Skip to content

Effect on Bacterial Glycolytic Acid Formation on Plaque

Effect on Bacterial Glycolytic Acid Formation on Plaque

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00762450
Enrollment
6
Registered
2008-09-30
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2012-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Plaque

Brief summary

To determine the effect of an amino acid on bacterial glycolytic acid formation in human interdental plaque.

Interventions

Rinse 3 times daily with assigned toothpaste slurry

DRUGfluoride

Rinse 3 times daily with assigned toothpaste slurry

DRUGFluoride, triclosan, amino acid

Rinse 3 times daily with assigned toothpaste slurry

Sponsors

Colgate Palmolive
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
72 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Maxillary dentition is preferentially natural. * Maxillary restorations and/or reconstructions and eventual partial dentures must be in clinically good condition. * Natural mandibular front teeth and first premolars (4-4) are retained. * Second mandibular molars are ideally present to serve as abutment teeth. * Mandibular restorations and/or reconstructions must be in clinically good condition. * Partial mandibular denture replacing second premolars and first (and second) molars in good clinical condition. * Subjects should have a stimulated saliva flow rate of 1-2 ml/min (by chewing paraffin wax). * Willingness to give their informed consent and comply with the protocol. * No history of allergy to personal/oral care consumer products or ingredients, relevant to any ingredient in the test products as determined by the dental/medical professional monitoring the study

Exclusion criteria

* Current participation in other dental clinical trials. * Subjects who are unable to provide sufficient plaque growth over a 2-day non- brushing period (by visual assessment). * Subjects in whom the plaque pH fails to fall sufficiently, i.e. at least to pH 5 following a sucrose rinse. * Subjects with poor oral health, i.e. with advanced periodontitis, un-restored carious lesions and stomatological diseases. * Subjects taking drugs known to currently affect salivary flow. * Subjects with un-stimulated salivary flow \<0.3 ml/min and/or stimulated flow \<0.9 ml/min. * Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding * History of allergy to common dentifrice ingredients * Immune compromised individuals (HIV, AIDS, immuno suppressive drug therapy) * Women of child bearing potential and not on birth control (Diaphragm, birth control pills or implants, IUD (intrauterine device) or condoms) * Medical condition which requires premedication prior to dental procedures/visits * History of allergy to amino acids

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ph of Dental Plaque After Sucrose Challenge1 weekPanelists rinsed with toothpaste slurry (2 grams of toothpaste dissolved in 10 ml of water) waited 20 minutes and then rinsed with a 10% sucrose solution. Sucrose challenge is used to change the ph in the mouth and help determine if the toothpastes used in this study and control dental plaque growth.

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

subjects are recruited by the PI at the clinical site

Pre-assignment details

subjects are screened for medical and oral health criteria and start a 1 week washout period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo First, Positive Control Second and Experimental Last2
Positive Control First, Experimental Second and Placebo Last2
Experimental First, Placebo Second and Positive Control Last2
Total6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPositive Control First, Experimental Second and Placebo LastExperimental First, Placebo Second and Positive Control LastPlacebo First, Positive Control Second and Experimental LastTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age Continuous77.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
73.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
76.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
75.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
2 participants2 participants2 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 20 / 20 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20 / 20 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

ph of Dental Plaque After Sucrose Challenge

Panelists rinsed with toothpaste slurry (2 grams of toothpaste dissolved in 10 ml of water) waited 20 minutes and then rinsed with a 10% sucrose solution. Sucrose challenge is used to change the ph in the mouth and help determine if the toothpastes used in this study and control dental plaque growth.

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Comparatorph of Dental Plaque After Sucrose Challenge4.88 ph of dental plaqueStandard Deviation 0.38
Placebo - Silica Controlph of Dental Plaque After Sucrose Challenge5.04 ph of dental plaqueStandard Deviation 0.38
Experimental Toothpasteph of Dental Plaque After Sucrose Challenge4.98 ph of dental plaqueStandard Deviation 0.24
Comparison: The null hypothesis states that there is no difference between groups.p-value: 0.05ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026