Skip to content

Early Supported Discharge After Stroke in Bergen

Early Supported Discharge After Stroke in Bergen. An RCT Looking at the Collaboration Between Hospital Service and Primary Health Care.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00771771
Enrollment
306
Registered
2008-10-13
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2014-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Stroke, Rehabilitation, Early Supported Discharge, ESD, RCT

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit of early supported discharge (ESD) in rehabilitation of stroke patients in two different outpatient modalities. In a collaborating study, changes in physical function as well as the patients' own perception of physical function, pain and fatigue will be studied. In further collaborating studies, health economics and organizational issues will also be evaluated.

Detailed description

Early supported discharge (ESD) seems to be at least as effective as hospital rehabilitation after stroke, and possibly better. In this study patients with recent stroke will be randomized to one of three different treatment arms: * ESD with treatment at a day institution until 4 hrs. per day for up to 5 weeks * ESD with treatment in the patients' home until 4 hrs. per day for up to 5 weeks * Rehabilitation treatment as usual, with a longer hospital stay, but without any specific treatment or follow-up after discharge The patients in the two ESD arms will in addition be followed closely by a multidisciplinary coordinating team during the stay in hospital and the 5 week period of treatment after discharge, and they will be offered follow-ups at 3 and 6 months after inclusion into the study. Patients in all 3 arms will be systematically examined with a set of measuring instruments as well as objective physical and function tests. This will be performed at inclusion and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after inclusion. In the collaborating study by physiotherapist Bente Gjelsvik a comparison between changes in trunk control, balance, walking and ADL 3 months post stroke, as well as the patients' perceptions of physical function, pain and fatigue, will be the main focus. To assess function, functional change and possible differences between different interventions, there is a need for reliable and valid outcome measures. As a basis for the use of the outcome measure Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) in this study, the TIS has been translated into Norwegian, Trunk Impairment Scale - Norwegian version (TIS-NV) and will be examined for measurement properties using data from the above study as well as data from patients with brain damage recruited from the Department of Physical Rehabilitation Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital. An examination of a possible connection between localisation and size of the stroke and trunk control will also be performed, as characteristics of the stroke may have therapeutic implications for the choice of intervention for the individual patient. The research questions for the planned doctoral thesis for Bente Gjelsvik are therefore as follows: 1. Is the TIS-NV reliable and valid in patients with brain damage? 2. Are changes in trunk control, balance, walking and daily activities, as well as pain and fatigue 3 months post stroke different in patients who have received interventions from different courses of rehabilitation in the study Early supported discharge after stroke in Bergen? To which degree do the patients perceive problems related to balance, physical activity, walking, pain and fatigue? 3. Is there a correlation between localization and size of the stroke as measured by magnetic tomography, and the patients' trunk control? Are initial localization and size of the stroke predictive for the patients' trunk control 3 months post stroke? Another collaborating project is carried out by PhD candidate Hedda Døli (Language outcome after stroke: lesion location, prognosis and consequences). The aim of her first study in the PhD project is to investigate the relationship between lesion location and aphasia severity one week post-stroke. Thereafter a follow-up study of the same patients 12 months post-stroke investigates the prognosis of aphasia and the variables that may influence recovery. In the third study the aim is to investigate the health-related quality of life and the occurrence of depression in patients with aphasia.

Interventions

OTHEREarly supported discharge with day unit rehabilitation

Treatment by physiotherapist and occupational therapist up to 4 hours a day for up to 5 weeks in a day unit

OTHEREarly supported discharge with home rehabilitation

Treatment by physiotherapist and occupational therapist up to 4 hours a day for up to 5 weeks in the patient's home

Sponsors

University of Bergen
CollaboratorOTHER
Municipality of Bergen, Norway
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Kavli Research Centre for Ageing and Dementia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Haukeland University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Living in own home in the community of Bergen, Norway * Inclusion within 1-7 days (24-168 hours) after debut of symptoms * Inclusion within 6-120 hours after admission to Department of Neurology * NIHSS score 2-26 at inclusion OR NIHSS score \< 2 if Modified Rankin Scale is 2 or higher when being 0 before the stroke * The patient must be awake and informed consent must be given by patient or relatives

Exclusion criteria

* Serious psychic illness * Serious drug abuse * Serious medical conditions that can influence the patients' cerebrovascular disease or rehabilitation * Poor knowledge of the Norwegian language

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MRS6 monthsModified Rankin Scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
BI3, 6, 12 and 24 monthsBarthel ADL Index
AMPS3 and 6 monthsAssessment of Motor and Process Skills
TIS3 and 6 monthsTrunk Impairment Scale
SIS12 monthsStroke Impact Scale
RSS12 monthsRelative Stress Scale
PGIC12 and 24 monthsPatients' Global Impression of Change
NIHSS3, 6 and 12 monthsNational Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
MRS3, 12 and 24 monthsModified Rankin Scale
PASS (Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke)3 and 6 months
5mTW (5 meter Timed Walk)3 and 6 months
TUG (Timed Up and Go)3 and 6 months
NRS (Numeric Rating Scale)3 and 6 months
Norwegian Basic Test for Aphasia3 and 12 months
SF-3612 and 24 monthsShort Form (36) Health Survey

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026