Breast Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
wound healing
Brief summary
This is a 90-day study to evaluate cosmetic outcome and Surgical Site Infection in approximately 100 patients from 6 centers in China undergoing scheduled modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.
Detailed description
Patients will be evaluated post-procedure on Days 3, 5, 7, 12, 30 and 90 for cosmetic outcome and surgical site infection.
Interventions
skin closure
skin closure
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years of age or older with written informed consent * Scheduled for a modified radical mastectomy * Surgical wound classified Class I/Clean using the CDC SSI Surgical Wound Classification
Exclusion criteria
* Unable to give consent and unlikely to comply with study requirements and complete the 90-day follow up visit * Undergoing surgery for modified radical mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction, cosmetic breast operations, reduction, expansion, insertion of prothesis, duct ectasia or infective breast disease or implant * Surgical wounds classified as Class II, III or IV using CDC SSI Surgical Wound Classification * Has inflammatory cancers or skin ulceration * Has known allergy or intolerance to triclosan * Has compromised wound healing or chronic immune deficiency, for example diabetes, prolonged steroid use, AIDS or substance abuse * Has serious heart and/or lung disease * Has skin scar history or family history * Has direct relationship to or involvement in this or other studies under the direction of the investigator or center * Received an experimental drug or device within 30 days prior to the planned start of treatment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Score on Cosmetic Outcome Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | 30 days (+/- 5) post-operative | Post-operative cosmetic outcome assessed on surgical site photographs by an independent blinded central assessor using a validated 100 mm visual analog scale, with 0 representing the worst possible scar and 100 representing the best possible scar |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Cosmetic Outcome Score on Modified Hollander Scale | 12 days | Post-operative cosmetic outcome assessed on surgical site by investigator using the modified Hollander Cosmetic Scale (mHCS) with 0 representing worst and 6 representing best, calculated by adding the individual scores on each of 6 categories (step-off borders, contour irregularities, wound margin separation, edge inversion, excessive inflammation, and overall appearance |
| Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale | Day 3 | Post-operative assessment of wound by trained observer to identify SSI based on several characteristics that are assigned points that contribute to a total score, with 0-10 representing satisfactory healing (best), 11-20 representing disturbance of healing, 21-30 representing minor wound infection, 31-40 representing moderate wound infection, and over 40 representing severe wound infection (worst) |
Countries
China
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Chinese Silk Suture Natural, non-absorbable silk suture made from entwined thread from silkworm larva, commercially available in China, used in a simple interrupted transdermal suture pattern | 50 |
| VICRYL* Plus Suture Synthetic absorbable surgical suture composed of a copolymer of 90% glycolide and 10% L-lactide and containing triclosan antibacterial, used in a subcuticular closure technique | 51 |
| Total | 101 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Chinese Silk Suture | VICRYL* Plus Suture | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | 52.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 | 53.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 | 52.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 |
| Region of Enrollment China | 50 participants | 51 participants | 101 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 50 Participants | 51 Participants | 101 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 14 / 50 | 7 / 51 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 50 | 1 / 51 |
Outcome results
Mean Score on Cosmetic Outcome Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Post-operative cosmetic outcome assessed on surgical site photographs by an independent blinded central assessor using a validated 100 mm visual analog scale, with 0 representing the worst possible scar and 100 representing the best possible scar
Time frame: 30 days (+/- 5) post-operative
Population: Intention to treat (ITT)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese Silk Suture | Mean Score on Cosmetic Outcome Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | 45.4 score on scale | Standard Deviation 12 |
| VICRYL* Plus Suture | Mean Score on Cosmetic Outcome Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | 67.2 score on scale | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
Mean Cosmetic Outcome Score on Modified Hollander Scale
Post-operative cosmetic outcome assessed on surgical site by investigator using the modified Hollander Cosmetic Scale (mHCS) with 0 representing worst and 6 representing best, calculated by adding the individual scores on each of 6 categories (step-off borders, contour irregularities, wound margin separation, edge inversion, excessive inflammation, and overall appearance
Time frame: 12 days
Population: Intention to treat (ITT)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese Silk Suture | Mean Cosmetic Outcome Score on Modified Hollander Scale | 5.2 score on scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| VICRYL* Plus Suture | Mean Cosmetic Outcome Score on Modified Hollander Scale | 5.7 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
