Skip to content

TAE and Surgery in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Bleeding Uncontrolled by Endoscopic Therapy

Randomized Comparison of Trans-catheter Arterial Embolization (TAE) and Surgery in Patients With Major Peptic Ulcer Bleeding Uncontrolled by Endoscopic Therapy

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00766961
Enrollment
34
Registered
2008-10-06
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2020-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bleeding, Peptic Ulcer

Keywords

Peptic ulcer bleeding uncontrolled by endoscopic therapy.

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare the outcomes of trans-catheter arterial embolization (TAE) and surgery as salvage therapy of peptic ulcer bleeding after failed endoscopic therapy.

Detailed description

The aim of the study is to examine the hypothesis that trans-catheter arterial embolization (TAE) is safer than and probably as effective as surgery in the control of bleeding from ulcers after failed endoscopic therapy. Patients with major arterial bleeding that cannot be stopped by endoscopic therapy will be randomly assigned to receive immediate TAE or surgery. Primary outcome will be death within 30 days of randomization. Secondary outcomes include recurrent bleeding after assigned treatment, need for additional intervention either in the form of interventional radiology or surgery, and post procedural morbidities.

Interventions

PROCEDURETrans-catheter arterial embolization

Trans-catheter arterial embolization

PROCEDURESurgery

Surgery

Sponsors

Karolinska University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Erasme University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with bleeding peptic ulcers documented during endoscopic therapy AND anyone of the following: * Forrest I bleeding that fails to be controlled by therapy during first endoscopy * Check endoscopy after clinical re-bleeding of Forrest I bleeding * Forrest IIa or an initial IIb but a sizable artery unveiled upon clot elevation in a high risk ulcer defined by: * posterior bulbar duodenal ulcer \> 2cm, or * an angular notch / lesser curve gastric ulcer \> 5cm that fail an attempt at endoscopic therapy together with evidence of a significant bleed (hypotension with SBP \< 90mmHg, fresh hematemesis or hematochezia).

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to participate in trial * No consent * Age \< 18 * Pregnancy * Moribund patients * Patients with terminal malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality within 30 days of randomization30 daysMortality within 30 days of randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrent bleeding after assigned treatment60 daysRecurrent bleeding after assigned treatment
The need for additional intervention either in the form of interventional radiology60 daysThe need for additional intervention either in the form of interventional radiology
Post procedural morbidities60 daysPost procedural morbidities
The need for additional intervention either in the form of surgery60 daysThe need for additional intervention either in the form of surgery

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026