Skip to content

Performance and Acceptance of Optive Versus Hylocomod Eyedrops in Patients With Dry Eye Symptoms

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00761202
Enrollment
50
Registered
2008-09-29
Start date
2007-08-31
Completion date
2008-06-30
Last updated
2013-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Brief summary

This study evaluates the performance and acceptance of Optive versus Hylocomod eyedrops, when administered for one month to patients with mild to moderate dry eye symptoms, with and without contact lenses.

Interventions

DRUGA sterile solution containing sodium carboxymethylcellulose and glycerin, preserved with PURITE®

Eyedrops as required, but at least 3 times per day

DRUGSodium hyaluronate

Eyedrops as required, but at least 3 times per day

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years or over * Contact lens wearer, spectacle wearer or non-spectacle wearer * Mild to severe dry eye symptoms, defined as OSDI score 13 to 100 * Mild to moderate conjunctival staining in each eye and/or mild to moderate corneal staining in each eye * Best corrected visual acuity of 6/9 in each eye

Exclusion criteria

* Previously used Hylocomod or Optive eyedrops * Systemic allergy or eye allergy * Systemic disease which might have an ocular component and/or interfere with contact lens wear * Autoimmune disease which might have an ocular component and/or interfere with contact lens wear * Systemic medication which might have eye side effects and or interfere with contact lens wear * Eye infection or use of eye medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Conjunctival Staining by Lissamine Greenweek 1, month 1Percentage of cases of limbal staining by lissamine green at each point on a five point scale (0 = None, 1 = Trace, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, 4 = Severe)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Corneal Staining by Fluoresceinweek 1, month 1Percentage of cases of limbal staining by sodium fluorescein at each point on a five point scale (0 = None, 1 = Trace, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, 4 = Severe)
Conjunctival Hyperaemiaweek 1, month 1Percentage of conjunctival response reported in terms of limbal hyperaemia for the worst responses over the area at each point on a five point scale (0=clear/white conjunctiva, 1=slight redness, 2=Mild redness, 3=Moderate redness, 4=Severe redness)
Ocular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue Scaleweek 1, month 1Mean comfort judged on a 100 point visual analogue scale (0=Very Poor, 100=Excellent)
Daily Eyedrop UsageMonth 1Average daily eyedrop use
Lipid Layer Pattern AssessmentWeek 1, month 1Lipid layer thickness as determined by lipid layer mixing pattern. A high mixing pattern = thick lipid layer.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin21
Sodium Hyaluronate26
Total47

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCarboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinSodium HyaluronateTotal
Age Continuous44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4
39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
42.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants20 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 212 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 210 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Conjunctival Staining by Lissamine Green

Percentage of cases of limbal staining by lissamine green at each point on a five point scale (0 = None, 1 = Trace, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, 4 = Severe)

Time frame: week 1, month 1

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenWeek 1 - None50.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenWeek 1 - Trace17.5 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenWeek 1 - Mild17.5 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenWeek 1 - Moderate15.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenWeek 1 - Severe0.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenMonth 1 - None78.6 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenMonth 1 - Trace11.9 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenMonth 1 - Mild9.5 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenMonth 1 - Moderate0.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenMonth 1 - Severe0.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenMonth 1 - Mild25.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenWeek 1 - None53.8 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenMonth 1 - None50.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenWeek 1 - Trace15.4 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenMonth 1 - Severe0.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenWeek 1 - Mild25.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenMonth 1 - Trace17.3 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenWeek 1 - Moderate5.8 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenMonth 1 - Moderate7.7 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival Staining by Lissamine GreenWeek 1 - Severe0.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Conjunctival Hyperaemia

Percentage of conjunctival response reported in terms of limbal hyperaemia for the worst responses over the area at each point on a five point scale (0=clear/white conjunctiva, 1=slight redness, 2=Mild redness, 3=Moderate redness, 4=Severe redness)

Time frame: week 1, month 1

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival HyperaemiaWeek 1 - Clear/White5.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival HyperaemiaWeek 1 - Slight75.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival HyperaemiaWeek 1 - Mild17.5 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival HyperaemiaWeek 1 - Moderate2.5 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival HyperaemiaWeek 1 - Severe0.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival HyperaemiaMonth 1 - Clear/White0.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival HyperaemiaMonth 1 - Slight71.4 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival HyperaemiaMonth 1 - Mild28.6 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival HyperaemiaMonth 1 - Moderate0.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinConjunctival HyperaemiaMonth 1 - Severe0.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival HyperaemiaMonth 1 - Mild28.8 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival HyperaemiaWeek 1 - Clear/White3.8 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival HyperaemiaMonth 1 - Clear/White0.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival HyperaemiaWeek 1 - Slight59.6 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival HyperaemiaMonth 1 - Severe0.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival HyperaemiaWeek 1 - Mild36.5 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival HyperaemiaMonth 1 - Slight71.2 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival HyperaemiaWeek 1 - Moderate0.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival HyperaemiaMonth 1 - Moderate0.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateConjunctival HyperaemiaWeek 1 - Severe0.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Corneal Staining by Fluorescein

