Skip to content

Corticolimbic Degeneration and Treatment of Dementia

Corticolimbic Degeneration and Treatment of Dementia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00768261
Enrollment
39
Registered
2008-10-08
Start date
2004-11-30
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2018-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dementia

Keywords

Dementia of the Alzheimer type

Brief summary

The overall purpose of this research is to determine if there is a relationship between your symptoms of Dementia of the Alzheimers type and changes in the size and shape of certain brain structures during combined Donepezil (Aricept®) and Memantine (Namenda®) treatment.

Detailed description

In this study we will be using Memantine (Namenda®) in an investigational fashion with individuals with very mild to mild dementia. Donepezil (Aricept®) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of Alzheimers disease. Memantine (Namenda®) is currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for moderate and severe dementia only. This study may be instrumental in the development of a new therapy for others with similar conditions, and to determine whether Memantine (Namenda®) will be helpful to individuals with very mild to mild dementia. Specific Aim 1. To determine what neuroanatomical measures are most strongly correlated with the progression of clinical and cognitive deficits in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). To accomplish this aim, we will use high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and the tools of computational anatomy to assess changes in the structure of selected subcortical (e.g., hippocampus) and cortical (e.g., parahippocampal gyrus and cingulate gyrus) structure along with clinical and cognitive measures of dementia severity in subjects with very mild-to-mild DAT. Specific Aim 2 - To determine whether cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine can slow disease progression in DAT subjects. To accomplish this aim, we will use MR imaging and the tools of computational anatomy to compare the rate of change in the neuroanatomical measures listed above in 1) untreated DAT subjects, 2) DAT subjects treated with donepezil alone, and 3) DAT subjects treated with the combination of donepezil and memantine.

Interventions

DRUGMemantine (Namenda®)

Drug treatment will begin with 5 mg/day of donepezil for six weeks. After six weeks of such treatment, the subjects symptoms will be re-evaluated and any side-effects of treatment assessed and recorded. If no serious side-effects of donepezil are encountered, the dose of donepezil will be increased to 10 mg/day. For subjects prescribed the combination of donepezil and memantine, memantine (20 mg/day) will be added to the drug treatment regimen after the dose of donepezil has been established (i.e., at six weeks). Again, memantine will be initially started at 10 mg/day and increased to its full dose only if no serious side-effects are encountered.

5mg/day for six weeks and if no serious side-effects increased to 10mg/dy.

Sponsors

Northwestern University
CollaboratorOTHER
Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1) meets National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association(NINCDS-ADRDA) Alzheimer's criteria for dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT), 2) Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of 0.5 or 1, 3) 50-80 years of age, 4) able to give informed consent or has a primary caregiver or legal guardian, who can give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1) other psychiatric (e.g., depression) or neurological (e.g., CVA) disorders that would confound the assessment of dementia symptoms, 2) history of loss of consciousness, and 3) unstable or severe medical illness (e.g., hepatotoxicity) that would make donepezil or memantine treatment or participation in other aspects of the study unsafe.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Rate of Change of Hippocampal Volume Slope2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Combined DAT Patients' Mean (SD) Hippocampal Volume Slope (mm^3/Year) Rate of Changetwo yearsThe ADAS-Cog evaluates cognition and differentiates normal from impaired cognitive functioning. The total score is the summed number of errors in each task. The greater the impairment, the greater the score. We combined the dementia of the Alzheimer's type patients receiving all treatments together and grouped them into 3 subgroups according to the rates of change(roc) of their ADAS-Cog scores. To determine trends in hippocampal volume atrophy over time we compared the patients showing most negative ADAS-Cog rate of change (improving), patients with most positive ADAS-cog roc (worsening), patients with intermediate, near-zero ADAS-Cog roc (stable) .

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

39 subjects enrolled in Group3.14 maps have passed inspection for quality and are included in final analysis. Subject data from a previously published study of donepezil(Wang et al.,2010) with 18 very mild dementia of the Alzheimer's type patients treated with donepezil,14 untreated with mild DAT, and 56 cognitively normal individuals are included.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1 Very Mild to Mild DAT Untreated
Group 1) subjects with very mild (CDR 0.5) to mild (CDR 1) DAT that are untreated with either cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine
14
2 Very Mild to Mild DAT Treated With Donepezil
Group 2) subjects with very mild (CDR 0.5) to mild (CDR 1) DAT that are treated with donepezil. Donepezil (Aricept®): 5mg/day for six weeks and if no serious side-effects increased to 10mg/dy.
18
3 Very Mild to Mild DAT Treated With the Combination
Group 3) subjects with very mild (CDR 0.5) to mild (CDR 1) DAT that are treated with the combination of donepezil and memantine. Memantine (Namenda®): Drug treatment will begin with 5 mg/day of donepezil for six weeks. After six weeks of such treatment, the subjects symptoms will be re-evaluated and any side-effects of treatment assessed and recorded. If no serious side-effects of donepezil are encountered, the dose of donepezil will be increased to 10 mg/day. For subjects prescribed the combination of donepezil and memantine, memantine (20 mg/day) will be added to the drug treatment regimen after the dose of donepezil has been established (i.e., at six weeks). Again, memantine will be initially started at 10 mg/day and increased to its full dose only if no serious side-effects are encountered. Memantine (Namenda®): Initial dose of 10mg/day and increased to full dose of 20mg/day if no serious side-effects
14
4 Nondemented Comparison Subjects.
Group 4) nondemented comparison subjects.
56
Total102

