Skip to content

Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL)+ Drugs Versus Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL) Alone For Secondary Prophylaxis

Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Plus Propranolol And Isosorbide Mononitrate Versus Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Alone For Secondary Prophylaxis Of Variceal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00766805
Acronym
Secondary
Enrollment
177
Registered
2008-10-06
Start date
2002-10-31
Completion date
2007-06-30
Last updated
2008-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Portal Hypertension

Brief summary

Background: Both endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and propranolol are valuable methods for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Addition of ISMN to propranolol improves the efficacy of drug therapy. It is hypothesized that a combination of EVL and portal pressure reducing drugs should significantly be better than EVL alone. Patients and Methods: Patients with history of variceal bleed were randomized to EVL plus drugs (propranolol and ISMN) or EVL alone. EVL was repeated every 3-4 weeks until variceal eradication. Propranolol dose was adjusted to reduce the resting heart rate to 55 bpm. Dose of ISMN was 40 mg/d. Primary end points were rebleed or death. Secondary end points included complications of portal hypertension and the development of serious adverse effects to therapy.

Interventions

DRUGEVL + Propranolol + Isosorbide 5 mononitrate

Treatment was started with propranolol at a dose of 40 mg twice a day. The heart rate and blood pressure were checked after 12 to 24 hours. The dose of propranolol was increased at increments of 20 to 40 mg per day until the patient achieved a heart rate of 55 bpm, or a maximum dose of 320 mg/day was achieved.ISMN was added at a dose of 10 mg twice a day. The dose was escalated at increments of 10-20 mg/day till a maximum dose of 40 mg/day was reached.

OTHEREVL alone

Sponsors

Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients presenting to G B Pant Hospital, New Delhi, with history of hematemesis and/or melena and proven to have esophageal varices as the bleeding source on upper GI endoscopy were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* A history of undergoing endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST), EVL, or cyanoacrylate injection; * A history of surgery for portal hypertension; * Coexisting malignancy; * Severe cardiopulmonary or renal disease; * A history of severe side-effects or contraindications to beta-blockers like bronchial asthma, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, prostatic hypertrophy, arterial hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 100 mm Hg), bradycardia (basal heart rate \<55 beats per minute), or complete heart block; and * Refusal to give consent to participate in the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary end points of the study were bleeding and death.During the study period

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Complications, UGI bleeding due to causes not related to PHT, and adverse effects that required the discontinuation of therapy.During the study period

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026