Skip to content

Phase 2a Extension Study of Ataluren (PTC124) in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)

A Phase 2a Extension Study of PTC124 in Subjects With Nonsense-Mutation-Mediated Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00759876
Enrollment
36
Registered
2008-09-25
Start date
2008-08-13
Completion date
2010-05-17
Last updated
2020-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Keywords

Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Nonsense mutation, Premature stop codon, DMD, PTC124, Ataluren

Brief summary

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a genetic disorder that develops in boys. It is caused by a mutation in the gene for dystrophin, a protein that is important for maintaining normal muscle structure and function. Loss of dystrophin causes muscle fragility that leads to weakness and loss of walking ability during childhood and teenage years. A specific type of mutation, called a nonsense (premature stop codon) mutation, is the cause of DMD in approximately 10-15% of boys with the disease. Ataluren is an orally-delivered, investigational drug that has the potential to overcome the effects of the nonsense mutation. This study is a Phase 2a extension trial that will evaluate the long-term safety of ataluren in boys with nonsense mutation DMD, as determined by adverse events and laboratory abnormalities. The study will also assess changes in walking, muscle function, strength, and other important clinical and laboratory measures.

Detailed description

This Phase 2a, multicenter, open-label safety and efficacy study will be performed at 3 sites in the United States. The study will enroll up to 38 participants with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy who participated in a previous Phase 2a study of ataluren (Protocol Number PTC124-GD-004-DMD \[NCT00264888\]). Participants will receive study drug 3 times per day (at breakfast, lunch, and dinner) for approximately 96 weeks (approximately 2 years). Study assessments will be performed at clinic visits during screening, every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks, and then every 12 weeks until the end of the study. Additional safety laboratory testing, which may be performed at the investigational site or at an accredited local laboratory or clinic, is required every 3 weeks for the first 24 weeks and then every 6 weeks from Week 24 to Week 48. Participants will have a biceps muscle biopsy before ataluren treatment and again after 24 weeks of ataluren treatment to evaluate changes in muscle dystrophin expression. An evaluation of the effects of ataluren on corticosteroid pharmacokinetics will be performed. Associated with this ataluren clinical trial is a substudy that will use magnetic resonance evaluations to assess changes in the composition of muscles of the legs.

Interventions

DRUGAtaluren

Ataluren will be provided as a vanilla-flavored powder to be mixed with milk. Dosing based on participant body weight

Sponsors

Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
PTC Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Completion of ataluren treatment in the previous Phase 2a study (Protocol PTC124-GD-004-DMD). * Ability to provide written informed consent (parental/guardian consent if applicable)/assent (if \<18 years of age). * Confirmed screening laboratory values within the central laboratory ranges. * In participants who are sexually active, willingness to abstain from sexual intercourse or employ a barrier or medical method of contraception during ataluren administration and the 6-week follow up period. * Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, drug administration plan, study procedures, laboratory tests, and study restrictions.

