Skip to content

Phase 3 Clinical Study for the Treatment of Cold Sore

A Randomised, Double-Blind, Single Dose, One-Day Early Administration, Multicentre Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Acyclovir Lauriad® 50 mg Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablet to Matching Placebo, in the Treatment of Herpes Labialis in Immunocompetent Patients.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00769314
Acronym
LIP
Enrollment
1727
Registered
2008-10-09
Start date
2007-05-31
Completion date
2009-08-31
Last updated
2012-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Herpes Labialis

Brief summary

To demonstrate the efficacy of a single dose of acyclovir Lauriad® 50mg muco-adhesive buccal tablet versus a single dose of matching placebo on the primary vesicular lesion of cold sore.

Interventions

DRUGAcyclovir Lauriad

50 mg muco-adhesive buccal tablets, single application on the gum

DRUGPlacebo

50 mg muco-adhesive buccal tablets, single application on the gum

Sponsors

Valerio Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* History of recurrent herpes labialis lesions where: * At least 50% of previous episodes produced classical lesions to the vesicular stage (i.e. episodes that progressed through macula, papule, vesicle, crust and healed); * Prodromal symptoms (itching, tingling, pain etc.) should precede herpes labialis lesions in at least 50% of the previous herpes episodes * Good general health (ECOG \< 2), immunocompetent * Signed and dated written informed consent * Women of childbearing potential must have effective contraception method

Exclusion criteria

* More than 50% of recurrences that aborted spontaneously in the past 12 months * Primary herpes lesion outside the lips (e.g. nose, chin, etc.) * Abnormal peri-oral skin condition that might affect the normal course of cold sores (e.g. eczema, psoriasis…) * Oral diseases whose prodromal symptoms may mimick those of herpes labialis, including recurrent oral aphthous disease * Oral diseases that might interfere with the evaluation of the efficacy or safety of the treatments, including gingivitis, parondotis, mucositis, oropharyngeal candidiasis… * History of infection known to be resistant to acyclovir family agents * Previous vaccination against herpes * Concomitant treatment likely to interfere with acyclovir * Allergy to any acyclovir containing agents * Immunocompromised condition, including HIV+ * Unability to properly understand protocol requirements, to follow the study procedures, to complete the patient diary or to start the self-initiation of the treatment * Upper full or partial dentures with acrylic border in the canine fossa * Milk allergy or known history of hypersensitivity to one of the components of the products * Rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance. * Lactase enzyme deficiency or glucose galactose malabsorption * Clinically significant abnormal level of serum creatinine * Patients whose occupations make them unlikely to return to the clinic within 24h of treatment initiation * Pregnancy or breast-feeding * Investigational drug or immunomodulator treatment in the 30 days prior randomisation * Prior enrollment in this study * Participation in another therapeutic trial evaluating new drugs or which could interfere with the evolution of herpes labialis or the evaluation of the drug in the study within preceding 30 day.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Healing (TTH) of Vesicular Primary LesionAssessed from time of treatment initiation through Day 14Healing was defined as the loss of crust (erythema may be present) as assessed by the investigator. TTH was the time from treatment initiation to healing as defined above and was assessed from the time of treatment initiation through Day 14. The primary vesicular lesion was the first developed lesion located on the lip and was not to have extended more than 1 cm outside the lip.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Abortion of Primary LesionsAssessed from the time of treatment initiation through Day 14Aborted lesions were defined as herpetic lesions preceded by prodromal symptoms that did not progress beyond the papule stage.
TTH of Non-primary Lesions (Aborted Lesions Excluded)Assessed from the time of treatment initiation through Day 14TTH of non-primary lesions was defined as the time from treatment initiation to healing of all non-primary vesicular lesions. Non-primary lesions were those that developed in addition to and/or in 1 or more days after the primary vesicular lesion and that were located at least 1 cm from the primary lesion. Aborted lesions were not included in this parameter. TTH was to be assessed by the investigator.
Duration of Episode (DOE)Assessed from initiation of treatment to Day 14For patients who experienced a vesicular lesion, DOE was defined as the time from treatment initiation to healing of primary and secondary vesicular lesions (loss of crust). For subjects whose primary and secondary lesions were not vesicular in nature, DOE was defied as the time from treatment initiation to return to normal skin or to cessation of symptoms, whichever came last.
Time to Cessation of SymptomsAssessed from time of treatment initiation through Day 14Time to cessation of symptoms was defined as the time from treatment initiation to cessation of all symptoms: pain, burning, itching, tingling, tenderness and discomfort. It was to be assessed by the investigator.
Patient Assessment of Efficacy of the TreatmentAssessed on Day 14 (or within 24 hours of healing)At the end of study (Day 14 \[ or within 24 hours of healing\]), patients were asked to rate efficacy of treatment using a 4-point scale (inactive, mildly active, moderately active, or very active).
Time to Recurrence of Non-aborted Lesions During 9-month Follow-upFrom time of initial healing through the 9-month follow-upTime to recurrence was the time from the healing of all lesions of the initial episode to the occurrence of new lesions.
Patient Incidence of Recurrence of Non-aborted Lesions During 9-month Follow-upFrom time of initial healing through the 9-month follow-upRecurrence was the occurrence of new lesions and was evaluated in a subgroup of patients who agreed to record recurrences during the 9-month follow-up period.
Symptom Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])Assessed on Days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 (or within 24 hours of healing)Patients were asked to place a tick mark on a 10 centimeter VAS indicating their symptom intensity. Scale ratings ranged from a minimum of 0 (none at all) to a maximum of 10 (worst possible). The location of the tick mark from 0 was measured in millimeters (0 - 100) and recorded.
Patient Satisfaction With TreatmentAssessed on Day 14 (or within 24 hours of healing)At the end of study (Day 14 \[or within 24 hours of healing\]), patients were asked whether they were satisfied with treatment (yes/no).
TTH of Aborted Primary LesionsAssessed from time of treatment initiation through Day 14TTH of aborted primary lesions was defined as the time from treatment initiation to healing of the primary lesion (erythema or papule) or cessation of symptoms, whichever came last. It was to be assessed by the investigator.