Mean Cosmetic Outcome Score on Modified Hollander Scale
Post-operative cosmetic outcome assessed on surgical site by investigator using the modified Hollander Cosmetic Scale (mHCS) with 0 representing worst and 6 representing best, calculated by adding the individual scores on each of 6 categories (step-off borders, contour irregularities, wound margin separation, edge inversion, excessive inflammation, and overall appearance
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Intention to treat (ITT)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese Silk Suture | Mean Cosmetic Outcome Score on Modified Hollander Scale | 5.0 score on scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| VICRYL* Plus Suture | Mean Cosmetic Outcome Score on Modified Hollander Scale | 5.7 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale
Post-operative assessment of wound by trained observer to identify SSI based on several characteristics that are assigned points that contribute to a total score, with 0-10 representing satisfactory healing (best), 11-20 representing disturbance of healing, 21-30 representing minor wound infection, 31-40 representing moderate wound infection, and over 40 representing severe wound infection (worst)
Time frame: Day 3
Population: Intention to treat (ITT)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese Silk Suture | Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale | 1.6 score on scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| VICRYL* Plus Suture | Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale | 1.2 score on scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale
Post-operative assessment of wound by trained observer to identify SSI based on several characteristics that are assigned points that contribute to a total score, with 0-10 representing satisfactory healing (best), 11-20 representing disturbance of healing, 21-30 representing minor wound infection, 31-40 representing moderate wound infection, and over 40 representing severe wound infection (worst)
Time frame: Day 5
Population: Intention to treat (ITT)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese Silk Suture | Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale | 1.5 score on scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| VICRYL* Plus Suture | Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale | 1.2 score on scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale
Post-operative assessment of wound by trained observer to identify SSI based on several characteristics that are assigned points that contribute to a total score, with 0-10 representing satisfactory healing (best), 11-20 representing disturbance of healing, 21-30 representing minor wound infection, 31-40 representing moderate wound infection, and over 40 representing severe wound infection (worst)
Time frame: Day 7
Population: Intention to treat (ITT)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese Silk Suture | Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale | 1.4 score on scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| VICRYL* Plus Suture | Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale | 0.9 score on scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale
Post-operative assessment of wound by trained observer to identify SSI based on several characteristics that are assigned points that contribute to a total score, with 0-10 representing satisfactory healing (best), 11-20 representing disturbance of healing, 21-30 representing minor wound infection, 31-40 representing moderate wound infection, and over 40 representing severe wound infection (worst)
Time frame: Day 12
Population: Intention to treat (ITT)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese Silk Suture | Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale | 4.6 score on scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| VICRYL* Plus Suture | Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale | 3.3 score on scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale
Post-operative assessment of wound by trained observer to identify SSI based on several characteristics that are assigned points that contribute to a total score, with 0-10 representing satisfactory healing (best), 11-20 representing disturbance of healing, 21-30 representing minor wound infection, 31-40 representing moderate wound infection, and over 40 representing severe wound infection (worst)
Time frame: Day 30
Population: Intention to treat (ITT)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese Silk Suture | Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale | 4.6 score on scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| VICRYL* Plus Suture | Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale | 3.7 score on scale | Standard Deviation 5.2 |
Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale
Post-operative assessment of wound by trained observer to identify SSI based on several characteristics that are assigned points that contribute to a total score, with 0-10 representing satisfactory healing (best), 11-20 representing disturbance of healing, 21-30 representing minor wound infection, 31-40 representing moderate wound infection, and over 40 representing severe wound infection (worst)
Time frame: Day 90
Population: Intention to treat (ITT)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese Silk Suture | Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale | 4.3 score on scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| VICRYL* Plus Suture | Mean Surgical Site Infection Score on Modified ASEPSIS Scale | 3.2 score on scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |