Skip to content

Effect of Orthopedic Blocking on Cervical Spine Flexion and Extension Strength

Effect of Orthopedic Blocking on Cervical Spine Flexion and Extension Strength

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00758888
Enrollment
30
Registered
2008-09-25
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2008-10-31
Last updated
2009-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sacroiliac Function

Brief summary

A few studies concerning the effects of joint manipulation have shown muscle responses distal to the site of manipulation. The purpose of this study is to determine if pelvic orthopedic blocking, a low force method of manipulating the sacroiliac joint, can have produce changes to cervical spine function.

Detailed description

All mechanoreceptor types are found in diarthrodial joints. Mechanoreceptor afferents have reflexive connections to motor neurons. Stimulation of muscle and joint afferents are known to produce reflexive muscle changes. Orthopedic blocking applies a gentle compression to the sacroiliac joints. The current study seeks to determine if orthopedic blocking of the sacroiliac joint can affect cervical spine function thereby serving as a useful adjunctive procedure in the treatment of cervical spine joint dysfunction. The current study will compare pre & post treatment cervical isometric strength readings from an orthopedic blocking group, a trochanter belt group (another type of compression), and a sham group.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOrthopedic Blocking

Place the blocks under the pelvis for 2 minutes

PROCEDURETrochanter Belt

Participant is fitted with trochanter belt on the adjusting table and wear it while Investigator checks their flexion and extension strength.

OTHERBlocking Sham

Participant lies on adjusting table, blocks are placed in a similar configuration but distant to actual points of leverage.

Sponsors

Logan College of Chiropractic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Logan faculty, students, or staff 18-30 years of age with a leg-length inequality of 5mm or more.

Exclusion criteria

* Fractures * Tumors * Myopathies * Consumption of prescription drugs that affect nervous system function * Recent cervical spine injuries or surgeries * Cervical pain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cervical Isometric StrengthPre and post treatment

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactKristan Giggey, DC
Kristan.Giggey@logan.edu636-230-1942

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026