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with systemic aminoglycoside antibiotics within 3 months prior to start of study treatment. * Treatment with warfarin within 1 month prior to start of study treatment. * Known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients or excipients of the study drug (Litesse® UltraTM \[refined polydextrose\], polyethylene glycol 3350, Lutrol® micro F127 \[poloxamer 407\], mannitol 25C, crospovidone XL10, hydroxyethyl cellulose, vanilla, Cab-O-Sil® M5P \[colloidal silica\], and magnesium stearate). * Exposure to another investigational drug within 2 months prior to start of study treatment. * History of major surgical procedure within 1 month prior to start of study treatment. * Ongoing immunosuppressive therapy (other than corticosteroids). * Ongoing participation in any other clinical trial (except for sub-studies specifically approved by PTC Therapeutics). * Clinically significant symptoms and signs of congestive heart failure (CHF) (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Stage C or Stage D). * Prior or ongoing medical condition (for example, concomitant illness, psychiatric condition, behavioral disorder, alcoholism, drug abuse), medical history, physical findings, electrocardiogram findings, or laboratory abnormality that, in the Investigator's opinion, could adversely affect the safety of the participant, makes it unlikely that the course of treatment or follow-up would be completed, or could impair the assessment of study results.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline up to Week 89TEAE: any untoward medical occurrence or undesirable event(s) that begins or worsens following administration of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the treatment by the Investigator. Severity of an adverse event (AE) was classified as: mild (does not interfere with usual function), moderate (interferes with usual function; may require medical intervention), severe (interferes significantly with usual function; likely require medical intervention), life-threatening, and fatal. Drug-related AEs: AEs with a possible or probable relationship to study drug. Serious AEs: death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized participant and required medical intervention. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60Timed function tests included time to stand from supine position (rise to standing), time to run/walk 10 meters (m), and time to ascend/descend 4 stairs. Timed function tests were assessed in ambulatory participants. A decrease from baseline reflects faster completion of the functional task and, thus, better muscle function. If the time taken to perform a test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform the test due to disease progression (PD), a value of 30 seconds was used. Test results were set to missing in the analysis for participants who could not perform the tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).
Change From Baseline in Standing From Supine Position as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60Timed test evaluations included scoring of method that ambulatory participants used to complete test. Scale for method used for standing from supine position: 1) Unable to stand from supine, even with use of a chair. 2) Assisted Gowers, requires furniture to rise from supine to full upright posture. 3) Full Gowers, rolls over, stands with both hands climbing up legs to above knees to achieve full upright posture. 4) Half Gowers, rolls over, stands up with 1 hand support on lower legs. 5) Rolls to side and/or stands with 1 or both hands on floor to start to rise but does not touch legs. 6) Stands without rolling over or using hands. Increases from baseline are indicative of improving ability to perform functional task. If a participant could not perform a timed function test because of PD, a method value of 1 was assigned in analysis. Test results set to missing in analysis for participants who could not perform tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).
Change From Baseline in Run/Walk 10-Meters as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60Timed test evaluations included scoring of method that ambulatory participants used to complete test. Scale for method used to run/walk 10-meters: 1) Unable to walk independently. 2) Unable to walk independently but can walk with knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs) or with support from a person 3) Highly adapted, wide-based lordotic gait, cannot increase walking speed. 4) Moderately adapted gait, can pick up speed but cannot run. 5) Able to pick up speed but runs with a double stance phase (that is, cannot achieve both feet off the ground). 6) Runs and gets both feet off the ground (with no double-stance phase). At the visit, if a participant could not perform a timed function test because of PD, a method value of 1 was assigned in analysis. Test results set to missing in analysis for participants who could not perform tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).
Change From Baseline in Ascending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60Timed test evaluations included scoring of method that ambulatory participants used to complete test. Scale for method used to ascend 4 stairs: 1) Unable to climb 4 standard stairs. 2) Climbs 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs 1 foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on 1 or both handrails. 3) Climbs 4 standard stairs marking time using 1 arm on 1 handrail. 4) Climbs 4 standard stairs marking time not needing handrail. 5) Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support. 6) Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support. At the visit, if a participant could not perform a timed function test because of PD, a method value of 1 was assigned in analysis. Test results set to missing in analysis for participants who could not perform tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).
Change From Baseline in Descending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60Timed test evaluations included scoring of method that ambulatory participants used to complete test. Scale for method used to descend 4 stairs: 1) Unable to descend 4 standard stairs. 2) Descends 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs 1 foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on 1 or both handrails. 3) Descends 4 standard stairs marking time, using 1 arm on 1 handrail. 4) Descends 4 standard stairs marking time, not needing handrail. 5) Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet in both directions, needs handrail for support. 6) Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support. At the visit, if a participant could not perform a timed function test because of PD, a method value of 1 was assigned in analysis. Test results set to missing in analysis for participants who could not perform tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).
Change From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryBaseline, Week (Wk) 48 and Wk 60Upper extremity myometry was performed using a hand-held dynamometer following standardized procedures. With this system, evaluators judged the strength of each muscle using an 11-point descriptive scoring system. From the individual muscle-group scores, a total composite score was derived. Bilateral assessments were done, and 3 measurements were recorded from each muscle group on each side, when possible. The best of the 3 replicates was used in the analysis. An increase from Baseline is reflective of increased muscle strength, whereas a decrease from Baseline is reflective of decreased muscle strength. Participants who became unable to perform a myometry test because of disease progression were assigned a value of 0 for each visit at which the participant was no longer able to perform the test. Test results were set to missing in the analysis for participants who could not perform the tests for reasons other than disease progression (for example, bone fracture).
Change in Resting, Active, and Recovery Heart Rate as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar RS400Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60Heart rate was measured with a Polar RS400 heart rate monitor, which consists of a transmitter strap worn around the chest and a wristwatch receiver. The monitor produces a digital text file with 1 value per minute that represents the mean heart rate for that minute. Mean heart rate values were collected before, during, and after the 6MWT. The participant rested for 5 minutes in a sitting position before the 6MWT, and the mean heart rate for the last minute of this rest period was obtained and documented as the resting heart rate. During the 6MWT, the mean heart rate was collected and documented as the active heart rate. After completing the 6MWT and resting for 3 minutes, the mean heart rate for 1 minute was obtained and documented as the recovery heart rate.
Change From Baseline in Verbal Memory and Attention as Assessed by the Digit Span TaskBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60The digit span task is a 2-part (forward and backward) test in which a series of digits (3 to 9) were presented to participant in an auditory format only. For forward condition, the participant was to repeat digits back in the order they were presented. For backward condition, the participant was to reverse the order of presentation. Maximum score for each part (digit forward and digit backward) of task is 14; participants received a score of 2 points if they passed both trials, score of 1 point if they passed only 1 trial, and score of 0 points if they failed both trials. A raw score of total number of correct forward and backward responses was age-normalized by subtracting corresponding mean and dividing by corresponding standard deviation of a reference population for that age. For each forward and backward result, the resulting Z score was transformed into percentile rank of normal distribution. Change from Baseline in number of digits recalled forward and backward is reported.
Change From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60The 6MWD was assessed in participants who were ambulatory using standardized procedures. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices during the 6MWD test. Only the results of the participant's best valid test at each visit were included in the analysis. The mean change from baseline in the distance the participant walked is reported.
Change From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventoryBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60The PedsQL Generic Core Scales comprises 23 questions, which are grouped into 4 scales (physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and school functioning); the fatigue-specific module included an additional 18 questions. The appropriate age-specific version was completed. On PedsQL Generic Core Scales, items were reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale so that higher scores indicate a better HRQL (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0). Mean is the sum of the items over the number of items that were answered (which accounts for missing data) to create scale scores. If \>50% of the items in a scale were missing, the scale score was not computed. Mean Fatigue Scale Score is the sum of the items over the number of items that were answered in the Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Scales. Mean Total Scale Score is the sum of all of the items over the number of items that were answered on all scales.
Change From Baseline in Serum Creatine Kinase (CK) LevelsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60Serum CK concentrations (as measured by the central laboratory) were quantified from the blood samples that were collected as part of the safety laboratory evaluations. The normal range for CK is 18 to 363 units/liter (U/L).
Change From Baseline in Dystrophin Expression on Biceps Muscle Biopsy as Measured by Immunofluorescence Staining of the Sarcolemmal Membrane With an Antibody to the C-Terminal Portion of the Dystrophin ProteinBaseline, Week 24The biceps muscle was biopsied from 1 arm for confirmation of the absence or low levels of dystrophin prior to treatment initiation and from the other arm to assess for production of dystrophin post-treatment. Muscle tissue sections were processed and immunostained to detect muscle membrane-localized dystrophin. An increase in value indicates dystrophin production.
Study Drug ComplianceBaseline up to Week 89Study drug compliance was assessed by the participant daily diary and quantification of used and unused study drug. Compliance was assessed in terms of the amount of drug actually taken relative to the amount that was prescribed. Physician-prescribed dose reductions and interruptions were factored into the calculations. Not recorded applies only to the days on which all dosing information was missing or for missing days. Invalid entries in the participant daily diary were assigned values of 0.0 for percentage of doses taken and 99.0 for percentage of doses not recorded.
Pharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-morning dose and 0 (pre-dose) and 2 hours post-midday dose on Day 2 of Week 1 and Day 2 of Week 6Blood for ataluren concentrations over a 24-hour period was to be collected on Day 2 of Week 1 and Day 2 of Week 6. Analysis of the blood samples was to be conducted using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 0.5 micrograms/milliliters (μg/mL). Plasma concentrations below qualification (BQ) is treated as 0 in the summary calculation.
Pharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-morning dose and 0 (pre-dose) and 2 hours post-midday dose on Day 2 of Week 1 and Day 2 of Week 6Blood for ataluren concentrations were collected on Day 2 of Week 1 and Day 2 of Week 6. Analysis of the blood samples was to be conducted using a validated HPLC-MS/MS method with a LLOQ of 0.5 μg/mL. Plasma concentrations BQ is treated as 0 in the summary calculation.
Corticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-morning dose and 0 (pre-dose) and 2 hours post-midday dose on Day 2 of Week 1 and Day 2 of Week 6Blood for prednisone and deflazacort concentrations were collected on Day 2 of Week 1 and Day 2 of Week 6. Plasma samples for the determination of prednisone concentrations were analyzed using a validated HPLC/MS/MS method, with LLOQs of 1.00 nanograms/milliliters (ng/mL). Prednisone concentrations \<1.01 are treated as 1.01 in the summary calculation. Plasma samples for the determination of 21-desacetyl deflazacort concentrations were analyzed using a validated HPLC/MS/MS method with an LLOQ of 1.0 ng/mL. Deflazacort concentrations BQ are treated as 0 in the summary calculation.
Change in Muscle Composition as Assessed by Limb Magnetic Resonance (MR) TestingBaseline, Week 48, Week 60This Outcome Measure is an exploratory study objective and data were not collected or analyzed for this extension study.
Change From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventoryBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60The PedsQL Generic Core Scales comprises 23 questions, which are grouped into 4 scales (physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and school functioning); the fatigue-specific module included an additional 18 questions. The appropriate age-specific version was completed. On PedsQL Generic Core Scales, items were reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale so that higher scores indicate a better HRQL (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0). Mean is the sum of the items over the number of items that were answered (which accounts for missing data) to create scale scores. If \>50% of the items in a scale were missing, the scale score was not computed. Mean Total Scale Score is the sum of all of the items over the number of items that were answered on all scales.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This extension study was initiated approximately 2 years after the completion of Study PTC124-GD-004-DMD (Study 004 \[NCT00264888\]).

