Skip to content

Ketotifen/Naphazoline Ophthalmic Solution in the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model of Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis.

A Multi-center, Double-masked, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Evaluation of the Onset and Duration of Action of KetoNaph Ophthalmic Solution in the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) Model of Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00770133
Enrollment
141
Registered
2008-10-09
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2020-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Conjunctivitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to establish the safety and efficacy of ketotifen/naphazoline ophthalmic solution compared to vehicle and its individual components in alleviating the signs and symptoms of conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC)-induced allergic conjunctivitis.

Interventions

One drop of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% and naphazoline HCl 0.05% ophthalmic solution at visit 3 and visit 4.

One drop of naphazoline HCl 0.05% ophthalmic solution at visits 3 and 4.

One drop of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution at visits 3 and 4.

DRUGVehicle

One drop of vehicle ophthalmic solution at visit 3 and visit 4.

Sponsors

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Positive history of ocular allergies and positive skin test reaction to cat hair, cat dander, grasses, ragweed, and/or trees within the past 24 months. * Calculated best-corrected visual acuity of 0.7 logMAR or better in each eye as measured using the ETDRS chart. * Positive bilateral conjunctival allergen challenge(CAC) reaction within 10 minutes of instillation of the last titration of allergen at visit 1. * Positive bilateral CAC reaction for at least 2 out of 3 time points at visit 2.

Exclusion criteria

* Known contraindications or sensitivities to the study medication or its components. * Any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the subjects safety or trial parameters. * Use of disallowed medications during the period indicated prior to study enrollment or during the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ocular Itching3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge at 14 daysOcular itching was evaluated by the participant at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge. Assessments were made using a 0-4 numerical analog scale, allowing 0.5-unit increments (but disallowing 0.25-unit increments), where: 0.0=None and 4.0=Incapacitating itch with an irresistible urge to rub
Conjunctival Redness7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 daysConjunctival hyperemia was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Assessments were completed using a 0-4 numerical analog scale, allowing 0.5-unit increments, where: 0.0=None and 4.0=Extremely severe.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ciliary Redness7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 daysCiliary hyperemia (redness) was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Assessments were made using the same 0-4 scale, allowing 0.5-unit increments, where: 0.0=None and 4.0=Extremely severe.
Episcleral Redness7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 daysEpiscleral hyperemia (redness) was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Assessments were made using the same 0-4 scale, allowing 0.5-unit increments, where: 0.0=None and 4.0=Extremely severe.
Chemosis7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 daysChemosis was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on a 0-4 numerical analog scale, allowing 0.5-unit increments, where: 0.0=None and 4.0=Extremely severe.
Eyelid Swelling7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 daysLid swelling was evaluated by the participant at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on a 0-3 numerical analog scale, with 0.5-unit increments disallowed, where: 0.0=None and 3.0=Severe.
Percentage of Eyes With hTearing7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 daysTearing was evaluated by the participant at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Tearing was recorded as either absent or present.
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Mucus Discharge7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 daysOcular mucous discharge was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Mucous discharged was recorded as either absent or present.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

There were 70 eyes in the KetoNaph group, 72 in the ketotifen group, 70 in the naphazoline group, and 70 in the vehicle group, for a total of 282 eyes (141 subjects).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ketotifen/Naphazoline
Ketotifen/naphazoline ophthalmic solution administered in either the right eye, left eye or both eyes at visit 3 and visit 4. Ketotifen/naphazoline: One drop of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% and naphazoline HCl 0.05% ophthalmic solution at visit 3 and visit 4.
35
Ketotifen
Ketotifen ophthalmic solution administered in either the right eye, left eye or both eyes at visit 3 and visit 4. Ketotifen: One drop of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution at visits 3 and 4.
36
Naphazoline
Naphazoline ophthalmic solution administered in either the right eye, left eye or both eyes at visit 3 and visit 4. Naphazoline: One drop of naphazoline HCl 0.05% ophthalmic solution at visits 3 and 4.
35
Vehicle
Vehicle of ketotifen/naphazoline ophthalmic solution administered in either the right eye, left eye or both eyes at visit 3 and visit 4. Vehicle: One drop of vehicle ophthalmic solution at visit 3 and visit 4.
35
Total141

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicKetotifen/NaphazolineKetotifenNaphazolineVehicleTotal
Age, Continuous36.1 years40.7 years38.2 years38.4 years38.4 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants21 Participants18 Participants18 Participants73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants15 Participants17 Participants17 Participants68 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 350 / 360 / 350 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 350 / 360 / 350 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Conjunctival Redness

Conjunctival hyperemia was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Assessments were completed using a 0-4 numerical analog scale, allowing 0.5-unit increments, where: 0.0=None and 4.0=Extremely severe.