Countries

Australia, Czechia, France, Germany, Poland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were screened beginning March 2007 and the last patient was treated in October 2008. The study was conducted at 47 sites in Australia, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Poland, the United Kingdom and the United States.

Pre-assignment details

Per protocol, a total of 1950 patients were to be randomized. Following randomization, patients were not to start treatment until a new labial herpes episode occurred. Thus, of those randomized, only 780 patients were planned to be treated (390 patients per treatment group) and 1170 patients were to be randomized, but not treated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Acyclovir Lauriad Group
Acyclovir Lauriad 50mg muco-adhesive tablet/Intent-to-Treat population
376
Placebo Group
muco-adhesive buccal tablet with placebo/Intent-to-Treat population
395
Total771

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAcyclovir Lauriad GroupPlacebo GroupTotal
Age Continuous40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.97
41.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.33
41.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.18
Region of Enrollment
Australia
53 participants68 participants121 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
47 participants50 participants97 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
41 participants49 participants90 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
79 participants77 participants156 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
74 participants70 participants144 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
11 participants9 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
71 participants72 participants143 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
258 Participants271 Participants529 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
118 Participants124 Participants242 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 37822 / 397
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3781 / 397

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Healing (TTH) of Vesicular Primary Lesion

Healing was defined as the loss of crust (erythema may be present) as assessed by the investigator. TTH was the time from treatment initiation to healing as defined above and was assessed from the time of treatment initiation through Day 14. The primary vesicular lesion was the first developed lesion located on the lip and was not to have extended more than 1 cm outside the lip.

Time frame: Assessed from time of treatment initiation through Day 14

Population: The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population was the population used for analysis of this endpoint. The mITT population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication and who reached the vesicular stage (ie, episodes that progressed through macula, papule, vesicle, crust and healing).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupTime to Healing (TTH) of Vesicular Primary Lesion7.00 Days95% Confidence Interval 0.18
Placebo GroupTime to Healing (TTH) of Vesicular Primary Lesion7.32 Days95% Confidence Interval 0.18
p-value: 0.015Log Rank
Secondary

Abortion of Primary Lesions

Aborted lesions were defined as herpetic lesions preceded by prodromal symptoms that did not progress beyond the papule stage.