Pre-assignment details

Of the 36 participants, 11 received 20-, 20-, and 40-milligrams/kilograms (mg/kg); 20 received 10-, 10-, and 20-mg/kg; and 5 received 4-, 4-, and 8-mg/kg ataluren dose level in Study 004. The 31 participants receiving corticosteroid treatment at study entry could continue corticosteroid treatment during the study as long as regimen remained stable.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ataluren
Participants received ataluren 3 times per day with meals at doses of 20 mg/kg (breakfast), 20 mg/kg (lunch), and 40 mg/kg (dinner) for up to 89 weeks.
36
Total36

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudySponsor terminated study early36

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtaluren
Age, Continuous11.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.61
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
36 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

TEAE: any untoward medical occurrence or undesirable event(s) that begins or worsens following administration of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the treatment by the Investigator. Severity of an adverse event (AE) was classified as: mild (does not interfere with usual function), moderate (interferes with usual function; may require medical intervention), severe (interferes significantly with usual function; likely require medical intervention), life-threatening, and fatal. Drug-related AEs: AEs with a possible or probable relationship to study drug. Serious AEs: death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized participant and required medical intervention. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 89

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (As-Treated Population).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)At least 1 TEAE36 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Mild TEAE9 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Moderate TEAE16 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severe TEAE10 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Life-Threatening TEAE1 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Fatal TEAE0 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Related TEAE28 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAE6 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)

The 6MWD was assessed in participants who were ambulatory using standardized procedures. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices during the 6MWD test. Only the results of the participant's best valid test at each visit were included in the analysis. The mean change from baseline in the distance the participant walked is reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable 6MWT data. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)Change from Baseline at Week 48-80.4 metersStandard Deviation 59.5
AtalurenChange From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline367.8 metersStandard Deviation 107.3
AtalurenChange From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)Change from Baseline at Week 60-101.5 metersStandard Deviation 64.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ascending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function Tests

Timed test evaluations included scoring of method that ambulatory participants used to complete test. Scale for method used to ascend 4 stairs: 1) Unable to climb 4 standard stairs. 2) Climbs 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs 1 foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on 1 or both handrails. 3) Climbs 4 standard stairs marking time using 1 arm on 1 handrail. 4) Climbs 4 standard stairs marking time not needing handrail. 5) Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support. 6) Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support. At the visit, if a participant could not perform a timed function test because of PD, a method value of 1 was assigned in analysis. Test results set to missing in analysis for participants who could not perform tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable method data for ascending 4 stairs. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Ascending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline3.58 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.717
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Ascending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsChange from Baseline at Week 48-0.46 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.141
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Ascending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsChange from Baseline at Week 60-0.48 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.365
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Descending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function Tests

