Standardizing Management of Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care and Physical Therapy

Back Pain, Low Back Pain

Low Back Pain, Clinical Practice Guidelines, Spinal Manipulation, Physical Therapy Techniques

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and costs associated with two different management strategies for patients with acute low back pain who consult their primary care physician. The investigators hypothesize that management using a brief, standardized physical therapy intervention will result in better outcomes than management based on current practice guideline recommendations of watchful waiting for the first 4 weeks following consultation.

The Institute of Medicine recognizes low back pain (LBP) as a top 15 priority condition, calling for health care organizations to develop new, evidence-based management strategies. Most patients with acute LBP are managed in primary care. Primary care management is characterized by high variability in decision-making, including referral to specialties such as physical therapy. In the face of this variability it is not surprising that the outcomes of management for patients with acute LBP are also inconsistent, with a considerable proportion going on to persistent or recurrent symptoms. Costs associated with patients who fail to recover quickly or completely can be substantial. Many patients with acute LBP are referred from primary care to physical therapy. Physical therapy management of patients with acute LBP is also highly variable in terms of the interventions used and the outcomes achieved. More effective and standardized management for patients with acute LBP could impact progression of the condition before the concerns associated with chronic pain become evident, and are therefore central to reducing costs and improving outcomes. Numerous practice guidelines have been developed to attempt to reduce variability and improve outcomes for patients with acute LBP managed in primary care. Current guidelines provide little direction for determining the optimal type of patient and timing for referral to physical therapy, other than a broad recommendation to delay referral for at least a few weeks. Within physical therapy there is an absence of validated decision-support tools to reduce inappropriate variation in care and improve outcomes. The Investigators have developed and validated a clinical decision rule identifying a subgroup of patients with LBP likely to experience rapid and sustained improvement with a brief, standardized physical therapy intervention delivered early in the course of care, suggesting it may be more cost-effective to manage this subgroup with early referral to physical therapy. The impact of integrating this rule into routine clinical care has not been assessed. We will conduct a randomized clinical trial examining outcomes and costs associated with integrating the decision rule into primary care management of patients with LBP. Patients with LBP who fit the decision rule criteria will be randomized into one of two groups; one managed with usual care based on current practice guidelines; the other managed based on the decision rule with early, standardized physical therapy. Patients will be followed for 6 months. Outcomes will include measures of disability, pain, satisfaction, and costs.

No related papers found yet.

United States