Skip to content

IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines No. 2

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), Free of Complexing Proteins, in the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines. No. 2

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00770029
Enrollment
276
Registered
2008-10-09
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2013-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Moderate to Severe Glabellar Frown Lines

Brief summary

The study objective was to show the superior efficacy of IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) over placebo by evaluation of treatment success analyzing the investigator's rating on the Facial Wrinkle Scale and the patient's assessment on a 4-point scale. 255 female and male patients with moderate to severe glabellar frown lines to be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive one injection of IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) or placebo and will be followed up until day 120.

Detailed description

The study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter phase 3 clinical trial. Approximately 285 females and males with moderate to severe glabellar frown lines at maximum frown were to be screened during a screening period of four months in order to randomize approximately 255 subjects into one treatment and one placebo group at a ratio of 2 : 1. After the single injection treatment with a total dose of 20 Units IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) or corresponding placebo, the subjects were observed over 120 days. During the study participation the subjects performed seven visits. Eight (8) sites in the United States and Canada participated in this trial. The study was led by one Lead PI and a Co-Lead PI who was assisting the Lead PI. The role of the Lead PI and the Co-Lead PI was executed by one of the PIs of this study, respectively. The PI at each site was a medical doctor who was experienced in aesthetic dermatology, i.e. who had several years (\>=2 years) of experience in treatment of glabellar frown lines with BTX-A preparations. The PI was the person who led the team at one trial site and who was responsible for the conduct of the clinical trial at the site. The sub-investigator was a member of the team designated by the PI to perform important trial-related decisions. A maximum number of two sub-investigators could be authorized for injection and rating if necessary. At each site, ideally one investigator was to inject and rate all subjects. Injecting and rating sub-investigators had to be medical doctors with several years of experience in treatment of glabellar frown lines with BTX-A preparations. A subject had to be rated by the same investigator at all visits. Another phase 3 trial MRZ 60201-0741/1 (NCT00770211) with design and endpoints identical to those in this trial was performed in order to compare efficacy and safety results with a second study population.

Interventions

The treatment will be administered only once at day 0 at five injection sites in the glabellar area. The total dose of 20 Units IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) is reconstituted in a total injection volume of 0.5 mL that is to be injected to the five sites in equal aliquots of 0.1 mL.

DRUGPlacebo

The treatment will be administered only once at day 0 at five injection sites in the glabellar area. Volume of Placebo equivalent to IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin).

Sponsors

Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 or over * Moderate to severe glabellar frown lines at maximum frown (severity score of 2 or 3 on Facial Wrinkle Scale as assessed by investigator's rating: 0= 'none', 1= 'mild', 2= 'moderate', 3= 'severe' * Moderate to severe glabellar frown lines at maximum frown (severity score of 2 or 3 on Facial Wrinkle Scale as assessed by patient's assessment: 0= 'none', 1= 'mild', 2= 'moderate', 3= 'severe' * Stable medical condition

Exclusion criteria

* Previous treatment with Botulinum toxin of any serotype in the glabellar area within the last 8 month * Previous treatment with any facial aesthetic procedure (e.g. injection with biodegradable fillers, chemical peeling, photo rejuvenation) in the glabellar area within the last 12 month * Previous insertion of permanent material in the glabellar area (regardless of the time between previous treatment and this study) * Planned treatment with Botulinum toxin of any serotype in any other body region during the study period * Any surgery in the glabellar area including surgical removal of the corrugator, procerus, or depressor supercilii muscles or a combination of these, or scars in the glabellar area and the surrounding areas (including eye brow) * Any other planned facial aesthetic procedure during the trial period * Inability to substantially lessen glabellar frown lines even by physically spreading them apart * Marked facial asymmetry or ptosis of eyelid and/or eyebrow * History of facial nerve palsy * Any infection in the area of the injection sites

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite Endpoint Treatment Success (CETS) Constituted by 2 Variables: 2-point Responders at Maximum Frown (Frown as Much as Possible) at Day 30 by Investigator's Rating on Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) and by Patient's Assessment on 4-point ScaleBaseline to Day 30Composite endpoint CETS constituted by two efficacy variables: 1. The investigator's assessment on the four-point FWS: none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. 2. Patient's assessment on the 4-point scale in comparison to sample photos: 0 = No muscle action at all; 1 = Some even slight muscle action possible i.e. visible furrows; 2 = Moderately strong muscle action possible i.e. visible muscle bulges; 3 = Strong muscle action possible which may cause local pallor. A subject was a responder only if a 2-point improvement compared to baseline occurred simultaneously for both variables.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Responders at Rest at Day 30 by Investigator's Rating on FWS.Baseline to Day 30The investigator's assessment at rest (no muscle action in the face, no frown at all) on the four-point FWS: none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. A responder was defined as a subject with a rating of none = 0 or mild = 1.
1-point Responders at Rest at Day 30 by Patient's Assessment on 4-point Scale.Baseline to Day 30Patient's assessment at rest (no muscle action in the face, no frown at all) on the 4-point scale in comparison to sample photos: 0 = No visible vertical line(s) at all (i.e. no visible upright line); 1 = Slightly visible vertical line(s) (i.e. slightly visible upright line); 2 = Moderate vertical line(s) with depression (i.e. upright line with deepening); 3 = Deep vertical line(s) and depression which cannot be effaced by spreading (i.e. cannot be smoothed out). A subject was a responder if a 1-point improvement occurred compared to baseline.
Responders at Maximum Frown at Day 30 by Investigator's Rating on FWS.Baseline to Day 30The investigator's assessment at maximum frown (frown as much as possible) on the four-point FWS: none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. A responder was defined as a subject with a rating of none = 0 or mild = 1.
1-point Responders at Maximum Frown at Day 30 by Patient's Assessment on 4-point Scale.Baseline to Day 30Patient's assessment at maximum frown (frown as much as possible) on the 4-point scale in comparison to sample photos: 0 = No muscle action at all; 1 = Some even slight muscle action possible i.e. visible furrows; 2 = Moderately strong muscle action possible i.e. visible muscle bulges; 3 = Strong muscle action possible which may cause local pallor. A subject was a responder if a 1-point improvement occurred compared to baseline.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) (20 Units)
IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), also known as 'NT 201' or 'Botulinum toxin type A (150 kD), free from complexing proteins' (active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins) powder for solution for injection, 20 units; mode of administration: intramuscular injection
184
Placebo
Placebo to IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) powder for solution for injection; dose: one injection session of solution, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% NaCl; mode of administration: same as for IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin).
92
Total276