Timed test evaluations included scoring of method that ambulatory participants used to complete test. Scale for method used to descend 4 stairs: 1) Unable to descend 4 standard stairs. 2) Descends 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs 1 foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on 1 or both handrails. 3) Descends 4 standard stairs marking time, using 1 arm on 1 handrail. 4) Descends 4 standard stairs marking time, not needing handrail. 5) Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet in both directions, needs handrail for support. 6) Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support. At the visit, if a participant could not perform a timed function test because of PD, a method value of 1 was assigned in analysis. Test results set to missing in analysis for participants who could not perform tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable method data for descending 4 stairs. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Descending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline3.63 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Descending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsChange from Baseline at Week 48-0.04 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Descending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsChange from Baseline at Week 60-0.10 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.889
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Dystrophin Expression on Biceps Muscle Biopsy as Measured by Immunofluorescence Staining of the Sarcolemmal Membrane With an Antibody to the C-Terminal Portion of the Dystrophin Protein

The biceps muscle was biopsied from 1 arm for confirmation of the absence or low levels of dystrophin prior to treatment initiation and from the other arm to assess for production of dystrophin post-treatment. Muscle tissue sections were processed and immunostained to detect muscle membrane-localized dystrophin. An increase in value indicates dystrophin production.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (As-Treated Population) and had evaluable dystrophin expression data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Dystrophin Expression on Biceps Muscle Biopsy as Measured by Immunofluorescence Staining of the Sarcolemmal Membrane With an Antibody to the C-Terminal Portion of the Dystrophin ProteinBaseline16.828 dystrophin positive fibersStandard Deviation 8.4285
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Dystrophin Expression on Biceps Muscle Biopsy as Measured by Immunofluorescence Staining of the Sarcolemmal Membrane With an Antibody to the C-Terminal Portion of the Dystrophin ProteinChange from Baseline-1.880 dystrophin positive fibersStandard Deviation 5.1337
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by Myometry

Upper extremity myometry was performed using a hand-held dynamometer following standardized procedures. With this system, evaluators judged the strength of each muscle using an 11-point descriptive scoring system. From the individual muscle-group scores, a total composite score was derived. Bilateral assessments were done, and 3 measurements were recorded from each muscle group on each side, when possible. The best of the 3 replicates was used in the analysis. An increase from Baseline is reflective of increased muscle strength, whereas a decrease from Baseline is reflective of decreased muscle strength. Participants who became unable to perform a myometry test because of disease progression were assigned a value of 0 for each visit at which the participant was no longer able to perform the test. Test results were set to missing in the analysis for participants who could not perform the tests for reasons other than disease progression (for example, bone fracture).

Time frame: Baseline, Week (Wk) 48 and Wk 60

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had Baseline and on-treatment data (Evaluable Population) with evaluable myometry data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryLeft (L) Knee Flexion, Baseline9.48 poundsStandard Deviation 4.395
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Knee Flexion, Change from Baseline at Wk 481.23 poundsStandard Deviation 2.715
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Knee Flexion, Change from Baseline at Wk 600.64 poundsStandard Deviation 3.079
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryRight (R) Knee Flexion, Baseline10.15 poundsStandard Deviation 5.439
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Knee Flexion, Change from Baseline at Wk 480.81 poundsStandard Deviation 2.254
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Knee Flexion, Change from Baseline at Wk 60-0.05 poundsStandard Deviation 2.24
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Knee Extension, Baseline8.63 poundsStandard Deviation 5.124
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Knee Extension, Change from Baseline at Wk 48-1.07 poundsStandard Deviation 1.842
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Knee Extension, Change from Baseline at Wk 60-1.00 poundsStandard Deviation 1.567
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Knee Extension, Baseline9.10 poundsStandard Deviation 6.109
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Knee Extension, Change from Baseline at Wk 48-1.33 poundsStandard Deviation 2.021
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Knee Extension, Change from Baseline at Wk 60-1.65 poundsStandard Deviation 2.204
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Elbow Flexion, Baseline5.70 poundsStandard Deviation 3.611
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Elbow Flexion, Change from Baseline at Wk 48-0.15 poundsStandard Deviation 0.998
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Elbow Flexion, Change from Baseline at Wk 60-0.51 poundsStandard Deviation 1.121
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Elbow Flexion, Baseline5.85 poundsStandard Deviation 3.758
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Elbow Flexion, Change from Baseline at Wk 48-0.28 poundsStandard Deviation 1.05
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Elbow Flexion, Change from Baseline at Wk 60-0.55 poundsStandard Deviation 1.061
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Elbow Extension, Baseline4.55 poundsStandard Deviation 2.322
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Elbow Extension, Change from Baseline at Wk 48-0.10 poundsStandard Deviation 0.993
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Elbow Extension, Change from Baseline at Wk 60-0.32 poundsStandard Deviation 0.818
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Elbow Extension, Baseline4.89 poundsStandard Deviation 2.68
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Elbow Extension, Change from Baseline at Wk 48-0.10 poundsStandard Deviation 1.6
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Elbow Extension, Change from Baseline at Wk 60-0.60 poundsStandard Deviation 1.352
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Shoulder Abduction, Baseline4.29 poundsStandard Deviation 2.783
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Shoulder Abduction Change from Baseline at Wk 48-0.90 poundsStandard Deviation 0.906
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Shoulder Abduction Change from Baseline at Wk 60-1.10 poundsStandard Deviation 1.632
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Shoulder Abduction, Baseline4.39 poundsStandard Deviation 2.666
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Shoulder Abduction Change from Baseline at Wk 48-1.02 poundsStandard Deviation 1.369
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Shoulder Abduction Change from Baseline at Wk 60-1.23 poundsStandard Deviation 1.888
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Hand Grip, Baseline15.19 poundsStandard Deviation 5.881
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Hand Grip, Change from Baseline at Wk 480.30 poundsStandard Deviation 3.353
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryL Hand Grip, Change from Baseline at Wk 601.04 poundsStandard Deviation 4.811
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Hand Grip, Baseline17.17 poundsStandard Deviation 7.266
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Hand Grip, Change from Baseline at Wk 48-0.79 poundsStandard Deviation 3.628
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryR Hand Grip, Change from Baseline at Wk 60-0.61 poundsStandard Deviation 3.01
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Inventory