Time frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days

Population: The intent to treat population consisted of participants who were randomized, received investigational treatment, and had at least 1 post-challeng assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ketotifen/NaphazolineConjunctival Redness7 minutes post-challeng0.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Ketotifen/NaphazolineConjunctival Redness20 minutes post-challenge1.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Ketotifen/NaphazolineConjunctival Redness15 minutes post-challenge1.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
KetotifenConjunctival Redness7 minutes post-challeng1.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
KetotifenConjunctival Redness20 minutes post-challenge1.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
KetotifenConjunctival Redness15 minutes post-challenge1.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
NaphazolineConjunctival Redness15 minutes post-challenge1.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
NaphazolineConjunctival Redness7 minutes post-challeng1.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
NaphazolineConjunctival Redness20 minutes post-challenge1.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
VehicleConjunctival Redness7 minutes post-challeng2.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
VehicleConjunctival Redness20 minutes post-challenge2.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
VehicleConjunctival Redness15 minutes post-challenge2.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Primary

Ocular Itching

Ocular itching was evaluated by the participant at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge. Assessments were made using a 0-4 numerical analog scale, allowing 0.5-unit increments (but disallowing 0.25-unit increments), where: 0.0=None and 4.0=Incapacitating itch with an irresistible urge to rub

Time frame: 3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge at 14 days

Population: The intent to treat population consisted of participants who were randomized, received investigational treatment, and had at least 1 post-challeng assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ketotifen/NaphazolineOcular Itching3 minutes post-challenge0.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Ketotifen/NaphazolineOcular Itching7 minutes post-challenge0.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Ketotifen/NaphazolineOcular Itching5 minutes post-challenge0.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
KetotifenOcular Itching3 minutes post-challenge0.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
KetotifenOcular Itching7 minutes post-challenge0.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
KetotifenOcular Itching5 minutes post-challenge0.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
NaphazolineOcular Itching5 minutes post-challenge1.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
NaphazolineOcular Itching3 minutes post-challenge1.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
NaphazolineOcular Itching7 minutes post-challenge1.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
VehicleOcular Itching3 minutes post-challenge1.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
VehicleOcular Itching7 minutes post-challenge1.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
VehicleOcular Itching5 minutes post-challenge1.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Secondary

Chemosis

Chemosis was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on a 0-4 numerical analog scale, allowing 0.5-unit increments, where: 0.0=None and 4.0=Extremely severe.

Time frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days

Population: This outcome measure was not assessed for the Vehicle group. The intent to treat population consisted of participants who were randomized, received investigational treatment, and had at least 1 post-challenge assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ketotifen/NaphazolineChemosis15 minutes post-challenge0.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Ketotifen/NaphazolineChemosis7 minutes post-challenge0.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Ketotifen/NaphazolineChemosis20 minutes post-challenge0.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
KetotifenChemosis15 minutes post-challenge0.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
KetotifenChemosis7 minutes post-challenge0.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
KetotifenChemosis20 minutes post-challenge0.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
NaphazolineChemosis7 minutes post-challenge0.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
NaphazolineChemosis20 minutes post-challenge0.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
NaphazolineChemosis15 minutes post-challenge0.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Secondary

Ciliary Redness

Ciliary hyperemia (redness) was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Assessments were made using the same 0-4 scale, allowing 0.5-unit increments, where: 0.0=None and 4.0=Extremely severe.

Time frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days

Population: This outcome measure was not assessed for the Vehicle group. The intent to treat population consisted of participants who were randomized, received investigational treatment, and had at least 1 post-challenge assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ketotifen/NaphazolineCiliary Redness15 minutes post-challenge1.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Ketotifen/NaphazolineCiliary Redness7 minutes post-challenge0.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Ketotifen/NaphazolineCiliary Redness20 minutes post-challenge1.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
KetotifenCiliary Redness15 minutes post-challenge1.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
KetotifenCiliary Redness7 minutes post-challenge1.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
KetotifenCiliary Redness20 minutes post-challenge1.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
NaphazolineCiliary Redness7 minutes post-challenge1.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
NaphazolineCiliary Redness20 minutes post-challenge1.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
NaphazolineCiliary Redness15 minutes post-challenge1.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Secondary

Episcleral Redness

Episcleral hyperemia (redness) was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Assessments were made using the same 0-4 scale, allowing 0.5-unit increments, where: 0.0=None and 4.0=Extremely severe.

