Skip to content

Combining Topical Corticosteroid and LCD Treatment for Localized Plaque Psoriasis

A Steroid-Sparing Effect of Supplemental LCD Treatment in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Localized Psoriasis Lesions: a Pilot Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00769184
Enrollment
15
Registered
2008-10-09
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2009-04-30
Last updated
2015-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis

Keywords

chronic plaque psoriasis

Brief summary

This is a 12 week bilateral study, consisting of 6 weeks of treatment and 6 weeks of follow-up. The purpose of the study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of combining and then following a high potency topical corticosteroid treatment with LCD treatment for moderate-to-severe localized plaque psoriasis.

Detailed description

Superpotent topical corticosteroids such as clobetasol propionate are highly effective in treating plaque psoriasis but are not indicated for long term use due to their side effects. Therefore, steroid-sparing combination and sequential regimens, in which the corticosteroid gets supplemented with a non-steroid medication, such as calcipotriol or tazarotene, have become the standard of care, especially in the management of localized psoriasis lesions. A new steroid-free 15% liquor carbonis distillate (LCD) solution (Psorent) was recently found to be more successful than 0.005% calcipotriol cream (Dovonex) at improving and delaying worsening of psoriasis symptoms in a controlled clinical trial. The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate if this LCD solution can be used in combination with acute topical corticosteroid therapy as a new steroid-sparing / enhancing regimen. We hope to explore the compatibility, patient tolerability, and clinical benefit of using LCD solution during and after treatment with clobetasol propionate in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This is a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, bilateral study. Men and women 18 years of age or older, with chronic plaque psoriasis affecting less than or equal to 10% body surface area (BSA) in areas other than the scalp, face, palms, soles, axillae, and groin, are recruited. Those with a Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score greater than 3 and are in general good health will qualify as candidates. On one side of the body, LCD solution and clobetasol propionate will be administered twice daily for the first 2 weeks of treatment, followed by 4 weeks of LCD solution only, followed by 6 weeks of no treatment. On the second half of the body, subject will apply a vehicle solution and clobetasol propionate twice daily for the first 2 weeks, only the vehicle solution twice daily for the next four weeks, and then no treatment for the next 6 weeks. Subjects will be evaluated at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12. investigators will use the PGA scale \[Clear (0) - Severe (5)\] to determine treatment effects as well as Target Lesion assessments of Erythema, Scaling, Induration and overall severity \[None (0) - Very Severe (4)\]. patients will also be required to complete Self-Assessment questionnaires on their psoriasis \[None (0) - Severe (6)\]. as well as an assessment of the study solution \[Excellent (9) - Poor (1)\]. . Photographs will be taken at each study visit and adverse events will be monitored throughout the study.

Interventions

OTHERPlacebo

One side of body: Placebo Solution: 2 applications / day along with clobetasol 2 applications/day

DRUGCorticosteroid

One side of body: clobetasol: 2 applications / day along with LCD application 2 applications/day

DRUGLCD

One side of body: LCD Solution: 2 applications / day along with clobetasol 2 applications/day

Sponsors

NeoStrata Company, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * able to provide written informed consent * able to attend study visits, apply medications, and follow instructions * moderate to severe localized plaque psoriasis lesions (\<10% BSA on each side of the body)

Exclusion criteria

* other current treatments for psoriasis * hypersensitivity to steroids, liquor carbonis detergens, alcohol, fragrance * pregnant or nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients Who Are Clear (PGA Score 0) or Have Minimal Disease (PGA Score 1) on Each Treated Side at Each Visit.Weeks 2, 6, & 12.Those patients that have reached a PGA score of zero \[PGA scale: clear (0) - very severe (5)\], and are considered clear of chronic plaque psoriasis, or have reached a PGA score of 1, with minimal disease at each visit, in each condition. Data was collected at weeks 2, 6 and 12.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target LesionsWeeks 2, 6, & 12Mean percent improvement in disease severity using Physician Global Assessment (PGA) \[PGA scale: Clear (0) - Very Severe (5)\] and overall severity scores of target lesions (OTLS) \[OTLS scale None (0) - Very Severe (4)\] based on erythema, scaling and induration, at each visit interval.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Corticosteroid+LCD vs Corticosteroid+Placebo
one side of body: corticosteroid and liquor carbonis distillate (LCD) treatment applied twice a day, for 2 weeks, then LCD-only twice a day, for 4 weeks, then no treatment for 6 weeks opposite side of body: corticosteroid and placebo vehicle solution twice a day, for 2 weeks, then placebo vehicle solution-only twice a day, for 4 weeks, then no treatment for 6 weeks
15
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Corticosteroid + LCD/ +Placebo (2 Weeks)Adverse Event10
Corticosteroid + LCD/ +Placebo (2 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up01
No Treatment (6 Weeks)Adverse Event11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCorticosteroid+LCD vs Corticosteroid+Placebo
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 151 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients Who Are Clear (PGA Score 0) or Have Minimal Disease (PGA Score 1) on Each Treated Side at Each Visit.

