Skip to content

Clinical Comparison of Two Silicone-Hydrogel Contact Lenses

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00762385
Enrollment
97
Registered
2008-09-30
Start date
2007-08-31
Completion date
2007-10-31
Last updated
2018-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Refractive Error

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of two silicone-hydrogel contact lenses.

Interventions

galyfilcon A

DEVICEcomfilcon A

comfilcon A

Sponsors

Foresight Regulatory Strategies, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Visioncare Research Ltd.
CollaboratorOTHER
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 39 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The subject must be at least 18 and less than or equal to 39 years of age and have a need for vision correction in both eyes. * The subject must require a lens power between -1.00 to -6.00D and have no more than 1.00D of corneal cylinder. * The subject, based on his/her knowledge, must be in good general health. * The subject must be able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol and complete all specified evaluations. * Subject must be a current adapted daily wearer of soft contact lenses with at least 6 months of CL wear. * Subject must agree to wear their contact lenses in both eyes on a daily wear schedule for at least 8 hours per day every day during the study. * Subject must be willing and able to use only the care systems and lubricating drops provided for the study during the 4 week period. * The subject must read, indicate understanding of and sign the Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion criteria

* The subject is a rigid gas permeable (RGP) or daily disposable lens wearer. * The presence of clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) anterior segment abnormalities; inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids or associated structures. * The presence of ocular or systemic disease or need for medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or which would cause the lenses to be removed more than twice a day. (i.e., Sjogren's syndrome, type II diabetes, etc.) * Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as: * pathological dry eye or associated findings * pterygium or corneal scars within the visual axis * neovascularization equal to or greater than 1mm in from the limbus * history of giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) worse than grade 2 * anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present) * seborrhoeic eczema * seborrhoeic conjunctivitis * A history of recurrent erosions, corneal infiltrates, corneal ulcer or fungal infections. * A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity). * Contact lens snellen visual acuities (VA) worse than 20/30. * Aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea. * Current pregnancy or lactation (to the best of the subject's knowledge) * Any active participation in another clinical study at any time during this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lens Comfort1-week, 2- weeks\>0 = comfortable, \<0 = uncomfortable; a weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions was used to derive comfort outcomes.
Comfort Symptoms1-week, 2-weeksA weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions was used to derive comfort outcomes. \>0 = comfortable, \<0 = uncomfortable

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Corneal Staining2 weeksMeasured for 5 zones of the cornea (superior, nasal, central, inferior, temporal)on a 0 to 3 grade scale (NEI 0-3 scale). Grade 0 = Normal/ grade 1 = mild, superficial stippling/ grade 2 = moderate, punctate staining including superficial abrasion of the cornea/ grade 3 = severe, abrasion or corneal erosion, deep corneal abrasion or recurrent erosion.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Completed Population
Includes subjects randomized to galyfilcon A/comfilcon A and comfilcon A/galyfilcon A and that completed the study.
85
Total85

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First InterventionIneligible10
First InterventionLens Issue11
First InterventionLost to Follow-up02
First InterventionProtocol Violation01
Second InterventionProtocol Violation33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCompleted Population
Age, Continuous28.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 510 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 510 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Comfort Symptoms

A weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions was used to derive comfort outcomes. \>0 = comfortable, \<0 = uncomfortable

Time frame: 1-week, 2-weeks

Population: Only participants who completed the study per protocol (n=78)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Galyfilcon AComfort Symptoms0.2440 scoreStandard Error 0.1262
Comfilcon AComfort Symptoms-0.02862 scoreStandard Error 0.1275
Comparison: Results is overall lens effect with time as a covariate.98.3% CI: [0.04553, 0.2726]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Lens Comfort

\>0 = comfortable, \<0 = uncomfortable; a weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions was used to derive comfort outcomes.

Time frame: 1-week, 2- weeks

Population: Only participants who completed the study per protocol (n=78)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Galyfilcon ALens Comfort0.1452 combined scoreStandard Error 0.1097
Comfilcon ALens Comfort0.1135 combined scoreStandard Error 0.1112
Comparison: Results is overall lens effect with time as a covariate.98.3% CI: [-0.2346, 0.03164]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Overall Corneal Staining

Measured for 5 zones of the cornea (superior, nasal, central, inferior, temporal)on a 0 to 3 grade scale (NEI 0-3 scale). Grade 0 = Normal/ grade 1 = mild, superficial stippling/ grade 2 = moderate, punctate staining including superficial abrasion of the cornea/ grade 3 = severe, abrasion or corneal erosion, deep corneal abrasion or recurrent erosion.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: Only the participants who completed the study per protocol (n=78)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Galyfilcon AOverall Corneal Staining0.07582 combined scoreStandard Error 0.02192
Comfilcon AOverall Corneal Staining0.07026 combined scoreStandard Error 0.02192
Comparison: Results is overall lens effect with time as a covariate.98.3% CI: [-0.04297, 0.00556]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026