The PedsQL Generic Core Scales comprises 23 questions, which are grouped into 4 scales (physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and school functioning); the fatigue-specific module included an additional 18 questions. The appropriate age-specific version was completed. On PedsQL Generic Core Scales, items were reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale so that higher scores indicate a better HRQL (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0). Mean is the sum of the items over the number of items that were answered (which accounts for missing data) to create scale scores. If \>50% of the items in a scale were missing, the scale score was not computed. Mean Fatigue Scale Score is the sum of the items over the number of items that were answered in the Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Scales. Mean Total Scale Score is the sum of all of the items over the number of items that were answered on all scales.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had Baseline and on-treatment data (Evaluable Population) with evaluable parent- or caregiver-reported PedsQL data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventoryPhysical Functioning, Baseline48.07 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.111
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventoryPhysical Functioning Change from Baseline at Wk 482.31 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.284
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventoryPhysical Functioning Change from Baseline at Wk 601.85 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.366
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventoryEmotional Functioning, Baseline69.45 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.465
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventoryEmotional Function, Change from Baseline at Wk 485.27 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.595
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventoryEmotional Function, Change from Baseline at Wk 603.29 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.021
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventorySocial Functioning, Baseline57.95 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.397
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventorySocial Functioning, Change from Baseline at Wk 489.38 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.956
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventorySocial Functioning, Change from Baseline at Wk 606.16 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.599
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventorySchool Functioning, Baseline67.61 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.944
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventorySchool Functioning, Change from Baseline at Wk 485.66 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.824
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventorySchool Functioning, Change from Baseline at Wk 60-0.37 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.651
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventoryFatigue Scale Score, Baseline72.25 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.777
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventoryFatigue Scale Score, Change from Baseline at Wk 480.77 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.703
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventoryFatigue Scale Score, Change from Baseline at Wk 60-0.40 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.269
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventoryTotal Score, Baseline59.08 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.348
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventoryTotal Score, Change from Baseline at Wk 485.24 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.409
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent- or Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL InventoryTotal Score, Change from Baseline at Wk 602.68 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.261
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Inventory

The PedsQL Generic Core Scales comprises 23 questions, which are grouped into 4 scales (physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and school functioning); the fatigue-specific module included an additional 18 questions. The appropriate age-specific version was completed. On PedsQL Generic Core Scales, items were reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale so that higher scores indicate a better HRQL (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0). Mean is the sum of the items over the number of items that were answered (which accounts for missing data) to create scale scores. If \>50% of the items in a scale were missing, the scale score was not computed. Mean Total Scale Score is the sum of all of the items over the number of items that were answered on all scales.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had Baseline and on-treatment data (Evaluable Population) with evaluable participant-reported PedsQL data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventoryPhysical Functioning, Baseline45.13 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.114
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventoryPhysical Functioning Change from Baseline at Wk 483.16 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.18
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventoryPhysical Functioning Change from Baseline at Wk 606.25 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.545
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventoryEmotional Functioning, Baseline65.29 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.141
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventoryEmotional Function, Change from Baseline at Wk 488.24 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.294
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventoryEmotional Function, Change from Baseline at Wk 6012.22 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.614
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventorySocial Functioning, Baseline61.80 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.914
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventorySocial Functioning, Change from Baseline at Wk 484.82 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.463
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventorySocial Functioning, Change from Baseline at Wk 603.75 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.861
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventorySchool Functioning, Baseline70.29 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.466
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventorySchool Functioning, Change from Baseline at Wk 481.76 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.917
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventorySchool Functioning, Change from Baseline at Wk 603.29 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.273
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventoryFatigue Scale Score, Baseline74.28 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.917
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventoryFatigue Scale Score, Change from Baseline at Wk 485.08 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.661
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventoryFatigue Scale Score, Change from Baseline at Wk 604.39 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.777
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventoryTotal Score, Baseline58.59 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.793
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventoryTotal Score, Change from Baseline at Wk 484.28 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.406
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) InventoryTotal Score, Change from Baseline at Wk 606.42 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.887
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function Tests