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) (20 Units)PlaceboTotal
Age Continuous46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.87
46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.56
46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.09
Sex: Female, Male
Female
162 Participants76 Participants238 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants16 Participants38 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 18415 / 92
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1841 / 92

Outcome results

Primary

Composite Endpoint Treatment Success (CETS) Constituted by 2 Variables: 2-point Responders at Maximum Frown (Frown as Much as Possible) at Day 30 by Investigator's Rating on Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) and by Patient's Assessment on 4-point Scale

Composite endpoint CETS constituted by two efficacy variables: 1. The investigator's assessment on the four-point FWS: none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. 2. Patient's assessment on the 4-point scale in comparison to sample photos: 0 = No muscle action at all; 1 = Some even slight muscle action possible i.e. visible furrows; 2 = Moderately strong muscle action possible i.e. visible muscle bulges; 3 = Strong muscle action possible which may cause local pallor. A subject was a responder only if a 2-point improvement compared to baseline occurred simultaneously for both variables.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 30

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All randomized subjects treated with study medication. Missing values were imputed by the evaluations made at Day 7 according to the LOCF (last observation carried forward). If no ratings for Day 7 were available values were set to 'no 2-point responder'.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) (20 Units)Composite Endpoint Treatment Success (CETS) Constituted by 2 Variables: 2-point Responders at Maximum Frown (Frown as Much as Possible) at Day 30 by Investigator's Rating on Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) and by Patient's Assessment on 4-point Scale111 Participants
PlaceboComposite Endpoint Treatment Success (CETS) Constituted by 2 Variables: 2-point Responders at Maximum Frown (Frown as Much as Possible) at Day 30 by Investigator's Rating on Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) and by Patient's Assessment on 4-point Scale0 Participants
Comparison: The efficacy of the treatment was confirmed if H0 was rejected at a given α of 5%, that means if the two sided p-value was ≤0.05. Power of 90%p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.52, 0.68]Fisher Exact
Secondary

1-point Responders at Maximum Frown at Day 30 by Patient's Assessment on 4-point Scale.

Patient's assessment at maximum frown (frown as much as possible) on the 4-point scale in comparison to sample photos: 0 = No muscle action at all; 1 = Some even slight muscle action possible i.e. visible furrows; 2 = Moderately strong muscle action possible i.e. visible muscle bulges; 3 = Strong muscle action possible which may cause local pallor. A subject was a responder if a 1-point improvement occurred compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 30

Population: The number and percentage of responses by treatment group will be provided for all secondary endpoints on the FAS observed cases.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) (20 Units)1-point Responders at Maximum Frown at Day 30 by Patient's Assessment on 4-point Scale.161 Participants
Placebo1-point Responders at Maximum Frown at Day 30 by Patient's Assessment on 4-point Scale.9 Participants
Secondary

1-point Responders at Rest at Day 30 by Patient's Assessment on 4-point Scale.

Patient's assessment at rest (no muscle action in the face, no frown at all) on the 4-point scale in comparison to sample photos: 0 = No visible vertical line(s) at all (i.e. no visible upright line); 1 = Slightly visible vertical line(s) (i.e. slightly visible upright line); 2 = Moderate vertical line(s) with depression (i.e. upright line with deepening); 3 = Deep vertical line(s) and depression which cannot be effaced by spreading (i.e. cannot be smoothed out). A subject was a responder if a 1-point improvement occurred compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 30

Population: The number and percentage of responses by treatment group will be provided for all secondary endpoints on the FAS observed cases.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) (20 Units)1-point Responders at Rest at Day 30 by Patient's Assessment on 4-point Scale.131 Participants
Placebo1-point Responders at Rest at Day 30 by Patient's Assessment on 4-point Scale.10 Participants
Secondary

Responders at Maximum Frown at Day 30 by Investigator's Rating on FWS.

The investigator's assessment at maximum frown (frown as much as possible) on the four-point FWS: none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. A responder was defined as a subject with a rating of none = 0 or mild = 1.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 30

Population: The number and percentage of responses by treatment group will be provided for all secondary endpoints on the FAS observed cases.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) (20 Units)Responders at Maximum Frown at Day 30 by Investigator's Rating on FWS.147 Participants
PlaceboResponders at Maximum Frown at Day 30 by Investigator's Rating on FWS.0 Participants
Secondary

Responders at Rest at Day 30 by Investigator's Rating on FWS.

The investigator's assessment at rest (no muscle action in the face, no frown at all) on the four-point FWS: none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. A responder was defined as a subject with a rating of none = 0 or mild = 1.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 30

Population: The number and percentage of responses by treatment group will be provided for all secondary endpoints on the FAS observed cases.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) (20 Units)Responders at Rest at Day 30 by Investigator's Rating on FWS.123 Participants
PlaceboResponders at Rest at Day 30 by Investigator's Rating on FWS.36 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026