Time frame: Assessed from the time of treatment initiation through Day 14

Population: This endpoint was analyzed using the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which consisted of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication and who had complete information recorded for the application time.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupAbortion of Primary LesionsAborted Lesions = Yes130 participants
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupAbortion of Primary LesionsAborted Lesions = No242 participants
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupAbortion of Primary LesionsAborted Lesions = Missing4 participants
Placebo GroupAbortion of Primary LesionsAborted Lesions = Yes109 participants
Placebo GroupAbortion of Primary LesionsAborted Lesions = No279 participants
Placebo GroupAbortion of Primary LesionsAborted Lesions = Missing7 participants
p-value: 0.041995% CI: [0.0025, 0.1339]Chi-squared
Secondary

Duration of Episode (DOE)

For patients who experienced a vesicular lesion, DOE was defined as the time from treatment initiation to healing of primary and secondary vesicular lesions (loss of crust). For subjects whose primary and secondary lesions were not vesicular in nature, DOE was defied as the time from treatment initiation to return to normal skin or to cessation of symptoms, whichever came last.

Time frame: Assessed from initiation of treatment to Day 14

Population: This endpoint was analyzed using the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupDuration of Episode (DOE)5.57 Days
Placebo GroupDuration of Episode (DOE)6.38 Days
p-value: 0.0033Log Rank
Secondary

Patient Assessment of Efficacy of the Treatment

At the end of study (Day 14 \[ or within 24 hours of healing\]), patients were asked to rate efficacy of treatment using a 4-point scale (inactive, mildly active, moderately active, or very active).

Time frame: Assessed on Day 14 (or within 24 hours of healing)

Population: This endpoint was analyzed using the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupPatient Assessment of Efficacy of the TreatmentModerately active100 participants
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupPatient Assessment of Efficacy of the TreatmentVery active154 participants
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupPatient Assessment of Efficacy of the TreatmentMidly active49 participants
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupPatient Assessment of Efficacy of the TreatmentMissing23 participants
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupPatient Assessment of Efficacy of the TreatmentInactive50 participants
Placebo GroupPatient Assessment of Efficacy of the TreatmentMissing22 participants
Placebo GroupPatient Assessment of Efficacy of the TreatmentInactive79 participants
Placebo GroupPatient Assessment of Efficacy of the TreatmentMidly active44 participants
Placebo GroupPatient Assessment of Efficacy of the TreatmentVery active146 participants
Placebo GroupPatient Assessment of Efficacy of the TreatmentModerately active104 participants
Secondary

Patient Incidence of Recurrence of Non-aborted Lesions During 9-month Follow-up

Recurrence was the occurrence of new lesions and was evaluated in a subgroup of patients who agreed to record recurrences during the 9-month follow-up period.

Time frame: From time of initial healing through the 9-month follow-up

Population: This endpoint was analyzed using the follow-up population, a subgroup of the ITT population who continued to the 9 month follow-up and had at least 1 diary assessment during that period. The follow-up population was defined as patients whose lesions were healed at the end of Day 14 and had no recurrence within 15 days of healing of all lesions.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupPatient Incidence of Recurrence of Non-aborted Lesions During 9-month Follow-upRecurrence during 9-month follow-up = yes149 participants
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupPatient Incidence of Recurrence of Non-aborted Lesions During 9-month Follow-upRecurrence during 9-month follow-up = no83 participants
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupPatient Incidence of Recurrence of Non-aborted Lesions During 9-month Follow-upRecurrence during 9-month follow-up = missing35 participants
Placebo GroupPatient Incidence of Recurrence of Non-aborted Lesions During 9-month Follow-upRecurrence during 9-month follow-up = yes181 participants
Placebo GroupPatient Incidence of Recurrence of Non-aborted Lesions During 9-month Follow-upRecurrence during 9-month follow-up = no65 participants
Placebo GroupPatient Incidence of Recurrence of Non-aborted Lesions During 9-month Follow-upRecurrence during 9-month follow-up = missing24 participants
p-value: 0.0271Chi-squared
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction With Treatment

At the end of study (Day 14 \[or within 24 hours of healing\]), patients were asked whether they were satisfied with treatment (yes/no).

Time frame: Assessed on Day 14 (or within 24 hours of healing)

Population: This endpoint was analyzed using the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupPatient Satisfaction With TreatmentSatisfied with treatment = yes297 participants
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupPatient Satisfaction With TreatmentSatisfied with treatment = no66 participants
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupPatient Satisfaction With TreatmentMissing13 participants
Placebo GroupPatient Satisfaction With TreatmentSatisfied with treatment = yes275 participants
Placebo GroupPatient Satisfaction With TreatmentSatisfied with treatment = no105 participants
Placebo GroupPatient Satisfaction With TreatmentMissing15 participants
p-value: 0.0022Chi-squared
Secondary

Symptom Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])

Patients were asked to place a tick mark on a 10 centimeter VAS indicating their symptom intensity. Scale ratings ranged from a minimum of 0 (none at all) to a maximum of 10 (worst possible). The location of the tick mark from 0 was measured in millimeters (0 - 100) and recorded.