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic1 Very Mild to Mild DAT Untreated2 Very Mild to Mild DAT Treated With Donepezil3 Very Mild to Mild DAT Treated With the Combination4 Nondemented Comparison Subjects.Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
13 Participants17 Participants14 Participants56 Participants100 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 Participants18 Participants14 Participants56 Participants102 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants8 Participants6 Participants35 Participants55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants10 Participants8 Participants21 Participants47 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 140 / 180 / 140 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 180 / 140 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Rate of Change of Hippocampal Volume Slope

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1 Very Mild to Mild DAT UntreatedRate of Change of Hippocampal Volume Slopeleft hippocampal volume slope-70.2418748 mm^3/yearStandard Deviation 31.4801034
1 Very Mild to Mild DAT UntreatedRate of Change of Hippocampal Volume Sloperight hippocampal volume slope-99.9437062 mm^3/yearStandard Deviation 65.1619838
2 Very Mild to Mild DAT Treated With DonepezilRate of Change of Hippocampal Volume Sloperight hippocampal volume slope-94.3258652 mm^3/yearStandard Deviation 44.7959659
2 Very Mild to Mild DAT Treated With DonepezilRate of Change of Hippocampal Volume Slopeleft hippocampal volume slope-88.4738591 mm^3/yearStandard Deviation 52.2621175
3 Very Mild to Mild DAT Treated With the CombinationRate of Change of Hippocampal Volume Slopeleft hippocampal volume slope-94.0768115 mm^3/yearStandard Deviation 48.349487
3 Very Mild to Mild DAT Treated With the CombinationRate of Change of Hippocampal Volume Sloperight hippocampal volume slope-125.0687876 mm^3/yearStandard Deviation 72.5509442
4 Nondemented Comparison Subjects.Rate of Change of Hippocampal Volume Slopeleft hippocampal volume slope-46.9484805 mm^3/yearStandard Deviation 83.582553
4 Nondemented Comparison Subjects.Rate of Change of Hippocampal Volume Sloperight hippocampal volume slope-80.0840066 mm^3/yearStandard Deviation 130.3453711
p-value: 0.095ANOVA
Secondary

Comparison of Combined DAT Patients' Mean (SD) Hippocampal Volume Slope (mm^3/Year) Rate of Change

The ADAS-Cog evaluates cognition and differentiates normal from impaired cognitive functioning. The total score is the summed number of errors in each task. The greater the impairment, the greater the score. We combined the dementia of the Alzheimer's type patients receiving all treatments together and grouped them into 3 subgroups according to the rates of change(roc) of their ADAS-Cog scores. To determine trends in hippocampal volume atrophy over time we compared the patients showing most negative ADAS-Cog rate of change (improving), patients with most positive ADAS-cog roc (worsening), patients with intermediate, near-zero ADAS-Cog roc (stable) .

Time frame: two years

Population: We combined the DAT patients who received any treatment (donepezil or combined) \& used the annual roc in ADAS-Cog to equally separate them into 3 subgroups; improving (1/3 negative ADAS-Cog roc), stable (1/3 near-zero ADAS-Cog change) \& worsening (1/3 positive ADAS-Cog change).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1 Very Mild to Mild DAT UntreatedComparison of Combined DAT Patients' Mean (SD) Hippocampal Volume Slope (mm^3/Year) Rate of Changeleft hippocampal volume slope-70 (mm^3/year)Standard Deviation 56
1 Very Mild to Mild DAT UntreatedComparison of Combined DAT Patients' Mean (SD) Hippocampal Volume Slope (mm^3/Year) Rate of Changeright hippocampal volume slope-77 (mm^3/year)Standard Deviation 51
2 Very Mild to Mild DAT Treated With DonepezilComparison of Combined DAT Patients' Mean (SD) Hippocampal Volume Slope (mm^3/Year) Rate of Changeleft hippocampal volume slope-106 (mm^3/year)Standard Deviation 55
2 Very Mild to Mild DAT Treated With DonepezilComparison of Combined DAT Patients' Mean (SD) Hippocampal Volume Slope (mm^3/Year) Rate of Changeright hippocampal volume slope-141 (mm^3/year)Standard Deviation 78
3 Very Mild to Mild DAT Treated With the CombinationComparison of Combined DAT Patients' Mean (SD) Hippocampal Volume Slope (mm^3/Year) Rate of Changeleft hippocampal volume slope-100 (mm^3/year)Standard Deviation 37
3 Very Mild to Mild DAT Treated With the CombinationComparison of Combined DAT Patients' Mean (SD) Hippocampal Volume Slope (mm^3/Year) Rate of Changeright hippocampal volume slope-105 (mm^3/year)Standard Deviation 34
Comparison: There would be a treatment effect on the changes of hippocampal measures over time.~Repeated measures ANOVA on hippocampal volume slopes with hemisphere as a within-subject repeated factor, and treatment group as the main effect.p-value: 0.066ANOVA
Comparison: There would be a treatment effect on the changes of hippocampal measures over time.~Repeated measures ANOVA on hippocampal volume slopes with hemisphere as a within-subject repeated factor, and treatment group as the main effect.p-value: 0.009ANOVA
Comparison: There would be a treatment effect on the changes of hippocampal measures over time.~Repeated measures ANOVA on hippocampal volume slopes with hemisphere as a within-subject repeated factor, and treatment group as the main effect.p-value: 0.3ANOVA
Comparison: RM-ANOVA on hippocampal volume slopep-value: 0.0288Repeated Measures ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026