Skip to content

Study of Urgent PC Versus Sham Effectiveness in Treatment of Overactive Bladder Symptoms

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00771264
Acronym
SUmiT
Enrollment
220
Registered
2008-10-13
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2012-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overactive Bladder

Keywords

Overactive Bladder

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate superiority of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) therapy compared to sham therapy for the treatment of patients with overall bladder (OAB) symptoms.

Interventions

The Urgent PC Neuromodulation System is a minimally invasive neuromodulation system designed to deliver retrograde access to the sacral nerve through percutaneous electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve. The method of treatment is referred to as Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS).

Sponsors

Uroplasty, Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women and men \>18 years of age * A score of \> 4 on the OAB-q short form for urgency (question 1) * Average urinary frequency \> 10 times in one 24 hour day based on a 3-day voiding diary * Self-reported bladder symptoms present \> 3 months * Self-reported failed conservative care (i.e., dietary restriction, fluid restriction, bladder training, behavioral modification, pelvic muscle training, biofeedback, etc.) * Off all antimuscarinics for at least 2 weeks prior to enrollment * Capable of giving informed consent * Ambulatory and able to use a toilet independently, without difficulty * Capable and willing to follow all study-related procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant as confirmed by urine pregnancy test, or plans to become pregnant during the study period * Neurogenic bladder * Botox use in bladder or pelvic floor muscles in the past year * Pacemakers or implantable defibrillators * Primary complaint of stress urinary incontinence * Current urinary tract infection (UTI) * Current vaginal infection * Current use of InterStim * Current use of Bion * Current use of TENS in the pelvic region, back or legs * Previously been treated with PTNS * Use of investigational drug/device therapy within the past 4 weeks * Participating or have participated within the past 4 weeks in any clinical investigation involving or impacting gynecologic, urinary or renal function * Deemed unsuitable for enrollment in study by the investigators based on subjects' history or physical examination (including bleeding disorders or anticoagulant medications, and peripheral neuropathy) * Subjects with nerve damage that would impact either percutaneous tibial nerve or pelvic floor function

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Global Response Assessment (GRA) for Overall Bladder Symptoms to Compare the Proportion of Subjects Reporting Moderately or Markedly Improved Responses on the GRA After 12 Interventions of Randomized Therapy, in an Intent to Treat Analysis.13 weeksA responder was defined as reporting bladder symptoms as moderately or markedly improved on a 7-level GRA at week 13 after completing 12, 30-minute, consecutive weekly intervention sessions.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited by investigator sites with limited advertising

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Urgent PC110
Sham / Placebo110
Total220

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham / PlaceboUrgent PCTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
46 Participants56 Participants102 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
64 Participants54 Participants118 Participants
Age Continuous60.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
Region of Enrollment
United States
110 participants110 participants220 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
88 Participants86 Participants174 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants24 Participants46 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 1100 / 110
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1100 / 110

Outcome results

Primary

The Global Response Assessment (GRA) for Overall Bladder Symptoms to Compare the Proportion of Subjects Reporting Moderately or Markedly Improved Responses on the GRA After 12 Interventions of Randomized Therapy, in an Intent to Treat Analysis.

A responder was defined as reporting bladder symptoms as moderately or markedly improved on a 7-level GRA at week 13 after completing 12, 30-minute, consecutive weekly intervention sessions.

Time frame: 13 weeks

Population: Intent to treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Urgent PCThe Global Response Assessment (GRA) for Overall Bladder Symptoms to Compare the Proportion of Subjects Reporting Moderately or Markedly Improved Responses on the GRA After 12 Interventions of Randomized Therapy, in an Intent to Treat Analysis.60 participants
Sham / PlaceboThe Global Response Assessment (GRA) for Overall Bladder Symptoms to Compare the Proportion of Subjects Reporting Moderately or Markedly Improved Responses on the GRA After 12 Interventions of Randomized Therapy, in an Intent to Treat Analysis.23 participants
Comparison: Mean values were analyzed for significant change using a 2-sided paired t test and proportions were analyzed using chi-square methodology. Median values were analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test with p\<0.05 considered statistically significant. A sample size estimate of 214 subjects, 107 per arm, was calculated using a 2-sided Fisher's exact binomial test based on an estimated 60% responder rate in the PTNS group and a 40% in the sham group with a 5% significance level and 80% power.p-value: 0.05t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026