Those patients that have reached a PGA score of zero \[PGA scale: clear (0) - very severe (5)\], and are considered clear of chronic plaque psoriasis, or have reached a PGA score of 1, with minimal disease at each visit, in each condition. Data was collected at weeks 2, 6 and 12.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 6, & 12.

Population: All randomized patients were included in analyses. Missing scores within each study phase only were filled in by last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Corticosteroid + LCDPercentage of Patients Who Are Clear (PGA Score 0) or Have Minimal Disease (PGA Score 1) on Each Treated Side at Each Visit.Percentage with PGA scores ≤ 1 at Week 233.3 percentage of participants
Corticosteroid + LCDPercentage of Patients Who Are Clear (PGA Score 0) or Have Minimal Disease (PGA Score 1) on Each Treated Side at Each Visit.Percentage with PGA scores ≤ 1 at Week 646.2 percentage of participants
Corticosteroid + LCDPercentage of Patients Who Are Clear (PGA Score 0) or Have Minimal Disease (PGA Score 1) on Each Treated Side at Each Visit.Percentage with PGA scores ≤ 1 at Week 1225.0 percentage of participants
Corticosteroid + PlaceboPercentage of Patients Who Are Clear (PGA Score 0) or Have Minimal Disease (PGA Score 1) on Each Treated Side at Each Visit.Percentage with PGA scores ≤ 1 at Week 26.7 percentage of participants
Corticosteroid + PlaceboPercentage of Patients Who Are Clear (PGA Score 0) or Have Minimal Disease (PGA Score 1) on Each Treated Side at Each Visit.Percentage with PGA scores ≤ 1 at Week 615.4 percentage of participants
Corticosteroid + PlaceboPercentage of Patients Who Are Clear (PGA Score 0) or Have Minimal Disease (PGA Score 1) on Each Treated Side at Each Visit.Percentage with PGA scores ≤ 1 at Week 1216.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Mean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target Lesions

Mean percent improvement in disease severity using Physician Global Assessment (PGA) \[PGA scale: Clear (0) - Very Severe (5)\] and overall severity scores of target lesions (OTLS) \[OTLS scale None (0) - Very Severe (4)\] based on erythema, scaling and induration, at each visit interval.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 6, & 12

Population: All randomized patients were included in analyses. Missing scores within each study phase only were filled in by last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Corticosteroid + LCDMean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target LesionsPercent improvement of PGA score at Week 1231 Mean Percent Improvement
Corticosteroid + LCDMean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target LesionsPercent improvement of OTLS score at Week 243 Mean Percent Improvement
Corticosteroid + LCDMean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target LesionsPercent improvement of PGA score at Week 239 Mean Percent Improvement
Corticosteroid + LCDMean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target LesionsPercent improvement of PGA score at Week 647 Mean Percent Improvement
Corticosteroid + LCDMean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target LesionsPercent improvement of OTLS score at Week 646 Mean Percent Improvement
Corticosteroid + LCDMean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target LesionsPercent improvement of OTLS score at Week 1229 Mean Percent Improvement
Corticosteroid + PlaceboMean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target LesionsPercent improvement of OTLS score at Week 620 Mean Percent Improvement
Corticosteroid + PlaceboMean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target LesionsPercent improvement of PGA score at Week 1212 Mean Percent Improvement
Corticosteroid + PlaceboMean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target LesionsPercent improvement of PGA score at Week 625 Mean Percent Improvement
Corticosteroid + PlaceboMean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target LesionsPercent improvement of OTLS score at Week 243 Mean Percent Improvement
Corticosteroid + PlaceboMean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target LesionsPercent improvement of OTLS score at Week 127 Mean Percent Improvement
Corticosteroid + PlaceboMean Percent Improvement in Disease Severity Using PGA and OTLS Scores of Target LesionsPercent improvement of PGA score at Week 234 Mean Percent Improvement

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026