Percentage of cases of limbal staining by sodium fluorescein at each point on a five point scale (0 = None, 1 = Trace, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, 4 = Severe)

Time frame: week 1, month 1

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinCorneal Staining by FluoresceinWeek 1 - None45.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinCorneal Staining by FluoresceinWeek 1 - Trace25.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinCorneal Staining by FluoresceinWeek 1 - Mild15.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinCorneal Staining by FluoresceinWeek 1 - Moderate15.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinCorneal Staining by FluoresceinWeek 1 - Severe0.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinCorneal Staining by FluoresceinMonth 1 - None73.8 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinCorneal Staining by FluoresceinMonth 1 - Trace21.4 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinCorneal Staining by FluoresceinMonth 1 - Mild4.8 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinCorneal Staining by FluoresceinMonth 1 - Moderate0.0 Percentage of Participants
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinCorneal Staining by FluoresceinMonth 1 - Severe0.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateCorneal Staining by FluoresceinMonth 1 - Mild26.9 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateCorneal Staining by FluoresceinWeek 1 - None57.7 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateCorneal Staining by FluoresceinMonth 1 - None51.9 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateCorneal Staining by FluoresceinWeek 1 - Trace15.4 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateCorneal Staining by FluoresceinMonth 1 - Severe0.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateCorneal Staining by FluoresceinWeek 1 - Mild25.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateCorneal Staining by FluoresceinMonth 1 - Trace15.4 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateCorneal Staining by FluoresceinWeek 1 - Moderate1.9 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateCorneal Staining by FluoresceinMonth 1 - Moderate5.8 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateCorneal Staining by FluoresceinWeek 1 - Severe0.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Daily Eyedrop Usage

Average daily eyedrop use

Time frame: Month 1

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinDaily Eyedrop Usage3.7 drops/dayStandard Deviation 1.4
Sodium HyaluronateDaily Eyedrop Usage3.3 drops/dayStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Lipid Layer Pattern Assessment

Lipid layer thickness as determined by lipid layer mixing pattern. A high mixing pattern = thick lipid layer.

Time frame: Week 1, month 1

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinLipid Layer Pattern AssessmentWeek 14.50 Lipid Layer Mixing Pattern
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinLipid Layer Pattern AssessmentMonth 13.00 Lipid Layer Mixing Pattern
Sodium HyaluronateLipid Layer Pattern AssessmentWeek 15.50 Lipid Layer Mixing Pattern
Sodium HyaluronateLipid Layer Pattern AssessmentMonth 15.00 Lipid Layer Mixing Pattern
Secondary

Ocular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue Scale

Mean comfort judged on a 100 point visual analogue scale (0=Very Poor, 100=Excellent)

Time frame: week 1, month 1

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinOcular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue ScaleOcular Comfort - Daytime (Wk.1)63.20 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.05
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinOcular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue ScaleOcular Comfort - Waking (Mo.1)65.05 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.48
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinOcular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue ScaleOcular Comfort - Waking (Wk.1)67.05 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinOcular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue ScaleOcular Comfort - Evening (Wk.1)57.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.3
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinOcular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue ScaleOcular Comfort - Evening (Mo.1)60.38 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.29
Carboxymethylcellulose and GlycerinOcular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue ScaleOcular Comfort - Daytime (Mo.1)68.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.25
Sodium HyaluronateOcular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue ScaleOcular Comfort - Evening (Mo.1)65.06 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.44
Sodium HyaluronateOcular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue ScaleOcular Comfort - Waking (Wk.1)58.81 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.73
Sodium HyaluronateOcular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue ScaleOcular Comfort - Daytime (Wk.1)68.21 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.48
Sodium HyaluronateOcular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue ScaleOcular Comfort - Evening (Wk.1)63.38 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.71
Sodium HyaluronateOcular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue ScaleOcular Comfort - Waking (Mo.1)63.56 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.79
Sodium HyaluronateOcular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue ScaleOcular Comfort - Daytime (Mo.1)70.48 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.21

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026