Timed function tests included time to stand from supine position (rise to standing), time to run/walk 10 meters (m), and time to ascend/descend 4 stairs. Timed function tests were assessed in ambulatory participants. A decrease from baseline reflects faster completion of the functional task and, thus, better muscle function. If the time taken to perform a test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform the test due to disease progression (PD), a value of 30 seconds was used. Test results were set to missing in the analysis for participants who could not perform the tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable data for the applicable timed function test. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsRise to Standing, Baseline13.57 secondsStandard Deviation 11.111
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsRise to Standing, Change from Baseline at Week 486.49 secondsStandard Deviation 8.059
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsRise to Standing, Change from Baseline at Week 605.77 secondsStandard Deviation 7.79
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsWalk/Run 10 m, Baseline7.62 secondsStandard Deviation 3.641
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsWalk/Run 10 m, Change from Baseline at Week 483.15 secondsStandard Deviation 5.591
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsWalk/Run 10 m, Change from Baseline at Week 603.20 secondsStandard Deviation 5.93
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsAscend 4 Stairs, Baseline7.16 secondsStandard Deviation 7.481
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsAscend 4 Stairs, Change from Baseline at Week 484.92 secondsStandard Deviation 6.856
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsAscend 4 Stairs, Change from Baseline at Week 606.30 secondsStandard Deviation 7.926
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsDescend 4 Stairs, Baseline6.42 secondsStandard Deviation 7.565
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsDescend 4 Stairs, Change from Baseline at Week 485.25 secondsStandard Deviation 8.839
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsDescend 4 Stairs, Change from Baseline at Week 604.28 secondsStandard Deviation 7.275
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Run/Walk 10-Meters as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function Tests

Timed test evaluations included scoring of method that ambulatory participants used to complete test. Scale for method used to run/walk 10-meters: 1) Unable to walk independently. 2) Unable to walk independently but can walk with knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs) or with support from a person 3) Highly adapted, wide-based lordotic gait, cannot increase walking speed. 4) Moderately adapted gait, can pick up speed but cannot run. 5) Able to pick up speed but runs with a double stance phase (that is, cannot achieve both feet off the ground). 6) Runs and gets both feet off the ground (with no double-stance phase). At the visit, if a participant could not perform a timed function test because of PD, a method value of 1 was assigned in analysis. Test results set to missing in analysis for participants who could not perform tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable method data for running/walking 10 meters. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Run/Walk 10-Meters as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline4.42 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.974
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Run/Walk 10-Meters as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsChange from Baseline at Week 48-0.25 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.073
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Run/Walk 10-Meters as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsChange from Baseline at Week 60-0.57 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.207
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Creatine Kinase (CK) Levels

Serum CK concentrations (as measured by the central laboratory) were quantified from the blood samples that were collected as part of the safety laboratory evaluations. The normal range for CK is 18 to 363 units/liter (U/L).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had Baseline and on-treatment data (Evaluable Population) with evaluable CK data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Serum Creatine Kinase (CK) LevelsBaseline5988.31 U/LStandard Deviation 3967.714
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Serum Creatine Kinase (CK) LevelsChange from Baseline at Week 4884.06 U/LStandard Deviation 2641.422
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Serum Creatine Kinase (CK) LevelsChange from Baseline at Week 60-549.57 U/LStandard Deviation 3261.151
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Standing From Supine Position as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function Tests

Timed test evaluations included scoring of method that ambulatory participants used to complete test. Scale for method used for standing from supine position: 1) Unable to stand from supine, even with use of a chair. 2) Assisted Gowers, requires furniture to rise from supine to full upright posture. 3) Full Gowers, rolls over, stands with both hands climbing up legs to above knees to achieve full upright posture. 4) Half Gowers, rolls over, stands up with 1 hand support on lower legs. 5) Rolls to side and/or stands with 1 or both hands on floor to start to rise but does not touch legs. 6) Stands without rolling over or using hands. Increases from baseline are indicative of improving ability to perform functional task. If a participant could not perform a timed function test because of PD, a method value of 1 was assigned in analysis. Test results set to missing in analysis for participants who could not perform tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable method data for standing from supine. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Standing From Supine Position as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline3.25 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Standing From Supine Position as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsChange from Baseline at Week 48-0.58 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.929
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Standing From Supine Position as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsChange from Baseline at Week 60-0.62 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.921
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Verbal Memory and Attention as Assessed by the Digit Span Task

The digit span task is a 2-part (forward and backward) test in which a series of digits (3 to 9) were presented to participant in an auditory format only. For forward condition, the participant was to repeat digits back in the order they were presented. For backward condition, the participant was to reverse the order of presentation. Maximum score for each part (digit forward and digit backward) of task is 14; participants received a score of 2 points if they passed both trials, score of 1 point if they passed only 1 trial, and score of 0 points if they failed both trials. A raw score of total number of correct forward and backward responses was age-normalized by subtracting corresponding mean and dividing by corresponding standard deviation of a reference population for that age. For each forward and backward result, the resulting Z score was transformed into percentile rank of normal distribution. Change from Baseline in number of digits recalled forward and backward is reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had Baseline and on-treatment data (Evaluable Population) with evaluable verbal memory and attention data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Verbal Memory and Attention as Assessed by the Digit Span TaskRecalled Forward, Baseline3.66 digits recalledStandard Deviation 2.378
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Verbal Memory and Attention as Assessed by the Digit Span TaskRecalled Forward, Change from Baseline at Wk 480.14 digits recalledStandard Deviation 1.353
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Verbal Memory and Attention as Assessed by the Digit Span TaskRecalled Forward, Change from Baseline at Wk 600.04 digits recalledStandard Deviation 1.453
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Verbal Memory and Attention as Assessed by the Digit Span TaskRecalled Backward, Baseline3.15 digits recalledStandard Deviation 2.524
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Verbal Memory and Attention as Assessed by the Digit Span TaskRecalled Backward, Change from Baseline at Wk 480.74 digits recalledStandard Deviation 1.442
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Verbal Memory and Attention as Assessed by the Digit Span TaskRecalled Backward, Change from Baseline at Wk 600.74 digits recalledStandard Deviation 1.442
Secondary

Change in Muscle Composition as Assessed by Limb Magnetic Resonance (MR) Testing

This Outcome Measure is an exploratory study objective and data were not collected or analyzed for this extension study.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48, Week 60

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had Baseline and on-treatment data (Evaluable Population) with evaluable muscle composition data. Muscle composition data were not collected or analyzed for this extension study.

