/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 41.3
Serum Creatinine1.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
1.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
1.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
122 Participants64 Participants58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Urine Creatinine (24 hour collection)1107.6 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 472.8
1132.8 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 409.3
1081.5 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 532.4
Urine Protein (24 hour collection)4167.3 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3566.4
4509.4 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3987.7
3814.8 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3063.6
Urine Protein-to-Creatinine Ratio
<= 3 mg:mg
76 participants37 participants39 participants
Urine Protein-to-Creatinine Ratio
> 3 mg:mg
58 participants31 participants27 participants
Urine Protein-to-Creatinine Ratio (24 hour collection)3.9 mg:mg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
4.1 mg:mg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
3.6 mg:mg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
39 / 6942 / 68
serious
Total, serious adverse events
28 / 6926 / 68

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Complete Response

Complete response definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to \<=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as CR failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AbataceptNumber of Participants With Complete Response22 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Complete Response21 participants
p-value: 0.85Chi-squared
Secondary

Lupus Disease Activity - Frequency of Flares

Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Flares can be renal or non-renal. A renal flare is defined as two successive evaluations at least 1 week apart as proteinuria \>1 gm/24h for participants who attain a complete response at Week 12 and for all other participants either 1) Increasing serum creatinine and persistent proteinuria, or 2) Worsening proteinuria. A non-renal flare is defined as any new post-baseline BILAG A in a non-renal organ system using BILAG-2004. This outcome measures the number of participants with the presence of renal and non-renal flares from Week 24 through Week 52 by response status. Having flares is indicative of more lupus disease activity.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat with available data between weeks 24 and 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Frequency of FlaresParticipants with a Renal Flare0 participants
AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Frequency of FlaresParticipants with at least 1 Non-renal Flare1 participants
PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Frequency of FlaresParticipants with a Renal Flare2 participants
PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Frequency of FlaresParticipants with at least 1 Non-renal Flare1 participants
Week 24 Partial Response: AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Frequency of FlaresParticipants with a Renal Flare1 participants
Week 24 Partial Response: AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Frequency of FlaresParticipants with at least 1 Non-renal Flare0 participants
Week 24 Partial Response: PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Frequency of FlaresParticipants with a Renal Flare3 participants
Week 24 Partial Response: PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Frequency of FlaresParticipants with at least 1 Non-renal Flare1 participants
Week 24 No Response: AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Frequency of FlaresParticipants with a Renal Flare1 participants
Week 24 No Response: AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Frequency of FlaresParticipants with at least 1 Non-renal Flare1 participants
Week 24 No Response: PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Frequency of FlaresParticipants with a Renal Flare0 participants
Week 24 No Response: PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Frequency of FlaresParticipants with at least 1 Non-renal Flare0 participants
Comparison: Comparison of groups with renal flarep-value: 0.23Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison of groups with renal flarep-value: 0.61Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison of groups with at least one non-renal flarep-value: >0.99Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison of groups with at least one non-renal flarep-value: >0.99Chi-squared
Secondary

Lupus Disease Activity - Negative Anti-dsDNA

Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. This measure was the number of participants who had negative anti-dsDNA at Week 104. Having a negative score is indicative of low lupus disease activity.

Time frame: Week 104

Population: Intent-to-treat participants who completed Week 104.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Negative Anti-dsDNA7 participants
PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Negative Anti-dsDNA10 participants
Comparison: Comparison of Participants across groups who had negative anti-dsDNA at Week 104. Baseline is defined as the last measurement taken on or prior to the first day of dosing. Analysis is performed on participants with available data.p-value: >0.99Chi-squared
Secondary

Lupus Disease Activity - Participants Who Were Anti-dsDNA Positive at Baseline and Negative at Week 104

Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. One measure used to assess disease activity is the number of participants who were anti-dsDNA positive at baseline but negative at Week 104. Going from positive to negative is indicative of lowered lupus activity.

Time frame: Week 104

Population: Participants from Intent-to-treat population who had positive anti-dsDNA at baseline and completed Week 104.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Participants Who Were Anti-dsDNA Positive at Baseline and Negative at Week 1043 participants
PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Participants Who Were Anti-dsDNA Positive at Baseline and Negative at Week 1043 participants
Comparison: Comparison of Participants across groups who had negative anti-dsDNA at Week 104. Baseline is defined as the last measurement taken on or prior to the first day of dosing. Analysis is performed on participants with available data.p-value: >0.99Chi-squared
Secondary

Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment

Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.

Time frame: Week 104

Population: Intent-to-treat who completed Week 104 and had patient global assessment data available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment13.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment18.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.7
Secondary

Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment Percent Change From Baseline

Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.

Time frame: Week 104

Population: Intent-to-treat who completed Week 104 and had patient global assessment data available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment Percent Change From Baseline26 percent changeStandard Deviation 343.9
PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment Percent Change From Baseline-35.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 98
Secondary

Lupus Disease Activity - Presence of Hypocomplementemia

Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. Participants were categorized as having hypocomplementemia if their serum complement test results (C3, and C4) were below the normal range at the site. Below normal complement test results are indicative of active lupus erythematosus.