Time frame: Assessed on Days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 (or within 24 hours of healing)

Population: This endpoint was analyzed using the safety population, which consisted of all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupSymptom Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])Day 321.2 units on a scale (0 - 100)Standard Deviation 22.88
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupSymptom Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])Day 78.2 units on a scale (0 - 100)Standard Deviation 13.63
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupSymptom Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])Day 512.7 units on a scale (0 - 100)Standard Deviation 17.6
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupSymptom Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])Day 14 (or within 24 hours of healing)1.0 units on a scale (0 - 100)Standard Deviation 5.14
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupSymptom Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])Day 130.5 units on a scale (0 - 100)Standard Deviation 22.37
Placebo GroupSymptom Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])Day 14 (or within 24 hours of healing)0.9 units on a scale (0 - 100)Standard Deviation 3.61
Placebo GroupSymptom Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])Day 131.1 units on a scale (0 - 100)Standard Deviation 22.07
Placebo GroupSymptom Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])Day 322.9 units on a scale (0 - 100)Standard Deviation 22.6
Placebo GroupSymptom Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])Day 517.3 units on a scale (0 - 100)Standard Deviation 20.7
Placebo GroupSymptom Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])Day 710.7 units on a scale (0 - 100)Standard Deviation 18.48
Comparison: Analysis conducted between treatment groups at Day 1 timepoint.p-value: 0.5695Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Analysis conducted between treatment groups at Day 3 timepointp-value: 0.1824Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Analysis conducted between treatment groups at the Day 5 timepointp-value: 0.0078Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Analysis conducted between treatment groups at the Day 7 timepointp-value: 0.3303Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Analysis conducted between treatment groups at the Day 14 timepointp-value: 0.6045Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Time to Cessation of Symptoms

Time to cessation of symptoms was defined as the time from treatment initiation to cessation of all symptoms: pain, burning, itching, tingling, tenderness and discomfort. It was to be assessed by the investigator.

Time frame: Assessed from time of treatment initiation through Day 14

Population: This endpoint was analyzed using the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupTime to Cessation of Symptoms3.57 Days
Placebo GroupTime to Cessation of Symptoms4.16 Days
p-value: 0.0098Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Recurrence of Non-aborted Lesions During 9-month Follow-up

Time to recurrence was the time from the healing of all lesions of the initial episode to the occurrence of new lesions.

Time frame: From time of initial healing through the 9-month follow-up

Population: This endpoint was analyzed using the follow-up population, a subgroup of the ITT population who continued to the 9 month follow-up and had at least 1 diary assessment during that period. The follow-up population was defined as patients whose lesions were healed at the end of Day 14 and had no recurrence within 15 days of healing of all lesions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupTime to Recurrence of Non-aborted Lesions During 9-month Follow-up205.0 Days95% Confidence Interval 19.4
Placebo GroupTime to Recurrence of Non-aborted Lesions During 9-month Follow-up165.0 Days95% Confidence Interval 9.3
p-value: 0.0412Log Rank
Secondary

TTH of Aborted Primary Lesions

TTH of aborted primary lesions was defined as the time from treatment initiation to healing of the primary lesion (erythema or papule) or cessation of symptoms, whichever came last. It was to be assessed by the investigator.

Time frame: Assessed from time of treatment initiation through Day 14

Population: This endpoint was analyzed using the subgroup of patients within the ITT population with aborted lesions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupTTH of Aborted Primary Lesions2.57 Days
Placebo GroupTTH of Aborted Primary Lesions2.67 Days
p-value: 0.8005Log Rank
Secondary

TTH of Non-primary Lesions (Aborted Lesions Excluded)

TTH of non-primary lesions was defined as the time from treatment initiation to healing of all non-primary vesicular lesions. Non-primary lesions were those that developed in addition to and/or in 1 or more days after the primary vesicular lesion and that were located at least 1 cm from the primary lesion. Aborted lesions were not included in this parameter. TTH was to be assessed by the investigator.

Time frame: Assessed from the time of treatment initiation through Day 14

Population: This endpoint was analyzed using a subgroup of patients in the ITT population with non-primary lesions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Acyclovir Lauriad GroupTTH of Non-primary Lesions (Aborted Lesions Excluded)7.00 Days
Placebo GroupTTH of Non-primary Lesions (Aborted Lesions Excluded)9.08 Days
p-value: 0.0683Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026