Secondary

Change in Resting, Active, and Recovery Heart Rate as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar RS400

Heart rate was measured with a Polar RS400 heart rate monitor, which consists of a transmitter strap worn around the chest and a wristwatch receiver. The monitor produces a digital text file with 1 value per minute that represents the mean heart rate for that minute. Mean heart rate values were collected before, during, and after the 6MWT. The participant rested for 5 minutes in a sitting position before the 6MWT, and the mean heart rate for the last minute of this rest period was obtained and documented as the resting heart rate. During the 6MWT, the mean heart rate was collected and documented as the active heart rate. After completing the 6MWT and resting for 3 minutes, the mean heart rate for 1 minute was obtained and documented as the recovery heart rate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable heart rate data. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenChange in Resting, Active, and Recovery Heart Rate as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar RS400Recovery Heart Rate, Baseline113.13 beeps per minuteStandard Deviation 12.664
AtalurenChange in Resting, Active, and Recovery Heart Rate as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar RS400Resting Heart Rate, Baseline106.46 beeps per minuteStandard Deviation 11.163
AtalurenChange in Resting, Active, and Recovery Heart Rate as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar RS400Resting Heart Rate, Change from Baseline at Wk 488.30 beeps per minuteStandard Deviation 12.382
AtalurenChange in Resting, Active, and Recovery Heart Rate as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar RS400Resting Heart Rate, Change from Baseline at Wk 605.16 beeps per minuteStandard Deviation 11.197
AtalurenChange in Resting, Active, and Recovery Heart Rate as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar RS400Active Heart Rate, Baseline152.17 beeps per minuteStandard Deviation 13.457
AtalurenChange in Resting, Active, and Recovery Heart Rate as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar RS400Active Heart Rate, Change from Baseline at Wk 483.86 beeps per minuteStandard Deviation 12.365
AtalurenChange in Resting, Active, and Recovery Heart Rate as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar RS400Active Heart Rate, Change from Baseline at Wk 60-2.84 beeps per minuteStandard Deviation 17.238
AtalurenChange in Resting, Active, and Recovery Heart Rate as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar RS400Recovery Heart Rate, Change from Baseline at Wk 484.64 beeps per minuteStandard Deviation 9.079
AtalurenChange in Resting, Active, and Recovery Heart Rate as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar RS400Recovery Heart Rate, Change from Baseline at Wk 601.68 beeps per minuteStandard Deviation 15.688
Secondary

Corticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort

Blood for prednisone and deflazacort concentrations were collected on Day 2 of Week 1 and Day 2 of Week 6. Plasma samples for the determination of prednisone concentrations were analyzed using a validated HPLC/MS/MS method, with LLOQs of 1.00 nanograms/milliliters (ng/mL). Prednisone concentrations \<1.01 are treated as 1.01 in the summary calculation. Plasma samples for the determination of 21-desacetyl deflazacort concentrations were analyzed using a validated HPLC/MS/MS method with an LLOQ of 1.0 ng/mL. Deflazacort concentrations BQ are treated as 0 in the summary calculation.

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-morning dose and 0 (pre-dose) and 2 hours post-midday dose on Day 2 of Week 1 and Day 2 of Week 6

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (As-Treated Population) and had evaluable prednisone or deflazacort plasma data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or DeflazacortPre-Dose, Prednisone, Week 11.01 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort30 minutes Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 118.27 ng/mLStandard Deviation 14.451
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort1 hour Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 135.48 ng/mLStandard Deviation 24.026
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort2 hours Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 132.41 ng/mLStandard Deviation 27.603
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort3 hours Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 157.12 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6.948
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort4 hours Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 149.44 ng/mLStandard Deviation 12.139
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort6 hours Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 131.41 ng/mLStandard Deviation 12.367
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort8 hours Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 115.59 ng/mLStandard Deviation 8.735
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or DeflazacortPre-Dose, Prednisone, Week 61.01 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort30 minutes Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 617.13 ng/mLStandard Deviation 16.376
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort1 hour Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 632.48 ng/mLStandard Deviation 21.19
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort2 hours Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 639.91 ng/mLStandard Deviation 26.374
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort3 hours Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 641.02 ng/mLStandard Deviation 13.444
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort4 hours Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 638.82 ng/mLStandard Deviation 5.934
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort6 hours Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 624.95 ng/mLStandard Deviation 14.243
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort8 hours Post-Dose, Prednisone, Week 613.52 ng/mLStandard Deviation 11.872
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or DeflazacortPre-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 10 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort30 minutes Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 128.25 ng/mLStandard Deviation 31.968
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort1 hours Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 149.47 ng/mLStandard Deviation 43.631
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort2 hours Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 174.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 49.349
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort3 hours Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 163.34 ng/mLStandard Deviation 38.045
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort4 hours Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 145.50 ng/mLStandard Deviation 31.427
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort6 hours Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 118.67 ng/mLStandard Deviation 17.648
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort8 hours Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 17.57 ng/mLStandard Deviation 9.418
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or DeflazacortPre-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 60.06 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.268
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort30 minutes Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 633.46 ng/mLStandard Deviation 32.511
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort1 hour Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 671.94 ng/mLStandard Deviation 77.37
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort2 hours Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 681.41 ng/mLStandard Deviation 44.945
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort3 hours Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 649.63 ng/mLStandard Deviation 26.633
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort4 hours Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 625.85 ng/mLStandard Deviation 16.126
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort6 hours Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 610.14 ng/mLStandard Deviation 14.08
AtalurenCorticosteroid Plasma Concentrations as Assessed by a Validated Bioanalytical Method, in Participants Who Received a Daily Corticosteroid Regimen With Prednisone or Deflazacort8 hours Post-Dose, Deflazacort, Week 64.15 ng/mLStandard Deviation 7.985
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants

Blood for ataluren concentrations over a 24-hour period was to be collected on Day 2 of Week 1 and Day 2 of Week 6. Analysis of the blood samples was to be conducted using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 0.5 micrograms/milliliters (μg/mL). Plasma concentrations below qualification (BQ) is treated as 0 in the summary calculation.