Time frame: Week 104

Population: Intent-to-treat participants who completed Week 104 and had hypocomplementemia data available

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Presence of HypocomplementemiaC3 Hypocomplementemia12 participants
AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Presence of HypocomplementemiaC4 Hypocomplementemia11 participants
PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Presence of HypocomplementemiaC3 Hypocomplementemia11 participants
PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Presence of HypocomplementemiaC4 Hypocomplementemia8 participants
Secondary

Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores

Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.

Time frame: Week 104

Population: Intent-to-treat who completed Week 104 and had SF-36 data available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - SF-36 ScoresWeek 104 Physical Component Score49.3 ScoreStandard Deviation 11.1
AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - SF-36 ScoresWeek 104 Mental Component Score50.9 ScoreStandard Deviation 12.7
PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - SF-36 ScoresWeek 104 Physical Component Score45.3 ScoreStandard Deviation 11.8
PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - SF-36 ScoresWeek 104 Mental Component Score49.2 ScoreStandard Deviation 12.4
Secondary

Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores Percent Change From Baseline

Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores. The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.

Time frame: Week 104

Population: Intent-to-treat who completed Week 104 and had SF-36 data available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores Percent Change From BaselinePercent Change From Baseline on Physical Component32.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 49.1
AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores Percent Change From BaselinePercent Change from Baseline Mental Component Scor39.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 70.4
PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores Percent Change From BaselinePercent Change From Baseline on Physical Component28.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 66.4
PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores Percent Change From BaselinePercent Change from Baseline Mental Component Scor37.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 55.2
Secondary

Lupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-2004

BILAG-2004 has 5 categories of scoring.Category A:defined by severe disease activity requiring any of the following treatments: 1) systemic high dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) IV pulse glucocorticoids, 3) systemic immunomodulators, or 4)therapeutic high dose anticoagulation in the presence of high dose steroids or immunomodulators. Category B:defined by moderate disease activity requiring any of the following treatments:1) systemic low dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) intramuscular or intra-articular or soft tissue glucocorticoids injection,3) topical glucocorticoids, 4) topical immunomodulators,5) antimalarials or thalidomide or prasterone or acitretin, or 6) symptomatic therapy.Category C:defined by mild disease.Category D is defined by inactive disease, previously affected.Category E is defined as the system never being involved.The categories are converted to a numeric score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) and treated as a continuous variable. Higher score= more severe disease activity.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat who completed Week 52 and BILAG 2004 data available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-20041.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-20041.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Week 24 Partial Response: AbataceptLupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-20043.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Week 24 Partial Response: PlaceboLupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-20043.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
p-value: 0.79ANCOVA
p-value: 0.74ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Complete Response

A complete proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as urine protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5 and prednisone dose tapered to \<= 10mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Complete responders are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AbataceptNumber of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Complete Response22 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Complete Response21 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Partial Response

A partial proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as an improvement (reduction) of \>=50% in the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio at either visit -1 or 0, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AbataceptNumber of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Partial Response39 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Partial Response42 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response by Week 24 and Maintained the Complete Response Through Week 52

Complete response definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to \<=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and had minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AbataceptNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response by Week 24 and Maintained the Complete Response Through Week 5211 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response by Week 24 and Maintained the Complete Response Through Week 5213 participants
p-value: 0.54Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study

A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response or a partial response at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the site investigator judged that the participant could benefit from continued participation. Non responders did not respond to treatment and lupus activity is moderate to severe.

Time frame: Week 104

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AbataceptNumber of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study , Achieving a Complete or Partial Response

A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the investigator judged that the participant may benefit from continued participation. CR definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to \<=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a CR. PR definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline, and improvement (reduction) \>= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat

Secondary

Number of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response

Complete response: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to \<=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder. Partial response: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement \>= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol. Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis. Partial responders showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AbataceptNumber of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response12 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response14 participants
Week 24 Partial Response: AbataceptNumber of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response13 participants
Week 24 Partial Response: PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response13 participants
p-value: 0.54Chi-squared
p-value: 0.72Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Partial Response

Outcome measure description: Partial response definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement (reduction) \>= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol. Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as complete response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AbataceptNumber of Participants With Partial Response39 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Partial Response40 participants
p-value: 0.99Chi-squared
Secondary

Proportion of Vaccinated Participants With a Competent Immune Response

Among participants who are vaccinated, the number of who have a competent immune response at Week 52 as defined as having met both of the following criteria: 1. Pneumococcal vaccination response - absolute value \>= 0.35 ug/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a \>=2-fold increase from baseline in serotype-specific antibody titer for at least 50% of the serotypes tested. 2. Tetanus toxoid vaccination response - absolute value \>=0.015 IU/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a 2-fold increase from baseline in antigen-specific antibody titer Competent immune response is indicative of low disease activity.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat who completed Week 52 and were vaccinated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AbataceptProportion of Vaccinated Participants With a Competent Immune ResponsePneumococcal Vaccines67 percentage of participants
AbataceptProportion of Vaccinated Participants With a Competent Immune ResponseTetanus Toxoid Vaccines50 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Vaccinated Participants With a Competent Immune ResponsePneumococcal Vaccines100 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Vaccinated Participants With a Competent Immune ResponseTetanus Toxoid Vaccines100 percentage of participants
Comparison: Comparison of groups for Pneumococcal vaccinesp-value: 0.43Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison of groups for Tetanus Toxoid vaccinesp-value: 0.99Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026