Time frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days

Population: This outcome measure was not assessed for the Vehicle group. The intent to treat population consisted of participants who were randomized, received investigational treatment, and had at least 1 post-challenge assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ketotifen/NaphazolineEpiscleral Redness15 minutes post-challenge1.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Ketotifen/NaphazolineEpiscleral Redness7 minutes post-challenge0.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Ketotifen/NaphazolineEpiscleral Redness20 minutes post-challenge1.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
KetotifenEpiscleral Redness15 minutes post-challenge1.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
KetotifenEpiscleral Redness7 minutes post-challenge1.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
KetotifenEpiscleral Redness20 minutes post-challenge1.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
NaphazolineEpiscleral Redness7 minutes post-challenge1.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
NaphazolineEpiscleral Redness20 minutes post-challenge1.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
NaphazolineEpiscleral Redness15 minutes post-challenge1.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Secondary

Eyelid Swelling

Lid swelling was evaluated by the participant at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on a 0-3 numerical analog scale, with 0.5-unit increments disallowed, where: 0.0=None and 3.0=Severe.

Time frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days

Population: This outcome measure was not assessed for the Vehicle group. The intent to treat population consisted of participants who were randomized, received investigational treatment, and had at least 1 post-challenge assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ketotifen/NaphazolineEyelid Swelling15 minutes post-challenge0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Ketotifen/NaphazolineEyelid Swelling7 minutes post-challenge0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Ketotifen/NaphazolineEyelid Swelling20 minutes post-challenge0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
KetotifenEyelid Swelling15 minutes post-challenge0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
KetotifenEyelid Swelling7 minutes post-challenge0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
KetotifenEyelid Swelling20 minutes post-challenge0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
NaphazolineEyelid Swelling7 minutes post-challenge0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
NaphazolineEyelid Swelling20 minutes post-challenge0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
NaphazolineEyelid Swelling15 minutes post-challenge0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Secondary

Percentage of Eyes With hTearing

Tearing was evaluated by the participant at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Tearing was recorded as either absent or present.

Time frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days

Population: This outcome measure was not assessed for the Vehicle group. The intent to treat population consisted of participants who were randomized, received investigational treatment, and had at least 1 post-challenge assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Ketotifen/NaphazolinePercentage of Eyes With hTearing15 minutes post-challenge4 eyes
Ketotifen/NaphazolinePercentage of Eyes With hTearing7 minutes post-challenge7 eyes
Ketotifen/NaphazolinePercentage of Eyes With hTearing20 minutes post-challenge5 eyes
KetotifenPercentage of Eyes With hTearing15 minutes post-challenge9 eyes
KetotifenPercentage of Eyes With hTearing7 minutes post-challenge11 eyes
KetotifenPercentage of Eyes With hTearing20 minutes post-challenge6 eyes
NaphazolinePercentage of Eyes With hTearing7 minutes post-challenge13 eyes
NaphazolinePercentage of Eyes With hTearing20 minutes post-challenge11 eyes
NaphazolinePercentage of Eyes With hTearing15 minutes post-challenge12 eyes
Secondary

Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Mucus Discharge

Ocular mucous discharge was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Mucous discharged was recorded as either absent or present.

Time frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days

Population: This outcome measure was not assessed for the Vehicle group. The intent to treat population consisted of participants who were randomized, received investigational treatment, and had at least 1 post-challenge assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Ketotifen/NaphazolinePercentage of Eyes With Ocular Mucus Discharge15 minutes post-challenge0 eyes
Ketotifen/NaphazolinePercentage of Eyes With Ocular Mucus Discharge7 minutes post-challenge0 eyes
Ketotifen/NaphazolinePercentage of Eyes With Ocular Mucus Discharge20 minutes post-challenge0 eyes
KetotifenPercentage of Eyes With Ocular Mucus Discharge15 minutes post-challenge0 eyes
KetotifenPercentage of Eyes With Ocular Mucus Discharge7 minutes post-challenge0 eyes
KetotifenPercentage of Eyes With Ocular Mucus Discharge20 minutes post-challenge0 eyes
NaphazolinePercentage of Eyes With Ocular Mucus Discharge7 minutes post-challenge0 eyes
NaphazolinePercentage of Eyes With Ocular Mucus Discharge20 minutes post-challenge0 eyes
NaphazolinePercentage of Eyes With Ocular Mucus Discharge15 minutes post-challenge0 eyes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026