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-morning dose and 0 (pre-dose) and 2 hours post-midday dose on Day 2 of Week 1 and Day 2 of Week 6

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (As-Treated Population) and had evaluable plasma data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All ParticipantsPre-Morning Dose, Week 10 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants30 minutes Post-Morning Dose, Week 114.59 μg/mLStandard Deviation 10.404
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants1 hour Post-Morning Dose, Week 116.24 μg/mLStandard Deviation 10.251
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants2 hours Post-Morning Dose, Week 123.71 μg/mLStandard Deviation 12.895
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants3 hours Post-Dose, Week 128.96 μg/mLStandard Deviation 15.306
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants4 hours Post-Morning Dose, Week 129.44 μg/mLStandard Deviation 14.854
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All ParticipantsPre-Midday Dose, Week 120.43 μg/mLStandard Deviation 15.256
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants2 hours Post-Midday Dose, Week 135.00 μg/mLStandard Deviation 17.172
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All ParticipantsPre-Morning Dose, Week 619.99 μg/mLStandard Deviation 15.598
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants30 minutes Post-Morning Dose, Week 624.50 μg/mLStandard Deviation 17.916
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants1 hour Post-Morning Dose, Week 624.68 μg/mLStandard Deviation 19.577
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants2 hours Post-Morning Dose, Week 626.79 μg/mLStandard Deviation 18.709
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants3 hours Post-Morning Dose, Week 626.40 μg/mLStandard Deviation 16.961
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants4 hours Post-Morning Dose, Week 624.04 μg/mLStandard Deviation 17.641
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All ParticipantsPre-Midday Dose, Week 617.15 μg/mLStandard Deviation 13.19
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in All Participants2 hours Post-Midday Dose, Week 625.49 μg/mLStandard Deviation 14.297
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants

Blood for ataluren concentrations were collected on Day 2 of Week 1 and Day 2 of Week 6. Analysis of the blood samples was to be conducted using a validated HPLC-MS/MS method with a LLOQ of 0.5 μg/mL. Plasma concentrations BQ is treated as 0 in the summary calculation.

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-morning dose and 0 (pre-dose) and 2 hours post-midday dose on Day 2 of Week 1 and Day 2 of Week 6

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable plasma data. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants2 hours Post-Midday Dose, Week 621.09 μg/mLStandard Deviation 7.959
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory ParticipantsPre-Morning Dose, Week 10 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants30 minutes Post-Morning Dose, Week 114.88 μg/mLStandard Deviation 10.771
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants1 hour Post-Morning Dose, Week 114.65 μg/mLStandard Deviation 9.608
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants2 hours Post-Morning Dose, Week 120.96 μg/mLStandard Deviation 12.648
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants3 hours Post-Dose, Week 126.29 μg/mLStandard Deviation 15.853
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants4 hours Post-Morning Dose, Week 126.19 μg/mLStandard Deviation 14.531
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory ParticipantsPre-Midday Dose, Week 115.26 μg/mLStandard Deviation 10.238
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants2 hours Post-Midday Dose, Week 132.08 μg/mLStandard Deviation 17.977
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory ParticipantsPre-Morning Dose, Week 614.83 μg/mLStandard Deviation 10.032
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants30 minutes Post-Morning Dose, Week 618.08 μg/mLStandard Deviation 8.654
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants1 hour Post-Morning Dose, Week 617.75 μg/mLStandard Deviation 8.66
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants2 hours Post-Morning Dose, Week 620.33 μg/mLStandard Deviation 9.103
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants3 hours Post-Morning Dose, Week 620.13 μg/mLStandard Deviation 9.423
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory Participants4 hours Post-Morning Dose, Week 618.72 μg/mLStandard Deviation 12.255
AtalurenPharmacokinetics: Ataluren Plasma Exposure in Ambulatory ParticipantsPre-Midday Dose, Week 612.40 μg/mLStandard Deviation 6.775
Secondary

Study Drug Compliance

Study drug compliance was assessed by the participant daily diary and quantification of used and unused study drug. Compliance was assessed in terms of the amount of drug actually taken relative to the amount that was prescribed. Physician-prescribed dose reductions and interruptions were factored into the calculations. Not recorded applies only to the days on which all dosing information was missing or for missing days. Invalid entries in the participant daily diary were assigned values of 0.0 for percentage of doses taken and 99.0 for percentage of doses not recorded.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 89

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (As-Treated Population).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
AtalurenStudy Drug CompliancePercentage of Doses Taken as Planned84.7 percentage of doses of study drug
AtalurenStudy Drug CompliancePercentage of Doses Missed1.1 percentage of doses of study drug
AtalurenStudy Drug CompliancePercentage of Doses Changed0.3 percentage of doses of study drug
AtalurenStudy Drug CompliancePercentage of Doses Not Recorded10.2 percentage of doses of study drug

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026